Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AUDIT PROCEDURES
FOR CUT-OFF PROBLEMS
In considering the validity of Sale or Purchase transaction, consider the following items:
As a rule of thumb assumption, a Sale is valid upon delivery and a Purchase is valid upon receipt. Exceptions:
1. Goods in Transit
FOB Shipping Point /FOB Seller or Seller’s Location include as inventory of buyer (plus freight in)
FOB Destination/FOB Buyer or Buyer’s Location include as inventory of seller (exclude freight out)
Cost of Insurance and Freight (CIF) include as inventory of buyer upon delivery to carrier (plus cost of insurance
and freight)
Free Alongside (FAS) the vessel include as inventory of buyer upon possession of the carrier (exclude freight cost
to vessel, include freight cost from Vessel to Customer)
– Segregated goods – mere segregation of goods does not exclude the same from the seller’s inventory, unless the
problem identified that sale is covered by a special sale agreement.
2. Determine whether sales/AR or purchases/AP has been recorded in the Sales or Purchases Journals. (Based on
the recording of the related sales/purchase invoice)
3. Determine whether inventories were Excluded or Included in the yea-end physical count.
If the problem did not indicate whether goods under consideration has been included or excluded from the count, the
following assumptions are to be made:
all deliveries (on sale) made on or before the count date are excluded from the count, all deliveries made after
the count date are included in the count, unless otherwise stated by the problem.
All receipt (on purchases) of goods on or before the count date shall be included in the count, all receipts after
the count date are excluded from the count, unless otherwise stated by the problem.
Sales Cut-off
COUNT DATE
Purchases Cut-off
If it is a valid sale, the receivable should be recorded, the Inventory should be excluded.
If it is not a valid sale, the receivable should not be recorded, the Inventory should be included.
If it is a valid purchase, the payable should be recorded, the Inventory should be included.
If it is not a valid purchase, the payable should not be recorded, the Inventory should be excluded.
FOR INVENTORY ESTIMATION PROBLEM
Cost of goods available for sale (actual*) xxx
Less: Cost of Sales (estimate**) (xxx)
Estimated Ending Inventory xxx
*COGAS is actual – consider all items included in the computation of Cost of goods available for sale (Inv. beg +
Purchases + Freight – in - Purch Discount – Purch Returns and Allow + Dept Transfer In – Dept Transfer out –
Abnormal spoilage, breakage, shrinkage)
** COS is estimated by:
Gross Sales x Cost Rate (if GP is based on sales)
Gross Sales / Selling Price Rate (if GP is based on cost)
***For the purpose of estimating Cost of Sales:
Assume that all sales were made under the normal GP rate thus, when computing gross sales:
2. Retail Method
Cost of goods sold available for sale (at Retail) ^ xxx
Less: Cost of sales (at Retail) = Gross Sales ^^ (xxx)
Estimated ending inventory (at Retail) xxx
Multiply by: Cost rate (LCA o Ave) x%
Estimated ending inventory (at Cost) xxx
Beginning Inventory Cost Retail
Add: xx xx
Purchases
Freight In xx
Less: xx
Purchase allowance
Purchase discount (xx)
Purchase returns (xx)
Add: Department Transfer In or Debit (xx) (xx)
Less: Department Transfer Out or Credit xx xx
Less: Abnormal Spoilage/breakage/shrinkage (xx) (xx)
Add: Mark-ups, net of cancellations (xx) (xx)
COGAS under CONSERVATIVE/LCA xx
xx / xx / x% Cost rate under Lower of
Cost or Average
(Conservative)
Less: Mark – downs, net of cancellations x% Cost rate under Average
(xx)
COGAS under AVERAGE APPROACH xx ^
Retail
Gross Sales xx / xx
Less: Sales Return (xx)
Add: Special Discounts (Employee Disc) xx
Normal Spoilage/Breakages/Shoplifting losses
Sales/ Cost of Sales at Retail xx
xx ^^
*For FIFO Average, simply disregard in the computation the cost of the beginning inventories:
COST % = (COGAS @ Cost – Beg Inventory at Cost) / (COGAS @ Retail – Beg Inventory at Retail )
or
Net Purchases @ Cost / Net Purchases @ Retail
FOR INVENTORY VALUATION PROBLEMS
Inventory shall be valued at lower of COST or NRV:
The average cost is recomputed after every purchase transaction. The last Moving average unit cost (after the last
purchase transaction of the year) shall be used for the computation of the inventory cost at year end.
Notes:
1. The DIRECT WRITE-OFF METHOD is used in instances where the company holds inventories that ae not
relatively the same from year-end to year-end. Thus, there shall be no chances to recover any loss on write-own
for the year. (which is either added to cost of sale or recognized as separate loss in the statement of
comprehensive income)
2. The ALLOWANCE METHOD is used in instances where the company holds inventories that are relatively the
same from one year-end to another. Thus there shall be a possibility of recovery from inventory write-down from
one year, unto the next year. The difference between cost and NRV, where NRV is lower becomes the required
allowance for inventory write-down (similar to allowance for bad debts), to determine how much is the loss during
the period, the increment from the unadjusted balance of the account shall be determined. Thus, if cost is lower
than the NRV, required balance is zero/nil, any unadjusted credit balance of the account shall generally be
recognized as gain from recovery in the income statement (or deducted from cost of sale).
Presented below is a list of items that may or may not be reported as inventory in a company’s December 31,
balance sheet:
Cost of goods out on consignment at another company’s store P 2 400 000
Goods sold on instalment basis 300 000
Goods in transit purchased FOB shipping point 360 000
Goods in transit purchased FOB destination 600 000
Cost of goods sold to another company, for which the company has signed
an agreement to repurchase at a set price that covers all costs related to the
inventory 900 000
Cost of goods sold where large returns are predictable 840 000
Cost of goods in transit sold FOB shipping point 360 000
Freight charges on goods purchased 240 000
Factory labor costs incurred on goods still unsold 150 000
Interest cost incurred for inventories that are routinely manufactured 120 000
Costs incurred to advertise goods held for resale 60 000
Materials on hand not yet placed into production 1 050 000
Office Supplies 30 000
Raw materials on which the company has started production, but which are
not completely processed 840 000
Factory supplies 60 000
Cost of goods held on consignment from another company 1 350 000
Cost identified with units completed but not yet sold 780 000
Cost of goods in transit sold FOB destination 120 000
Temp. Investment in stocks and bonds that will be resold in the near future 1 500 000
How much of these items would typically be reported as inventory in the financial statements?
Solution:
Cost of goods out on consignment at another company’s store P 2 400 000
Goods sold on instalment basis 300 000
Goods in transit purchased FOB shipping point 360 000
Goods in transit purchased FOB destination 600 000
Cost of goods sold to another company, for which the company has signed
an agreement to repurchase at a set price that covers all costs related to the
inventory – Inventory Financing 900 000
Cost of goods sold where large returns are predictable 840 000
Cost of goods in transit sold FOB shipping point 360 000
Freight charges on goods purchased 240 000
Factory labor costs incurred on goods still unsold 150 000
Interest cost incurred for inventories that are routinely manufactured 120 000
Costs incurred to advertise goods held for resale 60 000
Materials on hand not yet placed into production 1 050 000
Office Supplies 30 000
Raw materials on which the company has started production, but which are
not completely processed 840 000
Factory supplies 60 000
Cost of goods held on consignment from another company 1 350 000
Cost identified with units completed but not yet sold 780 000
Cost of goods in transit sold FOB destination 120 000
Temp. investment in stocks and bonds that will be resold in the near future 1 500 000
How much of these items would typically be reported as inventory in the financial statements?
P6 900 000.00
The following accounts were extracted from the unadjusted trial balance of Silang Corp. as of December 31, 2014.
Cash 963 200
Accounts Receivables 2 254 000
Merchandise Inventory 6 050 000
Accounts Payable 4 201 000
Accrued Expenses 60 400
During your audit, you discovered that the client held its cash records open even after year end.
Audit notes:
Collections for January 2015 of P654 600 were recorded in the December 2014 cash records. The receipts of P360
100 represents cash sales with the balance representing collections from customers who paid within the 5% cash
discount period.
Accounts Payable of P372 400 was paid in January 2015. The payments on which a P12 400 cash discount has
been taken were included in the December 31, 2014 Check register
Merchandise inventory as stated in the trial balance represented the result of the count conducted on December 30,
2014 on inventories on hand. The following information were found to be relevant in your audit of inventories:
Goods Valued at P275 000 are on consignment with a customer and were not included in the physical count
Goods Costing P217 500 were received from a vendor on January 4, 2015. The related invoice was received and
recorded on January 6, 2015. These goods were shipped by the vendor on December 31, 2014 under an FOB
shipping point terms.
Goods costing P637 500 were shipped on December 31, 2014, and were received by the customer on January 2,
2015. The terms of the invoice were FOB Shipping Point. The sales of P815 000 has been recorded in 2014.
A shipment of goods invoiced at P182 000 to a customer on December 29, terms FOB destination was recorded in
2015. The cost of the related goods amounted to P130 000 and were received by the customers on January 4, 2015.
The invoice for goods costing P175 000 was received and recorded as purchase on December 31, 2014. The related
goods, shipped FOB Destination were received on January 4, 2015.
Goods valued at P612 00 are on consignment from a vendor. These goods were excluded from the physical count.
Based on the result of your audit, ascertain the following:
Adjusted balance of Cash
Adjusted balance of Accounts receivable
Correct Inventory ending balance
Net adjustment to cost of sales
Adjusted accounts payable
Solution:
Audit notes:
1. Collections for January 2015 of P654 600 were recorded in the December 2014 cash records. The receipts of
P360 100 represents cash sales with the balance representing collections from customers who paid within the 5%
cash discount period.
Cash -654 600
AR -310 000
2015. Accounts Payable of P372 400 was paid in January 2015. The payments on which a P12 400 cash discount
has been taken were included in the December 31, 2014 Check register
Cash +360 000
AP +360 000 + 12 400
1. Merchandise inventory as stated in the trial balance represented the result of the count conducted on December
30, 2014 on inventories on hand. The following information were found to be relevant in your audit of inventories:
Goods Valued at P275 000 are on consignment with a customer and were not included in the physical count
Inventory +275 000
Goods Costing P217 500 were received from a vendor on January 4, 2015. The related invoice was received and
recorded on January 6, 2015. These goods were shipped by the vendor on December 31, 2014 under an FOB
shipping point terms.
Inventory +217 500
Goods costing P637 500 were shipped on December 31, 2014, and were received by the customer on January 2,
2015. The terms of the invoice were FOB Shipping Point. The sales of P815 000 has been recorded in 2014.
Inventory -637 500
A shipment of goods invoiced at P182 000 to a customer on December 29, terms FOB destination was recorded in
2015. The cost of the related goods amounted to P130 000 and were received by the customers on January 4, 2015.
Inventory +130 000
The invoice for goods costing P175 000 was received and recorded as purchase on December 31, 2014. The related
goods, shipped FOB Destination were received on January 4, 2015.
AP -175 000
Goods valued at P612 00 are on consignment from a vendor. These goods were excluded from the physical count.
Based on the result of your audit, ascertain the following:
Adjusted balance of Cash 668 600
Adjusted balance of Accounts receivable 2 564 000
Correct Inventory ending balance 6 035 000
Net adjustment to cost of sales debit by 57 500
Adjusted accounts payable 4 615 900
You are making an audit of the MALAGA Co. for the year ended December 31, 2014. You have observed the taking
of physical inventory and have noted that all merchandise actually received up to the close of business, December
28, 2014, were included on the inventory sheets. The total of the physical inventory, at invoice cost, is P175 000,
while the purchase account shows a balance of P 1 750 000 as of December 31, 2014.
You note also the following purchase invoices have been recorded in the voucher register as follows:
RR. NO. 01/15 Voucher Invoice Date Terms Merchandise
Register Received
What is the adjusted balance of Purchases for the period ended December 31, 2014?
What is the adjusted balance of the Inventory account as of December 31, 2014?
Solution:
01/15
RR. Invoic Terms Merchandise Inv Purch
Voucher
NO. e Date Received
Register
637 12.20 Destination 1.8 / -
P 8 500
638 1.2 Shipping Point 12.27 / +
7 200
639 12.28 Destination 1.7 / /
11 700
640 12.30 Destination 1.6 / /
6 900
641 1.2 Destination 12.25 / +
4 100
What is the adjusted balance of Purchases for the period ended December 31, 2014? 1 751 300
What is the adjusted balance of the Inventory account as of December 31, 2014? 194 000
You were assigned to test the reasonableness of the inventory account balance as reported by your client, Surely
Corp. The following information is made available by Surely Corp’s Accountant:
Cost Retail
Beginning Inventory P598 400 P1 500 000
Purchases 3 048 400 5 500 000
Freight In 80 000
Purchase Returns 140 000 180 000
Mark-ups 600 000
Mark-up cancellation 100 000
Mark-downs 1 300 000
Mark-down cancellation 385 000
Sales 4 470 000
Sales returns 150 000
Sales discount 200 000
Employee discount 400 000
Ending Inventory as a result of the physical count conducted on December 31, was at P649 600. What is the amount
of estimated inventory shortage, if any, as a result of your test of reasonableness under the following assumed
formula?
Lower of cost or average/Conservative/Conventional Approach
Average Approach
FIFO Retail Approach
Solution:
(Refer to the discussion part of this module for additional reference)
Cost Retail
Beginning Inventory P598 400 P1 500 000
Purchases 3 048 400 5 500 000
80 000
Freight In
140 000
Purchase Returns 180 000
Mark-ups 600 000
Mark-up cancellation 100 000
Mark-downs 1 300 000
TGAS 6 405
Mark-down TGAS 3 586 000 385 000
cancellation 800
4 470 000
Sales
150 000
Sales returns
200 000
Sales discount
4 720 000 400 000 + to
Employee discount Sales
1 685 000
Lower of cost or average/Conservative/Conventional Approach 176 050
TGAS @ COST / (TGAS @ RET + NET MD) = 49%
Average Approach 294 000
TGAS @ COST / TGAS @ RET = 56%
FIFO Retail Approach 378 250
(TGAS @ COST – B.I. @ COST) / (TGAS @ RET – B.I. @ RET) = 61%
On May 31, 2014, a fire completely destroyed the work-in-process inventory of Alder Paints. Physical inventory were
published as follows:
Sales for the first five months of 2014 were 150 000. Raw materials purchased were 50 000. Freight on purchases
was 5 000. Direct labor for the five months was 40 000. To determine the value of the lost inventory, the insurance
adjusters have agreed to use an average gross profit rate of 32.5%. Assume that the manufacturing overhead was
45% of direct labor cost.
How much is the value of the goods manufactured and completed as of May 31, 2014?
Raw materials used during the first five months of 2014 were?
The total value of the goods put into process during the five-month period amounted to?
The value of the destroyed work-in-process inventory as determined by the insurance adjusters
would be?
Solution:
Raw Materials, beg 15
Purchases 50
Freight-In 5
Raw Materials available for use 70
Raw Materials, end (30)
Raw Materials, used 40
Direct Labor 40
Overhead 18 (45% of DL)
Total manufacturing cost 98
Work-in-Process, beg 50
Total goods in process 148
Work-in-Process, end (56.75)
Total goods manufactured 91.25
Finished goods, beg 70
Total goods available for sale 161.25
Finished goods, end (60)
Cost of goods sold 101.25 (100% - 32.5%) of sales
How much is the value of the goods manufactured and completed as of May 31, 2014? 91 250
Raw materials used during the first five months of 2014 were? 40 000
The total value of the goods put into process during the five-month period amounted to? 148 000
The value of the destroyed work-in-process inventory as determined by the insurance adjusters
would be? 56 750
On May 21, 2014, a fire destroyed the entire merchandise inventory on hand of Natural Corporation. The following
information is available:
What is the estimated inventory on May 2, 2014 immediately prior to fire?
How much should be recognized as inventory loss?
Solution:
Net Sales (120%) 360 000
Cost of Sales (100%) (300 000)
Gross Profit (20%) based on cost 60 000
Merchandise Inventory, Beginning 80 000
Purchases 330 000
Merchandise Inventory, Ending (110 000)
Cost of Sales (360 000 x 20/120) 300 000
Merchandise Inventory, Ending 110 000
Goods in Transit ( 40 000)
Inventory Loss 70 000
What is the estimated inventory on May 2, 2014 immediately prior to fire? 110 000
How much should be recognized as inventory loss? 70 000
AUDIT PROCEDURES
1. Obtain a list of aged accounts receivable balances from the subsidiary ledger, and:
Investigate exceptions reported by customers and discuss with appropriate officer for proper disposal
Send a second request for positive confirmation requests without any replies from customers
If the second request does not produce a reply from the customer, perform extended procedures, like:
Reviewing collections after year-end
Checking supporting documents
Discussing the account with appropriate officer
Discuss with appropriate officer, confirmation requests returned by the post office and perform extended
procedures.
Prepare a summary of confirmation results.
Examine sales recorded and shipments made a week before and after the end of the reporting period and
ascertain whether the sales were recorded in the proper period.
Investigate large amounts of sales returned shortly after the end of the reporting period.
6. Perform analytical procedures, like:
7. Review individual balances and age of accounts with appropriate officer, and:
The aging schedule should be based on and should agree with the subsidiary ledger.
The aging schedule should be adjusted first with all possible adjustments before a required allowance is
computed. Possible adjustments include:
The adjusted balance of the subsidiary ledger shall ultimately be the correct/adjusted balance of the accounts
receivable gross of the required allowance
If the general ledger ultimately does not coincide or equal to the subsidiary ledger, an additional adjustment
should be in place to correct the general ledger to equal the Adjusted Balance of the subsidiary ledger. The
adjustment is either debited or credited to SALES account.
To compute for the Bad Debt Expense for the period, the adjusted balance per computation is compared to the
unadjusted balance. (Do not forget to consider write-off of accounts receivable, recoveries of previously written-off
accounts and interim bad debt provisions, if there are any):
Allowance for Bad Debt Expense
Beginning Balance
Dr: Write-off Receivables (including
Cr: Recovery of Previous Write-off
additional write-off per audit)
Cr: Bad Debt Expense (Squeeze)
FOR LOANS RECEIVABLE PROBLEMS (SIMILAR TO FINANCIAL ASSET AT AMORTIZED COST)
INITIAL MEASUREMENT:
Initial measurement of loans receivable shall be fair at market value, which shall be the net initial investment or the
net cash given-up on the loan transaction. More specifically, the net initial investment shall be:
*Origination costs are costs that are directly attributed to the loan transaction such as brokers’ fees and
commissions, prof. fees (e.g. lawyers for drafting debt agreements or to accountants for assessment of any asset
collateral on the loan).
**Origination fees are origination costs chargeable to the debtor as per the debt agreement. It can be an amount
higher or lower than the actual origination cost incurred.
BALANCE SHEET MEASUREMENT
Loans receivable shall be measured at the balance sheet date at amortized cost, which shall be:
Initial amount recognized/FMV at initial
xx
recognition
(xx)
Less: Principal collections
xx
Less: Amortization of premium on loan or
(xx)
Add: Amortization of discount on loan
(xx)
Less: Impairment loss*, if any
xx
Amortized cost
*IMPAIRMENT LOSS OF LOANS RECEIVABLE
SOLUTION:
Trade CA
Trade accounts receivable 1550 000 /
20% Trade notes receivable, discounted at 40% upon receipt of the 180 day
300 000
note on a without recourse basis
Customers’ accounts reporting credit balances arising from Sales returns 60 000
How much is the total trade receivables? 3 100 000
How much is the amount to be presented as “trade and other receivables” under current assets?
4 050 000
Proceeds from AR factored 250 000
Carrying value of AR factored (300 000)
Loss from factoring (50 000)
Proceeds from NR discounted:
Maturity value (principal + interest)
Principal 300 000
Interest (300 000 * 20% * 6/13) 30 000
330 000
Less: Discount (MV*disc%*remaining term) (66 000)
(330 000*40%*6/12)
Proceeds from NR discounted: 264 000
Carrying value of NR (no interest) 300 000
Loss from discounting i8 (36 000)
Total loss from receivable financing (86 000)
How much loss from receivable financing should be recognized in the income statements?
86 000
In relation to your audit of Phish Inc.’s accounts receivable, you ascertained the following information:
The general ledger balances of the client’s receivable and accounts were:
Accounts receivable 3 225 300
Allowance for bad debts (169 000)
Amortized Cost 3 056 300
Phish estimates its bad debt losses by aging its accounts receivable, the aging schedule of accounts
receivable at December 31, 2014, is presented below:
Age of accounts Amount
Current 1 686 400
1 to 30 days past due 922 000
31 to 60 days past due 384 800
61 to 90 days past due 153 300
Over 90 days past due 78 800
The company normally sells n/30.
Furthermore, the company’s uncollectible accounts experience for the past years is summarized in the
schedule that follows:
Year Current 1-30 days PD 31-60 days PD 61-90 days PD More than 90 days PD
2013 1% 6% 9% 23% 55%
2012 2% 8% 10% 18% 60%
2011 1% 4% 11% 16% 45%
2010 3% 5% 12% 22% 45%
2009 3% 2% 8% 21% 45%
The required allowance for bad debts is?
The net realizable value of the company’s accounts receivable on December 31, 2014, should be?
SOLUTION:
The required allowance for bad debts is?
Year Current 1-30 days PD 31-60 days PD 61-90daysPD More than 90 days PD
2013 1% 6% 9% 23% 55%
2012 2% 8% 10% 18% 60%
2011 1% 4% 11% 16% 45%
2010 3% 5% 12% 22% 45%
2009 3% 2% 8% 21% 45%
Ave 2% 5% 10% 20% 50%
AR 1 686 400 922 000 384 800 153 300 78 800
Req. Allow 33 728 46 100 38 480 30 660 39400 = 188 368
The net realizable value of the company’s accounts receivable on December 31, 2014, should be?
Gross Accounts Receivable 3 225 300
Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts (188 368)
Amortized cost/ Net realizable value 3 036 932
You are auditing the Accounts Receivable of Rovers Inc. as of December 31, 2014. You found the following
information in the general journal:
Accounts Receivable 1 466 720
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts (46 720)
Accounts receivable net 1 420 000
The accounts receivable subsidiary ledger had the following details:
Customer Invoice Date Amount Balance
Assuming that there were no entries to the allowance for doubtful accounts, what is the corrected bad debts expense
for the year?
What is the correct allowance for bad debts expense for the year ended December 31, 2014?
What is the net adjustment to the Accounts receivable in the general ledger?
What is the carrying value of the company’s accounts receivable as of December 31, 2014?
What is the necessary adjusting entry to adjust any difference between the SL and GL?
SOLUTION:
Reconciliation between GL and SL with Aging of AR analysis
1 375
Adjusted balance
360
Required allowance
2% 5% 10% 20% 50%
for BD in %
Required allowance
120 320 8 512 22 688 22 080 47 040 20 000
for BD in amount
120
Allowance for BD
320
(46
Less: Allowance for BD, unadjusted
720)
144
Bad Debt Expense
960
1 375
Gross Accounts Receivables
360
(120
Allowance for Bad Debts
320)
1 255
Amortized cost/Carrying value
040
Sales 20 000
On December 31, 2013, ISIAH Company, a financing institution lent P4 000 000 to PSALMS Corp. due 3 years after.
The loan is supported by an 8% note receivable. Transaction cost incurred to originate the loan amounted to P248
000. P374 000 was chargeable to Psalms as origination fee. Interest on the loan is collectible at the end of each
year. The yield rate on the loan is 9.25%.
Isiah was able to collect interest as it became due at the end of 2014. During 2015, however, due to Psalms
Corporation’s business deterioration and due to political instability and faltering global economy, the company was
not able to collect amounts due at the end 2015. After reviewing all available evidence at December 31, 2015, Isiah
Company determined that it was probable that Psalms would pay back only P3 400 000 collectible as follows
As of December 31, 2015, the prevailing rate of interest for all debt instruments is 14%.
SOLUTIONS:
Based on the above information and on your audit, answer the following requirements:
1. What is the carrying value of the loans receivables as of December 31, 2014?
Amortization table: Loans receivable
December 31, 2014 358 345 320 000 38 345 3 912 345
December 31, 2015 361 892 320 000 41 892 3 954 237
December 31, 2016 365 763 320 000 45 763 4 000 000
2. What is the impairment loss to be recognized in the 2015 statement of comprehensive income?
1 656 188
3. What is the interest income to be recognized in the 2017 statement of comprehensive income?
4. What is the correct carrying value of the loans receivable as of December 31, 2017?
December 31 2018 159 543 - 159 543 1 000 000 884 332
Visage Corp. had the following receivable financing transactions during the year:
On March 1, 2014, Visage Corp. factored P500 000 of its accounts receivables to BPI. as of the date of factoring,
it was ascertained that P20 000 of the accounts receivable is doubtful of collection. CPI advanced P350 000 cash
to Visage Corp. and withheld P50 000 as factors holdback (to cover future sales discount and sales returns and
allowances). The company incurred P10 000 direct transaction costs (legal fees and other professional fees)
related to the factoring. The factoring was done on a without-recourse bases, thus transferring all significant risks
and rewards associated to the receivable to BPI.
On May 1, 2014, Visage Corp. assigned P800 000 of its outstanding accounts receivable to BPI in consideration
of a P500 000, 24% loan. BPI charged the company 2% of the accounts assigned as service charge. By the end
of May, Visage Corp. collected P200 000 cash from the assigned accounts after P4 000 sales discount. The
company accepted merchandise originally invoiced at P30 000 as sales returns and wrote-off P20 000 of the
assigned accounts as worthless. It was agreed between parties that monthly collections shall be remitted in the
bank as partial payment of the loan and interest.
On July 1, 2014, Visage Corp. accepted from a customer a 6-month P600 000, 12% notes receivable for the sale
of merchandise. On October 31, 2014, Visage Corp. discounted the note to BPI at a discount rate of 10%. The
discounting done on a without-recourse basis, thus transferring all significant risks and rewards associated to the
receivable to BPI.
SOLUTIONS:
1. How much should be reported as gain/loss in the income statement on the transfer of receivables on the factoring
of receivable on March 1?
Net cash proceeds from factoring (P350 000-P10 000) 340 000
2. How much should be reported as gain/loss in the income statement on the transfer of receivables on the
assignment of receivable on May1?
May collections with sales discount (P200 000+P5 000) (205 000)
June collection with sales discount (P150 000+P4 000) (154 000)
4. What is the carrying value of the loans payable related to the accounts receivable assigned as of June 30?
5.
Payment Interest Principal Balance
(Bal*24%*1/: (Payment-Int)
5. How much should be reported as gain/loss in the income statement on the transfer of receivables on the
discounting of the note receivable on July 1?