Beyond Omicron: What You Need to Know about the

Never-Ending Variants

Omicron Facts vs. Myths & Misconceptions — And Why There’s No Need to Panic

One month into Omicron’s detection and almost two years trapped under the COVID
narrative, the world continues to grapple and thrive amid this fear-stricken pandemic.

The introduction of the Omicron variant sent the world into a media-driven panic mode
once again. But while it was found to be highly transmissible, numerous studies have
shown that Omicron is far less severe than previous variants.

What We Know So Far

● According to the CDC website, on November 24, 2021, a new variant was
reported to the World Health Organization and was tagged as variant B.1.1.529
(Pango Lineage). This new variant was first detected in specimens collected on
November 11, 2021 in Botswana and on November 14, 2021 in South Africa. On
November 26, 2021, WHO classified it as a Variant of Concern (VOC) and
labeled it Omicron.

● Though Omicron was first reported from South Africa, its exact origin is still
unknown. Scientists in South Africa first confirmed detection of this variant that
has about 50 mutations — 36 of which are in the spike protein, allowing the
virus to attach to human cells and invade them.These multiple mutations make
Omicron more transmissible and more likely to evade the body’s immune
defense.

● Since December 1, when the first case was confirmed in the United States,
Omicron has been reported in more than 100 countries. It is expected to become
the dominant variant worldwide.

● One of Denmark’s top virologists, Dr. Anders Fomsgaard, suggests that

Omicron’s origins were perhaps connected to HIV, as the virus could have come
from an immunocompromised person whose body couldn’t kill it off — allowing it
to grow and mutate.
 ● Dr. Fomsgaard thinks that Omicron may deepen people’s immunity and could
push the virus into something less menacing (like the annual flu), but will not be
able to eradicate it fully. It could jump into rodents and back to humans again,
and re-mutate into yet another variant. He described the coronavirus as a
“master mutator” and clearly, with vaccination, humans are driving the virus into a
corner, where it can either weaken or change. “It could come out on the other
end even weaker,” Fomsgaard said. “But that is risky business. It might hit
another jackpot mutation”

Transmission and Seriousness

Since its emergence, Omicron has repeatedly been found to be more contagious, but
less severe in terms of sickness than the Delta variant. Hospitalization and death rates
for Omicron are much lower than they are for previous COVID infections.

● On December 14, 2021, the President of Cornell University notified students that
its Ithaca, New York campus, where it has about 25,600 students, would be shut
down. This was due to a reported 903 COVID-19 cases among students between
December 7-13, 2021. A high percentage of them were fully-vaccinated
individuals. Cornell’s overall vaccination rate among students is 99%, a
portion of whom had also received a booster shot.

● In South Africa, where the variant was first reported, hospitalizations may have
reached their peak as case counts have declined and are down by 20% in the
last week. Notably, South Africa recorded nearly 27,000 new cases nationwide
but those numbers dropped to 15,424 within a week — signaling that the
country’s dramatic surge in Omicron cases had peaked. That short wave
has shown that it was not very severe in terms of hospitalizations and
deaths.

● The South African Medical Research Council conducted a significant study in

collaboration with Discovery Health, a large health insurance company that
shows reduced risks of hospitalization and severe disease in people infected with
Omicron versus the Delta variant. This study looked at more than 200,000
COVID cases in South Africa during the Delta-driven surge in September and
October, and the beginning of the Omicron-driven surge in November as it began
increasing rapidly in the region. About a quarter of the people in the study
already have chronic illness, putting them at higher risk of severe COVID.
Researchers found that the risk of hospitalization for adults dropped 30%
during the early days of Omicron surge from the levels seen in September
 and October. Hospital admissions are the lowest of the 4 COVID waves, and
are ONE THIRD of what they were during the Delta surge.

● Scientists from the National Institute for Communicable Diseases, University of

Witwatersrand, and the University of Cape Town in South Africa studied 161,328
COVID-19 cases, reported nationally between October 1 and December 6, 2021.
They found that 2.5% of people with Omicron were admitted to the hospital
compared with 12.8% of people with the Delta variant during this time
period.

● Researchers from the University of Edinburgh in Scotland studied data on 23,840

Omicron cases and 126,511 Delta cases, from November 1 to December 19,
2021. For Omicron, there were 15 hospital admissions (0.06%) versus Delta
having 856 hospital admissions (0.68%).

● In a study from the LKS Faculty of Medicine at Hong Kong University, Dr. Michael
Chan Chi-wai and his team also found that Omicron multiplies 70 times faster
than Delta but replicates 10 times slower in the lungs, an indication of lower
disease severity.

● In London, England, where a large number of Omicron cases were reported,

infected people were asked about their symptoms through the ZOE COVID Study
App under the ZOE Symptom Tracking Study. The latest data shows most
people reported having common cold symptoms: runny nose, headache,
sore throat, and sneezing. With fewer people getting severely ill, this study
suggests that Omicron is indeed a milder variant.

With concrete ground data from South Africa and study results from Scotland, Hong
Kong, and the UK indicating that Omicron, though easily transmissible, has caused
fewer hospital admissions and severe cases than the Delta variant, it is puzzling why
governments around the world are determined to enforce mask and vaccine mandates.
Why does the mainstream media continue to wreak fear with news of a serious global
risk when evolving science on Omicron reveals the contrary? Why are we being led to
believe that another booster shot is necessary to fight off the Omicron variant? Is there
really a cause for panic or are we just being driven into another rollercoaster ride of
vaccine-induced dystopia, where everyone’s freedom to decide for their own life is at
stake?
Booster Fail: Some Countries Already Pushing the FOURTH Shot

“Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different
results." — Albert Einstein

Government authorities and Big Pharma once promised us that "vaccines work". They
urged — and forced — people to get vaccinated, repeatedly. With the discovery of the
Omicron variant in late November 2021, they are now promoting the need for a fourth
shot to declare a person safe from COVID — despite several top medical experts
warning of serious consequences.

● On December 21, Israel became the first country in the world to approve the
fourth shot for the elderly, immunocompromised people, and its health care
workers.

● The Israeli government’s health ministry panel recommended the country begin
offering a fourth COVID vaccine dose within 5 days. Prime Minister Naftali
Bennet immediately welcomed it saying it’s "great news that will help us
overcome the Omicron wave that is spreading around the world."

● However, on December 23, The Times of Israel reported that country’s health
minister director-general, Dr. Nachman Ash, may not endorse the panel’s
recommendation, because he has been examining data from Britain
indicating the Omicron variant is less severe than the Delta strain.

● Also on December 23, The New York Times reported “some scientists warned
that the plan could backfire, because too many shots might cause a sort of
immune system fatigue, compromising the body’s ability to fight the
coronavirus.”

● Along with the generally sparse knowledge about Omicron, the effect of a fourth
dose against the new variant is also unknown. But the country’s medical
experts point to waning immunity in those 60 or older, who were the first to
receive the third shot starting in August. The presentation showed a
doubling of the rate of infection from Delta among the 60-plus age group
within four or five months of the third shot.

● “Prof. Hagai Levine, an epidemiologist and chairman of the Israel Association of

Public Health Physicians, said that Israel was not seeing a sharp rise in
infections yet — daily infections are at around 1,200 a day, down from 11,000 at
 the peak of the Delta wave in August — and there was no evidence that a
fourth shot was needed to prevent severe illness from Omicron.”

● Interestingly, Israel pioneered the “third shot” for at-risk people. Since then, over
four million Israelis have received the third dose. It begs the question that, if the
third shot didn’t work, why do they think the fourth shot will work?

● Germany was the second country to announce their plan for a fourth shot to
tackle Omicron. Health minister Karl Lauterback has ordered 80 million doses of
BioNtech vaccine that is expected to arrive in Germany by May. He also ordered
4 million doses of the newly approved Novavax and 11 million doses of Valneva
(which is still waiting for authorization).

● Dr. Anthony Fauci stated US health officials are discussing the prospect of rolling
out the fourth COVID shot for Americans. He added they would eventually
change the definition of "fully vaccinated" to someone who has received all
vaccine doses.

● Not surprisingly, Pfizer’s chief executive, Albert Bourla, once projected that a
fourth dose might be needed 12 months after the third shot. However, on CNBC's
"Squawk Box", he said, “we may need it faster.”

● Pfizer is currently working on another COVID vaccine that specifically targets

Omicron. They said it would be delivered within 100 days, pending regulatory
approval.

● Although Dr. Fauci, Bourla, and other health officials are keen on rolling out the
fourth COVID shot, The World Health Organization's (WHO) chief scientist,
Soumya Swaminathan said “The boosters are, unfortunately, probably not
the solution to this” — however, the WHO is not ruling out the need for
boosters in the future.

● It’s also worth noting the statement from another WHO official. In a recent
briefing in Geneva, WHO's director-general, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, said
“Blanket booster programs are likely to prolong the pandemic rather than
ending it.”

Omicron may have proven itself more infectious than its predecessors: however, it's still
unclear whether this new variant is more severe than delta. Earlier data from South
Africa's private hospitals have shown that cases of the new variant in the country
appear to be much milder than the previous infection waves.

Using Fear and Bribery to Force Compliance of Never Ending Boosters

Almost two years into the COVID pandemic, the narrative from our public officials and
health authorities has had little to no change. Time and again, “getting the jab done”
was offered as the best solution to counter numerous COVID strains, although
authoritative health officials have clarified since the beginning that the vaccines
do not grant immunity nor do they prevent transmission of the virus from one
individual to another.

To make matters worse, in spite of the never-ending fear mongering, mandates,

coercion, and bribery, we are nowhere near the finish line. After being deluged with the
narrative that getting both doses of the vaccine was the most effective course of action,
we were again dumbfounded when the same officials announced months back that the
vaccines require a booster shot — allegedly to counter new strains or to prolong the
“effectiveness” of the vaccines. It would seem that, for as long as the virus
continues to exist and new strains are discovered, the number of booster shots
would also increase.

Now, with the occurrence of the new COVID strain, the Omicron variant, known to be far
more contagious yet much less severe than the Delta variant, officials are again pushing
the same failed narrative to get the jab done. And as occurred when the COVID-19
vaccines first became available, they are utilizing fear and bribes to incentivize
compliance.

● New York CIty restaurant owner, Danny Meyer, founder of Burger Palace and
Gramercy Tavern, announced that starting January 1, all diners, staffers, and
new employees must get a booster shot if they want to eat or work at his
three restaurants. These individuals will be required to show proof of their
booster vaccination at the door.

● And as a way of motivating the masses to get the shot, Meyer highlighted on
his social media account the city’s $100 incentive for anyone who gets a
booster. The incentive was the order of the city’s Mayor Bill De Blasio, reviving
the $100 payout for booster shots received by December 31 at eligible clinics
around town.
 ● Walmart reintroduced its COVID vaccine incentive for frontline associates to
receive $150 after they become fully vaccinated.

● West Virginia is offering a $50 incentive to their citizens to become vaccinated.

● In Vermont, rather than targeting hesitant adults who often aren’t persuaded to
get a vaccine or booster for cash, Gov. Phil Scott and the Agency of Education
announced the School Vaccine Incentive Program in which schools that
achieve a student vaccination rate of 85% or higher will be eligible for a minimum
award of $2,000 and a potential maximum of $15,000 for schools over 90%
vaccinated.

● Governor Kathy Hochul of New York announced the new 'Ski for Free'
COVID-19 vaccine incentive sweepstakes for children ages five to 11 and
booster shot recipients.

● The New Jersey Department of Health leveraged a child to pressure parents

by running a commercial of a boy asking Santa for the COVID-19 vaccine instead
of games and toys.

Israel became the first nation in the world to administer a fourth shot of the
Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for individuals over the age of 60 and its medical personnel.
That’s because getting only the first two doses leaves individuals vulnerable and at a
higher risk of getting Omicron — since immunity gained from the first two shots
wanes within a few months.

This plan was met with a warning from some scientists concerned that a fourth
shot might cause immune system fatigue, severely compromising the body’s
ability to fight the coronavirus.

● Dr. Anthony Fauci, Chief Medical Advisor to the President of the U.S, along with
Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, are considering the idea of administering a fourth
shot to Americans in the coming months as well.

● Premier Mark McGowan confirmed that Western Australia became the first
jurisdiction to introduce mandatory COVID-19 booster shots to more than
one million workers in its essential industries. These include those who are
working in healthcare, aged care, quarantine, and mining. McGowan said, “You
need to start thinking about booking a third dose as soon as possible
before Omicron comes into our community.” Although booster shots are not
 compulsory for the rest of WA’s population, McGowan did not rule out its
possibility and confirmed that its scope may widen in the future, especially for
those who want to attend concerts and sporting matches — in other words,
anyone who wants to do normal day-to-day activities.

Big Brother: CCTV Cameras & Vaccine Passport Microchips — What’s Next?

In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, public health officials have shifted from traditional
public health surveillance to innovative technology, such as tracking applications, to
restrict the spread of SARS-CoV-2.

These new surveillance tools underscore long-standing public health issues

between individual rights and the common good. They are also at the core of a
number of current issues, including the loss of privacy online, the monetization of
online data, and the abuse of online surveillance by governments. These
tendencies are seen as establishing "surveillance states" and new kinds of "surveillance
capitalism" that have the potential to degrade human rights and weaken
democracy.

● During pandemics, public health surveillance is thought to be very important for

preventing and stopping the spread of a disease. These public health data, on
the other hand, can be very personal and private, and they can show a lot
about a person's lifestyle, habits, and health. It has always been a concern for
people's rights when these kinds of surveillance technologies have grown.

● Digital health surveillance raises four main concerns for human rights, and
these concerns risk undermining the public health surveillance system. The
efficacy of digital tools for global health surveillance is questionable. Making
digital surveillance tools contingent on downloading them could be discriminatory
toward already disadvantaged people. In India, for instance, contact tracing app
Aarogya Setu has now become mandatory for all employees.

● Mandatory requirements to download and use such apps would mean that they
have to buy new models of smartphones. The long-term nature of the
COVID-19 crisis has led to fears that a new extended regime of health
surveillance could entail permanent, intrusive surveillance. Digital
surveillance apps could be linked to comprehensive medical records and used to
determine healthcare access. Data could also lead to discriminatory exclusions
(such as pre-existing conditions) and differential pricing by insurance companies.
● In Bucheon, South Korea, government officials are planning to use over 10,000
surveillance cameras to try out face-recognition technology to spy on people who
have been infected with the virus so they can track their movements and make
sure they wear masks. The massive surveillance scheme “harvests credit
card records, cell phone location data, and closed-circuit television (CCTV)
footage, among other personal information.”

● The availability and use of a large, publicly available database of personal

images has prompted apparent issues about privacy. “The subject of facial
recognition software is particularly controversial, especially when it comes to
matters of privacy,” the Daily Wire noted.

● Moscow is using facial recognition technology to ensure that anyone told to

remain at home or at their hotels during a coronavirus quarantine comply. A
freelance journalist, Andrey Kaganskikh, stated that “it was possible to
purchase access to the system.” Dealers on Russian internet forums offer to
conduct people searches similar to those conducted by law enforcement officers.

● Kaganskikh stated in a report for the independent Russian news organization

MBKhMedia that he paid one dealer to conduct a search for him using his
photos. The dealer sent a dossier containing approximately 200 screenshots
from cameras where the system believed it detected him. However, despite the
fact that several of the persons in the photographs resembled him, Kaganskikh
stated that none of them were truly him. While Kaganskikh believes the
surveillance system has legitimate applications, he believes it was introduced
with little debate and few legal safeguards, making it ripe for abuse. He stated
that the epidemic was hastening the system's spread.

● Epicenter, a Stockholm-based business, recently presented a new approach to

carry a COVID vaccine passport – in the form of a microchip inserted
beneath the skin. The implant is readable by any device that supports the
near-field communication (NFC) protocol – the same technology that enables
contactless payments and keyless entry devices. '’In case your phone runs out
of battery, it's always accessible to you. So of course, that's how we use
this technology today, next year we are going to use it for something else,'’
said Hannes Sjöblad, Epicenter’s chief distribution officer.
 ● Mobile tracking's underlying idea – that users are inextricably linked to their
phones - conflicts with the experience of those who share devices, cannot afford
regular service, or face frequent internet outages.

● Human rights organizations argue that as surveillance capabilities improve, it

may be difficult for governments to draw back. Additionally, experts are
concerned that surveillance methods such as a person's location data may be
ineffective and that there may be no timeline for when governments will
cease collecting such data.

● According to Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), a nonprofit digital privacy

advocacy group, “one of the big problems of this digital surveillance is that
collection of certain data like phone location, hasn’t been proven to be
effective in tracking the spread of the virus.

● “Because new government dragnet location surveillance powers are such a

menace to our digital rights, governments should not be granted these
powers unless they can show the public how these powers would actually
help, in a significant manner, to contain COVID-19,” the EFF said.

Dr. Peter McCullough’s Treatment Protocol

[00:10:21] Dr Peter McCullough: So here's probably the biggest update and now the
featured approach for Omicron, which should have been our featured approach from the
onset of the pandemic. But we learned about it late. The randomized trials and data
came in late, and that is the use of virus sidel nasal and oral washes. There has been a
preoccupation on masks, social distancing, hand sanitizers. None of those things impact
whatsoever. The patient who actually has inhaled enough inoculum of the virus and has
that virus in the nasal passages. Once the virus is a nasal passages, it finds a warm,
mucus laden sets of cavities where the virus can replicate in the nasal venoms. In fact,
those who've had COVID 19? No, because you can feel it right in the face. One can
lose their sense of taste and smell because the olfactory nerve at the roof of the nasal
cavity is now inflamed with SARS-CoV-2. But since the virus is in the nasal cavity
without exception, in fact, people know that because that's how we test, we put a swab
way up in the nose. That's how we test for it. So it should be obvious to everyone who
gets COVID 19, the virus is up in the nose. That should be obvious. So if the virus is up
in the nose, it is reasonable to actually kill the virus in the nose. And the question is,
how do you kill it? We now know it can be killed with pervading iodide. Pablo, nine, is
known as Baradine. It's sold as a liquid in a bottle that we use to sterilize wounds. That
bulk distribution of it is a 10 percent solution. We can actually dilute that one to 10. So
conveniently, that's a half a teaspoon in a shot glass of water, which is point five CCS.
And that solution, which should be the consistency of dark tea, can be squirted or
sprayed up in the nose, sniff back and then spit out very important and bring it all the
way back and then spit it out and then do it twice on either side. That's an effective
nasal wash that is tremendously valuable for people to understand that can be used for
common colds that can be used for bacterial sinusitis. Iodine kills germs. That's the
reason why we use it to sterilize the skin when we do surgeries and other procedures.
Sounds like you like that better [00:12:33][132.8]

[00:12:34] Jonathan Otto: than budesonide or hydrogen peroxide? [00:12:36][2.6]

[00:12:37] Dr Peter McCullough: Well, that if someone cannot tolerate it, there is an
iodine allergy. They have a hyper functioning thyroid problem like graves disease or
hyper function, and they can't take it and we need something else to use. What else can
we use? We can use hydrogen peroxide. Hydrogen peroxide is more noxious to tissues
anybody's ever poured. Hydrogen peroxide in a wound will see it bubble up, and it'll
hurt. So hydrogen peroxide is more noxious. The current available over the counter
hydrogen peroxide has to be diluted basically one two three one two three. So that
would be three quarters of a teaspoon in a 1.5 cc's of water, a shot glass and then that
can also be squirted up or sniffed up. But if it burns, it means it's too strong. Many can't
tolerate that, so it has to be nebulizer. So if we nebulizer hydrogen peroxide and we
actually sniff it into the the passages that can be done. So hydrogen peroxide, I think, is
a second best to provide an idea and just because of the nature of what hydrogen
peroxide is. It can also be improved upon if one can tolerate a little bit of iodine with
adding a few drops of little girls item. Turns out, though, that the virus, just like with hand
sanitizers, the virus is easily killed by many substances. The virus is also killed by a
whole variety of other substances, including colloidal silver, including sodium
hypochlorite, potentially other spices, herbs and spices. People have tried a whole
variety of naturopathic remedies that actually seem to symptomatically work. But what
we know from the published data is there are 12 poveda and iodine studies and one of
them a large, high quality, prospective randomized trial. In total, there are nearly 900
patients in clinical trials, and there's. Absolutely no doubt with early treatment, it
dramatically reduces the risk of hospitalization and death by zapping the virus, killing
the virus in the nasal passages. We reduce the intensity and duration of symptoms. And
by that mechanism, reduce the risk of hospitalization and death. We probably actually
reduce the risk of invasiveness. There's actually less virus that can invade the body. So
how often do we recommend this stuff every four hours with acute illness? We can do it
twice a day for prevention, and it's extraordinary. The impact this is inexpensive. It's
universally available, and the innovation came from the East came from Bangladesh
and other countries around it. And the information emerged in 2021. I am remorseful
that I couldn't help more patients with this simple recommendation. Now this is a
uniform recommendation and I get patient after patient saying, Wow, I'm already better.
I'm already very particularly. Omicron Omicron is a high intensity, very quickly replicating
virus. It's perfect. The more fast a virus replicates, the more amenable it is to something
that's going to kill it. OK. So I think very, very important. And here are the published
metadata on this 71 percent improvement across all the studies. The big study is by
Chowdhary and colleagues for the outcomes of measurement for late treatment even
late later in disease. Forty four percent improvement. Who would not try it even later in
disease? And then finally, for prophylaxis, about forty five percent preventive. But only
one study, the seat study from Singapore that attempted to show that it was a relatively
large study. But the point is, even preventively, it plays a role and all depends on how
assiduous one is in doing that. So we have some, I think, some universe of ours to
conclude. I would want to say that one, no matter where they are, can have a COVID 19
readiness kit, a COVID 19 survival kit at this point in time. COVID 19 should not be a
surprise. We're two years into this and doctors are still getting calls. Doctor, I'm
surprised I got COVID, so I know everyone's going to get COVID. It looks like we're
going to get COVID more than once now with Omicron, even the recovered and
vaccinated, everyone is going to get COVID. So if we just plan that everyone's going to
get this illness, it's mild. It's a mild respiratory illness. What we have in our home toolkit,
we would have provided an iodine as our nasal virus, hydrotherapy and a bottle of it's
going to last forever because we use such a dilute solution that's not tolerated. We
would have hydrogen peroxide next. Number two, we would have zinc. Zinc, 50 mg
elemental zinc is an inhibitor of the polymerase. Many adults are zinc deficient. Almost
everybody antibiotics, zinc deficient. So that needs to be their vitamin D five thousand
international units prevention. And that analysis showing that we achieve a vitamin D
level in the blood of fifty or greater. There's almost a zero percent mortality with COVID
19's extraordinary relationship and then with the Q chip. And now we use 20000
international units a day vitamin C. Not much data on prevention, but clearly an active
treatment three thousand milligrams a day. Quercetin Quercetin is a polyphenol
supplement, five hundred milligrams a day prevention 500 mg a day, twice a day for
treatment. That's number five. One last thing to add over-the-counter Pepcid or
famotidine for moradian is a histamine blocker. It is works to impair viral replication
through another pathway it uses called the temp two receptor, and then it reduces
inflammation and histamine release. So six things basically in a shoe box can give a
great, great hope to people that they will get through the Omicron variant without having
to make any panicked calls, any panic hospitalizations. The medical community can be
relieved. We have actually been relieved of our reliance on hydroxychloroquine and
ivermectin. By and large severe cases, we can use a monoclonal antibody or such a
rhythm that there will be patients who we could use a or ivermectin. We have the new
Pfizer drug coming in a combination of economies like three inhibitor, and we're return
of our older producers and we have the Merck drug coming in molnupiravir. So in a
sense, the crisis is over. Omicron coming in is going to be manageable at home.
Over-the-counter remedies are the featured approach. The additional prescription
agents now, which will actually be all be under EUA, there should be no argument here
the federal government will. Shouldn't I have no argument with the drugs that they have
approved under the emergency use authorization for doctors to use. I'm predicting this
is a great opportunity to close the pandemic. [00:18:54][377.1]

[00:18:55] Jonathan Otto: Wouldn't that be wonderful? Wouldn't that be something?

Well, I appreciate it so much. And before you leave, if you can show the McAllen
Protocol, [00:19:01][6.5]

[00:19:03] Dr Peter McCullough: so the McCullough protocol is called sequence

multidrug therapy for COVID 19, and it's now a year old. It's a year old. This figure is a
year old and there have been changes. The changes that I've mentioned don't iodine or
hydrogen peroxide being used as. There's a virus hydrotherapy increased every four
hours of the acute treatment, that's an important update here. Adding in the new Pfizer
and Merck drug are important additions, phasing out the Regeneron monoclonal
antibody that carries over Melbourne in November and moving in Socha River Map into
that space. The corticosteroids and anti-inflammatories and anticoagulant stays the
same. Adding famotidine up under the over available over the counter. So the McCalla
protocol is now in a sense, it's a year out there. It's been widely utilized in guidelines
widely used in home treatment guide. Some people have given some credit to this that it
may have saved millions, if not tens of millions of lives. It's a very rewarding thing to be
involved with, and it's not just me. It is a whole host of important people who have
contributed their ideas, the thoughts and their energies towards coming up with a
sequenced multidrug approach. But it's ripe for revision. But the revision is easier. Its
revision is actually more leveraged towards over-the-counter, widely available solutions
that we should not be controversial, in fact, are not controversial. And it's more
leveraged now with brands to use authorized products, of which we're thankful for our
government for bringing forward fantastic. [00:20:30][86.7]

[00:20:31] Jonathan Otto: So people can find that protocol will one. We've got it here
on the screen so people can screenshot it right because that's it, right? What what
you're what we're seeing right now with this graphic is, is the protocol. [00:20:42][10.9]

[00:20:42] Dr Peter McCullough: Yeah, that's right. But they can find this and more text
description on what to do, as well as list of training doctors on the Association of
American Physicians and Surgeons website and The Truth four Health Foundation
website. Both of those carry this protocol, and it's not the only way to treat COVID 19.
The Frontline Critical Care Consortium carries their protocols math, plus an eye mouth.
Those also are very effective protocols. I think America and the world should be
reassured that people working with myself, Peter McCullough in my circles were
working independently of Dr. Corey and Dr. America, the Frontline Critical Care
Consortium, which were working independently from delivery, often France and working
independently from Vladimir Lanco in Monroe, New York. All of us working early in the
pandemic were not communicating with one another, and we came up with similar ideas
and similar approaches based on our clinical observation and also the available sources
of literature. I think the world should be reassured that different medical minds working
in different places independently came up with the same type of approach. We need
drugs to reduce viral replication, treat inflammation or cytokine storm, and manage
coagulation or thrombosis. So the principles are solid. And I can tell you, as a doctor
who's fairly far along in my career as a senior academician, I am greatly reassured
when people all over the world independently think about a problem and come up with
the same or very similar solutions. [00:22:16][93.8]

[00:22:17] Jonathan Otto: Awesome. Thank you so much. What do you believe in the
importance as we wrap up now? What do you believe in the importance of content in
films like this? In order to educate and help the [00:22:27][10.4]

[00:22:27] Dr Peter McCullough: public, the media is extraordinarily important because

censorship not only is rampant. In fact, it's overt in the major media and social media,
but it's actually now overt in the medical media. The medical literature is censored and I
went over and a great great example with Elsevier that this point time the censor
censorship has been covert, meaning it's been very difficult to get any treatment studies
published. And as we sit here today, there are three times as many papers on vaccines
and there are treatment. No vaccines are treatment. Vaccines don't save any lives, but
treatment does. And yet treatment has been actually overtly suppressed in the medical
literature. So films like this are very important because people who watched this film
watched this production they themselves know need to know that COVID 19 is a
treatable illness. I don't want a single person out there to get this illness and think to
themselves, there's no treatment. I need to stay in fear. I need to suffer. I need to
basically endure this and then face the specter of hospitalization, isolation and never
seeing their loved ones again. Let's never let that happen ever again. [00:23:39][71.4]

[00:23:40] Jonathan Otto: What's your message for people to stand for their health and
that freedom be unbreakable? [00:23:44][4.0]

[00:23:45] Dr Peter McCullough: Health, freedom and the principle of autonomy must
be unbreakable. Think about it, think about analogies, let's say we tell somebody that
they must jump off of this ledge and fall to their fate at the bottom of the building. No,
you would never do it, the principle of autonomy would keep you safe and secure inside,
you would never do it. Then how about if we just go down a few floors? Would you do it
now? Why don't you go down a few more floors? Would you do it? No. The what I'm
saying is, listen, the vaccines are obviously dangerous. Very dangerous. Record
numbers of people are being injured, permanently disabled, and sadly, many are dying.
It should be obvious to all that they're dangerous. One would never be forced to take a
potentially dangerous substance in their body under no circumstances. It's absolute. It's
complete. One needs to be personally decisive on this. And then once the decision is
made to have an unbreakable resolve.