Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Submitted to:
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Project Description 1
1.2 Purposes of Study 1
1.3 Scope of Geotechnical Investigations covered in this Interim Report 1
4.0 CLOSURE 6
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Caption Plate
-------------------------------------------------------
DEFINITION OF ACRONYMS
BIS REFERENCES
Compendium of Indian Standard on Soil Engineering (Part-2, Field Testing of Soils for Civil Engineering
Purposes), SP36 (Part-2:1988)-RA 2006
Compendium of Indian Standard on Soil Engineering (Part-1, Laboratory Testing of Soils for Civil
Engineering Purposes), SP36 (Part-1:1987)-RA 2006
1.0 INTRODUCTION
M/s. Ambika Realcon Pvt. Ltd. is planning to construct a group housing project at village Dhode
Majra, New Chandigarh, Punjab. The site covers an area about 10.46 acres. We understand the
proposed project will comprise of several multi-storeyed buildings of about G + 18 storeys. A single
basement is also planned to be constructed.
M/s. Cengrs Geotechnica Pvt. Ltd. has carried out the geotechnical investigations at the project
site. The geotechnical investigation work on site has been carried out in accordance with Drawing No.
nd
WD-S01 entitled “BOREHOLE Location”, dated 2 February, 2016 issued to us. A layout plan showing
the borehole locations of our field investigation is illustrated on Plate 1.
As on this date, the field work is ongoing at the site. This interim report is based on limited data
of 5 boreholes completed at the site till date. The recommendations given in this report may please be
taken as preliminary and subject to change. Our final report shall be submitted after completion of the
field and laboratory testing program.
The overall purposes of this study are to investigate the stratigraphy at the site and to develop
geotechnical recommendations for foundation design and construction. The study was carried out in the
following phases:
(i) drilling sixteen (16) borehole (6 boreholes to 15 m and 10 boreholes to 30 m depth) to specified
depths or refusal, whichever is earlier, in order to determine site stratigraphy and to collect soil
and groundwater samples for laboratory testing,
(ii) testing selected soil and groundwater samples in the laboratory to determine pertinent index and
engineering properties; and
(iii) analyzing all field and laboratory data to develop geotechnical recommendations for foundation
design and construction.
(1)
Borehole Survey Coordinates , m Borehole Termination
Location
Designation Depth, m
X Y
Tower-8 BH-5 26875 151980 30.45
• A layout plan indicating the borehole locations of our field investigations are illustrated on Plate 1.
• The borehole locations were marked on the field by the client representative and recorded by us
using a hand-held Global Positioning System (GPS). A satellite image indicating the borehole
locations (as recorded by GPS) is presented on Plate 2.
• The depths referred to in this report are with respect to the existing ground levels (EGL) at the time
of our field investigation.
The proposed site is located near Dhoda Majra village, New Chandigarh, Punjab; about 2 km
west of the Kurali-Chandigarh road.
At the time of our field investigations, the site was fairly level and vegetation-free.
- The Siwalik range trending NW-SE forms the northeastern boundary of Chandigarh and is
exposed in a small patch on the northeastern side.
- Southwestern slopes of the foothills are covered with loose talus material deposited by hill
torrents forming alluvial fans. These alluvial fans coalesce to form piedmont Kandi formation,
running parallel to the hill ranges.
- The Kandi formations merge into Sirowal formation in south and southwest.
- The Sirowal merges with the main Alluvial plains (Indo-Gangetic Alluvium) towards south and
southwest.
The piedmont deposits at the foot of Siwalik Hills comprise cobbles, pebbles and boulders
associated with sand, silt and clay. The piedmont deposits are followed by soils of the alluvial plains
consisting of clay, silt and sand.
(2)
The alluvial deposits are of Quaternary age and comprise layers of fine sand and clay. The
soils are loamy sand at surface and calcareous sandy loam in subsurface layers. The hard clay forms
pan at depths varying between 20 and 30 m. In northern parts, the soil is sandy to sandy loam where as
it is loamy to silt loam in southern parts. The soils are light yellowish brown to pale brown in color. The
soils are calcareous in nature and normally have kankar (calcareous nodules).
The soils at the site are alluvial in nature and belong to the Indo-Gangetic Alluvium. Based on
the completed borehole data, the natural soil may be divided into three generalized stratums as
described below:
Stratum-I: In stratum-I, firm to stiff clayey silt/sandy silt is met to about 1.5-4.5 m depth. The sandy silt /
clayey silt layers absent at BH-10 location. The field SPT values in stratum-I range from 6 to 16 to about
4.5 m depth.
(1)
Sushil Gupta (2007), “Groundwater Information Booklet, Chandigarh (U.T)”, Central Ground Water Board, Govt. of
India, North Western Region, Chandigarh.
(2)
Krishnan, M.S. (1986), “Geology of India & Burma”, CBS Publishers, New Delhi.
Stratum-II: Below stratum-I, medium dense silty fine sand is met to about 8.5-12.0 m depth. The field
SPT values in this stratum range from 17 to 28 to about 8.5-12.5 m depth.
Stratum-III: Below stratum-II, very stiff to hard clayey silt is met to the maximum explored depth of 30 m.
The field SPT values range from 20 to 31 about 24 m depth and from 26 to 35 to the maximum explored
depth of 30.45 m.
A summary of the borehole profiles is illustrated on Plate 3. Plots of field and corrected SPT
values versus depth are presented on Plates 4 and 5, respectively.
2.4 Groundwater
Based on our measurements in the completed boreholes, groundwater was met at 4-6 m depth
below EGL during the period of our field investigations (February, 2016). The water level measured at
each the completed borehole is summarized in the table below:
Fluctuations may occur in the measured groundwater level due to seasonal variations in rainfall and
surface evaporation rates.
3.1 General
A suitable foundation for any structure should have an adequate factor of safety against
exceeding the bearing capacity of the supporting soils. Also the vertical movements due to compression
of the soils should be within tolerable limits for the structure. We consider that foundation designed in
accordance with the recommendations given herein will satisfy these criteria.
As per IS: 1893-2002, liquefaction is likely to occur in loose fine sand below water table.
The following points are highlighted for the soils encountered at the site, with reference to the
liquefaction susceptibility assessment:
(3)
Marcuson, W.F. (III) (1978), “Definition of terms related to liquefaction”, J. Geotech Engg. Div,, ASCE, 104(9),
1197-1200.
Groundwater was met at 4.0-6.0 m depth during the period of our field investigation (February,
2016).
Based on the limited data available, the SPT values in the sand strata exceed the limits
prescribed in IS: 1893 (Part-1) – 2002 for liquefaction potential. The sandy silt / clayey silt layers
are not likely to liquefy due to the high fines content and plasticity.
As per our assessment of the limited borehole data, we are of the opinion that liquefaction is
not likely to occur at the project site in the event of an earthquake. According to Fig.1 of IS: 1893
(Part-1)-2002 showing seismic zones, the project site falls under Zone-IV. The design for seismic forces
should be done considering the project site in Zone-IV.
We understand that the proposed buildings shall have G + 18 storeys with a single basement.
We are of the opinion that raft foundations may be a suitable foundation scheme to support the
structural loads of the proposed towers at basement level. Open spread foundations, isolated footings
or strip footings with interconnecting beams may be provided in the non-tower / extended basement
areas at the single basement level.
Our suggested values of net and corresponding gross allowable bearing pressure for open/raft
foundations are given below:
Suggested values of net and corresponding gross allowable bearing pressures for raft
foundations bearing at the single basement level are given below:
Suggested values of net allowable bearing pressures for open foundations in the non-tower /
extended basement areas are given below:
Level 40 mm 50 mm
Non-Tower Open
3.5 1.0 m 8.0 10.0 2000
/ Extended Foundations
Basement (3m ≥ B
Area ≥ 6 m) 4.5 1.0 m 10.0 12.5 2500
The following points are highlighted with reference to the recommended bearing pressures given
in the above table:
2. The appropriate values of net bearing pressure may be selected as per the permissible
settlement criterion.
3. Net bearing pressures for foundations at intermediate depths may be interpolated linearly
between the values given above.
4. The gross bearing pressure has been computed by adding the overburden pressure to the net
bearing pressure.
5. For open foundations, the lateral edge-to-edge spacing between the foundations should at least
be equal to “0.8B” where “B” is the width of the larger footing.
7. The suggested modulus of sub grade reaction (k) has been computed based on empirical
(4)
relationships as given in published literature , and is applicable for minimum 3-6 m size square
footing at the center of the loaded area.
For the purposes of this report, the net allowable bearing pressure should be calculated as the
difference between total load on the foundation and the weight of the soil overlying the foundation
divided by the effective area of the foundation. The gross bearing pressure is the total pressure at the
foundation level including overburden pressure and surcharge load.
where:
(4)
Bowles, J.E. (1996), "Foundation Analysis and Design Fifth Edition", The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc., pp. 503
It may please be noted that safe bearing pressures recommended in this report refer to “net
values”. Where filling is done, it should be treated as a surcharge over the foundation.
Groundwater was met at 4.0-6.0 m depth during the period of our field investigation (September-
February, 2016). The basement should be designed to resist lateral earth pressure as well as hydrostatic
pressure.
For design purpose, the ground water may be considered at ground level. The basement floor
slab design should be checked to ensure it shall resist the consequent hydrostatic uplift with an
adequate factor of safety. The basement retaining wall should be designed to resist horizontal earth
pressure as well as hydrostatic pressure.
We suggest the following values of coefficients of lateral earth pressure for design of basement
retaining walls:
Depth, m
ka kp k0
From To
where:
A suitable safety factor should be applied on the passive earth pressures in the design of the
wall.
4.0 CLOSURE
We appreciate the opportunity to submit this preliminary report. We wish to emphasize here that
the recommendations given in this report are preliminary and subjected to change. Laboratory testing of
soil samples collected is currently in progress.
Our final report will be submitted upon detailed analysis of all field and laboratory data. In the
meantime, please feel free to contact us for any further information.
(RAVI SUNDARAM)
DIRECTOR
BH 10
BH 5
BH 15
BH 6
BH 14
LEGEND
Symbol Type of Test
Borehole (BH)
17.5
Commercial Central
22 20
Tower-1 Landscape
20 Green
25 23
23.5
24 35 32
26.5
26 33
28
30.0 102/25cm
28
30.40m
32 30.45m
Tower-7
Tower-8
36
LEGEND
SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
Silty fine sand (SM)
Sandy silt (CL)
Clayey silt (CI)
Water table
Borehole Details
Symbol Borehole Number Location
BH-5 Tower-8
BH-6 Tower-7
BH-10 Commercial Tower -1
BH-14 -
BH-15 Central Landscape Green
12
Depth, m
16
20
24
28
102/25cm
32
Borehole Details
Symbol Borehole Number Location
BH-5 Tower-8
BH-6 Tower-7
BH-10 Commercial Tower -1
BH-14 -
BH-15 Central Landscape Green
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
0
12
Depth, m
16
20
24
28
32