* Manuscript

Click here to view linked References

COMPARISON OF TEST METHODS TO ASSESS POZZOLANIC ACTIVITY

1
2 Centre for Environmental Control and Waste Management,
3 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Skempton Building,
4 Imperial College, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
5
6 Abstract
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 Keywords:
22
23
24 1. INTRODUCTION
25
26
a siliceous and aluminous material which, in itself, possesses
27
28 little or no cementitious value but which will, in finely divided form in the presence of moisture, react
29 chemically with calcium hydroxide at ordinary temperature to form compounds possessing
30 cementitious properties
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25 2. EXPERIMENTAL
26
27
28 2.1 Materials and characterisation
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50 2.2 Pozzolanic activity test methods
51
52 a) Strength Activity Index (SAI)
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
 1
2
3
4
5
6
7 SAI A
8
B
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
b) Frattini Test
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38 c) Saturated Lime Test
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60 3. RESULTS
61
62
63
64
65
 3.1 Strength activity index test
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14 3.2 Frattini Test
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 Max CaO
29 OH
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46 3.3 Saturated Lime Test
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12 3.4 Correlation between methods
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 4. DISCUSSION
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57 Comparison of the Frattini test with the Saturated Lime (SL) test
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12 Comparison of the Strength Activity Index (SAI) test and the Frattini test
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Comparison of SAI test with SL test
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52 PHREEQC-I
53
54 HATCHES
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Conclusions
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36 Acknowledgements
37
38
39
40
41
42 References
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
PHREEC-I
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
Figure

100

90

80
MK SF PFA ISSA
Cumulative Volume (%)

70

60

50

40

30

20

10 <150um Sand

0
1 10 100 1000
particle diameter (um)

1.00
SAI (decimal relative to control strength)

0.80

0.60

0.40

0.20
7d
28d
0.00
sand ISSA FA SF MK
Test pozzolan
 20

18
Lime solubility curve
16

14
[CaO] mmol

12
20% SF
10 20% Sand

8 20% ISSA
Control
6
20% PFA
4

2
20% MK
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
[OH] mmol

100

90

80

70
% Total CaO removed

Sand
60 ISSA
PFA
50
MK
40 SF
Control
30

20

10

0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Time (days)
 100
MK
90
Frattini test result (% CaO removed)

80 R2 = 0.8593

70

60

50 FA

40
SF
30

20

10
sand ISSA
0
0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00
28d SAI result (% of control sample strength)

100
Saturated Lime test result (% Ca removed)

90

80

70

60 7d R2 = 0.2188

28d R2 = 0.2467
50

40 3d R2 = 0.13
1d R2 = 0.0114
30
1 day SL test
20 3 day SL test

10 7d SL test
28d SL test
0
60 70 80 90 100
28d SAI result (% of control sample strength)
 100
7d R2 = 0.2526
Saturated Lime test result (% Ca removed)

28d R2 = 0.2407
80

60
3d R2 = 0.0176

40
1d R2 = 0.0104

1 day SL test
20 3 day SL test
7 day SL test
28 day SL test
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Frattini Test result (% CaO saturation)

40
Wateq4f
35
Minteq4
30 Hatches
Solubility mmol/dm 3

LLNL
25

20

15

10

0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Temperature (o C)

PHREEC-I
 13.6
13.4 Wateq4f
13.2 Minteq4
13 Hatches
12.8 LLNL
pH

12.6
12.4
12.2
12
11.8
11.6
0 10 20 30 40 50
o
Temperature ( C)
Table