Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Leptodactylidae)
Author(s): W. Ronald Heyer
Source: Evolution, Vol. 23, No. 3 (Sep., 1969), pp. 421-428
Published by: Society for the Study of Evolution
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2406697 .
Accessed: 02/10/2014 13:02
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Society for the Study of Evolution is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Evolution.
http://www.jstor.org
W. RONALD HEYER
Division of Amphibiansand Reptiles,
Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago 60605
Frogs of the Neotropicalgenus Lepto- ica. The relationships among the species
dactylusprovidea clear exampleof one groupsare easiestexplainedvisually(Fig.
way in which a group of amphibians 1).
evolved froman almostaquatic to a ter-
THE ADAPTIVE ECOLOGY
restriallifehistory.The genusis comprised
OF THE SPECIES GROUPS
of approximately 30 species,but the tax-
onomyand relationships of manyof these The principalchange in mode of life
species are confused. My initial interest observablein Leptodactylusis fromripar-
in the genuswas to attemptto determine ian (in the broad sense) to terrestrial
if clusters of related species (species habitats. Fortunately,the species groups
groups) could be recognized, and if so, to presenta seriesof gradesin this process,
determinethe relationshipsamong the allowingtheprobablehistoryof theadapt-
species groups. The followingdiscussion ive shiftto be discerned.
uses as a backgroundthe synthesisof the Simpson(1947) laid down the founda-
species groupsand theirinterrelationshipstions of the adaptive zone concept. The
(Heyer, 1969). adaptive zone hypothesisis a conceptual
means of explainingthe origin of new
SYNOPSIS AND RELATIONSHIPS adaptivekindsof organisms.The useful-
AMONG THE SPECIES GROUPS ness of the concept has been treated
The fivespeciesgroupsand the species recentlyin a symposium(SystematicZool-
in each groupare: 1) Fuscus group-L. ogy,Volume14, Number4, 1965). Simp-
bufonius, fuscus,gracilis,labialis,labrosus, son's (1947) basic featuresof theadaptive
latinasus,mystaceus,mystacinus,poecilo- zone concept, pertinentto the present
chilus, ventrimaculatus;2) Marmoratus discussion,are these: (1) Adaptivezones
group-L. hylaedactylus, marmoratus;3) are subdivisionsof the environment based
Melanonotusgroup-L. dantasi,discodac- on broad adaptive types as evidencedby
taxonomicsegmentsof the biota; (2)
tylus,melanonotus, podicipinus, pustulatus,
Major adaptive zones are separated by
wagneri;4) Ocellatusgroup-L. bolivianus,
discontinuitiesor essentiallyinstableeco-
ckaquensis, ocellatus; 5) Pentadactylus
logical zones; (3) The change fromone
group-L. laticeps, pentadactylus,rho- zone to anotheris usuallyundertakenby
domystax,rhodonotus, rugasus. This is a a smallgroupof organismsat a veryrapid
conservativelist. The only species group
evolutionaryrate; and (4) A radiation
compositionconsidered accurate is the ensues in a newlyenteredadaptive zone.
Melanonotusgroup,as it is theonlygroup
Once thisradiationhas occurred,theforms
to have undergonerecentrevision(Heyer, in the transitional zonesare comparatively
in press). Members of each group are
ill-adapted and rapidly become extinct.
distributed in Centraland/orSouthAmer-
More recently, workers(particularlyBock,
1965; Hecht, 1965; King, 1965; and von
'This paper formedpart of a thesis submitted
in partial fulfillment
of the requirementsfor the Wahlert,1965) have concentrated on the
Ph.D. degree,Universityof SouthernCalifornia. processesinvolvedin the transitionfrom
EVOLUTION 23:421-428. September,1969 421
FIG. 1. Relationshipsamong the species groups of the genus Leptodactylus. Dark circles indicate
point locations of the species groups. F = Fuscus group, P = Pentadactylusgroup, Me = Melano-
notus group, 0 = Ocellatus group, Ma = Marmoratus group. Solid concentriccircles indicate total
number of evolutionaryadvancementsfor each of the groups. Dashed lines indicatethe way in which
the groups are related. Of all the groups,the Melanonotus and Ocellatus groups are most closely re-
lated to each other. The Pentadactylusgroup is then relatedto thesetwo groups,and the Fuscus group
is related to the clusterof the threegroups. The Marmoratusgroup is not closelyrelatedto the other
four groups. Taxonomicallyinterpreted,the genus Leptodactylusis composed of two subgenera; the
subgenus Leptodactyluswhich includes the Fuscus, Melanonotus,Ocellatus,and Pentadactylusgroups,
and the subgenusAdenomerawhich includes the Marmoratusspecies group.
INESTPLACED IN INCUBATING
It HAMBER. AQUATIC LARVAE
........ ~~~~~(FUSCUS
GROUP)
. ...........G
S)............*... RO P
AQUATIC EGGSS
LLAIDN INAWATER
FIG. 2. The adaptive shiftdemonstratedby the speciesgroupsof the genusLeptodactylus. The large
terrestrialand aquatic zones are above and below the transitionalriparianzone. Riparian in this con-
text means any freshwater-dryland interface. See text for furtherexplanation.