Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To cite this article: Richard Bailey & Tomonori Ariga (1998) The View of Jehovah's Witnesses
on Blood Substitutes, Artificial Cells, Blood Substitutes, and Biotechnology, 26:5-6, 571-576, DOI:
10.3109/10731199809117476
PREFACE
Under the direction of the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society whose
headquarters are in New York City, a department called “Hospital Information
Services” is set up in each of 104 branches around the world. This department
gives oversight to the Hospital Liaison Committees of Jehovah’s Witnesses in the
principal cities of more than 230 countries. The Hospital Liaison Committees
engage in various activities designed to promote cooperation between Witness
patients and medical professionals. They explain to medical and legal
professionals for example, the views of Jehovah’s Witnesses on medicine and
medical treatment and seek to clarify misconceptions. They also provide useful
medical and legal information helpful in dealing with Witness’ cases. On this
occasion, we would like to explain the view of Jehovah’s Witnesses on blood and
blood substitutes, as well as show how informed consent is related to treatment
by blood substitutes.
57 1
What is behind the growing interest in blood substitutes today? For one
thing, there is the growing awareness of the numerous risks associated with blood
transfusions. This is not only on the part of the medical professionals but also by
the public in general. For example, according to a Gallop poll conducted in
February 1996, 89 percent of Canadians requiring surgery, if given a choice,
would prefer an alternative to donor blood. When we consider the lethal risks
inherent in the use of blood or blood products, such as AIDS and hepatitis, as
well as the difficulties in completely eliminating those risks, even using the latest
screening techniques, we can see why the development of safe and effective
blood substitutes is very much desired.
As is well known, based on their deeply held religious convictions and for
sound medical reasons, Jehovah’s Witnesses refuse blood transfusions.
Therefore, if blood substitutes acceptable to Jehovah’s Witnesses were
developed, these would be valuable options in treating them while respecting
their ethical views.
through the mouth, but also through the veins in the form of a blood transfusion.
(2)
Based on this religious understanding, Jehovah’s Witnesses do not accept
whole blood, or major components of blood, namely, red blood cells, white blood
cells, platelets and plasma. Also, they do not accept hemoglobin which is a major
part of red blood cells. However, the decision whether to accept minor
derivatives of blood, namely blood plasma fractions, such as albumin, immune
globulins or clotting factors is up to each individual. In other words, the
conscience of some Jehovah’s Witnesses would allow them to accept these minor
blood fractions, but others would not. (3)
the Ministry of Health and Welfare (November 1996) stated, “It is a basic of
informed consent in pharmacotherapy that medical professionals fully explain to
patients the effects of a drug, how to take it, possible side-effects, and obtain their
understanding. Medical professionals have to fully appreciate that it is the efforts
of giving appropriate information to patients and of obtaining their understanding
that builds up a trustful relationship with patients and realization of better medical
treatment.” (7) As to what is required in informed consent, Dr. Michitaro
Nakamura stated the following in the Japan Medical Journal (1993): “It is the
idea that the doctor explains to the patient in easily understood words the illness
and prognosis, the method of treatment and side effects, and respects the patient’s
right of self-determination on the prognosis and method of treatment.” (8) We
eagerly hope that informed consent will be performed as a part of holistic
medicine in which the entire patient, including his rights and values are respected,
rather than merely being a means to avoid medical risks, and later litigation or
liabilities.
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
3. The Watchtower. Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania. June
1: 30-31 (1990).
4. Lawrence T. Goodnough, et al. Risks, Options, and Informed Consent for
Blood Transfusion in Elective Surgery. The American Journal of Surgery. 159:
607 (1990).
5. E c r e t no 95-1000 du 6 semtembre 1995 portant code de dkontologic
medicale. J.O. 8 September, 13305 (1995).
6. The Public Welfare Ministry. The Informed Consent Commission Report. 1
(1995).
7. The Public Welfare Ministry. The Final Report of Commission on Safety
Assurance of Drugs, 5 (1996).
8. Michitaro Nakamura. Relationship Between Patient’s Right of Self-
Determination and Doctor’s Right of Free Discretion. Japan Medical Journal,
95; 3632 (1993).