Security Level:

5G Wireless Network Planning Introduction

 Agenda

What’s New in 5G

 Huawei 5G Network Planning

 5G Wireless Network Dimensioning

 5G Network Coverage Simulation and Case Study

Page 2
5G5G New Features
2017 2017.3 2018 2018.6 2019 2020

Rel-14 Rel-15 Rel-16

NSA SA Late Drop eMBB Enhancement

(Option 3/3a/3x) (Option 2/5) (Option4/7, NR DC)
Vertical Enabler
ASN.1 Version： F10 F20 F30 F40
R15 F40, 5G NSA&SA
Basic Spec Version for Commercialization

Key Features

X 10
User Experience

5G Bandwidth NR Air Interface Massive MIMO eMBB Devices

C band：~100MHz f-OFDM, Polar Code, LDPC, 4T4R->64T64R 2T4R as >2.6GHz Basic Config.
X 20~30
mmWave：~400MHz EN-DC,UL & DL decoupling Full Channel BF HPUE with 26dBm Cell Capacity

Page 3
5GNew Spectrum: C-band & mmWave
Dense Urban Urban Suburban Rural
2 times spectrum,
6dB more path loss

mmWave( T
TDD) R

C-Band (TDD)

2.6GHz (T+F) Higher spectrum, more

penetration loss
700MHz/800MHz/900MHz/1.8GHz/2.1GHz (SUL)
T

1.8GHz / 2.1GHz (FDD)

R

700MHz/800MHz/900MHz (FDD)

5G higher spectrum results in smaller coverage，reflection/ diffraction have more influences for signal, more
accurate models required, DC/SUL for UL enhancement needed.
Page 4
 New Air Interface 5G V.S. 4G
Items LTE 5G NR
Bandwidth Up to 20MHz 100MHz @ FR1, 400MHz @ FR2, BWP
PBCH/SS Wide Beam Narrow beam with beam sweeping/Beam Forming
PDCCH CRS based cell specific weight DMRS based UE specific weight
Flexible: 15/30/60/120kHz SCS (e.g 0.5msTTI @
Numerology Fixed: 15kHz SCS (1ms TTI)
30kHz)
Data channel coding Turbo LDPC
Control channel coding Tail Biting Convolutional Coding Polar
UL/DL: 256QAM as baseline
Modulation DL: 64QAM as baseline
New pi/2 BPSK for UL
Reference signal CRS based CRS-FREE, CSI-RS/DMRS based
DMRS resource Dedicated Shared with PDSCH
ACK/NACK delay Minimal N+4 Minimal N+0
UE capability 1T2R baseline 2T4R baseline

Page 5 5
5GMassive MIMO is the mainstream for 5G
Massive MIMO is key for 5G to improve Massive MIMO changes the
spectrum efficiency and coverage network planning

Traditional Antenaa 64T Massive MIMO

• Narrower beam to reduce interference and • Coverage：64TRX/32TRx/8TRx different coverage

improve spatial multiplexing. • Capacity： 64TRX/32TRx/8TRx different peak/ave
• 64TRx with high BF gain and spatial throughput
multiplexing, realize >5X capacity gain. • Beam：Various SSB for different Scenario

Page 6
 5G Early Network Deployment Benchmark

Brand Competition： Reuse 4G Macro Sites

5-10X speed enhancement for each generation Reduce Cost：No additional sites in early deployment
Simulation result based on current 4G sites:
Everywhere: DL 50Mbps/UL 5Mbps
5G Site 5G AAU Coverage
RSRP Threshold
Number Number Percent
Outdoor: DL 240Mbps/UL 25Mbps
-113dBm 5 6 99%

3G 4G -96dBm
-93dBm
35
30
52
58
96.9%
95.4%
DL:512K DL:5M DL:50M -87dBm 32 72 80.8%
UL:64K UL:1M UL:5M LTE RRU in study area 48
LTE Antenna in study area
123
(one RRU with 2-3 antennas by splitter)
New Service Requirement：
HD 4K/3D VR as the entry level experience of 5G

Service Resolution 2D 3D
3GPP：50Mbps is Basic Requirement for eMBB
Service
720P ~1.5Mbps -
Smart phone/ Surveillance 1080P ~4Mbps -
2K ~10Mbps -
Source: 3GPP TS 22.261 -Performance requirements for
4K/ Basic VR/AR 4K ~25Mbps ~50Mbps
high data rate and traffic density scenarios.

4 key points : Brand Competition, Service Experience, Re-use 4G sites, 3GPP Requirement
Page 7
 Typical Carrier Network Deployment Benchmark ( Initial Phase)

Carrier Primary Service DL Cell Edge Throughput UL Cell Edge Throughput

Korea LGU+ VR/HD Video, Connected Drone Outdoor 240Mbps Outdoor 25Mbps

China CMCC VR/HD Video, Connected Drone 50Mbps 5Mbps

China CUCC VR/HD Video 50Mbps 5Mbps

Korea SKT VR/HD Video, Connected Car 30Mbps 10Mbps

180Mbps(Current)
Norway Telenor Fish Farm Monitor -
750Mbps(Future)

Ireland EIR FWA 70Mbps 30Mbps

Urban: 50Mbps Urban: 5Mbps

Netherlands KPN FWA
Rural: 30Mbps Rural: 3Mbps

Canada Telus FWA ~100Mbps ~30Mbps

Page 8
 Signal Level Vs Throughput Performance Curve
Downlink CSI-RSRP Vs Downlink CSI-RSRP Vs
DL cell edge throughput UL cell edge throughput
CSI-RSRP Throughput CSI-RSRP Throughput
-125 dBm 10Mbps -110dBm 2Mbps

-123dBm 20Mbps -107dBm 5Mbps

-120dBm 50Mbps -104dBm 10Mbps

-119dBm 60Mbps -101dBm 20Mbps

-118dBm 85Mbps

-117dBm 100Mbps

-115dBm 140Mbps

-112dBm 200Mbps

-106dBm 300Mbps

Assumption:
1) C-band, 100MHz BW, 200W Tx power, antenna configuration 64T64R. Based on Huawei field test result.
2) Light load. For typical commercial network cases(50%-70% load), 3-6dB interference margin need to be considered.
Page 9
 Agenda

 What’s New in 5G

 Huawei 5G Network Planning

 5G Wireless Network Dimensioning

 5G Network Coverage Simulation and Case Study

Page 10
 5G Early Deployment – 4G based coordinated network planning

Multi-dimensional Model to achieve Accurate Planning Solutions

5G candidate sites selection case in UK

1 Revenue Cell scoring
(Revenue per site) Cell Name
Congest
ed
Revenue
Score
VIP
Score
Congeste Revenue
d Weight Weight
VIP
Weight
Final
Score
Score

EHA294A4 5 5 5 30% 50% 20% 5

EAF049B3 5 5 5 30% 50% 20% 5
EAF049B4 5 5 5 30% 50% 20% 5
EAF203C4 5 5 5 30% 50% 20% 5
EHA387C4 5 5 4 30% 50% 20% 4.8
EHA092A4 5 5 4 30% 50% 20% 4.8
EHA092C4 5 5 4 30% 50% 20% 4.8
EHA236A4 5 5 4 30% 50% 20% 4.8

2 Load
(PRB ,Throughput,
Aggregation
active user) Priority ranking

Priority first

Priority second
3 VIP user area
Priority normal

User/Traffic coordination Site coordination EMF coordination Spectrum Coordination

Page 11
 Key Procedures of 5G Network Planning

Network Dimensioning Network Planning Simulation Network Parameter Planning

Objective: To provide the primary network Objective: To determine the multiple-site Objective: To configure the engineering parameters
configuration information such as the coverage networking coverage (RSRP, SINR, and TxPower) (longitude, latitude, antenna height, azimuth, down-tilt,
radius, single-site capacity, required number of and cell capacity (average throughput and cell edge and broadcast beam pattern).
sites throughput) based on digital map Tool: Cloud U-NET

Tool: WINS RND Tool: Cloud U-NET

5G network planning inherits experiences of 3G/4G network planning.

Page 12
 Agenda

 What’s New in 5G

 Huawei 5G Network Planning

 5G Wireless Network Dimensioning

 5G Network Coverage Simulation and Case Study

Page 13
 5G Network Coverage Estimation Process

Geometrical Calculation
Start
3-Sector Site Omni Site
Link Budget
Propagation
Cell Radius
Model

36.873 UMa/RMa gNB Coverage Area

Cell coverage radius: R Cell coverage radius: R
Inter-site distance: D=1.5*R Inter-site distance: D=1.732*R
Site cover area = Site cover area =
Total Coverage Area/ 1.949*R*R 2.598*R*R
gNB Coverage Area
 Three application scenarios of coverage
estimation
gNB Number  Calculate the coverage radius based on the rate required
at the edge.
 Estimate the user-perceived rate of 5G users based on
End the inter-site distance (ISD) on the live network.
 Estimate the number of sites required in a given region.

Page 14
 5G Link Budget Factors
gNodeB
transmit power Antenna gain
Link budget factors: 5G and 4G have no difference in
gNodeB
Cable loss
antenna gain Path loss Margin basic concepts. However, 5G introduces the impact of
Loss body block loss, foliage loss, and rain/snow attenuation
(especially for mmWave).
Penetration loss

Foliage loss Path loss (dB) = gNodeB transmit power (dBm) – 10 x log10 (subcarrier
quantity) + gNodeB antenna gain (dBi) – gNodeB cable loss (dB) –
Body block loss
penetration loss (dB) – foliage loss (dB) – body block loss (dB) –
interference margin (dB) – rain/ice margin (dB) – slow fading margin (dB)
Slow fading margin
– body block loss (dB) + UE antenna gain (dB) – Thermal noise power
Interference (dBm) – UE noise figure (dB) – demodulation threshold SINR (dB)
margin

Rain/Ice
margin
UE reception sensitivity
Body loss UE antenna gain

Link budget involves 2 types of factors:

 Certain factors: Power, antenna gain, noise figure, demodulation threshold, penetration loss.
 Uncertain factors: Such as slow fading margin, rain/snow margin, and interference margin. These factors occur more randomly or anywhere, and are considered
as link margins.

Page 15
 Key Differences Between 5G and 3G/4G Link Budgets

Key Factor Link Budget in LTE Link Budget in 5G NR

RRUs are used with external
Without cable loss for AAU.
Cable loss antennas, which lead to cable
RRUs are used with external antennas, which lead to cable loss.
loss.

Base station antenna Physical antenna gain, typical For Massive MIMO, total antenna gain = Gain of a single TRX antenna +
gain value is from 15-18dBi. Beamforming (BF) gain, typical value for 64T64R is 25dBi.

Propagation model Okumura-Hata/Cost231-Hata 36.873 UMa/RMa 38.901UMi

Penetration loss Relatively small A higher frequency band indicates higher penetration loss

Interference margin Relatively large Narrow beam to reduce the interference

It needs to be considered when UEs are located at a low altitude and the traffic
Body block loss N/A
volume is large, especially if mmWave is used.

If mmWave is used, rain attenuation needs to be considered in areas with

Rain attenuation N/A
intense and frequent rainfalls.

Foliage attenuation needs to be considered in areas with dense vegetation and

Foliage attenuation N/A
in LOS scenarios.

Page 16
 Huawei 5G Network Dimensioning Tool Introduction
Morphology Urban
Channel Type Uplink DownLink
Input Information User Environment Indoor-eMBB
System Bandwidth (MHz) 100 100
Time Slot Configuration (DL:UL) Sub6G 4:1
Requirements from Operator: Edge Throughput (Mbps) 5 50
 Scenario: Urban indoor MIMO Type 1-Stream 1-Stream
Allocated Bandwidth (MHz) 43.96 100.00
 Frequency Band: NR 3500MHz Frame Structure Sub6G
Allocated PRB Number 120 273.00
 Bandwidth: 100MHz Tx
 MIMO: 64T64R Total Tx Power (dBm) 26.00 53.00
Actual Transmission Power per Subcarrier (dBm) -5.58 17.85
 Cell edge data rate requirement: Tx Antenna Gain per TRX Channel (dBi) 0 10
Tx Cable Loss (dB) 0 0
5Mbps(UL) / 50Mbps (DL) EIRP Per Subcarrier (dBm) -5.58 27.85
Rx
Assumptions: SINR Requirement (dB) -14.20 -6.86
MCS Requirement MCS:5-QPSK MCS:5-16QAM
 Indoor Loss: 22dB Rx Noise Figure (dB) 3.50 7.00
 Interference margin: 2dB UL/6dB DL Thermal Noise in per Subcarrier (dBm) -129.23 -129.23
Receiver Sensitivity Requirement per Subcarrier (dBm) -139.93 -129.08
 Slow Fading Margin: 9dB Rx Antenna Gain per TRX Channel (dBi) 10 0
Interference Margin (dB) 2.00 6.00
 Antenna height: BS 25m, UE 1.5m Min Signal Reception Strength per RE at Antenna (dBm) -147.93 -123.08
Path Loss & Cell Radius
Penetration Loss (dB) 22.00
Area Coverage Probability (%) 93.5%
Shadow Fading Margin (dB) 9.00
Cell Radius
Output Path Loss (dB)
Propagation Model
111.35
3GPP_UMa_Model
119.93

Frequency (GHz) 3.5

eNodeB/UE Height (m) 1.5 25
Page 17 Cell Radius (m) 165.7 276.6
 5G Network Capacity Dimension
Start

Configuration Cell Average

Analysis Throughput Benchmark

Traffic Model Subscribers Supported

Analysis per Cell

gNB Number
(initialized by Coverage Dimensioning)

Satisfy Capacity No Adjust gNB

Total Subscribers
Requirement? Number

Yes
eNB Number

End

Page 18
 Capacity Domension based on User Experience
AverageCell Throughput *𝑂𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑𝑇ℎ𝑟𝑒𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑙𝑑
Max subscriber/ Cell
Ave User Tput @ BH * RRC connection ratio * duty ratio

Network Capacity:
Frequency Band: C-band 100MHz Cell level capacity:
eNode B : 64T64R Cell Capacity Dimensioning C-band 64T, BW 100MHz, ISD 500m
WTTx CPE : 2T4R
DL Average throughput: 1.006Gbps*0.7=700Mbps
Overload Threshold :70%

User experience speed :

User Busy hour speed
User experience speed @ busy hour
100Mbps(for example)
= 100Mbps

Traffic model :
Cell capacity /(Ave User Tput * traffic model)
RRC-Connected Ratio: 50% Subscriber per cell
Duty ratio: 10% =700/100/50%/10%=140

Page 19
 Agenda

 What’s New in 5G

 Huawei 5G Network Planning

 5G Wireless Network Dimensioning

 5G Network Coverage Simulation and Case Study

Page 20
Huawei Unet Simulation Platform Support 5G New Feature
5G NR new air interface
• 3GPP R15
• 5G spectrum, bandwidth and frame structure
• FDD NR/TDD NR
• 5G RSRP/SINR/throughput simulation

Accurate propagation model for new

frequency
• Support 3.5GHz~mmWave
• 5G loss estimation considering building, vegetation,
5G rain/snow etc
• Precise signal transmission, reflection, diffraction
and scattering forecast
• Propagation model database based on 5G NR test

Massive MIMO Simulation

• Massive MIMO accurate modeling
 MM SSB scenario Pattern
 SSB static BF
 User data dynamic BF
 SSB Beam sweaping
• SU-MIMO/MU-MIMO supported

Page 2121
 Network Simulation

Key Technologies: Huawei 3D Ray Tracing Propagation Model

3D Ray Tracing Propagation

Direct Path Diffraction Reflection Scattering

Case

 More accurate for new wireless network

 Provide multipath information to MM/MU-MIMO simulation
 3D wireless network planning
 Ray tracing model depend on 3D map, not support 2D map,
recommend the experience propagation model for 2D map.

Page 22
 Key Technologies: Massive MIMO Antenna Modeling
Traditional antenna Massive MIMO Antennas
 Massive MIMO antenna modeling
• Single-port antenna file
• Antenna architecture: 64T64R, 32T32R
• Weight matrix of beamforming

 3D beamforming Oscillator: Basic Unit

• Static beamforming: For a pilot channel(CSI and SSB), Port: Horizontal 1 drive 1,
vertical 1 drive 3 Massive MIMO
Side lobe

a static beam may be generated by using an antenna Array: 16H4V

(four rows and eight columns of
Main lobe
architecture and a predefined weight matrix. dual-polarized)

• Dynamic beamforming: For PDSCH channels,

dynamic beams can be generated by using the antenna Narrow beam

architecture and automatically calculating the user

channel environment.

 Massive MIMO antennas are used in Ray tracing model

simulation prediction
• Integrates Huawei Massive MIMO antennas to obtain
accurate antenna beams and gains. Massive MIMO
• The beam scanning process of the modeling product Antenna
determines the beam ID access.
• The level and interference of the primary serving cell are
Ray tracing provides service channel weights
simulated by the beam corresponding to the Massive
MIMO antenna. to form narrow beams

Page 23
 Increasing TRX number for more Layers / Beamforming

8TRX 16TRX
32TRX（3D-MIMO） 64TRX（3D-MIMO）
• Antenna array： • Antenna array： • Antenna array： • Antenna array：
4x12/8H1V 8x12/16H1V 8x12/16H2V 8x12/16H4V
•One array with 12 Elements •One array with 12 Elements •One array with 6 Elements •One array with 3 Elements

660mm
Horizontal: 8T 8H vs. 16T/32T/64T 16H 3D Vertical: 32T 2V vs. 64T 4V

*Below comparison of capacity and coverage are based on the above MIMO configuration(8T/16T/32T/64T).
Page 24
 Data Channel Beamforming Pattern and Sweeping Range
8TRX(8H1V) 16TRX(16H1V) 32TRX(16H2V) 64TRX(16H4V)
HPBW: 26° HPBW: 13° HPBW: 13° HPBW: 13°

Horizontal
Beam
SER: 108° SER: 108° SER: 108° SER: 108°
HPBW: 6.5° HPBW: 6.5° HPBW: 6.5°
HPBW: 6.5°
Vertical
Beam
SER: Sweep Envelope Range SER: 14° SER: 28°

* 8H1V 0.5𝝀 16H1V 0.5𝝀

16H2V 0.5𝝀
（AAU5313)
16H4V 0.5𝝀
（AAU5613）

Array Gain (dBi) 21 23 23.8 25

PDSCH Beam Horizontal HPBW 26° 13° 13° 13°
PDSCH Beam Vertical HPBW 5.5° 6.5° 6.5° 6.5°
Horizontal Beam Sweeping Range 75°/ 90° (ATD4516R5/R8) -54°~ 54°(108°) -54°~ 54°(108°) -54°~ 54°(108°)

Vertical Beam Sweeping Range NA NA -7°~7°(14°) -14°~14°(28°)

Page 25
* These productions are under study and all of these information is estimated value
 Massive MIMO Antenna Pattern Comparison *Based on Huawei RAN2.0

8T 16T 32T 64T

SSB
Pattern

*16H1V_S0_H105V6 *16H2V_S0_H105V6 *16H4V_S0_H105V6

8T 16T 32T 64T

CSI
Pattern

Page 26
 Coverage Package: 3D Coverage Pattern
Flexible Patterns According to Coverage Scenario

17 Typical Beam Patterns Supported

Pattern Horizontal HPBW Vertical HPBW Tilt range Azimuth adjust range

0 105° 6° –2 to 9 0
2 16
1 110° 6° –2 to 9 –10 to 10
2 90° 6° –2 to 9 –22 to 22
3 65° 6° –2 to 9 –32 to 32
4 45° 6° –2 to 9 –42 to 42
5 25° 6° 0 to 6 0
Seashore 90 degree horizontal Vertical Beams for high building
6 110° 12° 0 to 6 –10 to 10
coverage
7 90° 12° 0 to 6 –22 to 22
8 65° 12° 0 to 6 –32 to 32
9 45° 12° 0 to 6 –42 to 42 12 1
10 25° 12° 0 to 6 –47 to 47
11 15° 12 N/A 0
12 110° 25° N/A –22 to 22
13 65° 25° N/A –32 to 32
14 45° 25° N/A –42 to 42
2 Horizontal layer beams for 8 Horizontal Beams for
15 25° 25° N/A –47 to 47
Square + building Square
16 15° 25° –2 to 9 0

FOFD-020206 3D Coverage Pattern 27

Page 27
 3D BF Can Improved Whole Cell Coverage By Vertical Sweeping
3D BF improve user experience by larger sweep envelope To keep average experience, 64TRX has 9-
range 10dB coverage gain than 8TRX
 16T/8T vertical HPBW 5.5 ◦ 8T8R（8H1V）
 32T vertical HPBW 14 ◦
 64T vertical HPBW 28 ◦ 30m

Cell Radius

32T32R（16H2V）

BF Gain Area geographic 30m

Cell Edge 6~8dB
64T/32T prove wider beam coverage compare to
16T/8T Cell Radius

8T 64T 64T64R（16H4V）

◦
+20 30m

9~10dB

90◦ 110◦ Cell Radius

Page 288T RRU5258 antenna ATD4516R5
Massive MIMO Pattern Selection _SSB based on Scenario

MM 3D Demonstration

Page 29
 Network Simulation

5G Network Planning with Cloud U-Net 5G Planning Platform

Input Key Technologies
Output
3D scenario
modeling
 DL RSRP coverage
prediction
Building  DL SINR coverage
3D prediction
Ray Tracing Model
Digital Map Calculation  DL Throughput
coverage prediction

 UL SINR coverage
Clutter Altitude User level
prediction
Dynamic beam
 UL Throughput
Engineering parameters and MML configuration
coverage prediction
Antenna Antenna Antenna Antenna
Position height direction downtilt
Network
Antenna type Cell power Cell config … performance
Simulation SSB/CSI-RS/PDSCH/PUSCH

Page 30
 Key Parameters and Calculation Process
Key Simulation Parameters Coverage Prediction Calculation Process

Propagation model Massive MIMO Interference modeling NR air interface

Longitude and latitude of the (Ray tracing model, (Common channel (Interference between
Engineering modeling
site/antenna, antenna height, XXX terminals and base
parameters experience static beam and (Demodulation
antenna azimuth, and mechanical tilt
statistics model) traffic channel stations) performance/frame
Frequency (GHz) 3.5GHz dynamic beam) structure/TDD
ratio/RB/overhead)
System Bandwidth (MHz) 100MHz

Subcarrier Bandwidth (kHz) 30KHz

Maximum Transmit Power (dBm) 53dBm

Transmit Antenna Gain(dBi) 24dBi

0.502λ (horizontal) 2.03λ Coverage

Massive Port spacing
(vertical)
MIMO level
Antennas eight (horizontal) four
Number of ports
(vertical)
Coverage
Ratio of upstream and downstream frames Commercial 4:1 quality
Transmit Power (dBm) 23

Receive UE Noise factor 9

Antenna Gain (dBi) 3

Penetration loss (dB) 26(Dense urban)/22(Urban) Single user

peak rate
Network
planning Slow Fading Margin(dB) 9(Dense Urban)/8 (Urban)
parameters

Area Coverage Probability Requirement 95%

Page 31
LG U+ 5G 100AAU Pre-Commercial Simulation
LG U+ Gangnan 5G eMBB trial planning and summit demonstration 5G 100AAU Pre-commercial netowork planning and deployment
Verification：
Planning：13 sites planning and simulation Dense Urban
RSRP mean error<1dB
RSRP Simulation VS Industrial park
option5 Measurement
100

80

60 Urban High-rise residential

40
SSB RSRP
100% GangNam
20 Magok

CDF(%)
Yongsan
50%
0
-90 -80 -70 -60 -50
DL_RSRP_Simulation RSRP(dBm)
DL RSRP_Measurement Highway 0%
-110 -100 -90 -80 -70 -60

 5 typical scenario with different service/target speed, this will be the

5G user case and DT demonstration: Drone, AR/VR broadcasting, Speedtest
reference for large scale 5G rollout.
 100 AAU planning simulation and verification.
 LG U+ grant Huawei with 5G network planning and optimization contract

Simulation RAN1.0 DT
Page 3232
 Hangzhou 5G Gbps No.1 City with China Mobile
Cooperation：5G planning topic cooperation with Hangzhou Mobile Planning for 5G Gbps Route demonstration
Wulin Area Dense Urban Qianjiang New Town CBD

Simulation & Model 5.17 Gbps DT route 100 trial site 300 site pre-
calibration route simulation and DT for China commercial
evaluation
Mobile Group Qingfang Area Urban West Lake Attractions

2018年1月~4月 5月 8月 10月~

West Lake
 RAYCE Model verification on different scenarios：Rayce model outperforms
Aster model，total RMSE is 9.7% better

Wulin Area

 Site selection/new site suggestion based on simulation，Guarantee Gbps

route demonstration
 Typical scenario model calibration and indoor penetration test，prepare for
large scale commercial
 13AAU DT verification，simulation compare with DT： average ~0.2dB，
RMSE~7.6

1
0.9
3.5GHz DL 3.5GHz UL 1.8GHz UL 实测
DT 仿真
Simulation 0.8
0.7
( ≥100M@%) ( ≥5M@%) ( ≥5M@%) 0.6
0.5
THP 0.4
73.6% 65.6% 78.0% 0.3
(Mbps) 0.2
0.1
0
98+22 site in 13.8Km²，ISD ~350m
-100 -95 -90 -85 -80 -75 -70 -65 -60 -55 -50

Page 3333
 Key Parameters Assumption for Hong Kong C Project
3.5GHz 3.5GHz 28GHz
Parameter
64T64R 32T32R 4T4R
Antenna Element 192 192 768

gNB Channel Bandwidth(MHz) 50 50 600

Subcarrier Spacing(kHz) 30 30 120
gNB Power per carrier(dBm) 53 53 and 50 34
gNB Antenna Gain(dBi) 25 24 31
UE Antenna Gain(dBi) 0 0 5

Terminal Terminal Tx Power 23 23 21

(UE) Terminal Height(m) 1.5m 1.5m 1.5m
Terminal Type 2T4R 2T4R 2T4R

Predication Propagation Model Huawei Ray Tracing Model Huawei Ray Tracing Model Huawei Ray Tracing Model
Parameter
Penetration Loss_One wall(dB) 22 22 38

https://cloudunet-fr.inhuawei.com:31943/unet/assets/html/index.html#/job

Page 34
 Case Study

3.5GHz Coverage Predictions Based on Network Simulation

Causeway Bay铜锣湾 (Dense Urban)
32T 100W 32T 200W 64T 200W

Bandwidth Edge Edge

Area Scenario Freq gNB AVG RSRP
(MHz) RSRP(5%) Throughput(5%)

32T32R 100W -90.12 -114.84 70.68

Causeway Bay Dense Urban 3.5G 32T32R 200W 50MHZ -87.39 -112.16 103.97
64T64R 200W -85.34 -110.81 115.82

Page 35
 Case Study

mmWave Coverage Predictions Based on Network Simulation

CSI RSRP Value

CDF 86% -115dBm

 mmWave can provide outdoor coverage (>300Mbps @86% area) by reusing 4G sites, is suitable for hot zone
coverage
 Indoor coverage is very poor due to large path loss and large penetration loss of mmWave

Page 36
Thank You.
Copyright©2016 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
The information in this document may contain predictive statements including, without
limitation, statements regarding the future financial and operating results, future product
portfolio, new technology, etc. There are a number of factors that could cause actual
results and developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the
predictive statements. Therefore, such information is provided for reference purpose
only and constitutes neither an offer nor an acceptance. Huawei may change the
information at any time without notice.