Professional Documents
Culture Documents
UNIVERSITY
NYAYA NAGAR, MITHAPUR, PATNA – 800001
FEBRUARY, 2022
HYPOTHESIS:
The researcher has formulated the hypothesis, the validity of which will be checked in the
course of making of the project that (1) different writers have different views regarding if
precedent is a source of law or not, (2) precedent can be disregarded as well in certain cases.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY:
The researcher has adopted a purely doctrinal method of research. The researcher has made
extensive use of the internet sources.
RESEARCH QUESTIONS:
1. What is the role of precedent as a source of law?
2. How precedent evolves into law?
METHOD OF WRITING:
The method of writing followed in the course of this research is primarily analytical.
SOURCES OF STUDY:
1. Primary Sources: Case law, legal sources, bare acts, etc.
2. Secondary sources: Newspapers, journals, periodicals, etc.
TENTATIVE CHAPTERISATION:
1. INTRODUCTION
2. VIEWS OF DIFFERENT WRITERS/ JURISTS
i. FREDRICH CARL VON SAVIGNY
ii. JOHANN ERNST OTTO STOBBE
iii. ROBERT ERNEST KEETON
iv. ANTON FRIEDRICH JUSTUS THIBAUT
v. SIR WILLIAM BLACKSTONE
vi. BENJAMIN NATHAN CARDOZO
3. KINDS OF PRECEDENTS
4. NATURE, AUTHORITY & DIS-REGARD OF PRECEDENTS
5. RELEVANT DOCTRINES
6. CONCLUSION
7. BIBLIOGRAPHY