You are on page 1of 15

LOGICAL REASONING

SYLLOGISM
The word "syllogism" is given by Greeks ii) Predicate : Predicate is the part of the
which means 'inference' or 'deduction'. It was proposition denoting that which is affirmed
introduced by Aristotle. or denied about the subject.
An example of a question of syllogism is eg : In the proposition All novels are songs,
given below. something is being said about novels. So novels
Directions : In the following questions, two is the subject. Songs is the predicate here
statements are given followed by two because it affirmed about the subject.
conclusions. You have to study the two CLASSIFICATION OF PROPOSITIONS
statements and then decide which of the i) Universal positive proposition: A
conclusions follow from the statements. proposition of the form All S are P is called
Mark the right answer from (1), (2), (3), (4) and (5) a universal positive proposition. A
Statements : All plants are trees. universal positive proposition is denoted
by A.
No trees are green.
eg : All girls are disciplined.
Conclusions : I. Some plants are green.
All bulbs are lions.
II. No plants are green.
i) Universal negative proposition :A
1) Only I follows proposition of the form No S is P is called
2) Only II follows a universal negative proposition. It is
usually denoted by E.
3) Both I and II follow
eg : No professors is lazy.
4) Either I or II follows
No boxes are baskets.
5) Neither I nor II follows
ii) Particular positive Proposition : A
This is a typical question of syllogism. proposition of the form Some S are P is
Here the choice (2) is true. Later on we can discuss
called a particular positive proposition. It
the method to reach at the answer choice. Now let
is usually denoted by I.
us see some definitions related to syllogism.
eg : Some boys are smarts.
PROPOSITION
Some boys are cats.
A proposition is a sentence that makes
a statement and gives a relation between two or iv) Particular negative proposition :
more terms. A proposition of the form Some S are not
P is called particular negative proposition.
In logic, any statement is termed a
It is denoted by the letter O.
proposition.
eg : Some flowers are not grapes.
Eg : i) All windows are rods
Some fans are not black.
ii) No cloth is a bay
In syllogism, there are two types of inferences.
iii) Some students are members
1) Mediate inference :
iv) Some green are not white
Here conclusion is drawn from two
The parts of proposition are given below. propositions. For example, if you are given All
i) Subject : A subject is the part of the cats are dogs and All dogs are animals, then a
proposition about which something is conclusion of the form All cats are animals could
being said. be drawn from it.
2) Immediate inference : A - type hidden propositions :
Here conclusion is drawn from only one • All positive propositions beginning with
given proposition. For example if a given 'each', 'every' and 'any'.
statement is All gates are blue, then based on • A positive sentence with a particular
this a conclusion could be drawn that Some blue person as its subject.
are gates. This is a case of immediate inference. • A positive sentence with a very definite
Two important cases of immediate exception.
inference is given below. eg : Each of them plays football.
a) Implications : He should be awarded.
If a given proposition is A - type, then it All members except Kavitha have a share
also implies that the I - type conclusion must of profit.
be true. Let us verify it by considering the E - type hidden proposition
proposition, All elephants are big. This statement • All negative sentences beginning with
naturally implies that the conclusion Some 'no one', 'none' and 'not a single'
elephants are big must be true. Similarly we
• A sentence with a particular person as
can prove that an E - type proposition also implies
its subject but a negative sense.
an O - type conclusion.
• A negative sentence with a very definite
b) Conversion exception.
Two steps are to be followed in conversion. • An interrogative sentence which is used
The first step is to change the subject as the to make an assertion.
predicate and the predicate as the subject. The eg : None can escape from death.
second step is to change the type of the given
proposition to the pattern given in the following Swathi is not an IAS officer.
table. No student except Salim has attend the party.
Type of the given Type of the proposition Is there any person who can cheat himself?
proposition after conversion I - type hidden propositions :
A I
• Positive propositions beginning with words
E E such as 'most', 'a few', 'mostly', 'generally',
I I 'almost', `frequently', and negative
propositions beginning with words such
O Cannot be converted as 'few', 'seldom', `hardly', 'scarcely',
Let us consider the statement Some 'rarely' and 'little'.
posters are good looking. This can be converted • A positive sentence with an exception
by using the above table as Some good looking which is not definite.
are posters. In the same way, No books are eg : Very few writers research before they
pencils can be converted as No pencils are write.
books.
Seldom are people not jealous.
HIDDEN PROPOSITION All students except five have failed.
You may find it difficult to categorise some O - type hidden propositions :
propositions of the form Rahim is brilliant, Every • All negative propositions beginning with
man talks English, Not a single student passed words such as 'all', 'every', 'any' and 'each'.
the exam, No student except Prem was present, • Negative propositions with words as 'most'
etc. We shall know, how to find the hidden , 'a few', 'mostly', 'generally', 'almost', and
propositions in such sentences. `frequently'.
• Positive words beginning with 'few', eg : Statements : No watch is hat
'seldom', 'hardly', scarcely', 'rarely' and All pins are hats.
little.
In this pair, the common term is 'hat' and
• A negative sentence with an exception
which is not definite.. it is the predicate of both the sentences. So we
have to align the sentences by converting any
e.g. : All men are not honest of the sentences and changing the order if
Most of the books have not been read. needed.
Girls are usually not brave. After alignment, the above example will
Rarely is a rich man worried. become
No students except a few are absent. All pins are hats

EXCLUSIVE PROPOSITIONS No hat is watch.


While aligning a given pair of statements,
A statement beginning with'only', 'alone', the priority should be given while converting, to I
'none but' or 'none else but' is called exclusive - type statements to E-type statements and then
proposition. Such propositions can be reduced to A - type statement, in that order. That is, the
to A or E or I type. rule of IEA should be followed.
Only brave men are pilots. After aligning the given pair of statements,
This sentence means that "No coward the conclusion can be easily drawn by using
man is a pilot" and "All pilots are brave men". the following table.
SOLUTION OF SYLLOGISM BY ANALYTICAL Statement - I Statement - II Conclusion
METHOD A + A = A
There are two steps to be followed for A + E = E
solving syllogism by analytical method. E + A = O*
E + I = O*
A problem of syllogism consists of two I + A = I
propositions which have one common term. This I + E = O
common term will be the predicate of the first
proposition and the subject of the second. If this No definite conclusion can be drawn for
condition is not satisf ied in the giv en other combinations like A+I, O+A etc, which are
propositions, they should be aligned accordingly. not mentioned in the above table.
eg : Statement : All birds are trees. For the above given combinations which
are aligned properly, the conclusion is a
Some trees are cows.
proposition whose subject is the subject of the
Here the common term is 'trees'. Also it first statement and whose predicate is the
satisfies the above said condition. Hence the predicate of the second statements. The
statements are properly aligned. common terms disappears.
Let us consider another example. In the above table, O* implies that the
eg : Statement : All pencils are bottles conclusion is of type - O, whose subject is the
predicate of the second statement and the
All bricks are pencils. predicate of the conclusion is the subject of the
Here the common term is 'pencil'. But it first statement.
does not satisfy the given condition. So we have SOLVED EXAMPLES.
to align this pair. This can be aligned easily by
changing the order of the statements. The 1. Statements :All bags are toys.
aligned pair will be All toys are keys.
All bricks are pencils. The sentences are already aligned. From
All pencils are bottles. the above given Table, A+A=A. Hence the
conclusion is of type - A whose subject is the Now by changing the order of the
subject of the first proposition and the predicate statements, we can align the sentences. So the
is the predicate of the second proposition. So aligned pair is,
the conclusion is All bags are keys. No clip is red.
2. Statements : All teachers are readers. Some red are caps.
All teachers are writers. The conclusion is of type O* since
This pair is not properly aligned because E+I=O*. Hence the conclusion is
the subject of both the sentences is 'teachers'. Some caps are not clips.
Since both the sentences are of type - A, we
6. Statements : Some powders are not soaps.
may convert any of them. So the aligned pair is
Some readers are teachers. All soaps are detergents.
All teachers are writers. The given pair is properly aligned. But no
definite conclusion can be drawn from this type
Here the conclusion will be of type - I because it is a O+A - type combination.
because I+A=I.
 The conclusion is Some readers are IMMEDIATE INFERENCE
writers. Now let us consider an example which
3. Statements : Some chocolates are toffees. has two statements as well as two conclusions.
All chocolates are pastries. eg. Statements: All novels are stories.
The subject of both the sentences is the All stories are songs.
same.By the rule of IEA, we convert the I - type Conclusion : (i) All novels are songs.
statement.
(ii) Some songs are novels.
So the aligned pair is,
First of all let us consider only the
Some toffees are chocolates. statements . The sentences are already aligned.
All chocolates are pastries Since A+A = A, the conclusion will be All novels
I+A=I. So the conclusion is are songs If we convert this conclusion, we get
Some toffees are pastries. Some songs are novels.Hence both the
conclutions given in the question are true.
4. Statements :All lights are balls
eg: Statements :Some roses are leaves.
No bats are lights
Some leaves are throns.
By changing the order of the statements itself
we can align the sentences. The aligned pair is Conclusions : (i) Some roses are thorns.
No bats are lights. (II) Some leaves are roses.
All lights are balls. We know that for a combination of I+I -
E+A=O*. So the conclusion is, type no conclusion could be drawn. But if we
convert the first statement, we get Some leaves
Some balls are not bats. are roses. Which is conclusion (ii) Also on
5. Statements :Some caps are red. converting the second statement, we get some
No clip is red. thorns are leaves. This proposition is not given
in the conclusion part. So in this example,
Here the common term is 'red' which is conclusion (ii) alone is true.
the predicate of both the sentences. By the rule
of IEA, we convert the I - type statement. After So while solv ing the problems on
conversion, the given pair becomes, syllogism, we should also take the immediate
inferences of the given statements as well as
Some red are caps.
the immediate inference of the conclusion drawn
No clip is red. from the table.
COMPLEMENTARY PAIR I + E = O. So the conclusion is Some
houses are not stones, Hence we obtain a
Consider the following. definite conclusion that conclusion (ii) is correct.
Conclusions :i) Some buses are trucks. Hence step IV becomes unnecessary.
ii) Some buses are not trucks. 2. Statements :Some cows are horses
We know that either some buses will be All cows are tigers.
trucks or some buses will not be trucks. Hence Conclusions : i) Some tigers are horses.
either (i) or (ii) is true. Such pair of statements
are called complementary pairs. So in a ii) Some tigers are cows.
complementary pair, at least one of the two To align the sentences, it is sufficient to
statements is always true. We can call a pair convert the first statement. So the aligned pair
as a complementary pair if is
i) The subject and predicate of both the Some horses are cows.
sentences are the same. All cows are tigers.
ii) They are an I + O - type pair or an A + O I + A = I. Hence the conclusion will be
type pair or an I + E - type pair. Some horses are tigers. If we convert this
Some complementary pairs are given conclusion, we get Some tigers are horses which
below. is conclusion (i). Also if we convert the second
i) All birds are swans . statement, conclusion (ii) is obtained.
Some birds are not swans. Hence both the conclusions given above
should be taken as true. There is no need to
ii) Some tables are watches.
check for complementary pair because definite
Some tables are not watches. conclusion has already been obtained.
iii) Some girls are cute. 3. Statements :Some poets are teachers.
No girls are cute. Some teachers are saints
Note :The steps to be followed to do a syllogism Conclusions : i) Some poets are saints.
problem by analytical method are mentioned
below. ii) Some poets are not saints.
This pair is already aligned. But there is
i) Align the sentences properly
no definite conclusion for I + I type combinations.
ii) Draw conclusion using the table Also none of the given conclusions is the
iii) Check for immediate inferences. immediate inference of any of the statements.
So let us check for the complementary pair. The
iv) Check for complementary pair if steps ii conclusions given are in the form of 'some' and
and iii fail. 'some not'. Hence either conclusion (i) or (ii)
SOLVED EXAMPLES follows.
1. Statement : No rooms are stones
THREE - STATEMENT SYLLOGISM
Some houses are rooms.
Conclusions : i) Some houses are stones This type of syllogism problems consist
of 3 statements which are followed by 4 or more
ii) Some houses are not stones. conclusions.
We can easily align the statements by A typical three - statement syllogism
changing the order of the sentences. The aligned problem is given below.
pair is :
Directions : Below are given three statements
Some houses are rooms. followed by several conclusions based on them.
No rooms are stones. Examine the conclusions and decide whether
they logically follow from the given statements. and the subject of the third sentence are
You have to take the given statements as true the same.
even if they appear to be at variance with iii) Now arrive at the conclusion using the
commonly known facts. table.
Statements : A) All bags are hats. iv) Now compare the given conclusion with
B) Some pins are bags. the conclusion drawn using the tables. If
C) No hats are needles. they match, the given conclusion is true.
If they do not match, it is false.
Conclusions : I) Some pins are hats.
Step III
II) No needles are bags.
i) If a given statement has already been
III) Some pins are needles.
marked as a valid conclusion after step
IV) Some pins are not needles. II, then leave it. Otherwise check if it is
(a) Only I and II follow an immediate inference of any of the
three given statements of the conclusion
(b) Only I and IV follow derived.
(c) I, II and IV follow ii) Search for complementary pair :
(d) Either III or IV, and I follow a) Check if any two given conclusions have
(e) Either III or IV and I and II follow. the same subject and the same predicate.
Before solving this example, let us see b) If (a) is satisfied, then check whether any
the steps in solving a three-statement syllogism of them has been marked as a valid
problems. conclusion after step II or as an immediate
Step I inference.
i) Consider a given conclusion. c) If none of them has been marked as a
valid conclusion, then they will form a
ii) Note the subject and predicate of this given complementary pair if they are an A - O
conclusion. or I - O or I - E pair.
iii) Now f ind which of the two giv en d) If they do make a complementary pair,
statements has this subject and then mark the choice "either of the two
predicate. follows".
iv) a) If there is a common term between the If a conclusion is marked as a valid
two statements chosen in the previous conclusion after step II, then it is not necessary
part, then consider only these two to perform step III (i). Again if a given conclusion
statements. has already been accepted in step III (i), then it
b) If there is no common term between the is not necessary to perform step III (ii).
two statements chosen in the previous The learner should understand these
part, then we should consider all the three steps clearly. Now follow the solution to the
statements. example which is already given. Here we have
Step II to check the validity of each and every
i) If two statements are relevant for a given conclusions one by one.
conclusion, align them. Conclusion I : Here the subject is pin and the
predicate is hat. So let us consider (A) and (B)
ii) If three statements are relevant, write them
as our relevant statements because they have
as a chain. That is, align them in such a
a common term 'bags'.
way that the predicate of the first sentence
and subject of the second are the same, The second step is to align the sentences.
and the predicate of the second sentence The aligned pair is,
Some pins are bags. given conclusions definitely follows from the
All bags are hats. given statements.
I + A = I. So we arrive at the conclusion, Give answer ((a) if only I follows ; ((b)
'Some pins are hats'. So conclusion I is valid. if only conclusion II follows ; ((c) if either I or II
follows; ((d) if neither I nor II follows and ((e) if
Conclusion II : Here the subject is 'needles' both I and II follow.
and the predicate is 'bags'. Statement C contains 1. Statement : Some tables are glasses.
the subject 'Needles'. But 'bags' appears in both All trees are tables.
A and B. We should select A because there is Conclusions: I.Some trees are glasses
a common term between A and C. This is an II. Some glasses are trees.
aligned pair and so we arrive at the conclusion
No bags are needles which implies No needles 2. Statement : No man is a lion.
are bags. Hence conclusion II is valid. Somu is a man.
Conclusions: I. Somu is not a lion.
Conclusion III : Here the subject is 'pins' and II. All men are not Somu.
the 'predicate' is needles. These words appear 3. Statement : All boys are mothers.
in statements (B) and (C) respectively which have All mothers are fathers.
no term in common. So all the three statements Conclusions : I. All mothers are boys.
should be taken as relevant. Now align the II. All boys are fathers.
statements as Step II (ii) So we get, 4. Statement : All pots are cups.
Some pins are bags All cups are bowls.
All bags are hats. Conclusions: I. All pots are bowls.
No hats are needles. II. All cups are pots.
5. Statement : All students are girls.
I + A + E = (I + A) + E= I + E = O. No girl is dull
So the conclusion is 'Some pins are not Conclusions : I. There are no boys in the
needles', which is conclusion IV. So conclusion class
IV is valid. II. No student is dull.
Since conclusion III is not valid in step II, 6. Statement : Some cats are kittens.
let us perform step III (i). The conclusion, Some All goats are kittens.
pins are not needles is not an immediate Conclusions: I. Some cats are goats.
inference of any of the three given statements. II. Some goats are cats.
So the next step is to check the existence of a 7. Statement : All names are houses.
complementary pair in the given conclusions. No houses are foxes.
Conclusions : I. All names are foxes.
We see that conclusion III and conclusion II. No houses are names.
IV form a complementary pair of I - O type. So 8. Statement : All pens are dogs.
the choice "either III or IV follows" could be Some pens are lights.
selected. But we find that conclusion IV is valid Conclusions: I. Some dogs are lights.
from the previous step. So conclusion III is not II. Some lights are not dogs
valid. Hence for this given example, the third 9. Statement : Some birds are clouds.
choice which is 'I, II and IV follow' is true.
Horse is a bird.
Conclusions : I. Some clouds are birds.
PRACTICE TEST II. Horse is not a cloud.
Directions (Qs. 1 - 25) : Each of the following 10. Statement : All tables are ants.
questions contains two statements followed by Some ants are chairs.
two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to Conclusions: I. All ants are tables.
consider the two statements to be true, even if II. Some chairs are not ants.
they seen to be at variance at the commonly 11. Statement : All elephants are birds.
known facts. You have to decide which of the Some birds are cows.
Conclusions: I. Some cows are birds. 23. Statement : All players are tall.
II.Some elephants are cows. Pranesh is tall.
12. Statement : All papers are pencils. Conclusions: I. Pranesh is a player.
All pencils are erasers. II. Pranesh is not a player.
Conclusions: I.Some erases are papers. 24. Statement : Some hens are cows.
II. Some pencils are not All cows are horses.
papers. Conclusions : I. Some horses are hens.
13. Statement : Some trees are horses. II. Some hens are horses.
Some ships are trees. 25. Statement : All business men are hard
Conclusions: I.Some horses are ships. working.
II.Some trees are neither No hard working men are
ships nor horses. superstitious.
14. Statement : All glasses are mirrors. Conclusions: I. No business men are
Some mirrors are red. superstitious.
Conclusions: I. All mirrors are glasses. II. All superstitious are not
II. Some glasses are red. businessmen.
15. Statement : Some dogs are horses. Directions (Qs. 26 - 40) : In each question below,
No horse is black. there are two or three statements followed by
Conclusions: I. Some dogs are black. four conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV. You
II.Some horses are dogs. have to take the given statements to be true
16. Statement : All roads are poles. even if they seem to be at variance with
No poles are houses. commonly known facts and then decide which
Conclusions: I. Some roads are houses. of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from
II.Some houses are poles. the given statements.
17. Statement : Many actors are singers.
All singers are dancers. 26. Statements: Some boys are girls.
Conclusions: I. Some actors are All girls are students.
dancers. Conclusions:
II. No singer is an actor. I. Some boys are students.
18. Statement : Only cats are animals. II. Some students are boys.
No historian is an animal. III. Some students are girls.
Conclusions: I. Some cats are not IV. All students are girls.
historians. (a) I, II and III follow
II. Some historians are not (b) II, III and IV follow
cats. (c) I, III and IV follow
19. Statement : Some desks are caps. (d) I, II and IV follow
No cap is red. (e) All follow
Conclusions: I. Some caps are desks. 27. Statements: All books are watches.
II. No desk is red. Some watches are clips.
20. Statement : Some pots are belts. Conclusions:
No belt is white. I. Some watches are books.
Conclusions: I. Some pots are white. II. No watches are books.
II. Some pots are not white. III. Some books are clips.
21. Statement : Some girls are flowers. IV. No books are clips.
Some flowers are books. (a) I,and III follow
Conclusions: I. Some girls are books. (b) Only I follow
II. No books are girls. (c) Either I or II follows
22. Statement : Some files are ants. (d) Either III or IV and I follow
All insects are ants. (e) Either I or II and III follow.
Conclusions: I. All files are ants. 28. Statements: Some chairs are tables.
II. Some ants are insects. Some tables are desks.
Conclusions: Conclusions:
I. Some chairs are desks. I. All boys are students.
II. No chairs are desks. II. All boys are teachers.
III. Only desks are chairs. III. Some teachers are boys.
IV. Only chairs are desks. IV. No teachers are boys.
(a) Only I follows (a) Only I follows
(b) Only II follows (b) Only II and II follow
(c) Either I or II follows. (c) Either I or III follows
(d) Either III or IV follows (d) Either I or IV follows
(e) Either I or II and either III or IV follow. (e) Either III or IV follows
33. Statements: Some girls are teens.
29. Statements: Some reds are blues.
No teens are snakes.
No greens are blues.
Conclusions :
Conclusions : I. Some teens are girls.
I. Some reds are not greens. II. Some snakes are no girls.
II. All reds are greens. III. Some girls are not snakes.
III. Some greens are not reds. IV. All snakes are girls.
IV. All greens are reds. (a) Only I follows
(a) Only I follows (b) Either II or III follows
(b) Only III follows (c) Only I and III follow
(c) Either I or II follows. (d) Only I and II follow
(d) Either III or IV and I follow (e) Either III or IV follows
(e) I and II follow. 34. Statements :No blankets are pillows.
30. Statements :No systems are decks. Some beds are blankets.
All decks are books. Conclusions :
Conclusions: I. Some blankets are not pillows.
I. Some systems are books. II. Some pillows are not beds.
II. Some systems are not books. III. Some beds are not pillows.
III. Some books are systems. IV. All beds are pillows.
IV. Some books are not systems. (a) Either III or IV follows
(a) Only II follows (b) Either I or II follows
(b) Only IV follows (c) I and III follow
(c) I and IV follow. (d) Either II or III follows
(d) II and either III or IV follow (e) None of the above
(e) Either I or II and IV follow. 35. Statements: All classes are glasses.
All brasses are glasses.
31. Statements :All birds are animals.
Conclusions :
Many birds are stones.
I. Some classes are brasses.
Conclusions :
II. Some brasses are glasses.
I. Some birds are animals.
III. Some brasses are classes.
II. Some animals are stones. IV. Some classes are glasses.
III. All animals are stones. (a) Only I follows
IV. Some animals are not stones. (b) Only II follows
(a) Only I follows (c) I and II follow
(b) Only II follows (d) II and IV follow
(c) Either III or IV follows. (e) All follow
(d) I and II follow 36. Statements: All cars are buses.
(e) I and II and either III or IV follow Some buses are cycles.
32. Statements : Conclusions:
Some teachers are students. I. All cycles are buses.
Some students are boys. II. All cycles are car.
III. Some cars are cycles. (a) Only I follows
IV. No cars are cycles. (b) Either I or II follows
(a) Only I follows (c) Either III or IV follows
(b) Only II and III follow (d) Only I and III follow
(c) Either II or III follows (e) None of the above
(d) Either I or IV follows Directions (Qs. 41 - 60) : Below are given three
(e) Either III or IV follows statements A, B,and C followed by four
37. Statements: Some singers are rockers. conclusions. You have to take the given
All rockers are westerners. statements to be true even if they appear to be
Conclusions: at variance with commonly known facts, and
I. Some rockers are singers. then decide which of the conclusions logically
II. Some westerners are rockers. follow (s) from the given statements. For each
III. Some singers are westerners. question, mark out an appropriate answer choice
IV. Some singers are not westerners. that you think is correct.
(a) I, II and III follow
(b) I, II and IV follow 41. Statements:
(c) II, III and IV follow A. All thieves are men.
(d) I, III and IV follow B. All men are graduates.
(e) All follow C. No graduates are employed.
38. Statements: All pigs are elephants. Conclusions :
No pigs are bakers. I. Some graduates are thieves.
Conclusions : II. No employed are thieves.
I. Some bakers are not pigs. III. Some men are thieves.
II. Some pigs are not bakers. IV. Some employed are men.
III. Some elephant are not bakers. (a) I, II and III follow
IV. Some bakers are not elephants (b) II, III and IV follow
(a) I, II and III follow (c) Only I and II follow
(b) I, II and IV follow (d) Only II and II follow
(c) I, III and IV follow (e) Only II and IV follow.
(d) II, III and IV follow 42. Statements:
(e) All follow A. Some books are pens
39. Statements : All green are blue. B. All tables are chairs.
All blue are white. C. No pens are tables.
Conclusions : Conclusions:
I. Some blue are green. I. Some books are not tables.
II. Some white are green. II. Some pens are not chairs.
III. Some green are not white. III. Some books are not chairs.
IV. All white are blue. IV. Some chairs are not pens
(a) Only I and II follow (a) I, and IV follow
(b) Only II and III follow (b) II, and IV follow
(c) Only I and III follow (c) I and III follow
(d) Only I and IV follow (d) II and III follow
(e) All follow (e) III, and IV follow.
40. Statements: Some soaps are clean. 43. Statements :
All clean are wet. A. All satellites are planets.
Conclusions : B. No stars are planets.
I. Some clean are soaps. C. Some cosmos are satellites.
II. No clean are soaps. Conclusions:
III. Some wet are soaps. I. Some cosmos are stars.
IV. All wet are soaps. II. Some cosmos are planets.
III. Some stars are not cosmos. 47. Statements:
IV. Some cosmos are not stars A. All pins are staplers.
(a) Only II and III follow B. Some staplers are sharpeners.
(b) Only II and IV follow C. Some sharpeners are stands.
(c) Either I or IV follows Conclusions:
(d) Only IV follows I. Some staplers are stands.
(e) Either I or IV and III follow II. Some sharpeners are pins.
44. Statements: III. Some pins are stands.
A. All books are notes. IV. Some stands are sharpeners.
B. Some notes are pencils. (a) Only I and II follow
C. No pencils are papers. (b) Only II and IV follow
Conclusions: (c) Only III follows
(d) Only IV follows
I. Some notes are books.
(e) None of these
II. Some pencils are books.
48. Statements:
III. Some books are papers. A. Some oranges are apples.
IV. No books are papers. B. All apples are guavas.
(a) Only I follows C. No guavas are bananas.
(b) Only I and either III or IV follows Conclusions:
(c) Either III or IV follows I. Some guavas are oranges.
(d) Only I and III follow II. No apples are bananas.
(e) None of these. III. Some oranges are bananas.
45. Statements : IV. Some apples are bananas.
A. Some cups are utensils. (a) Only I and II follow
B. No utensils are buckets. (b) Only I and either II or IV follow
C. All buckets are plates. (c) Only I, II and IV follow
Conclusions: (d) Only III and either II or IV follow.
I. Some cups are buckets. (e) None of these
II. Some utensils are plates. 49. Statements:
III. No utensils are plates. A. Some streets are roads.
IV. Some cups are plates B. Some roads are lanes.
(a) Only I follows C. Some lanes are highways.
(b) Only III follows Conclusions :
(c) Either II or III follows I. Some roads are not streets.
(d) Either III or IV follows II. No highways are streets.
(e) None of these III. Some streets are not roads.
46. Statements : IV. Some lanes are not roads.
(a) Only III follows
A. Some keys are locks.
(b) Only III and IV follows
B. All locks are doors.
(c) Either I or III follows
C. Some doors are windows. (d) Both I and III follow
Conclusions: (e) None of these
I. Some locks are windows. 50. Statements :
II. Some windows are keys. A. Some pencils are pens.
III. Some windows are doors. B. All pens are erasers.
IV. No locks windows. C. All staplers are erasers.
(a) Either I or IV follows Conclusions:
(b) Only II follows I. Some pens are not pencils.
(c) Only III and IV follow II All erasers are pencils.
(d) None follows III. Some staplers are pens.
(e) None of these. IV. Some staplers are pencils.
(a) Only I follows 54. Statements :
(b) Only II follows A. Some keys are locks.
(c) Only III follows B. Some locks are stickers.
(d) Only IV follows C. All stickers are pens.
(e) None follows Conclusions :
51. Statements: I Some pens are locks.
A. Some tables are chairs. II Some stickers are keys.
B. No cupboards are tables. III. No stickers are keys.
IV. Some locks are keys.
C. Some chairs are cupboards.
(a) I, IV and either II or III follow
Conclusions :
(b) Only I and IV follow.
I. Some chairs are not tables.
(c) Only II and III follow.
II. All chairs are either tables or cupboards. (e) None of these.
III. Some chairs are both tables and cup 55. Statements :
boards A. All books are papers.
IV. All chairs are tables. B. Some papers are journals.
(a) Only either I or IV follows. C. Some journals are calendars.
(b) Only either II or III follows. Conclusions :
(c) Only IV follows. I. Some journals are books.
(d) Either II or III and I follow II. Some calendars are papers.
(e) None of these. III. Some books are journals.
52. Statements : IV. Some books are calendars.
A. All birds are animals. (a) Only II and IV follow
B. Some animals are humans. (b) Only II and III follow
C. All humans are mammals. (c) Only I and III follow
Conclusions : (d) Only III and IV follow
I. Some humans are not birds. (e) None follows.
II. Some birds are humans. 56. Statements :
III. Some animals are not mammals. A. Some answers are questions.
B. Some questions are writers.
IV. All animals are mammals.
C. All writers are poets.
(a) Only I and II follow.
Conclusions :
(b) Either III or IV follows I Some writers are answers.
(c) Either I or II follows. II. Some poets are questions.
(d) Either I or II and either III or IV follow III. All questions are poets.
(e) None of these. IV. Some poets are answers.
53. Statements : (a) Only I and II follow
A. Some leaves are fruits. (b) Only I, II and IV follow
B. All branches are fruits . (c) Only II follows
C. Some roots are branches. (d) Only II and IV follow
Conclusions : (e) Only III follows.
I. Some roots are fruits. 57. Statements :
II. Some branches are leaves. A All bottles are boxes.
III. No leaves are branches. B. All boxes are bags.
IV. Some leaves are roots. C. Some bags are trays.
(a) Either II or III and I follow. Conclusions :
(b) Only I follows I Some bottles are trays.
(c) Only either II or III follows II Some trays are boxes.
(d) Only I and III follow III. All bottles are bags.
(e) None of these. IV. Some trays are bags.
(a) Only I, III and IV follow. Conclusions :
(b) Only II and III follow. I. All trees are flowers.
(c) Only I, II and III follow. II. Not all trees are flowers.
(d) Only III and IV follow. (a) Only I follows
(e) All follow. (b) Only II follows
58. Statements : (c) Either I nor II follows
A. Some envelops are gums. (d) Neither I or II follows.
B. All gums are seals. (e) Both I and II follow.
C. Some seals are adhesives. 60. Statements :
Conclusion : A. All chairs are apples.
I Some envelops are seals. B. Some apples are tables.
II. Some gums are adhesives. C. All tables are cupboards.
III. Some adhesives are seals. Conclusions :
IV. Some adhersives are gums. I. Some cupboards are chairs.
(a) Only I and II follow II. Some tables are not chairs.
(b) Only I and III follow (a) Only I follows
(c) Only II and IV follow (b) Only II follows.
(d) Only III and IV follow (c) Either I or II follows
(e) Only I and IV follow. (d) Neither I nor II follows
59. Statements : (e) Both I and II follows.
A. All flowers are garlands.
B. All garlands are fruits.
C. All fruits are trees.

ANSWERS AND EXPLANATIONS


1. (4) 2 . (a) 3 . (b) 4 . (a) 5 . (e) 6 . (d) 7 . (d) 8.(a)
9. (a) 1 0 . (d) 1 1 . (a) 1 2 . (a) 13. (d) 1 4 . (d) 1 5 . (b) 16.(d)
17. (a) 1 8 . (a) 1 9 . (a) 2 0 . (b) 21.(c) 2 2 . (b) 2 3 . (c) 2 4 . (e)
25. (e) 26. (a) 27. (d) 28. (c) 29. (d) 30. (e) 31. (e) 3 2 . (e)
33. (c) 3 4 . (c) 3 5 . (d) 3 6 . (e) 3 7 . (a) 3 8 . (a) 3 9 . (a) 4 0 . (d)
41. (a) 4 2 . (a) 4 3 . (b) 4 4 . (b) 4 5 . (c) 4 6 . (e) 4 7 . (d) 4 8 . (a)
49. (e) 5 0 . (e) 5 1 . (a) 5 2 . (d) 5 3 . (a) 5 4 . (a) 5 5 . (e) 5 6 . (c)
57. (d) 5 8 . (b) 5 9 . (b) 6 0 . (d)
1. d. The aligned pair is 5. e. A + E = E. The conclusion is No student
All trees are tables is dull. II follows. Since All students' are
Some tables are glasses. girls, which means No boys are students.'
Hence I also follows.
This is a `A + I - type pair which has no
solution 6. d. Align this pair as All goats are kittens
and Some kittens are goats.
2. a. Align this pair as Somu is a man and No
man is a lion. A + E = E. So the A + I pair has no definite conclusion.
conclusion is Somu is not a lion : 7. d. A + E = E, the conclusion here is No names
 I follows are foxes. But this conclusion is not given.
3. b. A + A = A. The conclusion is All boys 8. a. The aligned pair is Some lights are pens
are fathers .  II follows and All pens are dogs. So the conclusion
is Some lights are dogs which implies Some tall are players.
Some dogs are lights. A+ I - type pair has no definite conclusion.
9. a. The aligned pair is Horse is a bird and But Pranesh should either be a player or
Some birds are clouds. There is no a non - player. Hence either of the two
definite conclusion for A + I - type pair. conclusions follows.
But conversion of statement I implies 24. e. I + A = I. So the conclusion is
conclusion I. Some hens are horses. Again on
10. d. A + I - type has no definite conclusion. conversion, this gives Some horses are hens.
11. a. A + I - type has no definite conclusion. 25. e. A +E = E. The conclusion is No
But immediate inference of Some birds businessmen are superstitious. Also on
are cows implies Some cows are birds. conversion, this implies No superstitious
Hence I follows. are businessmen. This implies All
12. a. The conclusion is All papers are erasers. superstitious are not businessmen also
Conclusion I follows from the immediate must be true.
inference of this conclusion. 26. a. I + A = I. The conclusion is Some boys
15. b. I + E = O. So the conclusion is Some are students which is I. This can be
dogs are not black. But conclusion II converted to Some students are boys,
which is II. Some students are girls follows
follows as it is the conversion of the first
from All girls are students.
statement.
27. d. A+ I pair has no definite conclusion. But
16. d. A + E = E. So the conclusion is No roads conclusion I follows directly from All
are houses. books are watches. III and IV are a
17. a. I + A = I. So the conclusion is "Some complementary pair.
actors are dancers". 28. c. I + I pair has no conclusion. But
18. a. The first statement can be converted to conclusion I and II form a complementary
All animals are cats. Now align the pair pair. Hence either I or II follows.
by changing the order as 29. d. The aligned pair is
No historian is an animal. No greens are blues.
All animals are cats. Some blues are reds.
E + A = O*. So the conclusion is E + I = O. So the conclusion is Some
Some cats are not historians. reds are not greens. Hence I follows. Also
19. a. I + E = O. So the conclusion is Some III and IV make a complementary pair.
desks are not red. This is not given. But 30. e. E + A = O*. Hence the conclusion is
conclusion I is obvious from statement I. Some books are not systems. Again, I
20.b. I + E = O. The conclusion is and II are a complementary pair.
31. e. Many birds are stones implies Some birds
Some pots are not white
are stones. The aligned pair is
21. c. I + I pair has no definite conclusion. But Some stones are birds.
the choice make a complementary pair
when we consider I and the immediate All birds are animals.
inference of II. Spot either I or II follows. I + A = I. Hence the conclusion is Some
22. b. The aligned pair is stones are animals. On conversion
conclusion II is obtained. I is obviously
All insects are ants. from statement I. Also III and IV make a
Some ants are files. complementary pair.
A + I - type pair has no definite solution. 32. e. I + I - type pair has no conclusion. But III
But conclusion II follows directly from and IV are complementary pair.
statement II. 33. c. I + E = O. Hence Some girls are not
23. c. Aligned pair is snakes follows. Also I is obvious from the
Pranesh is tall. first statement.
34. c. I + E = O. So the conclusion is Some 46. e. For I, B and C are relevant. But here no
beds are not pillows. Hence III follows. conclusion is obtained. Similarly IV is not
Also I is obvious from the first statement. valid. But I and IV form a complementary
35. d. The aligned pair is pair. So either I or IV follows. For II all the
All classes are glasses. three statements are relevant. But no
conclusion follows from them. III is obvious
Some glasses are brasses. from C. Hence conclusions III and either I
A + I - type pair has no solution. But II is or IV follow.
obvious from All brasses are glasses and 47. d. For I, B and C are relevant. But no
IV is obvious from All classes are glasses. conclusion follows from them. For II all
38. a. The aligned pair is the three statements are relevant. But no
No backers are pigs. conclusion follows from them. III also not
All pigs are elephants. valid IV is obvious from C.
E + A = O*. Hence the conclusion is 48. a. A + B gives Some oranges are guavas. I
Some elephants are not bakers. Thus III is obvious from this statement. B + C
follows. No pigs are bakers implies that gives No apples are bananas. So II is
No bakers are pigs. I is obvious from this valid. For III all the three statements are
sentence. II follows directly from No pigs relevant. But the conclusion arrived here
are bakers. Hence I, II and III follow. is Some oranges are not bananas. So III
is invalid. IV is also invalid, since II is valid.
41. a. Conclusion drawn from statements A and
B is All thieves are graduates. Conclusion 49. e. No conclusion is derived from the given
I is obvious from this sentence. III is statements because I + I type pair has
obvious from statement A. Also A + A + no solution.
E = A + E = E. No conclusion can be arrived as the
Conclusion drawn from all the three is immediate inference of the statements.
No thieves are employed. II is obvious There is no complementary pair also. So
from this sentence. none follows.
42. a. I follows from statements A and C. 50. e. No conclusion is derived form the given
IV follows from statements C and B. statements because (I + A) + I = I + I.
This pair has no solution. Also no
No other conclusion is possible conclusion can be arriv ed as the
43. b. Statements C + A gives Some cosmos immediate inf erence of the given
are planets. So II is valid. By aligning II statements and there is no
and B or by aligning all the three complementary pair. So none follows.
statements, we get IV.
51. a. I and IV form a complementary pair.
44. b. Conversion of A gives Some notes are
books. Therefore I follows. For II A and 52. d. I and II form a complementary pair and III
B are the relevant statements. But A + I - and IV form another complementary pair.
type pair has no conclusion. So II is not 53. a. C + B gives I. Also II and III form a
valid. For III all the statements are complementary pair.
relevant. No definite conclusion can be 54. a. B + C gives, Some locks are pens.
obtained from this combination. But I is the conversion of this conclusion.
conclusions III and IV f orm a Also II and III form a complementary pair.
complementary pair.Hence either
conclusion III or conclusion IV follows. 56. c. B + C gives, Some questions are poets.
45. c. For I, A and B are relevant. But the II is obvious from this.
conclusion obtained here is Some cups 59. b. The conclusion drawn from these three
are not buckets. So I is not valid. II and III statements is All flowers are trees. So I
form a complementary pair. For IV, all the is invalid. II can be re-written as, Some
statements are relevant. But no conclusion trees are flowers. This is obvious from the
is obtained for this combination. derived conclusion.

You might also like