Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
Concrete is the most abundant manmade material in the world. One of the main ingredients in
a normal concrete mixture is Portland cement. However, the production of cement is responsible for
approximately 5% of the world’s carbon dioxide emissions. In order to create a more sustainable
world, engineers and scientists must develop and put into use a greener building material. This paper
will discuss the use of geopolymer concrete as well as consider its ethical issues.
Additionally, this paper will explore the areas in which geopolymer concrete outperforms
ordinary concrete. Geopolymer concrete uses fly ash and ggbs, a byproduct created from the burning
of coal and iron. Currently, the majority of fly ash is dumped into landfills, causing environmental
problems. The production of geopolymer concrete allows fly ash to be recycled and eliminated from
landfills. Geopolymer concrete is also more resistant to damage than standard concrete.
1. INTRODUCTION
It is widely known that the production of Portland cement consumes considerable energy and
at the same time contributes a large volume of CO2 to the atmosphere. However, Portland cement is
still the main binder in concrete construction prompting a search for more environmentally friendly
materials. One possible alternative is the use of alkali-activated binder using industrial byproducts
containing silicate materials.
The most common industrial by-products used as binder materials are fly ash (FA) and
ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS). GGBS has been widely used as a cement replacement
material due to its latent hydraulic properties, while fly ash has been used as a pozzolanic material to
enhance the physical, chemical and mechanical properties of cements and concretes. GGBS is a
1
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308 (Print),
ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online), Volume 5, Issue 4, April (2014), pp. 01-09 © IAEME
latent hydraulic material which can react directly with water, but requires an alkali activator. In
concrete, this is the Ca(OH)2 released from the hydration of Portland cement.
The term “Geopolymeric” is used to characterize this type of reaction from the previous one,
and accordingly, the name geopolymer has been adopted for this type of binder. The geopolymeric
reaction differentiates geopolymer from other types of alkali activated materials (such as; alkali
activated slag) since the product is a polymer rather than C-S-H gel.
It is evident from the present scenario that ordinary Portland cement is causing much of the
environmental hazards such as-
There is a need to find some alternative binding material. Any material which contains silicon
and aluminum in amorphous state can be a source of binding material in AAC. Fly ash and GGBS
which contains this are considered to be a waste product. They are produced abundantly in India and
hence can be utilized.
The aim of the research is to evaluate the performance and suitability of fly ash based
geopolymer and alkali activated slag (AAS) as an alternative to the use of ordinary Portland cement
(OPC) in the production of concrete.
Only limited research conducted on the utilization of slag as a binder in the production of
alkali activated concrete. As such this study provides information on the fresh properties and strength
development for the different molarity of alkali solution.
2
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308 (Print),
ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online), Volume 5, Issue 4, April (2014), pp. 01-09 © IAEME
silicate were procured commercially from a local vendor. The some property of Alkali activated
concrete are discoursed for the different molarity of alkali solution (NaOH).
According to Jiang, alkali activation is the term used to imply that alkalis, alkali earth ions
are used to stimulate the pozzolanic reaction or release the latent cementitious properties of finely
divided inorganic materials. The materials could be minerals as well as industrial by-products
consisting primarily of silicates, aluminosilicate and calcium. A classification of alkali activated
cementitious material based on the composition of hydration products was proposed by Krivenko:
The works conducted by Feret and Purdon were considered as the earliest studies on activated
slag. Although not until 1959 when Glukhovsky, published “soil silicates” was a theoretical basis of
alkaline cement established. However there was a substantial difference between the “soil silicates”
and previous works, as the alkali in soil silicates acts as a structure forming element compared to the
use of alkali as an accelerator for the reactivity of slag either in the blended slag-Portland cement
system or in 100% slag cement system Krivenko, further categorized the alkaline cements into two
groups, depending on the starting materials.
The first group is the alkaline binding system Me2O-Me2O3-SiO2-H2O and the second group
is the alkaline-alkali earth system Me2O-MeO-Me2O3-SiO2-H2O. In 1979, Davidovits developed a
new type of binder similar to the alkaline binding system, using sintering products of kaolinite and
limestone or dolomite as the aluminosilicate constituents. Davidovits adopted the term
“Geopolymer” to emphasize the association of this binder with the earth mineral found in natural
stone and to differentiate it from other alkali activated binding systems.
3
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308 (Print),
ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online), Volume 5, Issue 4, April (2014), pp. 01-09 © IAEME
Zhang Yunshen and Sun Wei. have conducted studies on Fly ash based Geopolymer
concrete. Studies were carried out to obtain the optimum Fly ash content in Geopolymer concrete
that gives high mechanical and compressive strength. The results reported show that Geopolymer
concrete with 30% fly ash prepared at 800C for 8 hours exhibited high mechanical strength. The
compressive strength was 32.2MPa and the flexural strength was 7.15MPa.
81.27%
5. Al2O3 27.61% 70% (min)
6. Fe2O3 4.79%
7. CaO 4.08%
8. MgO 1.04% 3.0% (max)
9. S 0.41% 5.0% (max)
4
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308 (Print),
ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online), Volume 5, Issue 4, April (2014), pp. 01-09 © IAEME
8.3 Aggregates
In the present experimental study river sand and crushed granite aggregated 12.5 mm down
size were used as fine aggregate and coarse aggregates respectively. Aggregate were in the saturated
surface dry condition. The characteristics of aggregates are presented in the Table 4.5 to Table 4.6.
5
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308 (Print),
ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online), Volume 5, Issue 4, April (2014), pp. 01-09 © IAEME
8.5 Water
Distilled water was used in experimental study, in order to avoid any mineral interference in
polymerization reaction. And water was used only for the preparation of sodium hydroxide solution.
9. PRILIMINARY INVESTIGATION
Initially, numbers of trial mixtures of AAC were prepared, and test specimens in the form of
150 mm cubes or 100x200 mm cylinders were made. The 60 liter capacity pan mixer with rotating
drum available in the concrete laboratory for making OPC concrete was used to manufacture the
AAC.
REFERENECES
BOOKS
1. Hardjito, D., & Rangan, B. V. (2005), Development and Properties of Low- Calcium Fly Ash-
Based Geopolymer Concrete (Research Report GC 1). Perth: Faculty of Engineering Curtin
University of Technology.
2. B.V Rangan, (2005). Development and Properties of Low- Calcium Fly Ash-Based
Geopolymer Concrete, (Research Report GC 1). Perth: Faculty of Engineering Curtin
University of Technology .
3. Wallah, S. E., & Rangan, B. V. (2006). Low-Calcium Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete:
Long-Term Properties (Research Report GC 2), Perth: Faculty of Engineering Curtin
University of Technology
6
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308 (Print),
ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online), Volume 5, Issue 4, April (2014), pp. 01-09 © IAEME
PAPER PRESENTATIONS
1. Glukhovsky, V. D., Rotovskaya, G. S., & Rumyna, G. V. (1980), High Strength Slag-Alkali
Cement, Paper presented at the 7th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cements.
2. Gjorv, O. E. (1989). Alkali Activation of a Norwegian Granulated Blast Furnace Slag, Paper
presented at the third international conference on fly ash, silica fume, slag, and natural
pozzolans in concrete.
3. Talling, B., & Brandstetr, J. (1989), Present State and Future of Alkali-Activated Slag
Concretes, Paper presented at the third international conference on fly ash, silica fume, slag,
and natural pozzolans in concrete, Trondheim, Norway.
4. Krivenko, P. D. (1994, 11-14 October). Alkaline cements, Paper presented at the The first
international conference on alkaline cements and concrete, Kiev, Ukraine.
THESIS
JOURNAL PAPERS
1. Savitha A.L, Krishna Gudi, Gyanen Takhdmayum (volumw 3, issue 3, March 2013)
“Experimental studies on soil stabilization using fine and coarse GGBS”, GSS Institute of
technology, VTU.
2. Ganapati Naidu .P, A.S.S.N.Prasad, S.Adiseshu, A.V.V.Satayanarayana (volume 2, issue 4,
July 2012,pp 19-28), A study on strength properties of geopolymer concrete with addition of
GGBS, Andhra University, Visakhapathnam.
3. K. Suvarna Latha, M.V. Seshagiai Rao, Srinivasa Reddy v (volume 2, issue 2, December
2012) Estimation of GGBS and HVFA strength efficiencies in concrete with age.
4. Gunavant K. Kate, Pranesh .B Murnal, Effect of addition of flyash on shrinkage character tics
in high strength concrete, Government college of Engineering, Aurangabad, Maharashtra.
5. J. Alam, L.M.N.Akhtar, Flyash utlilization in different sectors in Indian scenario, Aligarh
Muslim University, Aligarh, India.
6. Anand Kumar B .G, Effective Utilization of Fly Ash and Supplementary Cementitious
Materials in Construction Industry, R V College of Engineering, Bangalore.
7. Bennet Jose Mathew, Sudhakar M, Dr.C.Nataryan (valume 2, no. 5, June 2013) Development
of coal ash – ggbs based geopolymer bricks, National Institute of Technology, Trichy.
8. Attl Swaroop, K. Venkateswar Rao, Prof.P.Kodandarama Rao (volume 3, Issue 4, July-
August2012, PP285-289), Durabillity studies on concrete with flyash and ggbs, Gudlavalleru
Engineering college, Gudlavalleru.
7
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308 (Print),
ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online), Volume 5, Issue 4, April (2014), pp. 01-09 © IAEME
9. Mr. Bennet Jose Mathew, Mr. M Sudhakar, Dr. C Natarajan (volume 3, Issue 11) Strength,
Economic and Sustainability Characteristics of Coal Ash –GGBS Based Geopolymer
Concrete, National Institute of Technology, Thiruchirappalli, India.
10. Swamy, R. N. (1986), Cement Replacement Materials (Vol. 3), Glasgow: Surrey University
Press.
11. Bakharev, T., Sanjayan, J. G., & Cheng, Y.-B. (1999), Alkali activation of Australian slag
cements, Cement and Concrete Research, 29(1), 113- 120.
12. Brough, A. R., & Atkinson, A. (2002), Sodium silicate-based, alkali-activated slag mortars,
Part I. Strength, hydration and microstructure. Cement and Concrete Research, 32(6),
865-879.
13. Davidovits, J. (1994) Global Warming Impact on the Cement and Aggregates Industries,
World Resource Review, 6(2), 263-278.
14. Malhotra, V. M., & Mehta, P. K. (1996), Pozzolanic and Cementitious Materials Taylor &
Francis. Malhotra, V. M., & Ramezanianpour, A. A. (1994). Fly Ash in Concrete, Report MSL
94-45(IR). Ottawa: Canada Center for Mineral and Energy Technology (CANMET).
15. Popovics, S. (1992), Concrete Materials - Properties, Specifications and Testing (2nd Edition).
New Jersey, USA: Noyes Publications; Provis, J. L. (2006). Modelling the formation of
geopolymers. The University of Melbourne, Melbourne.
16. Feret, R. (1939), Slags for the manufacture of cement, Revue des matriaux de construction et
de travaux publics, 121-126.
17. Collins, F., & Sanjayan, J. G. (1998), Early Age Strength and Workability of Slag Pastes
Activated by NaOH and Na2CO3, Cement and Concrete Research, 28(5), 655-664.
18. Douglas, E., Bilodeau, A., Brandstetr, J., & Malhotra, V. M. (1991), Alkali activated ground
granulated blast-furnace slag concrete: Preliminary investigation, Cement and Concrete
Research, 21(1), 101-108.
19. Fernandez-Jimenez, A., & Palomo, A. (2005), Composition and microstructure of alkali
activated fly ash binder: Effect of the activator, Cement and Concrete Research, 35(10),
1984-1992.
20. Puertas, F., Martinez-Ramirez, S., Alonso, S., & Vazquez, T. (2000), Alkali activated fly
ash/slag cements: Strength behaviour and hydration products, Cement and Concrete Research,
30(10), 1625-1632.
21. Xu, H. and J. S. J. van Deventer. (2000), The Geopolymerisation of Alumino-Silicate
Minerals, International Journal of Mineral Processing 59(3): 247-266.
22. Brough, A. R., & Atkinson, A. (2002), Sodium silicate-based, alkali-activated slag mortars:
Part I. Strength, hydration and microstructure, Cement and Concrete Research, 32(6),
865-879.
23. Weng, L., & Sagoe-Crentsil, K. (2007), Dissolution processes, hydrolysis and condensation
reactions during geopolymer synthesis: Part I—Low Si/Al ratio systems, Journal of Materials
Science, 42(9), 2997-3006.
24. Hardjito, D., Wallah, S. E., Sumajouw, D. M. J., & Rangan, B. V. (2004a), On the
development of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete, Aci Materials Journal, 101(6), 467-472.
25. Teychenne, D. C., Franklin, R. E., & Erntroy, H. C. (1988), Design of normal concrete mixes
(rev. ed.), Great Britain. Department of the Environment.
26. Swanepoel, J. C. and C. A. Strydom. (2002), Utilisation of fly ash in a geopolymeric material,
Applied Geochemistry 17(8): 1143-1148.
27. Van Jaarsveld, J. G. S., J. S. J. van Deventer, L. Lorenzen. (1997), The Potential Use of
Geopolymeric Materials to Immobilise Toxic Metals: Part I. Theory and Applications,
Minerals Engineering 10(7): 659-669.
8
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308 (Print),
ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online), Volume 5, Issue 4, April (2014), pp. 01-09 © IAEME
IS: 456-2000, Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced Cement Concrete.
SP: 23-1982, Hand Book on Concrete Mixes (Based on Indian Standards).
IS: 10262-1982, Indian Standards, Recommended Guidelines for Concrete Mix-Design.
IS: 516-1959, Indian Standards, Methods of Tests for Strength of Concrete.
IS: 383 – 1970, Tests on Aggregates.
IS:5816-1999, Indian Standards, Split Tensile Test.
IS:1331(PART-I), Indian Standards, UPV Test.
IS:14858-2000, Indian Standards, Compressive Test.
IS:1199-1959, Indian Standards, Slump Test.