You are on page 1of 17

Name of Employees: TEKING TITSER Rater:

Position: MASTER TEACHER II Position:


Employee ID No: 200346 Date of Review:
Employment Status: REGULAR PERMANENT Rating Period:
Age: 35
Sex: FEMALE Number of Years in Teaching:
Level Taught: JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Highest Degree Obtained:
Grade level Taught: 7
Subject Taught: FILIPINO Area of Specialization

COT 1 COT 2
Weight Objectives COT
Weight per Indicator Mathematics Mathematics
KRA
per KRA Objective Number RPMS
Rating Rating
5-pt Scale
Objective 1 8.0% 1
KRA 1 Objective 2 8.0%
Objective 3 8.0%
Objective 4 8.0%
KRA 2 Objective 5 8.0% 2
Objective 6 8.0%
Objective 7 8.0% 3
KRA 3
Objective 8 8.0%
Objective 9 8.0%
KRA 4 Objective 10 8.0%
Objective 11 8.0%
Plus Factor Objective 12 12.0%
Date Observed January 15, 2021 May 19, 2021
TEACHER MAALAMATH Region: 2
PRINCIPAL I Division: QUIRINO
MARCH 21, 2021 District/Municipality: JUAN
2020 - 201 School Name: JUAN HIGH SCHOOL
School ID: 123456
15 School Type: URBAN
MASTER OF ARTS IN EDUCATION School Small: MEGA
Curr. Classification: K TO 12
MATHEMATICS

COT 2
IPCRF Numerical Ratings
Mathematics
Ave Score Adjectival Rating
RPMS Q E T Average
5-pt Scale
0
0
0
0
0.000 0.000 Poor
0
0.000 0.000 Poor
0
0
0
0
0
Final Rating 0
May 19, 2021
Adjectival Rating Poor
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF
Name of Employee: TEKING TITSER Name of Rater:
Position: MASTER TEACHER II Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: QUIRINO Date of Review:
Rating Period: 2020 - 201

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING


Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Modelled Quality Modelled Level 8 Modelled Level 7 Modelled Level 6
Services Knowledge and effective in Objective 1 as in Objective 1 as in Objective 1 as
Pedagogy applications shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT
of content rating sheets rating sheets rating sheets
knowledge
within and
across 8.0%
curriculum
teaching
areas
Efficiency
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Promoted Quality Modelled effective Modelled Modelled
Services effective strategies in effective effective
strategies in utilizing ICT that strategies in strategies in
the positive redefine and utilizing ICT that utilizing ICT that
use of ICT to transform learning augment and modify
facilitate the experiences and enrich learning processes and
teaching and are documented experiences are improve learning
learning properly and documented experiences and
process consistently properly and are documented
8.0% using any consistently properly and
referencing style using any consistently
as shown in the referencing using any
submitted learning style as shown referencing
material in the submitted style as shown
learning materiall in the submitted
learning material
l
Efficiency
Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Developed Quality Modelled Modelled Modelled
Services Knowledge and and applied effective teaching effective effective
Pedagogy effective strategies that teaching teaching
teaching challenge strategies that strategies that
strategies to learners to draw require require
promote conclusions and learners to learners to
critical and justify their make describe and
creative thinking or put connections explain ideas
thinking, as parts together to using ideas learned as
well as other promote deeper learned as shown in the in
higher-order 8.0% understanding of shown in the in the submitted
thinking skills ideas learned as the submitted learning
shown in the in learning material
the submitted material
learning material
well as other promote deeper learned as shown in the in
higher-order 8.0% understanding of shown in the in the submitted
thinking skills ideas learned as the submitted learning
shown in the in learning material
the submitted material
learning material

Efficiency
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Diversity of 4. Exhibited a Quality Modelled the use Modelled the Modelled the
Services Learners & learnercentered of effective use of effective use of an
Assessment culture that teaching teaching effective
and Reporting promotes strategies that strategies that teaching
success by are appropriate are strategy that is
using effective in responding to appropriate in appropriate in
teaching learners’ responding to responding to
strategies that linguistic, learners’ learners’
respond to cultural, linguistic, linguistic,
their linguistic, socioeconomic, cultural, cultural,
cultural, 8.0% or religious socioeconomic, socioeconomic,
socioeconomic backgrounds at or religious or religious
and religious an individual backgrounds at backgrounds as
backgrounds level as shown in a group level shown in the in
the in the as shown in the the submitted
submitted in the submitted learning
learning material learning material
material
Efficiency
Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Evaluated Quality Modelled Level 8 Modelled Level 7 Modelled Level 6
Services with colleagues in Objective 5 as in Objective 5 as in Objective 5 as
teaching shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT
strategies that rating sheets rating sheets rating sheets
are responsive
to the special
educational
needs of
learners in
difficult
circumstances*,
including: 8.0%
geographic
isolation;
chronic illness;
displacement
due to armed
conflict, urban
resettlement or
disasters; child
abuse and child
labor practices
Efficiency
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 2. Diversity of 6. Used effective Quality Modelled Modelled
Services Learners & strategies for effective Modelled effective
Assessment providing timely, strategies in effective strategies in
and Reporting accurate and providing strategies in providing
constructive learners with providing learners with
feedback to accurate, and learners with accurate, and
encourage specific and accurate, and general
learners to reflect directed specific constructive
on and constructive constructive feedback
improve their own feedback* feedback as shown in the
learning as shown in the as shown in the evidence
evidence evidence submitted
submitted submitted
8.0%
on and constructive constructive feedback
improve their own feedback* feedback as shown in the
learning as shown in the as shown in the evidence
evidence evidence submitted
submitted submitted
8.0%

Efficiency
MOV submitted MOV MOV
shows feedback submitted submitted
given within 5 shows shows
working days feedback feedback
from given within given within
submission** 6-10 working 11-20
days from working days
submission** from
submission**
Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 7. Advised Quality Modelled Level 8 Modelled Level 7 Modelled Level 6
Services and Planning and guided in Objective 7 as in Objective 7 as in Objective 7 as
colleagues in shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT
the selection, rating sheets rating sheets rating sheets
organization,
development
and use of
appropriate
teaching and
learning 8.0%
resources,
including ICT,
to address
specific
learning
goals

Efficiency
Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 8. Modelled to Quality All of the Majority of Half of the
Services and Planning colleagues the learning the learning learning
setting of outcomes set outcomes set outcomes set
achievable and are aligned are aligned are aligned
challenging with the with the with the
learning learning learning learning
outcomes that 8.0% competencies competencies competencies
are aligned as shown in as shown in as shown in
with learning the MOV the MOV the MOV
competencies submitted submitted submitted
to cultivate a
culture of Efficiency
excellence for Timeliness
all learners
Basic Education 4. Community 9.. Guided Quality Implemented/ Implemented/ Drafted an
Services Linkages and colleagues to Organized/ Organized/ action plan/
Professional strengthen Managed with Managed with project
Engagement & relationships colleagues an colleagues an proposal/
Personal with parents/ approved approved activity
Growth and guardians and activity activity proposal with
Professional the wider involving involving colleagues on an
Development school parents/ parents/ activity involving
community to guardians or guardians or parents/
Professional the wider involving involving colleagues on an
Development school parents/ parents/ activity involving
community to guardians or guardians or parents/
maximize their other other guardians or
involvement in stakeholders in stakeholders in other
the educative 8.0% the school/ the stakeholders as
process community as department/ evidenced by
evidenced by learning area/ MOV No. 2
MOV No. 3 grade level as
evidenced by
MOV No. 3
Efficiency Submitted any Submitted any Submitted any 2
4 of the 3 of the of the
acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV* MOV* MOV*
Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 4. Community 10. Contributed Quality Contributed Contributed Contributed
Services Linkages and actively to actively to any actively to any actively to any
Professional professional professional professional professional
Engagement & networks network/activity network/activity network/activity
Personal within and that requires that requires that requires
Growth and between output* and output* and output* to share
Professional schools to proof of proof of knowledge and
Development improve implementation implementation to enhance
knowledge and ** within the ** within the practice as
to enhance school to share department/ evidenced by
practice knowledge and grade level to the submitted
to enhance share MOV
8.0% practice as knowledge and
evidenced by to enhance
the submitted practice as
MOV evidenced by
the submitted
MOV

Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2


different kinds different kinds different kinds
of acceptable of acceptable of acceptable
MOV*** MOV*** MOV***
Timeliness
Basic Education 11. Initiated Quality Evaluated Conducted Planned
Services professional activities activities activities
reflections and involving involving involving
promote colleague/s in colleague/s in colleague/s in
learning professional professional professional
opportunities reflection and reflection and reflection and
with colleagues learning learning learning
to improve opportunities as opportunities as opportunities
practice shown in the shown in the as shown in
MOV submitted MOV submitted the MOV
8.0%
submitted
IPCRF-DP with
Efficiency Submitted the any 3 of the Submitted the
IPCRF-DP with acceptable IPCRF-DP with
any 4 of the Supporting any 2 of the
acceptable MOV* acceptable
Supporting Supporting
Timeliness

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 4. Assessment 12.Performed Quality Performed at Performed at Performed at
Services and Reporting various related least 1 related least 1 related least 1 related
works/activities work/activity work/activity work/activity
that contribute that contributed that contributed that
to the to the to the contributed to
teachinglearning teachinglearning teachinglearning the
process process process within teachinglearning
beyond the the school/ process within
school/ Community the learning
12.0% Community Learning area/
Learning Center (CLC) department as
Center (CLC) as evidenced evidenced by
as evidenced by submitted submitted
by submitted MOV MOV
Efficiency Submitted any Submitted any Submitted any
MOV
4 of the 3 of the 2 of the
acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV* MOV* MOV*
Timeliness

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES


RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory TEKING TITSER TEACHER MA
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rate
ENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Master Teacher I-III
TEACHER MAALAMATH
PRINCIPAL I
MARCH 21, 2021

NING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Modelled Level 5 Demonstrated
in Objective 1 as Level 3 in Objective 1
shown in COT as shown in COT
rating sheets
rating sheets
/interobserver
agreement forms
or No acceptable
evidence was
shown

Modelled No acceptable 0 0.000 0.000


strategies in evidence was
utilizing ICT but shown
do not create a
new learning
experience
and/or ICT used
are
documented
but not
consistent with
one
referencing
style as shown
in the submitted
learning
material

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Modelled No acceptable 0 0.000 0.000
teaching evidence was
strategies that shown
lead learners
along a single
path of inquiry
or to simple
recall and rote
memorization
of concepts as
shown in the in
the submitted
learning
material
of concepts as
shown in the in
the submitted
learning
material

Modelled the No acceptable 0 0.000 0.000


use of a evidence was
teaching shown
strategy or
strategies that
partially
respond to
learners’
linguistic,
cultural,
socioeconomic,
or religious
backgrounds as
shown in the in
the submitted
learning
material

Modelled Level 5 Modelled Level 0 0.000 0.000


in Objective 5 as 4 in Objective 5
shown in COT as shown in COT
rating sheets rating sheets
or
No acceptable
evidence was
shown

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Showed No evidence was 0 0 0.000 0
strategies in shown
giving feedback
but feedback
were
inaccurate
and/or
destructive
as shown in the
evidence
submitted
as shown in the
evidence
submitted

MOV submitted No evidence was


shows shown
feedback given
beyond 20
working days
from
submission**

Modelled Level 5 Modelled Level 4 0 0.000 0


in Objective 7 as in Objective 7 as
shown in COT shown in COT
rating sheets rating sheets
or
No acceptable
evidence was
shown

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Less than half No acceptable 0 0.000 0
of the learning evidence was
outcomes set shown
are aligned with
the learning
competencies
as shown in the
MOV submitted

Wrote a No acceptable 0 0 0.000 0


communication evidence was
letter with shown
colleagues about
an approved
activity involving
parents/
guardians or
other
parents/
guardians or
other
stakeholders as
evidenced by
MOV No. 1

Submitted any 1 No acceptable


of the evidence was
acceptable shown
MOV

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Contributed No acceptable 0 0 0 0
actively to any evidence was
professional shown
network/activity
that does not
require output
to share
knowledge and
to enhance
practice as
evidenced by
the submitted
MOV

Submitted any No acceptable


1 of the evidence was
acceptable shown
MOV

Synthesized No acceptable 0 0 0.000 0.000


IPCRF-DP of evidence was
colleague/s as shown
basis to provide
learning
opportunities as
shown in the
MOV submitted
Submitted the No acceptable
IPCRF-DP with evidence was
any 1 of the shown
acceptable
Supporting

Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Performed at No acceptable 0 0 0 0
least 1 related evidence was
work/activity that shown
contributed to
the
teachinglearning
process
within the class
as evidenced by
submitted MOV

Submitted any 1 No acceptable


of the evidence was
acceptable shown
MOV

RATING FOR OVER-ALL


Poor 0.000
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

TEACHER MAALAMATH
Rater Approving Authority
PART II: COMPETENCIES
CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES CORE SKILLS
Self-Management Teamwork Oral Communication

1 1 Sets personal goals and direction, needs and development. 1 1 Willingly does his/her share of responsibility. 1 1 Follows instruction accurately.

2 Undertakes personal actions and behaviors that are clear and purposive and Promotes collaboration and removes barriers to teamwork and goal
1 takes into account personal goals and values congruent to that of the 1 2 accomplishment across the organization. 1 2 Expresses self clearly, fluently and accurately.
organization.
3 Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements. 1 3 Uses appropriate medium for the message
3 Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by higher
1 goals.
4 Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions. 4 Adjust communication styles to others.
4 Prioritizes work tasks and schedules (through Gantt charts, checklists, etc.) to
1 achieve goals. 5 Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across organizations to
1 accomplish organizational goals and objectives. 5 Guides discussions between and among peers to meet an objective.
5
Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others.
Service Orientation Written Communication
Professionalism and Ethics 2
1 1 Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems. 1 Knows the different written business communication formats used in DepEd.
1 Demonstrates the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms of Conduct and
1 Ethical Standards for public officials and employees (RA 6713). 2 Takes personal responsibility for dealing with and/or correcting customer 3 Writes routine correspondence/communications, narrative and descriptive report
1 service issues and concerns.
2 Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into account the based on readily available information data with minimal spelling or grammatical
1 impact of his/her actions and decisions. errors (e.g. memos, minutes, etc.)
3 Initiates activities that promotes advocacy for men and women empowerment.
1
3 Maintains a professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of attendance and 3 Secures information from required references (i.e., Directories, schedules,
1 punctuality, good grooming and communication. 1
4 Participates in updating of office vision, mission, mandates and strategies based notices, instructions) for specific purposes.
on DepEd strategies and directions. 4
4 Makes personal sacrifices to meet organization’s needs. 1 Self-edits words, numbers, phonethic notation and content, if necessary.
5 Develops and adopts service improvement programs through simplified
5 Acts with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet organization’s needs, procedures that will further enhance service delivery. 5 Demonstrates clarity, fluency, impact, conciseness and effectiveness in his/her
improve systems and help others improve their effectiveness. Innovation written communications.
Result Focus 1 Computer/ICT Skills
Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solutions. Fosters 1 Prepares basic compositions (e.g., letters, reports, spreadsheets and graphics
1 1 Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the time. 1 new ideas, processes, and suggests better ways to do things (cost and/or 1
presentation using Word Processing and Excel).
operational efficiency).
2 Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work methods by 2 Identifies different computer parts, turns the computer on/off, and work on a
placing organizational needs before personal needs. 2 1 given task with acceptable speed and accuracy and connects computer
Demonstrates an ability to think “beyond the box”. Continuously focuses on peripherals (e.g. printers, modems, multimedia projectors, etc.)
3 Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to standard operating 1
improving personal productivity to create higher value and results.
procedures correctly and consistently. Able to produce very satisfactory quality
of work in terms of usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no 1 3 Prepares simple presentation using Powerpoint.
supervision required. 3
Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop original ideas or
4
solutions.
4 Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste or Utilizes technologies to: access information to enhance professional
1 inefficiency. May focus on new or more precise ways of meeting goals set. 1 productivity, assists in conducting research and communicate through local and
4 Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve global professional networks.
5 Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve the work unit and organization.
performance. Examples may include doing something better, faster, at a lower 5 5
cost, more efficiently, or improving quality, customer satisfaction, morale, Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilities. Demonstrates Recommends appropriate and updated technology to enhance productivity and
without setting any specific goal. resourcefulness and the ability to succeed with minimal resources. professional practice.

OVERALL COMPETENCY RATINGS


CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES 2.83

CORE SKILLS 3.33

OVERALL RATING 3.08


PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Final Performance Results Rating Adjectival Rating

Accomplishment of KRAs and Objectives 0.000 Poor

Rater-Ratee Agreement

The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed on the contents of this appraisal form and the performance rating.

Name of Employee Name of Superior


TEKING TITSER TEACHER MAALAMATH
MASTER TEACHER II PRINCIPAL I
Signature Signature

Date Date
MARCH 21, 2021 MARCH 21, 2021
PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND COACHING FORM
Critical Incidence Description Output Impact on Job Action Plan Signature of
Date
(Situation, Task & Action) (Result) (Outcome) (Reinforce/ Redirect) Ratee Rater
EMPLOYEE FEEDBACK FORM
Action Plan
Strengths Development Needs (Recommended Developmental Timeline Resources Needed
Intervention)

Feedback:
Enrol in the Graduate school. Conquer the challenges and achieve your goals. Start, persist, and Enjoy. You should not be in that postion (Teacher I) all the time. Exert effort to be in the higher position.

Rater: Ratee: Approving Authority:

TEACHER MAALAMATH TEKING TITSER Name


PRINCIPAL I MASTER TEACHER II Position
PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Action Plan
Strengths Development Needs Timeline Resources Needed
(Recommended Developmental Intervention)

Rater: Ratee: Approving Authority

TEACHER MAALAMATH TEKING TITSER Name


PRINCIPAL I MASTER TEACHER II Position

You might also like