Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DAVID, JENA
DEMOCOR, CYRIL
RUBEN, PHOEBE
BARBARONA, ADAM JUDE
ARADO, DAVE MANCERAS
PESCADOR, RHEA BUNAOS
FEBRUARY 2022
CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION
Rationale:
Academic stress affects students the most because they are exposed to a
variety of stressors, such as academic pressure and the pressure to succeed (Noson
& Shastri, 2016). Stress harms academic performance, according to Kötter et al.
(2017), and it can also become a vicious cycle of continually increasing stress and
decreasing performance.
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE:
2. Identify the academic performance of the senior high school students; and
This study determined the relationship between academic stress and the
academic performance of senior high school students. Specifically, it sought to
answer the following
questions:
1.3 Plan
1.4 Reflect
2. What is the senior high school student's academic performance level in terms
of:
2.1 Grades
HYPOTHESIS:
This unit presented the review of the relevant literature that supported the
study about academic stress scale and academic performance among senior high
school students. The independent variable was Academic stress with the following
indicators: Recognize, monitor, control, and reflect. On the other hand, the
dependent variable was the academic performance with an indicator of grades.
Subramani and Kadhiravan (2017) The link between academic stress and mental
health has been discovered. The academic framework is suffocating students.
Students are subjected to pressure from their parents and schools. enough parental
and school support in terms of advice The students are mentally challenged. When
they contribute positively to academic forums, they are in good health. They also
suggested that There was a difference in the mental health of kids from private and
public schools. Compared to government school kids from low-income families and
those from low-income families, among college students, He agreed that academic
stress and mental health are linked and that there is a link between the two. Kids in
private schools are under more pressure than students in public institutions. way too
much for higher grades, which demoralizes pupils, and to top it off, there isn't enough
time. argued that pupils in private schools receive different care and exposure than
students in public institutions. Due to an abundance of homework and other
academic-related responsibilities, schools have become overburdened. Significant
lack of exposure. This is one escalation of stress.
Stress among undergraduate students is multifactorial, arising from both academic and
nonacademic factors, including sociocultural, environmental, and psychological attributes
(Brand and SchoonheimKlein, 2009). Stress levels may escalate to significant proportions in
some students, to present with symptoms of anxiety especially during tests and examination
periods. In fact, previous research suggested a modest prevalence rate of 10 to 35 percent
of college students experience functionally impairing levels of test anxiety (Chapell et al.,
2005; NavehBenjamin et al., 1997). However, not all students experience anxiety with the
same severity. In the Social Survey of the German Student Union, it was estimated that
approximately 15–20 percent of students` functioning becomes impaired by exam nerves in
a “modest” to “high” degree (Neuderth et al., 2009). It has also been shown that students
with test anxiety are very likely to delay their studies and drop out, and are associated with
psychiatric morbidity such as suicidal behavior and high financial costs (Schaefer). et al.,
2007). It was also shown that 10% of dental students experienced severe emotional malaise,
17% reported severe unachieved, and 28% reported severe symptoms of depersonalization
(Pohlmann). et al., 2005). For most students, academic factors were the main cause of
stress, followed by physical, social and emotional factors. The majority of students
experiencing stress reported high scores with low self-esteem, and about half reported high
scores on the depression scale (Baste and Gadkari, 2014). Findings in the literature suggest
that higher levels of stress are associated with poor performance (Sohail, 2013).
Academic stress can endanger physical and mental conditions. Lin and Huang
(2014) asserted highlevel stress could contribute problems to all individuals,
including students. Several studies found that students with academic stress tend to
show low academic performance ability (Rafidah, Azizah, Norzaidi, Chong, Salwani,
& Noraini, 2009; Talib & ZiaurRehman, 2012), deteriorating health (Chambel &
Curral, 2005; Marshall, Allison, Nyakap & Lanke, 2008), depression (Das & Sahoo,
2012; Jayanthi, Thirunavukarasu & Rajkumar, 2015), and sleep disorders (Waqas,
Khan, Sharif, Khalid & Ali, 2014). Another impact of academic stress is that
individuals tend to experience addictions, one of which is smartphone addiction, this
is in accordance with the research conducted by (Chiu, 2014; Hamrat, Hidayat, &
Sumantri, 2019). Academic stress impacts smartphone addiction due to the fact that
the higher level of academic stress they have, the more addicted to smartphones
they show (Karuniawan & Cahyanti, 2013; Samaha & Hawi, 2016). This was
influenced by high academic pressure leading the student coping mechanism by
diverting attention to the smartphone and creating addictive behavior. Academic
stress also affects individuals addicted to the internet due to the intensive use of the
internet. Furthermore, several studies presented that the use of the internet by teens
is a way to relieve their stress (Hong, 2002; Lavoie & Pychyl, 2001; Suh & Yoo,
2001; Velezmoro, Lacefifield, & Roberti, 2010; Suh & Lee, 2007; Jun & Choi, 2015).
RECOGNIZE
Mokhayeri et al. in their study used physiological signals which are multi-
modal: Pupil diameter, photoplethysmogram, and electrocardiogram to distinguish
relaxed and stressed conditions. However, in some methods, surveys are used. In
this modern world, smartphones are showing many new features such as sensors
(accelerometer, microphones, and GPS) and usage-tracking functions (SMS and call
histories). Further few studies have evaluated mood or individual traits using
smartphones.
MONITOR
Recent studies showed that home quarantine is affecting the physical and
psychological health of young people (Al-Rabiaah et al., 2020). For example, college
students during the COVID-19 outbreak suffered post-traumatic stress disorder,
anger, fear, sadness, nervousness, and emotional disturbances (Brooks et al., 2020;
Cao et al., 2020). This has the potential of jeopardizing the psychological well-being
of senior high school students who are preparing for their final year at high school
and are required to sit for high school exams that determine their university
enrollment.
Control
Our mental health, a state of well-being in which an individual can cope with
the normal stresses of life, work productively and fruitfully, and can contribute to their
community (World Health Organization, 2018), includes our emotional,
psychological, and social well-being and determines how we handle stress, relate to
others, and make choices.
When our mental health is in a good state, we manage our basic cognitive
and social skills;
recognize, express, and modulate our emotions; are flexible and able to cope with
adverse life events; function in social roles; and modulate a harmonious relationship
between our body and mind (Galderisi et al., 2015)
Reflect
The fourth and last indicator for the independent variable is reflected.
In the beginning, in light of the recurrent claim that preservice teachers must
become reflective practitioners to attain professionalism (e.g., Schön, 1983; Zeichner
& Liston, 1987), along with preservice teachers’ documented difficulties in
conducting self-regulation and critical self-reflection processes (Butler et al., 2004;
Davis, 2006; Kohen & Kramarski, 2012), and, finally, considering tomorrow’s
increasing global reliance on technology in education, we suggest that the call for
reflective preservice teachers should be expanded to the domain of TPCK. Thus far,
as a relatively new framework, TPCK has mostly been investigated to understand
the interplay among its components for preservice and in-service teacher education
(Angeli & Valanides, 2009; Graham, 2011; Krauskopf, Zahn, & Hesse, 2012; Koehler
& Mishra, 2005; Niess, 2011).
Lastly, many studies that use different approaches have implemented self-
regulatory programs to support teachers’ self-reflection ability (e.g., Davis, 2006;
Kauffman et. al., 2008; Kramarski & Michalsky, 2010). Self-regulation involves “self-
generated thoughts, feelings, and actions that are planned and cyclically adapted to
the attainment of personal goals” (Zimmerman, 2000).
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE
Harb and El-Shaarawi (2006) found that the most important factor with a
positive effect on students' performance is parental involvement. The academic
performance of students heavily depends upon parental involvement in their
academic activities to attain a higher level of quality in academic success (Barnard,
2004; Henderson, 1988; Shumox & Lomax, 2001). Krashen (2005) concluded that
students whose parents are educated score higher on standardized tests than those
whose parents were not educated. Educated parents can better communicate with
their children regarding the school work, activities, and the information being taught
at school. The academic environment is the effective variable for students and has a
positive relationship with fathers’ education and grade level (Kirmani & Siddiquah,
2008). Considine and Zappala(2002) argue that families where the parents are
advantaged socially, educationally, and economically foster a high level of
achievement in their children.
The relationship between gender and the academic achievement of students has
been discussed for decades (Eitle, 2005). A gap between the achievement of boys
and girls has been found, with girls showing better performance than boys in certain
instances (Chambers &Schreiber, 2004).
The fraction of students who have to work to finance their studies may also
have increased impacting adversely on academic performance (Bratti, Checchi, and
de Blasio, 2008; Metcalf, 2003). Academic performance according to the Cambridge
University Reporter (2003) is frequently defined in terms of examination
performance. Nagaraju (2004) emphasizes that the level of motivation and attitude
towards test-taking significantly contribute to the quality of one’s study habits and, in
turn, their academic performance.
Poor academic performance often generates negative feedback about the
students’ performance; consequently, leading to stress, anxiety, and depression
(Ang & Huan, 2006). Most of the time first-year students are leaving home for the
very first time and therefore need to adjust to the newfound freedom as well as how
to maintain a high level of academic performance (Robotham, 2008).
GRADE
Williamson, Birmaher, Ryan, and Dahl (2005) reported that in anxious and
depressed youth, stressful life events are considerably elevated which in turn lead to
low performance in academics.
Bolkan, Goodboy & Kelsey (2015) examined the effect of instructor clarity on
learning with student motivation and academic performance. The study's findings
revealed a positive correlation between instructor clarity, student motivation, and
academic performance. This study's main objective is to determine the relationship
between stress and motivation on students' academic performance. The study's
findings could serve as a basis for program development to assess how the school
could alleviate stress, stimulate motivation, and improve the students' academic
performance. Gupta, Singh & Kumar (2017) conducted a study that explored the
relationship between emotional intelligence, perceived stress, and academic
performance. It was revealed in the findings that neither the perceived stress nor
emotional intelligence was related to academic stress. However, perceived stress
was significantly predicted by emotional intelligence. The researchers concluded that
medical students with higher emotional intelligence exhibited lower stress, while both
have no significant academic performance relationship.
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
In this premise, the theory that has been used in the study has been
discussed.
According to this theory, people’s learning and thinking are influenced and shaped
within a social and cultural context. Propounds of this theory believe that knowledge
is collaborative and situated (Boa, 2014). Vyogotsky (1978) cited in Boa (2014)
argued that individuals’ ability to learn and think begins from their social interaction
as a result social interaction is good for cognitive development.
The theoretical model used in this study is the Production Function Approach (PFA).
The next section provides a detailed explanation of this model.
This model has its root in economics. It was developed in 1767 by A.R.J. Turgot but
became known to the public in 1928 when Charles W. Cobb and Paul Douglas used
it in their study (Tangaraju, Chee, Koon, Yi & Mann, 2013). According to Gordon
(2007), this model is built on the principle of the input-output approach. That is
transforming raw materials (input) into goods and services (output).
This model has been used by several researchers to assess factors that contribute
to academic performance. Martha (2010) posited that the student's academic
performance or achievement is treated as the output factor and the input factors are
the independent variables. According to Tangaraju et al. (2013), the common input
factors used in teaching and learning materials, are teacher quality and family
factors.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
The major concept of this study was focused on the relationship between academic
stress and academic performance of Senior high students.
Figure 1 shows the conceptual framework of the study that includes the following
variables. The independent variable was self-regulation learning, which has the
following indicators: Plan, Monitor, Control, and Reflect.
The academic stress measures a student’s perceived level of mental state in the
four essential components of Academic: Recognize to be able to perceive or discern
stress, immediately Monitor the stress mental status, Control sudden changes in
stress levels by implementing specific strategies, and reflect on what worked and
what you can do better next time. On the other hand, the dependent variable was the
Academic Performance of the students with grades as an indicator.
Independent variable Dependent Variable
• Recognize • Grade
• Monitor
• Control
• Reflect
Students. The selected students of Senior High are the ones who will benefit from this
study. By knowing the effects of stress on their performance, it can help and remind
them to maintain a balanced, or be in their finest mental state.
Teachers. They are the teachers who supported the students in their academic journey.
In this research, they are the ones who will help the students to attain good
performance in the school.
School. When there is a successful academic performance and results among the
students, the school will also be recognized by others. This brings positive feedback or
comments about the school.
Parents. They are the parents of the students in this study, they can help by advising
their children that education is important and controlling/avoiding stress is necessary to
attain good performance in school. By encouraging, counseling, and helping them they
can help raise their daughters/sons in good ways.
Future Researchers. On the side of the future researchers, the result of the study
could be a basis for recommendation where they can also be benefited.
DEFINITION OF TERMS