Professional Documents
Culture Documents
situations.
topic and evaluate whether the sources you have found will be useful. For this Competency
Assessment, you will create an Annotated Bibliography that reviews four sources related to an
argument for change in your community or workplace. One of the sources in the Annotated
It is recommended that you use the thesis statement you created for the second course assessment
for CM220, but you may create a new thesis statement if you prefer. Be sure to include the thesis
Each annotation will be cited with a complete APA reference page citation for the source and a
paragraph about each source that includes a summary of the source’s main idea, an evaluation of
its credibility, and a discussion about the source’s usefulness to your argument.
Directly below the APA reference for each source, provide an annotation paragraph that includes
the following:
A one-two sentence summary of the source (no direct quotes from the source) and a
Explanation of how the source meets credibility standards, including the author’s credentials
and the verifiability of the source’s information; this should include where you found the source
(Library, Google search engine, government website, etc.). Use the criteria covered in Evaluating
(this would include whether it poses a challenge to your argument that you will need to address).
In this section, paraphrase a key point from the source that supports or challenges your thesis and
o At least one source should address an opposing viewpoint or misconception about your selected
topic.
external legal environment and company income fluctuations, and a more diverse workforce. A
lack of stress management or conflict management, team member attitudes, and a lack of
learning opportunities are all reasons why most organisations struggle to handle change.
While implementing change can be challenging for any business, a few strategies can
help make it a success (Castrillon, 2020). Using the Google search engine, I was able to find the
source, which is credible because the author's qualifications are listed and because the source's
content can be evaluated because I found it using Google. In this section, you will find all of the
previous year's content, as well as information and references. It is an objective article that offers
material that has been validated through research, and that is unbiased. The source, which will be
discussed in the context of change management practices, will support my case for workplace
active coping).
Workplace developments (such as more women and immigrants in the workforce) are viewed
positively by workers in the United States, but they are sometimes viewed negatively (Graf,
2018). Using the Google search engine, I was able to find the source, which is credible because
the author's qualifications are listed and because the source's content can be evaluated because I
found it using Google. Graphs and charts accompany the text in this article, which was initially
published around three years ago. It is an objective article that offers material that has been
validated through research, and that is unbiased. In order to refute the widespread misconception
about change, I will use the following source to support my case for organisational
transformation. Outsourcing, a surge in foreign employees, and automation are all cited by Graf
workplace teams, manage conflict, improve corporate governance, and deal with environmental
problems at both the internal and external levels (Kochan & Lipsky, 2019). I obtained the source
through the Purdue Global Library, which fulfils credibility standards in that both the author's
credentials and the verifiability of the source's content are indicated. I also found the source
through the Purdue Global Library, which meets credibility standards. Approximately two years
ago, the information was published, and facts were revealed. It is an objective eBook that
contains information that has been verified via study and is entirely unbiased. In support of my
argument for workplace change, I will refer to the source, which will range from addressing the
Kochan and Lipsky (2019), a broad spectrum of internal and external organisational changes are
currently handled through negotiation between stakeholders to create positive and successful
employees' perceptions and ensure organisational learning from the top to the bottom of the
company (Schultz et al., 2019). In addition, all of the author's credentials are listed. The
verifiability of the source's content may be evaluated because I obtained the seed from Purdue
Global Library. The head fulfils credibility standards. Approximately two years ago, the
information was published, and facts were revealed. It is an objective journal article containing
information verified through study and is entirely unbiased. When it comes to engaging middle
management, individual participation, and continual learning, I will draw on this source to
support my argument for workplace change. Schultz and colleagues (2019) discovered that the
'people' factor is critical to building resilience and self-efficacy in the face of change.
Technology is the driving force behind the transformation of organizational culture. In another
Because the author's qualifications are indicated, the source passes credibility standards. The
verifiability of the source's content may be evaluated because I discovered the source through the
Google search engine. The information was released approximately three years ago, and the facts
are supplied together with references to support them. It is an objective article that contains
information that has been verified through study and is unbiased. However, the source does not
support my case for workplace change because it considers technology change the primary cause
(2018), cultural change can be painful for an organization, but technology change is required to