BEFORE THE BAR COUNCIL OF THE STATE OFANDHRA PRADESH : :

HYDERABAD.

DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE NO.VIII

Dated this the Twenty Ninth day of March, 2014

- - -

Present: Shri K. Srinivasa Rao, Chairman

Shri B. Gokula Krishna, Member
Shri V.Srinivasa Reddy, Member
* * *
COMPLAINT CASE NO. 6 of 2014
Between:

SRI B.KUMARA SWAMY,

S/o late B.Anjaiah, Occ:Retd.
Govt. Employee, H.No.8-3-228/69, Rahmathagar,
Beside :Gurudwara, Yousufguda,
HYDERABAD -500 045. .. Complainant

Vs.

Sri SITA RAM BABU, S

Advocate,
HIG 111, Barath Nagar Colony, .. Respondent
Near community Hall, Moosapet, Hyderabad.

The case referred to the Disciplinary Committee No.IV by the Bar Council of A.P.
under section 35(1) of the Advocates Act, 1961 (Act No.25/1961).

This case is coming on for consideration before the Disciplinary Committee

No.VIII and after giving notice to the Advocate - General under Section 35(2) of
Advocates’ Act, 1961 and after perusing the entire record, the Committee made the
following:-

O R D E R

Today i.e. on 29-03-2014, both parties are present. Sri Nagarju Goud,

Advocate filed vakalat for the complainant. Sri M.Ganneswara Rao, Advocate filed

vakalat for the respondent. Memo filed by both the parties that the matter has been

compromised and the complainant may be permitted to withdraw the case. The said

Memo is signed by the Advocates for both the parties. Both the parties in the open

Court also stated that the petition may be permitted to withdraw the complaint,

therefore, the Memo has been recorded and the complaint is dismissed as not

pressed. Each party shall bear their own costs.

Sd/- K. Srinivasa Rao, Chairman

Sd/- B. Gokula Krishna, Member
Sd/- V.Srinivasa Reddy, Member
 Appendix of Evidence

ORAL

For the Complainant : - None -

For the Respondent : - None –

Documentary

For the complainant : - Nil -

For the Respondent : - Nil -

(BY ORDER )

(N.Renuka )
Secretary, Bar Council of Andhra Pradesh &
Registrar, Disciplinary Committee No. VIII

- - -