Professional Documents
Culture Documents
P
R
60 S
T
U
CLR (%)
40
20
0
0 20 40 60 80
CAR (%)
Figure 4: Correlation graph between CAR and CLR for all specimens after HIC experiments.
50
Fail Pass
40
30
CLR (%)
0
80
70 Fail Pass
60
50
CAR (%)
40
30 CAR upper limit: 23%
20
10
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Specimen n°
60
CAR (%) 50
40
30 P
R
20 S
T
10
U
0
0 1 2 3 4 5
H2 content (mass ppm)
Figure 6: Correlation graph between CAR (%) and diffusible hydrogen content (mass ppm) for
all HIC experiments.
80
P
70 R
S
60
T
50 U
CAR (%)
40
3 months
30
1 month
20
10
0
1 10 100
pH2S (mbar)
Figure 7: Impact of H2S partial pressure on CAR for the experiments at pH 3.5.
100
90 P T
R U
80 S
70
60
CAR (%) 50
40
30
20
10
0
3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5
pH
Figure 8: Impact of pH on CAR values for the 2 week exposure under 100mbar H2S (points at
pH 2.7 corresponds to test in NACE solution, without pH adjustment).
4.5
4.0
3.5
pH
3.0
2.5
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Time (days)
Figure 9: pH evolution during 2 weeks test in NACE TM0284-2003 Solution A
under 100mbar H2S.
Steel P - CAR (%) Steel R - CAR (%)
< 5% < 5%
5,5 5% < < 23% 5,5 5% < < 23%
23% < < 50% 23% < < 50%
> 50% > 50%
4,5 4,5
pH
pH
3,5 3,5
pH
3,5 3,5
3,5
1 10 100 1000
pH2S (mbar)
Figure 10: Representation of CAR results in the pH-pH2S diagram. Exposure time was
2 weeks for all experiments, except at pH 3.5 – 10mbar (4 weeks) and at pH 3.5 – 3mbar (3
months). EFC 16 solution A was used for all tests, except for tests at pH 2.7, where NACE
TM0284-2003 solution A was used.
Region 1:
mildly sour
6
Region 0:
5 Region 2/3:
sour service materials
pH
1 10 100 1000
pH2S (mbar)