Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-
srm:438851 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald
for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission
guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com
Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company
manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as
well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and
services.
Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for
digital archive preservation.
Sustainable
Sustainable brand image: an brand image
examination of ad–brand
incongruence
Paula Arbouw
Department of Business, Ara Institute of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
Received 6 April 2018
Paul W. Ballantine Revised 6 August 2018
13 November 2018
UC School of Business, University of Canterbury, 16 December 2018
Christchurch, New Zealand, and 19 December 2018
Accepted 20 December 2018
Lucie K. Ozanne
Downloaded by Fielding Graduate University At 02:53 28 March 2019 (PT)
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine how consumer attitudes are affected by corporate brands
that have newly adopted a sustainable brand image. Specifically, this paper examines consumer responses to
ad–brand incongruity and tests whether two-sided messages yield greater acceptance of incongruence.
Design/methodology/approach – In total, 528 responses were collected via an online experiment using a
3×2 between-subjects factorial design which manipulated three levels of perceived ad–brand congruence
(congruent, moderately incongruent and extremely incongruent) and two levels of message sidedness
(one- and two-sided).
Findings – Results indicate that brand managers have to be careful not to create ad–brand incongruence
after adopting new brand values and should avoid two-sided messages during this period.
Originality/value – This paper tests the use of two-sided messages as resolution hints for ad–brand
incongruence and furthers the corporate branding literature incorporating sustainability.
Keywords Sustainability, Brand image, Corporate branding, Message sidedness
Paper type Research paper
1. Introduction
Corporate branding aims to create symbolic meaning for consumers and is increasingly
used as a form of differentiation and relationship building through the use of symbolic
corporate values (De Chernatony, 2002). Business practices, including corporate values,
evolve over time in response to societal values and pressures (Delmas and Toffel, 2004). To
illustrate, Starbucks started to display fair-trade coffee in response to consumer activism,
which subsequently developed into their sustainable brand image (Delmas and Toffel, 2004;
Wagner et al., 2009; Walker and Kent, 2012). Sustainability, a recent pressure stakeholders
have imposed on companies, has resulted in most large companies reporting on their
sustainability or corporate social responsibility efforts, creating a sustainable brand image,
or completely adopting a sustainable corporate brand identity (Stuart, 2011). For example,
McDonald’s has been adopting a more sustainable image over the last decade and has set
the long-term goal of a 30 per cent reduction in their greenhouse gas emissions by 2030
(Sturcken, 2018).
When initially adopting sustainable values, corporate communication might not match
consumer’s existing notion of the corporate brand and could be perceived as incongruent.
Incongruence can occur between many elements; for example, when there is incongruence
between the corporate brand promise and corporate behaviours (Morsing and Kristensen, Marketing Intelligence & Planning
2002). To illustrate this point, McDonald’s caused incongruence in the minds of their © Emerald Publishing Limited
0263-4503
consumers when they tried to associate their brand with healthy food and sustainability DOI 10.1108/MIP-08-2018-0307
MIP (Associated Press, 2014), because the newly adopted values did not match the consumers’
existing brand schema.
An incoherent corporate brand image can occur if communication is incongruent
between the brand associations and the consumer’s knowledge (Sjödin and Törn, 2006). The
effects of brand image incongruity in communication, “a discrepancy between a particular
piece of communication about a brand and the brand image already established with
consumers” (Sjödin and Törn, 2006, p. 32), have been explored in several different research
settings, including advertising incongruity (e.g. Dahlén et al., 2005). Most literature refers to
information congruity, where information in a message is incongruent with the consumer’s
brand schema (e.g. Dahlén et al., 2008).
Studies show that incongruent ads can create positive consumer responses (e.g. Dahlén
et al., 2008); however, others show incongruence results in negative attitudes (e.g. Sjödin and
Törn, 2003). This research aims to answer the question of whether the negative effect of
Downloaded by Fielding Graduate University At 02:53 28 March 2019 (PT)
show that congruity, rather than incongruence in advertising, leads to positive evaluations of
the advertisement and brand. Consequently, it is hypothesised that:
H1. Ad–brand congruence (ABCON) has a positive relationship with AAD, where greater
levels of ABCON will lead to more positive AAD.
H2. ABCON has a positive relationship with Attitude towards the Corporate Brand (ACB);
where greater levels of ABCON will lead to more positive ACB.
Mason, 1999). Furthermore, MS is especially effective when the audience initially opposes
the advertiser’s argument (e.g. Kao, 2012). As incongruence is predicted to be unexpected
and initially opposed by consumers, two-sided messages will be more effective at explaining
the incongruence and allowing consumers to assimilate the information in their schema.
Consequently, it is hypothesised that:
H5. There is an interaction effect between ad–brand incongruence and MS on AAD.
Specifically, two-sided messages reduce the negative effect of ad–brand
incongruence on AAD, while two-sided messages increase the positive effect of
ABCON on AAD.
H6. There is an interaction effect between ad–brand incongruence and MS on ACB.
Specifically, two-sided messages reduce the negative effect of ad–brand
incongruence on ACB, while two-sided messages increase the positive effect of
ABCON on ACB.
2.4 Covariates
In addition to the hypothesised relationships, the effects of several covariate variables were
considered. These included involvement with supermarkets (Zaichkowsky, 1985), as high
product involvement results in more favourable responses to incongruence (Lalwani et al.,
2009); need for cognition (NFC), as this has been found to moderate the effectiveness of
two-sided messages and responses to incongruent information (e.g. Kao, 2011; Srivastava
and Sharma, 2012); need for change, as this affects the way people interpret incongruent
information, where high need for change leads to favourable evaluations of moderately
incongruent brand extensions (e.g. Srivastava and Sharma, 2012); prior brand attitude
(PBA), as two-sided messages have been found to be more effective when changing neutral
or negative prior attitudes to positive attitudes (e.g. Eisend, 2007); and brand familiarity, as
incongruence leads to positive brand evaluations for high brand familiarity, while this is not
the case for low brand familiarity (e.g. Dahlén and Lange, 2004).
3. Methodology
To examine the hypothesised relationships, an online experiment using a 3×2 between-subjects
factorial design where three levels of ABCON (congruent, moderately incongruent and extremely
incongruent) and two levels of MS (one- and two-sided) were manipulated as independent
variables to create six experimental conditions. A leading supermarket from the grocery sector
was the focus of this study. A retail brand was chosen for the corporate brand due to its
accessibility and relevance to consumers, which is reflected by the previous usage of retail
brands in the corporate branding literature (e.g. Papasolomou and Vrontis, 2006). The retailer in
question had a clear brand image as an everyday low price (EDLP) retailer, which was Sustainable
confirmed by measuring brand associations in a pre-study. This was important because this brand image
study tested how consumers would react to the supermarket adopting sustainability values in
their branding and communication (thereby creating incongruence between an advertisement
and the respondent’s brand schema). While the focal supermarket had not previously associated
itself with sustainable values or practices in the market, sustainability values or practices have
increasingly been adopted by many supermarkets (e.g. Jones et al., 2007).
Print advertisements were used in this study because they are reader-paced, and therefore,
well-suited for research concerning information incongruity (Lee, 2000). Additionally,
supermarkets regularly use print advertisements, mainly in newspaper and billboard formats,
often using a two by three aspect ratio. This format was also suited to an online study where
respondents would be viewing the experimental manipulations on a computer screen.
ABCON was manipulated using Heckler and Childers’ (1992) dimensions of incongruence:
Downloaded by Fielding Graduate University At 02:53 28 March 2019 (PT)
expectancy and relevancy. The congruent advertisements were adapted from existing
advertisements in terms of slogan, logo, colours and imagery. For the arguments to be
relevant and expected, they were taken from existing advertisements or facts from the
website. For the moderately incongruent condition, the advertisements were developed
based upon a sustainability orientation, while still acknowledging some existing brand
values by including a focus on consumer value. Visually, the moderately incongruent
advertisements looked similar to existing ones, providing high levels of expectancy. In
terms of wording, the advertisements included some expected and currently relevant
statements; however, most statements were not relevant to the store’s current brand image
and would have been perceived as unexpected. For the extremely incongruent condition, the
advertisements were developed using a pure sustainability focus, where no information was
provided about the existing EDLP strategy of the retailer. The extremely incongruent
condition used an unexpected background image of a fruit and vegetable display (not the
usual solid yellow background associated with the brand) to distinguish the manipulation
from the moderately congruent one, as was determined by the first pre-test. The retailer’s
logo was kept consistent across all six experimental conditions.
A message is perceived as two-sided if at least one of the arguments/attributes in the
advertisement is unfavourable (Eisend, 2007). For the purpose of this research, a one to two
ratio (negative: positive) was used for the two-sided manipulations, keeping the percentage of
negative information within the recommended 40 per cent to maintain advertiser credibility
(Crowley and Hoyer, 1994). The one-sided messages only contained positive content.
3.1 Measurement
The scale items used to measure the independent, dependent and covariate variables are
displayed in Table I. A three-item seven-point semantic differential scale adapted from Rifon
et al. (2004) was used to measure ABCON. MS was measured using a four-item seven-point
Likert scale adapted from Hastak and Park (1990), Kao (2012), and Winter and Krämer
(2012). AAD was measured using a three-item seven-point semantic differential scale adapted
from Aaker and Williams (1998). ACB was measured using a four-item seven-point semantic
differential scale adapted from Wagner et al. (2009).
With regard to the covariates, NFC was measured using a three-item seven-point Likert
scale adapted from Ailawadi et al. (2001). Need for change was measured using a three-item
seven-point Likert scale adapted from Wood and Swait (2002). Brand familiarity was
measured using a four-item seven-point Likert scale adapted from Lange and Dahlén (2003),
Dahlén and Lange (2004), Martin and Stewart (2001) and Halkias and Kokkinaki (2013). PBA
was measured using the same scale as for ACB. Finally, enduring involvement was
measured using a four-item seven-point semantic differential scale adapted from Mathwick
and Rigdon (2004).
MIP Cronbach’s
Construct/item wording Mean SD α AVE Pc
“bumped” up to the top of each forum. A total of 604 participants were recruited for this study.
The main effect of ABCON on ACB was significant (F (2, 511) ¼ 4.48, po 0.05). However,
this was only significant between the congruent and extremely incongruent manipulations,
as a Tukey HSD post hoc test revealed that there was no significant difference in ACB for the
congruent and moderately incongruent manipulations ( p W0.05) with means of 4.74 and
4.48, respectively. This was also the case between the extremely and moderately
incongruent manipulations ( pW0.05) with means of 4.40 and 4.48, respectively. Overall, the
results provide support for H2.
4.00
3.90
AAD
3.80
3.70
3.60
3.50 3.45 Figure 1.
Means plot for
3.40
attitude towards the
Downloaded by Fielding Graduate University At 02:53 28 March 2019 (PT)
3.30
3.30 ad for different levels
3.20 of ad–brand
CONGRUENT MODERATELY EXTREMELY congruence and
INCONGRUENT INCONGRUENT message sidedness
LEVEL OF AD-BRAND CONGRUENCE
that there was no significant difference in ACB for the congruent and moderately
incongruent manipulation ( p W0.05), as well as the extreme and moderately incongruent
manipulations ( p W0.05). Furthermore, Figure 2 shows that the direction of the interaction
effect was the opposite of that hypothesised. Two-sided messages did not explain
incongruence, and instead, two-sided messages resulted in lower, as opposed to higher ACB
for incongruent advertisements. Furthermore, two-sided messages did not enhance the
positive effect of congruence on ACB; thus showing partial support for H6.
4.90
4.92
4.80 4.77 4.82
4.70
4.70
4.60
4.50
ACB
4.40
4.30
4.20
Figure 2.
4.10 4.04 Means plot for
3.99 attitude towards the
4.00
corporate brand for
3.90 different levels of ad–
CONGRUENT MODERATELY EXTREMELY brand congruence and
INCONGRUENT INCONGRUENT
message sidedness
LEVEL OF AD-BRAND CONGRUENCE
MIP 5. Discussion
When businesses incorporate new brand values, such as sustainability, these might be
incongruent with the consumer’s brand schema. Marketers need to understand how
consumers react to this incongruence and how they can best yield positive responses while
incorporating new brand values. This study supports the hypothesised relationship
between ABCON and AAD and ACB. This finding aligns with congruency theory (Osgood and
Tannenbaum, 1955) and schema triggered affect (Fiske, 1982), as congruent advertisements
were perceived more favourably and led to increased brand attitudes. Furthermore, the
results support the idea that it is natural for people to react favourably to something that
matches their schemas or expectations (Mandler, 1982). Consequently, the results align with
the literature that has found that incongruence in advertisements leads to less favourable
brand evaluations (e.g. Kocher et al., 2006). This is specifically dependent on whether the
incongruity can be resolved or not – unresolved incongruity is likely to lead to less
Downloaded by Fielding Graduate University At 02:53 28 March 2019 (PT)
favourable brand attitudes (Sjödin and Törn, 2006). Overall, it is safer if incongruity can be
avoided when adopting new brand values.
This study partially supports the hypothesised interaction effects between ABCON and
MS on AAD and ACB. However, it found that two-sided messages did not lead to positive
attitudes in incongruent conditions. The findings suggest that two-sided messages do not
resolve incongruence, as they increased the negative impact of incongruence rather than
providing resolution hints. The ANCOVAs revealed a similar interaction effect between
ABCON and MS on both AAD and ACB. Results show that two-sided messages cause lower
brand and ad attitudes for incongruent conditions (both moderately and extremely), while
there was a little difference for the congruent condition. This indicates that the resolution
hints to explain incongruity, based on Lee and Schumann’s (2004) theory, containing
negative content did not provide the required information to resolve the incongruity and
assimilate this information into the brand schema. Rather than resolving the incongruity,
the two-sided messages may have emphasised the incongruity and do not appear to be a
good persuasion technique when adopting new brand values.
Furthermore, this study does not support the hypothesised relationships between MS
and AAD and ACB. It was predicted that two-sided messages would be perceived as honest
and genuine, and result in positive brand attitudes, as the previous literature indicates that
two-sided messages can lead to positive brand attitudes in the right conditions (Crowley and
Hoyer, 1994). However, two-sided messages negatively affected AAD and ACB. Eisend (2006)
emphasised this relationship is complex as it is affected by other message variables
including the placement of the negative information, importance of the negative
information, attribute quality, the amount of negative information, the negative–positive
attribute correlation, and whether the information is disclosed voluntarily. Some of these
variables might not have been optimum in the experimental design for two-sided messages
to have a positive effect, emphasising the caution marketers need to take when using
two-sided messages. In particular, as the existing brand image of the EDLP retailer was
linked to price, the incongruity and lack of focus on lower prices could have been perceived
as too important, especially in relation to sustainability, as it is suggested that negative
arguments should be of low to moderate importance (Eisend, 2007).
The sustainability literature has thus far not addressed the potential of using two-sided
messages for communicating sustainability. Though it was hypothesised that two-sided
messages can be used to favourably communicate a sustainable brand image, the results
from this study were unexpected and found two-sided messages not to be effective. This
may be related to the high value attached to the EDLP image of the focal brand or the
relative lack of importance of sustainability as a brand value. Further research should
investigate the importance of sustainability in relation to other brand values and
associations such as low prices, quality of offerings or high levels of customer service.
5.1 Managerial implications Sustainable
This study aimed to provide insight into how consumers deal with incongruence caused by brand image
incorporating new brand values in advertisements. Brand managers need to be aware that
incongruence in advertising is not favourable and is likely to negatively affect consumer
attitudes. This reinforces the idea that consumers respond favourably to information that
matches their brand schema (Fiske, 1982; Mandler, 1982). However, the results indicate that
moderate incongruity does not always lead to negative brand attitudes. Consequently, when
adopting new brand values, it is suggested to incrementally incorporate these to ensure the
consumer can assimilate small amounts of incongruent information into their brand schema
and leverage off the positive brand equity to ensure positive brand evaluations. Creating a
sustainable corporate brand can be seen as a repositioning process that goes beyond
external communication (Merilees and Miller, 2008; Stuart, 2011), and hence, the
repositioning literature should be considered in the implementation process. Key
Downloaded by Fielding Graduate University At 02:53 28 March 2019 (PT)
References
Aaker, J.L. and Williams, P. (1998), “Empathy versus pride: the influence of emotional appeals across
cultures”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 241-261.
Ailawadi, K.L., Neslin, S.A. and Gedenk, K. (2001), “Pursuing the value-conscious consumer: store
brands versus national brand promotions”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 65 No. 1, pp. 71-89.
Associated Press (2014), “McDonald’s confronts junkfood image”, available at: www.dailymail.co.uk/
news/article-2727939/McDonalds-confronts-junk-food-image.html (accessed 17 July 2018).
Braun-LaTour, K.A., Puccinelli, N.M. and Mast, F.W. (2007), “Mood, information congruency, and
overload”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 60 No. 11, pp. 1109-1116.
Crowley, A.E. and Hoyer, W.D. (1994), “An integrative framework for understanding two-sided
persuasion”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 561-574.
Dahlén, M. and Lange, F. (2004), “To challenge or not to challenge: ad-brand incongruency and brand
familiarity”, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 20-35.
Dahlén, M., Lange, F., Sjödin, H. and Törn, F. (2005), “Effects of ad–brand incongruence”, Journal of
Current Issues & Research in Advertising, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 1-12.
Dahlén, M., Rosengren, S., Törn, F. and Öhman, N. (2008), “Could placing ads wrong be right?
Advertising effects of thematic incongruence”, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 57-67.
De Chernatony, L. (2002), “Would a brand smell any sweeter by a corporate name?”, Corporate
Reputation Review, Vol. 5 Nos 2/3, pp. 114-132.
Delmas, M. and Toffel, M.W. (2004), “Stakeholders and environmental management practices: an
institutional framework”, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 209-222.
Eisend, M. (2006), “Two-sided advertising: a meta-analysis”, International Journal of Research in
Marketing, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 187-198.
Eisend, M. (2007), “Understanding two-sided persuasion: an empirical assessment of theoretical
approaches”, Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 24 No. 7, pp. 615-640.
Field, A. (2009), Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, 3rd ed., Sage, London.
Fiske, S.T. (1982), “Schema-triggered affect: applications to social perception”, in Clark, M.S. and Fiske, S.T.
(Eds), Affect and Cognition: The 17th Annual Carnegie Symposium, Prentice-Hall,
Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 55-76.
Gasiorowska, M. and Grochowska, A. (2012), “Conceptual coherence of print advertisements: effects of
brand knowledge, cognitive resources and emotion”, paper presented at the Asia-Pacific
Association for Consumer Research, Queenstown.
Hair, J.F., Black, W., Babin, B. and Anderson, R. (2010), Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective,
Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Halkias, G. and Kokkinaki, F. (2013), “Increasing advertising effectiveness through incongruity-based Sustainable
tactics: the moderating role of consumer involvement”, Journal of Marketing Communications, brand image
Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 182-197.
Hastak, M. and Park, J.W. (1990), “Mediators of message sidedness effects on cognitive structure for
involved and uninvolved audiences”, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 17, pp. 329-336.
Heckler, S.E. and Childers, T.L. (1992), “The role of expectancy and relevancy in memory for verbal
and visual information: what is incongruency?”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 18 No. 4,
pp. 475-492.
Hovland, C.I., Lumsdaine, A.A. and Sheffield, F.D. (1949), “Experiments on mass communication”,
Studies in Social Psychology in World War II, Vol. 3, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ,
pp. 201-227.
Hunt, J.M. and Kernan, J.B. (1984), “The role of discontinued expectancies in the processing of
advertising messages”, The Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 124 No. 2, pp. 227-236.
Downloaded by Fielding Graduate University At 02:53 28 March 2019 (PT)
Jones, P., Comfort, D. and Hillier, D. (2007), “What’s in store? Retail marketing and corporate social
responsibility”, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 17-30.
Kamins, M.A. and Marks, L.J. (1987), “Advertising puffery: the impact of using two-sided claims on
product attitude and purchase intention”, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 6-15.
Kamins, M.A., Brand, M.J., Hoeke, S.A. and Moe, J.C. (1989), “Two-sided versus one-sided celebrity
endorsements: the impact on advertising effectiveness and credibility”, Journal of Advertising,
Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 4-10.
Kao, D.T. (2011), “Message sidedness in advertising: the moderating roles of need for cognition and
time pressure in persuasion”, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, Vol. 52 No. 4, pp. 329-340.
Kao, D.T. (2012), “Exploring the effect of regulatory focus on ad attitudes: the moderating roles of
message sidedness and argument quality”, International Journal of Psychology, Vol. 47 No. 2,
pp. 142-153.
Kocher, B., Czellar, S. and Usunier, J.C. (2006), “The effect of perceived brand name-logo coherence on
brand attitudes”, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 274-276.
Lalwani, A.K., Lwin, M.O. and Ling, P.B. (2009), “Does audiovisual congruency in advertisements
increase persuasion? The role of cultural music and products”, Journal of Global Marketing,
Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 139-153.
Lange, F. and Dahlén, M. (2003), “Let’s be strange: brand familiarity and ad-brand incongruency”,
Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 12 No. 7, pp. 449-461.
Lee, E.J. and Schumann, D.W. (2004), “Explaining the special case of incongruity in advertising:
combining classic theoretical approaches”, Marketing Theory, Vol. 4 Nos 1/2, pp. 59-90.
Lee, Y.H. (2000), “Manipulating ad message involvement through information expectancy: effects on
attitude evaluation and confidence”, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 29-43.
Lee, Y.H. and Mason, C. (1999), “Responses to information incongruency in advertising: the role of
expectancy, relevancy, and humor”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 156-169.
Mandler, G. (1982), “The structure of value: accounting for taste”, in Clark, M.S. and Fiske, S.T. (Eds),
Affect and Cognition: The 17th Annual Carnegie Symposium, Prentice-Hall, Hillsdale, NJ,
pp. 3-38.
Martin, I.M. and Stewart, D.W. (2001), “The differential impact of goal congruency on attitudes,
intentions, and the transfer of brand equity”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 38 No. 4,
pp. 471-484.
Mathwick, C. and Rigdon, E. (2004), “Play, flow, and the online search experience”, Journal of Consumer
Research, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 324-332.
Merilees, B. and Miller, D. (2008), “Principles of corporate rebranding”, European Journal of Marketing,
Vol. 42 Nos 5/6, pp. 537-552.
Morsing, M. and Kristensen, J. (2002), “The question of coherency in corporate branding–over time and
across stakeholders”, Journal of Communication Management, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 24-40.
MIP Office for National Statistics (2017), “Internet users in the UK: 2017”, available at: www.ons.gov.uk/
businessindustryandtrade/itandinternetindustry/bulletins/internetusers/2017 (accessed 31
August 2017).
Osgood, C.E. and Tannenbaum, P.H. (1955), “The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude
change”, Psychology Review, Vol. 62 No. 1, pp. 42-55.
Papasolomou, I. and Vrontis, D. (2006), “Using internal marketing to ignite the corporate brand: the
case of the UK retail bank industry”, Journal of Brand Management, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 177-195.
Rifon, N.J., Choi, S.M., Trimble, C.S. and Li, H. (2004), “Congruence effects in sponsorship: the mediating
role of sponsor credibility and consumer attributions of sponsor motive”, Journal of Advertising,
Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 30-42.
Rucker, D.D., Petty, R.E. and Brinol, P. (2008), “What’s in a frame anyway? A meta-cognitive analysis of
the impact of one versus two sided message framing on attitude certainty”, Journal of Consumer
Psychology, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 137-149.
Downloaded by Fielding Graduate University At 02:53 28 March 2019 (PT)
Sjödin, H. and Törn, F. (2003), “Ad-brand incongruency and the role of preference for consistency”,
paper presented at the Proceedings of the 32nd EMAC Conference, Glasgow.
Sjödin, H. and Törn, F. (2006), “When communication challenges brand associations: a framework for
understanding consumer responses to brand image incongruity”, Journal of Consumer
Behaviour, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 32-42.
Srivastava, K. and Sharma, N.K. (2012), “Consumer attitude towards brand-extension incongruity: the
moderating role of need for cognition and need for change”, Journal of Marketing Management,
Vol. 28 Nos 5/6, pp. 652-675.
Stuart, H. (2011), “An identity-based approach to the sustainable corporate brand”, Corporate
Communications: An International Journal, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 139-149.
Sturcken, E. (2018), “I’m lovin’ it: McDonald’s exemplifies a sustainability leader”, available at: www.
forbes.com/sites/edfenergyexchange/2018/03/30/im-lovin-it-mcdonalds-exemplifies-a-sustainability-
leader/#6c6fa26d3f0d (accessed 17 July 2018).
Wagner, T., Lutz, R.J. and Weitz, B.A. (2009), “Corporate hypocrisy: overcoming the threat of
inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 73 No. 6,
pp. 77-91.
Walker, M. and Kent, A. (2012), “The roles of credibility and social consciousness in the corporate
philanthropy–consumer behavior relationship”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 116 No. 2,
pp. 1-13.
Winter, S. and Krämer, N.C. (2012), “Selecting science information in Web 2.0: how source cues,
message sidedness, and need for cognition influence users’ exposure to blog posts”, Journal of
Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 80-96.
Wood, S.L. and Swait, J. (2002), “Psychological indicators of innovation adoption: cross-classification
based on need for cognition and need for change”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 12 No. 1,
pp. 1-13.
Zaichkowsky, J.L. (1985), “Measuring the involvement construct”, Journal of Consumer Research,
Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 341-352.
Corresponding author
Paula Arbouw can be contacted at: Paula.Arbouw@ara.ac.nz
For instructions on how to order reprints of this article, please visit our website:
www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/licensing/reprints.htm
Or contact us for further details: permissions@emeraldinsight.com