Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Clinicopatlzologic S t u d y
CMDR BERNETT
L. JOHKSON, JR., M C , USN,” AND ELSONB. HELWG,MD
T t f Z l O R S O r S l V t A T GLAND ORIClN ARC FRE- I n 27G examples, the primary lesions were
quentlj confused with tumors arising in studied, in 7 both primary and benign recur-
other atlnexal structu~esand with metastatic rent lesions, and in 31 cases only the beriign
lesions. Ex en within the group of sweat gland recurrent lesions were examined. Fike ad-
tumors, thcie is confusion as to the classifi- ditional tumors that were regarded as malig-
catiorl . I , 2 .i -i nant were studied and will be presented at a
,I unique cutaneous tumor with laige cells later date. Follow-up information was avail-
and ductal structures has been reported vari- able o n 139 cases.
ously as: clear cell papillary cartinorna,lg clear Hematoxylin and eosin (I1 and E)-stained
cell myocpithelioma,l4 clear cell hidrade- sections were examined in all cases and se-
noIna,gj 18 carcinoma of the sweat gland,26 rial sections in selected cases. Several tumors
clear cell hidradenoina and hidradenocarci- were prepared by the following methods: pe-
norna,lO superficial hidradenoma,l2 large cell riodic acid-Schiff (PAS), with and without di-
sweat gland adenoma,ll basal cell carcinoma astase digestion; hlowry’s modification of the
of sweat gland origin,l dermal sweat duct Hale stain for acid mucopoly4accharides
t u ~ n o r , ~and ’ poros) ringoma.5 I n this paper, (AMP), with and without digestion with hy-
we report a clinicopathologic study of this aluronidase; Masson’s trichrome; aldehyde-
unique tumor, which we call eccrine acro- fuchsin at p H 1.7; hfajer’s mucicarmine;
spiroma. Snook’s reticulum; oil r e d - 0 for fat; Hart’s
elastica; Heidenhain’s iron-hematoxylin; tolui-
MATERIAL AND METHODS
dine blue at pH’s 1, 1.5 and 3; Prussian blue;
and Fontana. All stains were carried o u t as
Three hundred and nineteen cases of ac- indicated i n the Manual of Histologic and
rospiroma from the files of the Armed Forces Special Staining Technics.19
Institute of Pathology were selected €or study.
RESULTS
From the Dermal Pathology Branch arid the Reg-
istry of Dermal Pathology, Armed Forces Institute of CZin,icaZ data: Clinically, the acrospiroma
Pathologv, \Vashington, D.C. 20305. appeared as a single, nodular, solid, or cystic
* Presently Assistant Chief of the Dermatology Ser-
vice, l‘hiladclphia Xaval Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa. mass that sometimes protruded from the der-
Addiess for reprints: E. B. Helwig, M.D., Chief, mis (Figs. 1, 2). T h e skin over the tumors
Dermal Pathology Branch, Armed Forces Institute of
Pathology, Washington, D.C. 20305. varied from flesh color to red to blue and
Received for publication November 1 , 1968. sometimes was thickened and verrucous. The
64 1
6-12 Alarcli 1969
CANCER VOl. 23
phase the cell appeared as a clear cell (Fig. 13) from a h o s t loo(:; to less than 5%. Tumors
with little o r n o identifiable c)toplasm and present for 2 years or longer had slightly
distinct cell walls. T h e nucleus was usually more clear cells.
small and eccentric, with an eccentrically I n most of the tumors the neoplastic cells
placed nucleolus. T h e chromatin was dense appeared in large, solid nests, sheets and lob-
and clumped. Mitotic figures were not seen ules without a particular pattern other than
in this cell. their relation to ductlike structures (de-
Transitions occurred from the eosinophilic scribed subsequently). In several tumors,
cell to the clear cell (Figs. 14 and 15). I n the however, distinct patterns of the eosinophilic
same tumor, some areas showed a gradual cells were noted. One was a trabecular or
transition, and others an abrupt change. T h e cribriform pattern in which irregular rows of
number of clear cells in the tumor ranged tumor cells were separated and surrounded
644 March 1969
CANCER Vol. 23
stained with aldehyde-fuchsin at pH 1.7 gave positive material was noted in several tumors
variable results. When positive, the material (Fig. 27).5 I t was focal in distribution and
was found in granular form in the intercel- frequent in the cells lining the larger ductal
lular spaces and in the stroma. Specimens spaces. Lennoxl3 also noted mucin in sweat
stained with toluidine blue at pH 1.5 and 3.5 gland tumors.
were negative for metachromasia, indicating Reticular tissue was abundant in the inter-
that there were no strongly acid rnucopoly- nal stroma of the tumor as well as condensed
saccharides present. Prussian blue and acid- about the tumor lobules. Elastic tissue in the
fast stains25 were consistently negative. Speci- stroma was not increased but sometimes ap-
mens stained with the iron-hematoxylin peared to be compact about the tumor, prob-
method did not reveal myofibrils in the tu- ably from compression. T h e tumor cells did
mor cells. Mucicarmine- and colloidal iron- not contain fat in oil-red-0 preparations.
648 March 1969
CANCER Vol. 23
WITH REPORIS
COMPARISON IN THE squamous cells. This type of ductal struc-
LITERATURE ture is thought to represent a mimicry of the
iiitraepidermal portion ol the sweat duct.
Approximately 74 tumors of sweat gland Liu theorized that, on the basis of the abun-
origin with clear cells have been reported in dance of glycogen in the tumor and in the
the American literature. hair mot sheath, these tumors weie of hair
Liu15 in 1949 reported on the histogenesis follicle origin. Glycogen also occurs in sweat
o f clear cell papillary carcinoma occurring in glands2n 2 2 and sweat gland tuinots; this ma-
2 male and 2 female patients. RIetastatic le- terial was present in the tiiniors of oiir re-
sions did not occur. Structures Liu iclentified port.
as immature hair shafts within the tumor are Leier and Castleman14 in 1952 reported on
probably ductal structures within ~i Iiorl5 of 10 cases they called clear cell m\oepitheli-
oma. More of their patients were male than in our opinion the cysts represent dilated
female. None of their tumors recurred or ductlike structures. Glycogen was noted in
metastasized. No lesions were reported on the their tumors.
palms or the soles, in contrast with the dis- Stout and Cooley26 reported on 11 tumors,
tribution in our group. Three of their tu- 6 of which were sweat gland carcinomas, but
mors showed an epidermal connection, but from their descriptions and photographs
they believed that the tumors arose from the these did not resemble the acrospiroma or
myoepithelial cells of the sweat gland. We other reported clear cell tumors of the sweat
could not confirm this origin in our cases. gland. Of their remaining 5 tumors, only 1
Horny cells (squamous whorls), glandular (with clear cells) fits our criteria. This tumor
structures and cysts were also noted by these attained a very large size and led to amputa-
investigators. They concluded that the cysts tion of an extremity. A 9-year follow-up of
were the result of a degenerative process, but this patient showed n o evidence of meta-
static spread. These authors called their tu- these authors are apparently similar to those
mors “squamous cell epitheliomas of sweat studied by us. ‘CVithin their group, they noted
glands with clear cells.” They did not specu- some histologically atypical tumors, but on
late as to their histogenesis. No histochemical subsequent study and follou~-upinformation,
procedures were done. evidence of malignancy was not established.
Keasbey and Hadley” reported the largest Their group of malignant tiimois grew re-
series of clear cell tumors. I n their review of lentlessly and attained large size. One tumor
235 sweat gland tumors, 50 were of the clear metastasized to nodes, bone a i d pleura.
cell variety, and of this group 3 metastasized These metastatic lesions resembled the pri-
and 4 recurred after surgical excision. Two niary lesions in general but did not tend to
of the latter four lesions recurred locally and develop tubules.
were uncontrollable and resistant to massive Helwig,s in discussing the et crine spiiade-
x-ray. T h e 38 benign tumors reported by noma tlestrilxd 11) Kei sting m c 1 hiniself,11
noted that they also recognized an aclenoma recorded under the title of “Clear Cell Hi-
of sweat gland of the “large cell type” and clradenoma and Hidradenocarcinoma” de-
regarded it as originating from an eccrine scribed 2 patients with 5 tumors. He con-
sweat duct. T h e cell of this tumor was much sidered that these tumors were derived from
larger than the cell of the eccrine spirade- sweat glands and could find no evidence for
noma. Squamous differentiation, ductlike myoepithelial cell or hair origin. Through
structures and clear cells with glycogen in the his review of the literature, he recognized the
cytoplasm were observed. existence of a malignant form that can me-
Lundl* reported on 2 female patients with tastasize, but no malignant tumors were in-
benign “clear cell hidradenoma.” These le- cluded in his series. His cases were similar to
sions recurred locally and were identical with those in this report.
those in our report. T h e eccrine poroma described by Pinkus
A report of clear cell tumor by Kerstinglo et al.24 in all probability represents a sub-
so.3 -
ECCRINEACROSPIROMAJolriisoii aizcl Helzuig 653
group of the eccrine acrospiroma. I n the orig- tochemical and enz) matic studies. They now
inal study of the poromx, 5 cases were pre- beliexe that this tumor is of eccrine origin
sentcd. All the tumors were located on the and shows different histologic variations, de-
plantar surface of the foot, and histologically pending upon the level of involvement. Find-
all were within or connected to the epider- ings from enzymatic studies were similar to
mis. I-Iistochemically, the tumors contained those of the eccrine sweat gland and duct.
abundant gljc-ogen. O u r examples of acro- T h e histologic observations in their report
spiroma occurring on the plantar surface of are similar to ours.
the feet and the palms of the hands appeared Tvinkelmann and i\IcLeod2i presented 3
to be similar to the lesions of eccrine poroma cases of “dermal duct tumors.” These tumors
described by Pinkus. are histologically and histochemically similar
Ilashimoto, DiBella and Levi4 reported 2 to the acrospiroma, and we believe that theirs
cases of a clear cell tumor (“clear cell hid- is not a separate entity but just one of the
radenoma”) on which they performed his- variations of the acrospiroma.
T h e acrospiroma is an eccrine ductal tu- the subdermis. One phase of the biphasic cell
mor that may mimic any segment or seg- pattern comprising the tumor appears as a
ments of the duct. T h e predominant pattern clear cell that is oval, fusiform or polygonal,
of the tumor will depend on the area of ori- with scant to absent cytoplasm. T h e nucleus
gin and the potentiality of the cells in that of the clear cell is small, eccentric and con-
area of the duct, or of the cells from which tains a nucleolus. I n the other phase the cell
the duct is derived. is of similar shape but has an eosinophilic,
solid and finely granular or finely vesicular
DISCUSSION cytoplasm. T h e nucleus of the eosinophilic
T h e eccrine acrospiroma lacks specific di- cell is vesicular and has a reticular chroma-
agnostic features clinically, but the structure tin pattern and a prominent nucleolus. T h e
and the cells are histologically distinctive. It predominance of either type of cell within
is usually a nonencapsulated multilobular a given tumor is variable. T h e eosinophilic
tumor in the dermis that in many instances type of cell tends to predominate in the tu-
also involves the epidermis and occasionally mor of less than 2 years’ duration, and the
So. 3 ECCRINE
XCKOSPIROZ~A
* Joliiisoii niitl Hcliuig G.55
clear cell in tumors of more than 2 years' du- hair follicles or from the ni) oepithelial cell.
ration. Ductal structures may be seen within IVe believe that tlie histologic ant1 tlic his-
the tumor in three forms: (1) resembling ec- tochemical changes noted in the t uniors i n
cline sweat ducts; ( 2 ) large, dilated and cys- our study support our peniire that [lie tu-
tic; and (3) occurring within whorls of squa- mor arises from or mimics the stiricture of
mom cells. the eccrine sweat duct. Tlie ductal wuctures
Tlie majoricy of the acrospiromas are be- present in the tumor resemble the intraepi-
nign. Malignant forms occur and have the dermal zone,17. 2 2 , "3 the dermal, or both zones
same general configuration and pattern as do of the eccrine sweat duct. T h e cell t)Iies of
tlie benign tumors, but they also present ple- the tumor and of d i e etcrine hlve'it t l u c t are
omorphic cellular features that we belie\ e similar. I n sevei a1 instances. a cuticuhr border
are recogriiirable and distinctive. 'rva~seen on the ductal lurriinal cells of the
Tlie acrosprroma has been ariousl\ ie- .\
tumor. similar border occ irr5 on the luniinal
ported as arising from the epithelium of the tells of the ecciine cluct.20 l\'itliin the luniinal
REFERENCES
1. ,li-nold, H. L., Jr.: Basal cell carcinoma of sweat epitlieliorna o l the skin. Avzer. J . Palh. 28:691-699,
xlantl origin. Arch. Derm. (Chicago) 57: 1042-1046, 1952.
1963. 15. Liu, Y.: T h e histogenesis of clear cell papillary
2. Connor, D. H., Taylor, H. B., and Helwig, E. B.: carcinoma of the skin. Amer. J. Path. 25:93-103, 1949.
Cut:incous metastasis of renal cell carcinoma. Arch. 16. Lobitz, W. C., Jr.. Holyoke, J. B., and Brophy, D.:
Path. (Chicago) 76:339-346, 1963. Histochemical evidence for ‘human eccrine sweat duct
3. Crain, R. C., and Helwig, E. B.: Dermal cyl- activity. Arch. Derm. (Chicago) 72229-236, 1955.
indroma (dermal eccrine cplindroma). A m e ~ .J. CLin. 17. Lobitz, W. C., Holyoke, J. B., and Rlontagna, W.:
Pa11i. 35:504-515, 1961. The epidermal eccrine sweat duct unit. A morpho-
logic and biologic entity. J . Invest. Derm. 22:157-158,
4. Hashimoto, K., DiRella, R. J., and Levi, W. F.: 1954.
Clear cell hidradenoma. Arch. Derm. (Chicago) 96: 18-
38, 1967. 18. Lund, H. %.: Tumors of the Skin. Section I.
Fascicle 2, of Atlas of T u m o r Pathology. TVashington,
5 . Hehvig, E. B.: Seminar on the Skin. Neoplasms D. C.: .\rmed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1957.
and Dcrmatoses. I n Proceedings of the Tiventieth
Seminar of the American Society of Clinical Path- 19. Manual of Histologic and Special Staining Tcch-
nics, ed. 2. New York, McGraiv-Hill, Blakiston Div.,
ologist~,Sept. 11, 1954. American Society of Clinical
1960.
Pathologists, 1955.
20. hfonlagna, TVilliatn: T h e Structure and Function
6. -. . T u m o r Seminar. Texas State J. Aled. of the Skin, 2nd ed. Kew York, Academic Press.
59:652-689, 1963.
21. hfontagna, TV., Chase, H. B., and Lobitz, TV. C.:
7. IIirsch, P., and Helwig, E. 13.: Chondroitl syrin- Histology and cytochemistry of human skin. 11. T h e
goma. Arcli. Derm. (Chicago) 98:835-847, 1961. distribution of glycogen in the epidermis, hair follicle,
8. Johnson, TV. C., and Helivig, E. D.: Histochem- sebaceous gland, and eccrine sweat gland. Anat. Iiec.
istry of tlre acid mucopolvsaccharides in normal and 114:231-211, 1952.
in crrtain pathologic conditions. Ainer. J. C/in. Path. 22. -: Histology and c).tocheinistry of h u m a n
4O:12%131, 1963. skin. IV. T h e eccrine sweat duct. J. Invest. Derrn.
I). Keashey, I.. E., and Hadley, G. G.: Clear cell 20:415-423, 19.53.
hidratlenoma. Cancer 7:934-951, 1954. 23. Pinkus, H.: T h e wall of the intra-epideiinal
10. Kersting, D. TV.: Clear cell hidradenoma and part of the sweat duct. J . Invest. Derm. 231755186,
€litIratienocarcinoma. Arch. Derm. (Chicago) 87:323- 1939.
333. 1963. 21. Pinkus, H., Rosin, J., and Goldman, P.: Eccrine
poroma. Arch. Derm. (C1kag.o) 74:511-521, 1956.
11. Kersting, D. TV., and Helwig, E. B.: Eccrine
spiradcnoma. Arch. Derm. (Chirngo) 73:199-227, 19%. 2.5. Steck, TV. B., and Helwig, E. B.: Cutaneous
remnants of the omphalomesenteric duct. Arch. Derrn.
12. Lennox, B.: T h e superficial hidraclenomata. (Chicago) 90:463-450, 1964.
J. Path. Bact. 47:553-562, 1954. 26. Stout, A. P., and Cooley, S. G. E.: Carcinoma
13. Lennox, B., Pearse, A. G. E., and S!mmers, of sweat glands. Cancer 4:521-536, 1951.
TV. St.: T h e frequency and significance of mucin in 27. TTinkelmann, R . K., and RIcLeod, T\7. .4.:Der-
sweat gland tumors. Brit. J. Cancer 6:363-368, 1952. mal sweat duct tumor. Arch. Dernt. (Chicugo) 94:5&
14. Lever, TV. F., and Castleman, B.: Clear cell myo- 5.5, 1966.