View Reviews

Paper ID
35
Paper Title
Bidding strategy for VPP incorporating price market and solar generation uncertainties modeling using information gap
decision theory

Reviewer #11

Questions
1. The paper is within the scope of the conference.
Strongly Agree
2. Originality and significance with respect to the state-of-the-art in the field is good.
Agree
3. Quality and clarity of the abstract, introduction, background, and motivation are good.
Agree
4. Technical soundness of the results is good.
Agree
5. Overall organization and presentation of the paper are good.
Agree
6. English grammar and spelling are proper.
Agree
7. There evidence that this is a fake paper (e.g., the paper is generated by a computer program or that it was
plagiarized). If yes, then please provide an explanation in question 11 in detailed comments.
Disagree
8. This paper can be recommended for the best paper award.
Neutral
9. This paper can be recommended for the post-conference journal publication.
Neutral
11. Detailed Comments (will be seen by author/s).
.

Reviewer #22

Questions
1. The paper is within the scope of the conference.
Neutral
2. Originality and significance with respect to the state-of-the-art in the field is good.
Neutral
3. Quality and clarity of the abstract, introduction, background, and motivation are good.
Neutral
4. Technical soundness of the results is good.
Agree
5. Overall organization and presentation of the paper are good.
Agree
6. English grammar and spelling are proper.
Agree
7. There evidence that this is a fake paper (e.g., the paper is generated by a computer program or that it was
plagiarized). If yes, then please provide an explanation in question 11 in detailed comments.
Disagree
8. This paper can be recommended for the best paper award.
Neutral
9. This paper can be recommended for the post-conference journal publication.
Neutral
11. Detailed Comments (will be seen by author/s).
This study considers a VPP that aims to maximize profits through participation in the day-ahead market and
includes an information gap decision theory (IGDT) for modeling the price market and renewable generation
uncertainties.

IGDT is an improbable technique that models uncertainties by taking into account risk aversion and the opportunity
to earn higher profits under various uncertainties.

The abstract part should be expanded, cover the content,

The method used should be disseminated,

The contribution of the study to the literature should be expressed,

The literature is very weak, it should be expanded a little more,

Material methods and references should be strengthened,

Reviewer #23

Questions
1. The paper is within the scope of the conference.
Agree
2. Originality and significance with respect to the state-of-the-art in the field is good.
Agree
3. Quality and clarity of the abstract, introduction, background, and motivation are good.
Agree
4. Technical soundness of the results is good.
Agree
5. Overall organization and presentation of the paper are good.
Neutral
6. English grammar and spelling are proper.
Agree
7. There evidence that this is a fake paper (e.g., the paper is generated by a computer program or that it was
plagiarized). If yes, then please provide an explanation in question 11 in detailed comments.
Disagree
8. This paper can be recommended for the best paper award.
Agree
9. This paper can be recommended for the post-conference journal publication.
Agree
11. Detailed Comments (will be seen by author/s).
It would be good to write clearly what the abbreviation "VPP" is at the first place in the text.

It is not good to repeat some abbreviations over and over in the article with their explanations. (information gap
decision theory (IGDT)).

The paper can be accepted with its presented format, but the final format of paper should be prepared according to
conference template and also the scientific side of the paper should be improved.

Reviewer #24

Questions
1. The paper is within the scope of the conference.
Agree
2. Originality and significance with respect to the state-of-the-art in the field is good.
Neutral
3. Quality and clarity of the abstract, introduction, background, and motivation are good.
Neutral
4. Technical soundness of the results is good.
Neutral
5. Overall organization and presentation of the paper are good.
Neutral
6. English grammar and spelling are proper.
Neutral
7. There evidence that this is a fake paper (e.g., the paper is generated by a computer program or that it was
plagiarized). If yes, then please provide an explanation in question 11 in detailed comments.
Neutral
8. This paper can be recommended for the best paper award.
Neutral
9. This paper can be recommended for the post-conference journal publication.
Neutral
11. Detailed Comments (will be seen by author/s).
The paper should be organized using the conference template.

The introduction does not reflect a detailed discussion about the proposed topic. Please expand the introduction
using similar papers.

Please add more informative explanations for Fig 2 to 10. Also, please highlight your contribution/novelty using
obtained results.