Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jess Turner
ABSTRACT
The aim of the experiment was to determine the caffeine concentration in four drinks samples.
This was done through Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy. A set of standard
solutions were made and an IR spectrum for each was taken. The absorption values obtained at
1655cm-1 were then used to create a calibration curve. Based on this curve the concentration of
caffeine in each sample could be calculated through the linear regression of the curve and the
relationship between absorption and concentration given in Beer’s Law. It was found that the
beverage with the lowest concentration was the decaffeinated coffee sample (0.1921ppm),
followed by the black tea (0.4745 ppm), Goldberg’s cold brew (1.231 ppm) and the Kazaav
espresso (2.723 ppm) respectively. These results are to be expected, particularly the
decaffeinated coffee giving the lowest concentration of caffeine. However, there was some
difficulty in producing an accurate calibration curve; one data point had to be removed due to
unknown sources of error, which may limit the accuracy of the curve itself. This will in turn
have had an effect of the calculated concentration values for the beverages. Despite this, the
order of caffeine concentrations would likely remain unchanged. In conclusion, to confirm the
concentration values the calibration curve should be repeated to obtain a better curve and in turn
INTRODUCTION
across the globe. Appearing in many foods and drinks such as chocolate, coffee and soft drinks
it has become increasingly important for the general public to understand the effects of the
chemical. High consumption of the substance has been linked to several health effects,
especially for pregnant women. (3) For this reason, it is important that we know how much
Jess Turner Chem 219 page 3
Lab: FT-IR date: 5/5/2018
caffeine is in the foods and drinks we consume so that we can monitor uptake and avoid potential
health risks.
The use of FTIR provides several benefits over alternative methods of analysis. Firstly,
the Multiplex or Fellgett advantage allows all source wavelengths to be measured simultaneously
than for a standard dispersive spectrometer. Additionally, the throughput or Jacquinot advantage
allows more light to get through than a dispersive spectrometer which is limited by the slit width.
Combined these two advantages allow a signal to noise ratio to be obtained which is much
Experimental approach was simple; a set of standard solutions were made and analyzed
to make a calibration curve. Analysis was also conducted on four drinks samples; Kazaav
Espresso, Goldberg’s cold brew, black tea and decaffeinated coffee, which were diluted in
chloroform before analysis. The concentration of caffeine in each of these would then be
EXPERIMENTAL
Theory. Infrared (IR) spectroscopy is one of the most valuable analytical techniques
available to scientists today. (1) A spectrum is produced based on the absorbance of light by a
molecule. For a molecule to absorb IR radiation it must change its dipole moment upon
vibration; symmetrical molecules such as O2 and N2 do not absorb IR radiation. (2) However,
larger molecules such as caffeine are IR active and absorb well allowing concentrations to be
determined. IR radiation can be used for both qualitative and quantitative analysis through shift
and absorbance values respectively. For this experiment the instruments quantitative analysis
must be used in which Beer’s Law is utilized. It shows the linear relationship between
Jess Turner Chem 219 page 4
Lab: FT-IR date: 5/5/2018
absorbance and concentration, allowing the concentration of caffeine in each of the samples to be
still no "materials and
calculated based off the calibration curve and its linear regression. (2) safety considerations"?
reagent grade chloroform for caffeine extraction and caffeine for standard solution preparation.
The spectrometer used for analysis was the Shimadzu IR Affinity-1 with a PIKE MIRacle,
Procedures (4). 0.228g of caffeine was weighed by difference and used to create a stock
solution in chloroform in a 250 mL volumetric flask. A 10.00 mL aliquot of this solution was
used to create a second stock solution in chloroform in a 100 mL volumetric flask. This was
then used to create four standard solutions with concentrations as shown below.
Standard 1 2 3 4
mL of SS2 0.5 1.5 3 4
Concentration (ppm) 0.0456 0.1368 0.2736 0.3648
The liquid samples were then prepared for analysis. 3.00 mL of each sample and
phase separation 1.00 mL of the chloroform layer was diluted in chloroform to give a final
volume of 10 mL in a volumetric flask. This solution was used for the IR analysis. The FT-IR
analysis was conducted using the Shimadzu IR Affinity-1 with a PIKE MIRacle, single-
each sample to calculate the concentration of the caffeine in each one. To successfully do this a
standard curve was created using the absorption value for each standard solution at 1655 cm-1.
You disregarded my
previous comment: "
how was this
determined? It is critical
to your accuracy."
Jess Turner Chem 219 page 5
Lab: FT-IR date: 5/5/2018
From here the concentration of caffeine in each sample can then be determined using the
equation of linear regression from the curve and solving for x. (i.e. y=mx+c where y =absorption,
RESULTS
Table 3: Calculated concentrations of caffeine in each sample using the standard curve created
from the standard caffeine solutions.
Figures 1-4 and 7-10 can be found in an appendix at the end of the report.
Figure 5: Standard curve from all four absorptions obtained at 1655 cm-1
Figure 6: Standard curve from all three absorptions obtained at 1655 cm-1
Jess Turner Chem 219 page 7
Lab: FT-IR date: 5/5/2018
DISCUSSION
The aim of this experiment was to determine the caffeine concentrations in four different
(A=bc) shows the linear relationship between absorbance and concentration and so this can be
used to obtain the concentration from the measured results. The results show that the beverage
with the highest caffeine content was the Espresso Kazaav at 2.723. The beverage with the
lowest concentration was the decaffeinated coffee. This is to be expected given the nature of the
drink.
An important aspect of this experiment was the use of a standard curve to determine the
concentrations. However, the results obtained for this part of the experiment were not as would
be expected. Given the relationship shown in Beer’s law, one would expect the standard solution
with highest concentration of caffeine to have the largest absorption value, but as shown in Table
2 this was not the case; the sample with the second lowest concentration had the highest
absorption value at 0.1053 ppm. This result is almost certainly an anomaly given the general
trend seen with the other data points and was therefore omitted from the calculation of the curve.
However, the cause of such a large error cannot easily be identified. One possible explanation is
an instrumental cause. When calculating the concentration, it is assumed that all other
parameters including the path length remain constant. In reality it is very unlikely that this is the
case; the path length of the FTIR instrument is very small and therefore keeping it constant is
challenging. Deviation away from a constant path length can result in errors of concentration
There are, of course, other possible sources of error, such as human and experimental
error, but it’s hard to see where such a large human error would have come from.
Jess Turner Chem 219 page 8
Lab: FT-IR date: 5/5/2018
APPENDIX
Figure 1: Recorded data for standard solution 1; concentration =0.0456 ppm
Figure 1.1: Recorded data for standard solution 1 between 0 and 500 cm-1.
Jess Turner Chem 219 page 9
Lab: FT-IR date: 5/5/2018
Figure 2.1: Recorded data for standard solution 2 between 399 and 600 cm-1.
Jess Turner Chem 219 page 10
Lab: FT-IR date: 5/5/2018
Figure 3.1: Recorded data for standard solution 3 between 399 and 600 cm-1.
Jess Turner Chem 219 page 11
Lab: FT-IR date: 5/5/2018
Figure 4.1: Recorded data for standard solution 4 between 399 and 600 cm-1.
Jess Turner Chem 219 page 12
Lab: FT-IR date: 5/5/2018
Figure 7.1: Recorded data for Goldberg’s Cold Brew between 399 and 600 cm-1.
Jess Turner Chem 219 page 13
Lab: FT-IR date: 5/5/2018
Figure 8.1: Recorded data for Decaffeinated Coffee between 399 and 600 cm-1.
Jess Turner Chem 219 page 14
Lab: FT-IR date: 5/5/2018
Figure 9.1: Recorded data for Kazaav Espresso between 399 and 600 cm-1.
Jess Turner Chem 219 page 15
Lab: FT-IR date: 5/5/2018
Figure 10.1: Recorded data for Black Tea between 399 and 600 cm-1.
Jess Turner Chem 219 page 16
Lab: FT-IR date: 5/5/2018
LITERATURE CITED