Professional Documents
Culture Documents
9/10/ 1
2018
Origin of Soil and Grain Size
9/10/ 2
2018
Grain Size Distribution
9/10/ 3
2018
Soil – Particle Size
9/10/ 4
2018
Soil – Particle Size
To describe soils by their particle size, several
organizations have developed particle-size
classifications.
Particle-Size Classifications
Name of Grain size (mm)
organization Gravel Sand Silt Clay
MIT >2 2 to 0.06 0.06 to 0.002 < 0.002
USDA >2 2 to 0.05 0.05 to 0.002 < 0.002
AASHTO 76.2 to 2 2 to 0.075 0.075 to 0.002 < 0.002
USCS 76.2 to 4.75 4.75 t0 0.075 < 0.075
9/10/ 5
2018
Soil – Particle Size
9/10/ 6
2018
Soil – Particle Size
9/10/ 7
2018
Soil – Particle Size
Sand Gravels
9/10/ 8
2018
Soil – Particle Size
Coarse Medium
Clay Silt Sand Gravel Gravel
9/10/
2018
Soil – Particle Size
Shape of bulky particles
•Angular particles are those that have been freshly broken up and
are characterized by jagged projections, sharp ridges, and flat
surfaces.
•Subangular particles are those that have been weathered to the
extent that the sharper points and ridges have been worn off.
Angular Subangular
9/10/
2018
Soil – Particle Size
Shape of bulky particles
•Subrounded particles are those that have been weathered to a
further degree than subangular particles.
•Rounded particles are those on which all projections have been
removed, with few irregularities in shape remaining.
•Well rounded particles are rounded particles in which the few
remaining irregularities have been removed.
9/10/
2018
Structure of Clay Minerals
9/10/
2018
Structure of Clay Minerals
Clay minerals
Clay minerals are very tiny crystalline substances
evolved primarily from chemical weathering of
certain rock forming minerals, they are complex
alumino – silicates plus other metallic ions.
9/10/
2018
Structure of Clay Minerals
Clay minerals
Different arrangements of atoms in the silicate
minerals give rise to different silicate structures.
Clay minerals are composed of two basic units:
(1) silica tetrahedron and
(2) alumina octahedron.
These units are held together by ionic bonds.
9/10/
2018
Structure of Clay Minerals
Aluminum
Hydroxyl
si
Silica Tetrahedron Silica sheet
9/10/
2018
Structure of Clay Minerals
Aluminium (or Magnesium) Octahedral Unit
The octahedral unit has an aluminium ion or a
magnesium ion endorsed by six hydroxyl radicals or
oxygen arranged in the form of an octahedron. In some
cases, other cations (e.g. Fe) are present in place of Al
and Mg.
Aluminum
Hydroxyl
9/10/
2018
Structure of Clay Minerals
The octahedral units consist of six hydroxyls
surrounding an aluminum atom (Figure c), and the
combination of the octahedral aluminum hydroxyl units
gives an octahedral sheet.
9/10/
2018
Types of Clay Minerals
9/10/
2018
Types of Clay Minerals
Kaolinite
9/10/
2018
Types of Clay Minerals
Kaolinite Mineral
The basic kaolinite unit is a two-layer unit that is formed
by stacking a gibbsite sheet on a silica sheet. These basic
units are then stacked one on top of the other to form a
lattice of the mineral.
Gibbsite sheet
Silica sheet
H bond
Gibbsite sheet
7.2Å
Silica sheet
Kaolinite
9/10/
2018
Types of Clay Minerals
Kaolinite Mineral
The layers are held together by hydrogen bonding .
The strong bonding does not permit water to enter the
lattice. Thus, kaolinite minerals are stable and do not
expand under saturation. Kaolinite is the most
abundant constituent of residual clay deposits.
Gibbsite sheet
Silica sheet
H bond
Gibbsite sheet
7.2Å
Silica sheet
Kaolinite
9/10/
2018
Types of Clay Minerals
Kaolinite
9/10/
2018
Types of Clay Minerals
Kaolinite
The surface area of the kaolinite particles per unit mass is
about 15 m^2/g.
The surface area per unit mass is defined as specific surface
Joined by strong
hydrogen bond….no
easy separation
9/10/
2018
Types of Clay Minerals
Illite
Illite consists of a gibbsite sheet bonded to two
silica sheets—one at the top and another at the
bottom. It is sometimes called clay mica.
The illite layers are bonded by potassium ions.
Silica sheet
Gibbsite sheet
Silica sheet
Potassium
Silica sheet
10 Å Gibbsite sheet
Silica sheet
9/10/ 26
2018
Types of Clay Minerals
Illite
The negative charge to balance the potassium
ions comes from the substitution of aluminum
for some silicon in the tetrahedral sheets.
Silica sheet
Gibbsite sheet
Silica sheet
Potassium
Silica sheet
10 Å Gibbsite sheet
Silica sheet
9/10/
IUST
2018
Types of Clay Minerals
Illite
The bond with the non-exchangeable K+ ions are
weaker than the hydrogen bond in the Kaolite but
is stronger than the water bond of
montmorillonite.
The illite crystal does not swell so much in the
presence of water as does in montmorillonite
particles.
9/10/
IUST
2018
Types of Clay Minerals
Montmorillonite
Montmorillonite has a structure similar to that of
illite—that is, one gibbsite sheet sandwiched between
two silica sheets.
Silica sheet
Gibbsite sheet
Silica sheet
nH2O and exchangeable
Silica sheet
10 Å Gibbsite sheet
Silica sheet
9/10/
IUST
2018
Types of Clay Minerals
Montmorillonite
In montmorillonite there is isomorphous substitution of
magnesium and iron for aluminum in the octahedral sheets.
The specific surface is about 800 m^2/g.
Silica sheet
Gibbsite sheet
Silica sheet
nH2O and exchangeable
Silica sheet
10 Å Gibbsite sheet
Silica sheet
9/10/
2018
Types of Clay Minerals
Montmorillonite
Potassium ions are not present as in illite, and a large
amount of water is attracted into the space between the
layers. There exists interlayer swelling, which is very
important to engineering practice (expansive clay).
Silica sheet
Gibbsite sheet
Silica sheet
nH2O and exchangeable
Silica sheet
10 Å Gibbsite sheet
Silica sheet
9/10/
2018
Clay Minerals
9/10/
2018
Clay Minerals
9/10/
2018
Clay Minerals
9/10/
2018
Clay Minerals
Concentration of ions
Cations
Anions
9/10/
2018
Clay Minerals
9/10/
2018
Soil Structures
9/10/
2018
Soil Structures
9/10/
2018
Soil Structures
2) Honeycomb structure
Associated with silt deposits.
When silt particles settle out of suspension, in additional to
gravitational forces, the surface forces also play a significant
role. When particles approach the lower region of
suspension they will be attracted by particles already
deposited as well as the neighbouring particles leading to
formation of arches.
The combination of a number of arches leads to the honey
comb structure.
9/10/
2018
Soil Structures
3) (a) Flocculated structure
There will be edge-to-edge and edge-to-face contact
between particles.
9/10/
2018
Soil Structures
9/10/
2018
Soil Structures
9/10/
2018
Soil Structures
4) (b) Cohesive matrix structure
The cohesive matrix structure can be found in
composite soils in which the fine-grained fraction is
more in proportion compared to course grained
fraction. In this case the course-grained particles
will be embedded in fine-grained fraction and will
be prevented from having particle-to-particle
contact. This type of structure is relatively more
compressible compared to the more stable course
grained structure.
9/10/
2018
Grain Size Distribution
9/10/
2018
Grain Size Distribution
9/10/
2018
Mechanical Analysis (Sieve Analysis )
9/10/
2018
Mechanical Analysis (Sieve Analysis )
9/10/
2018
Mechanical Analysis (Sieve Analysis )
Pan
9/10/
IUST
2018
Mechanical Analysis (Sieve Analysis )
9/10/
IUST
2018
Mechanical Analysis (Sieve Analysis )
9/10/
IUST
2018
Mechanical Analysis (Sieve Analysis )
80
Percent finer
60
40
20
0
10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
Particle diameter (mm)
9/10/
IUST
2018
Particle-size Distribution Curve
4.75 2.0 0.6 0.425 0. 25 0.15 0.075 (mm)
Percent (%) Finer by Weight
9/10/
IUST
2018
Limitations of Sieve Analysis
9/10/
IUST
2018
Limitations of Sieve Analysis
9/10/
2018
Sedimentation Analysis (Hydrometer)
9/10/
2018
Sedimentation Analysis (Hydrometer)
9/10/
2018
Sedimentation Analysis (Hydrometer)
9/10/
2018
Sedimentation Analysis (Hydrometer)
9/10/
2018
Sedimentation Analysis (Hydrometer)
9/10/
2018
Sedimentation Analysis (Hydrometer)
9/10/
2018
Sedimentation Analysis (Hydrometer)
9/10/
2018
Sedimentation Analysis (Hydrometer)
Definition of L in Hydrometer
Rc R
. ... .. . .. . ... .. L1
. .. .. . .. . . . . .
L1 .. ... ...... . ... ..... .
.
. .. . .
. .. . ... ... .. . .. L
. . . . .
.. . .. . . .
.. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .
.. .. .. . . . . . . . .
.
..
. . . . .. Center
. . .
.
.. .. .. of L2
.
gravity of
.
. . . hydrometer
bulb
9/10/
2018
Sedimentation Analysis (Hydrometer)
The values of K as function of specific gravity and
temperature are given in table (ASTM2004):
Sedimentation Analysis (Hydrometer)
9/10/
IUST
2018
Sedimentation Analysis (Hydrometer)
9/10/
IUST
2018
Sedimentation Analysis (Hydrometer)
Reading the density of the suspension at
different time.
. . . . . .. . . ..
L
.
..
..
. . ..
. .. .. .
.
.
. . ..
.
.
.
L
. . .
... ...
L
.
. .
. . .. ...
. . . . .. . . ..
. .. . ... ... . ..
. ..
. . .
. . .
. .... . .
. . .. . .. .. .
.. .. ..
.. . . . . . . .
. . . . .. . . .
. .. .
...
... .
. . .. .. .. ..
.. .. ..
. . . . .
. . . . .
.... . .. ....
. .
.. . .....
. .
..
.
.
Start T1 T2 T3
9/10/
IUST
2018
Sedimentation Analysis (Hydrometer)
9/10/
IUST
2018
Sedimentation Analysis (Hydrometer)
9/10/
IUST
2018
Sedimentation Analysis (Hydrometer)
IUST
Particle size distribution curve
Sieve analysis and hydrometer analysis
Sieve analysis Hydrometer analysis
#10 #60 #200
100
80
Percent finer
60
40
20
0
10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
Particle diameter (mm)
9/10/
IUST
2018
Data obtained from Sieve Analysis
III
I
II
9/10/
IUST
2018
Data obtained from Sieve Analysis
9/10/
2018
Data obtained from Sieve Analysis
90
80
70
60
Percent finer
50
40
30
20
10
0
10 1 D60 D30 D10 0.01
80
Percent finer
60
40
Grav el Sa n Fin s
d e
20
0
10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
Particle diameter (mm)
9/10/
2018
Summary
9/10/
2018
Summary
9/10/
2018
Worked Example
9/10/
2018
Worked Example
Solution
Tabulate data to obtain % finer
Sieve Mass % Retained ∑( %Retained) % Finer
No. retained , g On each sieve
4 0 0 0 100-0 =100
10 14.8 3.0 3.0 100-3=97
20 98.0 19.6 22.6 100-22.6=77.4
40 90.1 18 40.6 100-40.6=59.4
100 181.9 36.4 77.0 100-77=23
200 108.8 21.8 98.8 100-98.8=1.2
pan 6.1 1.2 100
Total mass M = 499.7 g
9/10/
2018
Worked Example
Solution
Effective size= 0.1mm
9/10/
2018
Worked Example
Solution
Calculate Cu and Cc
D60= 0.45 D30 = 0.18
Cu = 0.45/0.1 = 4.5
Cc = 0.72
Extract percentage of gravel, sand, silt,
and clay.
Gravel = 0 %
Sand = 98.8 %
Silt and Clay = 1.2 %
9/10/ 89
2018
Relative Density
9/10/ 90
2018
Relative Density
e n a s − e0
Dr =
e n a s − enin
where:
e n a s is the maximum void ratio
( loosest condition),
e n i n is the minimum void ratio ( densest
9/10/ 91
2018
Relative Density
yd − y d (nin) y d max
Dr = × (2 − 11)
y d max − y d (nin) yd
yw ∗ Gc yw ∗ Gc
yd max = yd min
=
1 + enin 1 + enas
yw ∗ Gc
yd =
1 + eo
9/10/ 92
2018
Relative Density
9/10/ 93
2018
9/10/
2018