Q 1- You are the procurement manager for a large food processing company: canned soup.

There are three production line: beef, chicken, vegan soup, please discuss the sources of
uncertainty in this supply chain?
Ans- Here in the instant case of a food processing company: canned Soup, having three
production line i.e. Beef, Chicken & Vegan soup, the major sources of uncertainty in the supply
chain could be examined through 5 sources.

The five sources are:

1. Loss of Data- We can be questionable considering the way that we are missing critical
information. We probably won't have it, or we will not be able to observe it expecting it is
canvassed in information over-trouble. Regardless, we can't get to the information when we need
it.

2. Unreliable data- One can be uncertain considering the way that we can't trust in the
information, whether or not we have it. We could hypothesize it is wrong, or out of date, or that
we are getting comparative report from a couple of particular sources. Whether or not it turns out
to be exact, this uncertainty will impact our course.

3. Conflict of data- one could have the information and trust it, yet it might be clashing with
different information we have and trust. Assuming this is the case, we are standing up to an
irregularity

4. Noisy data- One could have to channel through a lot of insignificant information - noise - but
if we can't have confidence if it genuinely is upheaval, we really want to treat it in a genuine
manner and that adds to our weakness.

5. Confusing data. We might have all the data we want, trust every last bit of it, see that it is all
steady, see that it is all pertinent, , but we could regardless be sketchy if we can't unravel it.. This
occurs on the off chance that the information were so complicated we were unable to fabricate an
intelligent story for motivations behind clarification. Or then again the information could permit
more than one sensible translation.

The explanation it's critical to check against this rundown is on the grounds that you ought to
react distinctively to various wellsprings of vulnerability. For example, reacting to an absence of
data is not the same as managing data you can't decipher. This is not difficult to say, yet normally
challenging to do: regularly, we endeavor to determine the last situation with a quest for more
data maybe to try not to concede to ourselves that we can't decipher what we have within reach.

A Procurement manager can utilize following strategies to deal with the five sources of
uncertainty:

 Delaying- Now and then, not settling on a choice is the best choice you can make.
Sometimes, the emergency that got everybody stirred up yesterday turns out not to have
been nothing to joke about today. Talented leaders have a decent instinct for when a
circumstance is probably going to determine itself, or when more data is probably going
to come.
 Seeking more data- Requesting more data is the old style response to vulnerability.
People do this normally. Here and there this seems OK, however individuals frequently
use data looking for as a method for purchasing additional time. They are basically
postponing while at the same time having all the earmarks of being occupied. You need
to ensure that you're not blaming data chasing, when you should choose. Gifted leaders in
customary areas have instincts regarding where to look for more data. They are likewise
ready to check whether the data is adequately significant, and regardless of whether it is
adequately ideal.
 Increasing consideration- Here, you change your position to turn out to be more
dynamic in checking what is going on. This is unique in relation to looking for more data
since you're not searching for something particular; all things considered, you're simply
noticing a creating climate so you can take your action at the right second.
 Filling the holes with presumption- This is another normal reaction. Rather than get-
together more data, you can lessen vulnerability by making presumptions concerning
what the missing data is probably going to be. By and by, we as a whole need to make a
few suspicions, or we wouldn't continue extremely far
 Building an Interpretation- When you have sufficient data, you will 'detect make' - that
is, you will endeavor to portray the current choice. Now, your mind is probably going to
produce a story that clarifies the real factors. This is the story heuristic in real life.
 Pressing On. In some cases you can't have all the data you really want prior to settling on
a difficult choice. The arrangement is to simply acknowledge this, choose, and continue
on.
 Shaking the Tree- One normal choice is to effectively shape the climate. For example,
you could prudently reduce expenses, to compel a contender to respond to you.
 Simplifying the Plan- One more method for decreasing vulnerability is to just lessen the
intricacy of the arrangement you are figuring out. You could lessen the quantity of goals.
Or then again, in the event that that is absurd, you could make arrangements more
particular so that errands have less conditions on the effective culmination of different
assignments. Like that assuming one bunch of errands fall flat, different undertakings are
not impacted, and you can attempt to observe elective answers for the pieces that have
fizzled.
 Preparing for the Worst- You can likewise anticipate the most obviously awful, with
the goal that you're not impacted assuming the absolute most horrendous result happens.
You can prudently add more assets (for example seriously financing, and more labor) to
an arrangement moving. Or then again you could plan to endure the absolute worst
situation - for example, you financial plan for an extended time of level income so your
organization can take it in the event that the large undertaking doesn't work out.
 WORK CITED

Dreyer, B., Grønhaug, K (2012): Coping with unpredictable supply: the role of flexibility and
adaptation. 46, (1268–1282) https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01387179/document

Hull, B.Z (2005): The International Journal of Logistics Management, Are supply (driven)
chains forgotten? 16, (218–236)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/
09574090510634520/full/html

Van der Vorst, J.G.A.J., Beulens, A.J.M. (2002): International Journal of Physical Distribution &
Logistics Management, Identifying sources of uncertainty to generate supply chain
redesign strategies. 32, (409– 430) https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01387179/document

Van der Vorst, J., van Dijk, S.J., Beulens, A.J.M (2001): The International Journal of Logistics
Management, Supply Chain Design in the Food Industry. 12, (73–86)

Ottesen, G.G., Grønhaug, K. (2002): European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management,
Market orientation and uncertain supply in upstream markets: an exploratory study
8, (209–219), https://nofima.com/publication/542756/