Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(eds)
© 2008 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-41196-7
The evaluation of failure probability for rock slope based on fuzzy set theory
and Monte Carlo simulation
Hyuck-Jin Park
Department of Geoinformation Engineering, Sejong University, Republic of Korea
Jeong-gi Um
Department of Environmental Exploration Engineering, Pukyung National University, Republic of Korea
Ik Woo
Department of Ocean System Engineering, Kunsan National University, Republic of Korea
ABSTRACT: Uncertainty is pervasive in rock slope stability analysis due to various reasons and sometimes it
causes serious rock slope failures. Therefore, since 1980’s the importance of uncertainty has been recognized and
subsequently the probability theory has been used to quantify the uncertainty. However, not all uncertainties are
objectively quantifiable. Some uncertainties, due to incomplete information, cannot be handled satisfactorily in
the probability theory and the fuzzy set theory is more appropriate. In this study the random variable in rock slope
stability analysis is considered as fuzzy number and the fuzzy set theory is employed. In addition, the Monte
Carlo simulation technique is utilized to evaluate the probability of failure for rock slope. This overcomes the
shortcomings of the previous studies, which are employed vertex method, first order second moment method and
point estimate method. Since the previous studies used only the representative values from membership function
to evaluate the stability of rock slope, the approximated analysis results were obtained in the previous studies.
With Monte Carlo simulation technique, more complete analysis results can be secured in the proposed method.
The proposed method was applied to the practical example. According to the analysis results, the probabilities
of failure obtained from the fuzzy Monte Carlo simulation coincide with the probabilities of failure from the
probabilistic analysis.
1943
in the probability theory and the fuzzy set is more
appropriate (Dodagoudar and Venkatachalan, 2000).
1.0
Therefore, the present study proposed the utilization
Membership function
of fuzzy set theory in order to overcome the limitations
of the probabilistic approach. Fuzzy set theory has
been proposed by Zadeh (1965) and it has been known
as appropriate approach for dealing with uncertainty 0.5 HEIGHT
mainly caused by incomplete information. Conse-
quently, fuzzy set theory has been employed in many
slope stability analyses (Juang & Lee, 1992; Lee and CORE
Juang, 1992; Davis and Keller, 1997; Juang et al.,
1998; Dodagoudar and Venkatachalan, 2000; Giasi 0.0
SUPPORT
et al., 2003; Li and Mei, 2004). However, the pre-
x
vious studies combined the fuzzy set theory with the
approximate method such as point estimate method or Figure 1. Concept of membership function.
first order second moment method. Since the approx-
imate methods use only few representative values membership function in a fuzzy set may admit some
from uncertain parameters, the analysis cannot pro- uncertainty, its membership is a matter of degree. The
vide accurate analysis results. Therefore, this study membership function can be manifested by many dif-
proposed the new approach incorporating the Monte ferent types of function and different shapes of their
Carlo simulation which provides complete analysis graphs. Triangular and trapezoidal shapes are most
results with fuzzy set theory. common types in the membership function. Fig. 1
shows the concept for support, core and height in a
trapezoidal shaped fuzzy set. The support is the set of
2 FUZZY MONTE CARLO SIMULATION all elements of set x that have nonzero membership
METHOD in A. In addition, core is the set of all elements of x
for which the degree of membership in A is 1. The
2.1 Fuzzy set theory height of a fuzzy set A may be defined as the largest
membership grade obtained by an element in that set.
In classical set theory, an element either belongs or If the height of a fuzzy set A is 1, set A is called
does not belong to the set. That is, the membership of normal and otherwise, it is called subnormal.
classical set theory is defined in strict sense. When a There are two commonly used ways of denoting
certain element x belongs to set A, x is a member or fuzzy sets.
element of a set A and can be written
x
x|A (1) A = x, μA
1
Whenever x is not an element of a set A, we write or
x|A (2) μA (x)
A= (4)
x
A set can be defined by membership function that
declares which elements of x are members of the set
and which are not. 2.2 Fuzzy Monte Carlo simulation
The probabilistic analysis has been known as an
1, x | A
μA (x) = (3) effective tool to quantify and model uncertainty.
0, x | A
However, limited information for uncertain para-
For each x | A, when μA (x) = 1, x is declared to be meters makes the application of the probabilistic anal-
a member of A. When μA (x) = 0, x is declared to be ysis difficult. This is because the probabilistic analysis
a nonmember of A. is carried out on the premise that the precise mean and
However, in fuzzy sets, which is introduced by standard deviation and the appropriate probability den-
Zadeh (1965), more flexible sense of membership is sity function for uncertain parameter can be obtained.
possible. That is, the membership function can be gen- However, in order to obtain the adequate statisti-
eralized such that the values assigned to the elements cal parameters and distribution function for uncertain
fall within a specified range. In fuzzy set, the degree parameter, a large amount of data is required but it
of membership to a set is indicated by a number of is often not practically possible. Frequently only the
between 0 and 1. maximum and minimum values for uncertain parame-
In fuzzy set theory, each fuzzy set is uniquely ter can be obtained and therefore, uncertain parameter
defined by a membership function. Since an element’s can be expressed only with interval between minimum
1944
and maximum. Under this condition, uncertain param- angle is considered as fuzzy number and its member-
eter may be expressed as a fuzzy set, if there is some ship function is decided on the basis of analysis
reason to believe that not all values in the interval for laboratory test results. However, in the Monte
have the same degree of support (Juang et al., 1998). Carlo simulation, the cumulative density function for
Since uncertainties due to incomplete information are uncertain parameter is required. In the present study,
pervasive in the procedure of slope stability analysis, the membership function is adapted to cumulative
several researches utilized fuzzy set theory in slope density function in the calculation of performance
stability analysis (Juang et al., 1998; Dodagoudar and function. Then in Monte Carlo simulation, the process
Venkatachalan, 2000; Giasi et al., 2003). However, the takes a single value selected randomly from its cumu-
previous researches utilized the vertex method (Dong lative distribution. The randomly selected parameter
and Wong, 1987) to evaluate fuzzy input parameters is used to generate a single random value for factor of
in slope stability analysis. The vertex method is based safety. By repeating this process many times to gen-
on the α-cut concept of fuzzy numbers and involves an erate a large number of different factors of safety, a
interval analysis. The basic idea of the vertex method is cumulative density function for factor of safety can be
to discretize a fuzzy number into a group of α-cut inter- obtained and then probability of failure is evaluated.
vals. By replacing fuzzy numbers in the slope model
with intervals, the fuzzy computation obtains factor
of safety in the deterministic slope model. However,
when the factor of safety is evaluated from the deter- 3 CASE STUDY
ministic slope model using two interval values, the
first order second moment method (Giasi et al., 2003) The proposed method in the present study has been
or point estimate (Dodagoudar and Venkatachalam, applied to practical example in order to check the fea-
2000) has been applied. According to Harr (1987), the sibility and validity of the proposed approach and com-
first order second moment method and point estimate pare with the probabilistic analysis results. A slope has
method are considered as approximate method since been selected and the detailed field investigation has
the methods do not utilize complete information for been carried out. The dip direction and dip angle of
random variables to evaluate performance function. the slope are 325 degree and 65 degree, respectively
The approximate method has been proposed to evalu- and its height is 40.8 m. The slope is composed of
ate the probability using simple calculation with only Precambrian metasedimentary rock. Approximately
few representative values of random variable without 350 discontinuity data has been obtained on scan-
distribution information. However, since the previous line survey and 6 discontinuity sets were identified
researches used incomplete information in the analy- by means of clustering process (Table 1). Among
sis, there is a possibility that approximate results would 6 discontinuity sets, 2 sets (set 2 and set 4) are ana-
be obtained instead of the precise analysis results. lyzed as kinematically unstable for planar failure. In
Therefore, this study proposed the new approach this study, the analysis for only planar failure is per-
evaluating the reliability of rock slope with fuzzy num- formed since the analysis results of planar failure are
ber and Monte Carlo simulation. The Monte Carlo easy to compare to other analysis results. In addition,
simulation is the most complete method of the proba- the direct shear test is carried out in order to acquire
bilistic analysis since all the random variables are rep- the shear strength parameter for discontinuity. Based
resented by their statistical parameters and probability on the 19 direct shear test results, the friction angle
density function. In addition, the complete informa- ranges from 20.9 to 46.3 and their mean and standard
tion is employed to evaluate performance function in deviation are 34.6 and 8.2, respectively (Fig. 2). How-
Monte Carlo simulation. In order to combine Monte ever, even if 19 tests were performed, the probability
Carlo simulation with fuzzy set theory, uncertain density function cannot be determined due to severe
parameter is considered as fuzzy number and its mem- scattering as can be seen in Fig. 2. Even the previous
bership function is decided by means of available
information and engineering judgment. Then Monte Table 1. Discontinuity sets observed from field investi-
Carlo simulation is utilized to evaluate the probability gation.
of slope failure from fuzzy numbers of uncertain para-
meters. Discontinuity sets Representative orientation
In most rock slope stability analyses, the fric-
tion angle of discontinuity is considered as uncertain Set 1 217/77
parameters. This is because the number of the direct Set 2 320/30
shear tests which are carried out to acquire shear Set 3 061/66
Set 4 311/40
strength of discontinuity is always limited and there- Set 5 196/56
fore, the true value of friction angle cannot be eval- Set 6 183/05
uated. Consequently, in the present study the friction
1945
6 0.12
5 0.10
4 0.08
Frequency
Frequency
3 0.06
2 0.04
1 0.02
0.00
0
20 - 25 25 - 30 30 - 35 35 - 40 40 - 45 45 - 50 0 1 2 3
Figure 2. Results of direct shear tests. Figure 3. Results of probabilistic analysis for joint set 2.
0.16
tion is decided to 34.6 which is mean value of the test Factor of safety
results. In addition, on the basis of Hoek’s suggestion
(1997) in rock slope stability analysis, cohesion is not Figure 4. Results of probabilistic analysis for joint set 4.
considered in slope stability analysis.
1946
0.28 1.0
0.21 0.8
Membership function
Frequency
0.6
0.14
0.4
0.07
0.2
0.00
0 1 2 3
0.0
Factor of safety 10 20 30 40 50
Internal friction angle
Figure 5. Results of probabilistic analysis for joint set 2
when COV = 10%. Figure 7. Triangular membership function.
0.36
0.16
0.27
0.12
Frequency
Frequency
0.18
0.08
0.09
0.04
0.00
0 1 2 3 0.00
0 1 2 3
Factor of safety Factor of safety
Figure 6. Results of probabilistic analysis for joint set 4 on Figure 8. Results of FMC analysis for joint set 2.
when COV = 10%.
1947
0.12
to the practical example. In the deterministic analy-
0.10
sis results, joint set 2 is analyzed as stable but joint
set 4 is analyzed as unstable. On the contrary in the
0.08 probabilistic analysis results, the probability of fail-
Frequency
1948
Li, W.X. & Mei, S.H. 2004. Fuzzy system method for the Park, H.J., West, T.R. & Woo, I. 2005. Probabilistic analysis
design of a jointed rock slope. Proc. of SINOROCK 2004. of rock slope stability and random properties of discon-
2B-18. tinuity parameters, Interstate Highway 40. Engineering
Mostyn, G.R. & Li, K.S. 1993. Probabilistic slope analysis— Geology. 79: 230–250.
state of play. Proceeding of Conference on Probabilistic Pathak, D. & Nilsen, B. 2004. Probabilistic rock slope sta-
Method in Geotechnical Engineering: 89–109. bility analysis for Himalayan condition. Bull. Eng. Geol.
Mostyn, G.R. & Small, J.C. 1987. Methods of stability anal- Environ., 63: 25–32.
ysis. Soil Slope Instability and Stabilization. Balkema, Peck, R.B. 1969. Advantages of limitations of the observa-
71–120. tional method in applied soil mechanics. Geotechnique,
Nilsen, B. 2000. New trend in rock slope stability analysis. 19: 171–187.
Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ., 58: 173–178. Zadeh, L.A. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8:
Park, H.J. & West, T.R. 2001. Development of a probabilistic 338–353.
approach for rock wedge failure. Engineering Geology.
59: 233–251.
1949