Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/322209804
CITATIONS READS
0 1,511
4 authors, including:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Marulu Reddy Seelam on 02 January 2018.
Abstract: The present study analyzes elementary education in terms of enrolment with reference to Right to
Education Act 2009 with secondary data obtained from the annual report of National University of Educational
Planning and Administration (NUEPA).The time period consider for this study is span of 12 years from 2004-05
to 2015-16 and divided into 2 sub-periods with reference to Right to Education Act 2009 i.e., Before RTE Act
(2004-05 to 2009-10) and After RTE Act (2010-11 to 2015-16) for the purpose of our study. The study
considers all states and union territories of India as population and 17 states are selected as sample states.
Annual Average Growth Rates, Mean and Standard Deviation are calculated for fruitful results. Three statistical
tests are employed to test the statistical significance of variations in enrolment across the selected states. The
result reveals that the average growth of enrolment is better in pre RTE Act period than post RTE Act period.
The estimated average growth and distribution of enrolment during pre RTE Act differ significantly from that of
post RTE Act and showing better trend during pre RTE Act. The implementation of RTE Act not contributed in
declaiming enrolment in government and private schools. The average growths of girl’s enrolment during pre
RTE Act is positive and more during post RTE Act. The estimated average growth and distribution of girl’s
enrolment during pre RTE Act differ significantly from that of post RTE Act. The implementation of RTE Act
has positive impact in growth of girl’s enrolment.
I. INTRODUCTION
Education is the root cause for any change which takes place in the social, cultural, spiritual, political
and economic aspects of human life. It is education which not only transforms the human animal into a rational
human being but also prepares him to survive and adjust with surroundings so as to lead his personal as well
social(Samuel, 2011). Education is constant a process of development if innate power of man which are natural,
harmonious and progressive. It is said that in the 21st century, a nation ability to convert knowledge in to the
wealth and social good through the process of innovation is going to determine its future (Malik, 2012).
The UN declared Convention on Rights of Children that recognise education for all children of the
world as the fundamental rights of a child in 1989 but India recognised it in 2002 (Garje, 2011). The Right to
Education comprises two main dimensions: ‘entitlement’ and ‘empowerment’ (Singh, 2004). The right to
education thus acts as an enabling right that functions as the voice through which rights can be claimed and
protected. It is therefore an important stepping stone to improve the social situation of the people. Globally,
right to education derives its legal basis from Article 26(1) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
(UDHR), which states that “Everyone has the right to education”. Education shall be free, at least in the
elementary and fundamental stages. An increasing emphasis has been placed in recent years on right based
approach to development the paradigm-shift on the importance of Right to Education is instrumental in the
realisation of the other complementary rights as well (EFA, 2005).
The importance of education for the upliftment of the individual is universally acknowledged. It is a
recognized fundamental human right. Education is an important tool for empowerment envisaged under the
Constitution of India (Anil, 2009). The Government of India made an amendment (86th Constitutional
Amendment Act 2002) in article 45 of the Constitution and provided education as fundamental right of all
children (Garje, 2011). Consequently the constitution was amended in 2002, but the Act, required implementing
article 21A inserted by the 86th amendment Act was passed only seven years later in 2009 (RTE Forum,
2009).With the enforcement of RTE Act 2009, education has now become a fundamental right of every child in
this country. However, it is to be noted that for India as a whole, 19 per cent of the children in the age group 6–
17 years are still out of school (Planning Commission, 2011).
The purpose of the RTE Act 2009 was to give a boost to the universalization of primary education by
increasing enrolment and retention in the primary education. While most of the educational statistics are based
on enrolment, because of enrolment is the key indicator of education status at primary level. Enrolment is the
number of students registered on the rolls of an educational institution on a specific point of time. In the Indian
context, the enrolment refers to the number of children enrolled as on 30th September of the academic session.
Gross enrolment is the total enrolment of pupils in a grade or cycle or level of education, regardless of age, in a
given school year. Net enrolment is the number of pupils in the official school age-group in a grade or cycle or
level of education in a given school year (Aggarwal & Thakur, 2003).
The Right to Education (RTE) Act came into effect in 2010. The Act received huge acclaim, and
experts said it would change the education system in India. The mandates of RTE Act apply not only to publicly
funded government schools, but also to all schools wishing to remain operational in India. After crossing six
years of its implementation, it remains to be seen whether the Act has been implemented well enough to make a
significant impact in the lives of children and whether it will truly serve to improve the quality of education. In
this context it would be appropriate to conduct a study on implementation of Right to Education Act with
special reference to enrolment of elementary education.
among its stakeholders. By providing some recommendations the study calls for some necessary actions by the
government to improve the implementation status of the RTE Act in Himachal Pradesh.
KPMG & CII (2016) found that the RTE Act has been able to bring an improvement in the enrolment
in primary section. The Net Enrolment Rate (NER) in primary education increased from 84.5 per cent in
FY2005-06 to 88.08per cent in FY2013-14. An improvement has been recorded in the enrolment number of
girls in the upper primary section. The percentage of girls’ total enrolment in upper primary has increased from
48 per cent in FY2009-10 to 49 per cent in FY2013-14.
after RTE Act period clearly shown that the Primary with Upper Primary Schools declining trend in selected
States(Table-1).
estimated average growth and distribution of enrolment during pre RTE Act differ significantly from that of post
RTE Act (Table -3).
The average growth of girl’s enrolment of 18 states for government primary and upper primary schools
during the pre RTE Act (0.28 and 1.71) is higher than post RTE Act (-0.03 and 0.07). It shows that the average
growths of girl’s enrolment during pre RTE Act is positive and more during post RTE Act. The standard
deviation of growth during post RTE Act is smaller than pre RTE and it shows that the growth of t girl’s
enrolment has stable in the post RTE Act period than pre RTE Act period. The inception of RTE Act has no
impact in growth of girl’s enrolment and there are mean differs in growth of teachers during pre and post RTE
Act (Table-5).
Analysis of variance was conducted to examine the statistical significance of above mentioned
differences during before and after RTE Act regarding growth of girl’s enrolment with parametric and non-
parametric tests. Panel - A of Table presents the results of a series of t-test and the null hypothesis of no
difference in estimated average growth of girl’s enrolment between before and after RTE Act. The null
hypothesis is rejected in all cases. Hence, the study concludes that there exists a significant difference in average
growth of girl’s enrolment during pre and post reform periods. Panel B of the Table provides the results of the
F-test which is also reveals the above conclusion. The average growth of girl’s enrolment during pre RTE Act
differs significantly from that of post RTE Act in government and private schools. Panel-C of table provides the
results of Kruskal-Wallis Test and discloses that the distribution of growth of enrolment between pre RTE Act
and post RTE Act is significantly defers in all category of schools. We note that the null hypothesis is rejected in
most of the instances, indicating that the estimated average growth and distribution of girl’s enrolment during
pre RTE Act differ significantly from that of post RTE Act (Table-6).
V. CONCLUSION
The similar kind of pattern has been observed in growth of enrolment in government primary schools
during before and after RTE Act Periods. In majority States, the enrolment in primary education is sowing
declining trend during before and after the RTE Act. The trend during before RTE Act clearly indicate that the
enrolment in upper primary schools under government management noticed mixed and after RTE Act period
clearly shown that in upper primary schools enrolment is declining in selected States. The study found that the
annual growth rate of during before RTE, the enrolment in primary Schools under private management
increasing trend and after RTE Act period declining trend in selected States. Further, the enrolment before RTE
Act in upper Primary Schools under Private management is increasing and after RTE Act period is declining in
selected States. In majority States, girl’s enrolment in primary schools and upper primary schools is sowing
increasing trend during before and after the RTE Act.
The result reveals that the average growth of enrolment is better in pre RTE Act period than post RTE
Act period. The estimated average growth and distribution of enrolment during pre RTE Act differ significantly
from that of post RTE Act and showing better trend during pre RTE Act. The implementation of RTE Act not
contributed in declaiming enrolment in government and private schools. The average growths of girl’s
enrolment during pre RTE Act is positive and more during post RTE Act. The estimated average growth and
distribution of girl’s enrolment during pre RTE Act differ significantly from that of post RTE Act. The
implementation of RTE Act has positive impact in growth of girl’s enrolment.
REFERENCES
[1]. Aggarwal, Y. P. & Thakur, R. S. (2003).Concepts and Terms in Educational Planning A Guidebook.
Operations Research and Systems Management Unit, National Institute of Educational Planning and
Administration, New Delhi.
[2]. Anil R. Nair, (2009). Accessing Education: Legal Perspectives. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Cochin
University of Science & Technology, Kerala.
[3]. Bhatnagar, S. & Gill, S. (2014). Right to Education: Comparative Analysis of different countries. Journal
of Research in Humanities and Social Science, 2(2), 29-32.
[4]. Das, A. (2010) Right to Education. (First edn), Axis Publications, New Delhi.
[5]. Garje, A. (2011) 'Right to Education Act, 2009', Available at SSRN 1834282. Available at
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1834282
[6]. Gupta, S.P (2007). Statistical Methods, Sultan Chand & Sons Publications, New Delhi.
[7]. Jha, P. & Parvati, P. (2010). Right to Education Act 2009: Critical Gaps and Challenges. Economic and
Political Weekly, 45(13), 20-23.
[8]. Kanji, G. K. (2006).100 statistical tests. Sage publications, New Delhi.
[9]. Kaushal, M. (2012). Implementation of Right to Education in India: Issues and Concerns. Journal of
Management and Public Policy, 4(1), 42-48.
[10]. Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age International, New
Delhi.
[11]. KPMG & CII (2016).Assessing the impact of Right to Education Act, Ministry of Human Resource
Development, Govt. of India. New Delhi.
[12]. Malakar, R., &Mahato, A. (2015). Implementation Status of Right to Education (RTE) Act 2009 in
Tripura: A Critical Analysis. MGIRED Journal, 2(1), 90 - 100
[13]. Malik K. P. (2012). Right to Elementary Education. Allahabad Law Agency, New Delhi, p. 1.
[14]. Ojha, S. S. (2013). Implementing Right to Education: Issues and challenges. Research Journal of
Educational Sciences, 1(2), 1-7.
[15]. Planning Commission (2011).India Human Development Report – Towards Social Inclusion. New Delhi:
Institute of Applied Manpower Research and Planning Commission, Government of India, Oxford
University Press.
[16]. Puar, S. S. (2012). Right to Education Act: A Critical Analysis, International Journal of Educational and
Psychological Research, 1(2), 27-30.
[17]. RTE Forum, (2009).Vision Paper. Right to Education Forum, New Delhi.
[18]. Samuel, R. S. (2011). A comprehensive study of education. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd., p. 3.
[19]. Singh, K. (2004). Right to Education and International Law: UNESCO’s Normative Action. Indian
Journal of International Law, 44(1), 489.
[20]. Singh, V. (2016).Status of implementation of the Right to Education Act, 2009 in Himachal
Pradesh. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Applied Science, 2 (1), 491-505.
[21]. Singh, Y. K. (2006). Fundamental of research methodology and statistics. New Age International, New
Delhi.
[22]. The Universal Declaration of Human Right (UDHR),” UN website, http://www.un.org/en/documents/
udhr/index.shtml,
[23]. UNESCO, (2004). Global Monitoring Report 2005, Education for All: The Quality Imperative,
UNESCO, Paris.