Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project Report
On
Preparation of cellulose nanocrystals and
cellulose nanofibers.
Guided by-
Prof. Sanjib Sen.
Prof. Jaykumar Bhasarkar.
1 Abbreviations 3
2 INTRODUCTION 4
6 Conclusions References 18
INDEX
Abbreviations
Nanocelluloses –NCs
Bacterial cellulose - BC
Presently, there is a strong need for replacing fossil oil-basedproducts with biodegradable
and/or bio-based ones, which canresolve numerous issues, such as reduction of oil stocks and
theirgeographical localization, plastic pollution, carbon footprint andsustainability.Cellulose
is the most abundant natural polymer and can be sustainably produced from various biomass.
The global annual output of cellulose is approximately 75 to 100 billion tonnes. The
development and utilization of cellulose is of great significance to the sustainable
development of human society, especially the energy scarcity in the future. Nanocelluloses
(NCs) could be produced by the degradation of cellulose from various sources of biomass and
have many unique properties, such as high specific surface area, high aspect ratio, high
tensile strength and stiffness, low density, and low thermal expansion coefficient. Recently,
the application of NCs has attracted great attention. NCs include cellulose nanocrystals
(CNCs), cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs), bacterial cellulose (BC), and electrospun cellulose
nanofibers (ECNFs).
In previous decades the challenge associated with isolating CNF was the high energy demand
required by mechanical disintegration process. However, with discovering strong impact of
pre-treatment methods, e.g., 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-N-oxyl (TEMPO)-mediated
oxidation or enzymatic hydrolysis. Which were aimed at facilitating the mechanical dis-
integration, CNF became a more attractive material for commercial applications. However,
research continues focusing on optimization of the existing techniques and on development of
alternative methods, which can benefit the production process or endow theCNF with new
properties.
CNCs and CNFs are more common than the other NCs. This is because CNCs and CNFs are
gained by disintegration of raw cellulose materials into nanosize particles (top-down
process), while BC and ECNFs are produced by a build-up of nanofibers from low molecular
weight sugars by bacteria and electrospinning, respectively.This review will focus on CNCs
and CNFs, while BC and ECNFs will not be covered. There is a significant difference
between CNCs and CNFs in terms of dimension and crystallinity. CNCs are highly
crystalline and usually have a length less than 500 nm, while CNFs are made up of
amorphous and crystalline cellulose chains and have a length of up to several microns. Both
of them have immense potential in the manufacture of renewable and biodegradable
materials. They have been applied in the fields of biomedical engineering, food, sensor,
packaging, optical and electronic devices, and so on. However, there aresome recent
advances that were not enough addressed, including certain mechanical disintegration
techniques (e.g., extrusion),biochemical pretreatments (e.g., periodate–chlorite
oxidation,sulfonation, quaternization, solvent-assisted pretreatments), frac-tionation
techniques, some issues of CNF quality assessment,production of CNF in different forms
(e.g., powders, hydrogels, aero-gels) etc. Thus, this review aims at complementing with the
aboveissues and focuses on the recent advances achieved in CNF production.
Cellulose and nanocellulose
2.1. Feedstock
Cellulosecan be derived from a variety of sources, such aswood (hardwood and softwood),
seed fibers (cotton, coir etc.), bastfibers (flax, hemp, jute, ramie etc.), grasses (bagasse,
bamboo etc.),marine animals (tunicate), algae, fungi, invertebrates and bacteria. Wood is
currently the most important industrial source of cellulose. Besides cellulose, it also contains
hemicellulose,lignin and a comparably small amount of extractives and inorganicsalts. Wood
species can be distinguished as hard- and softwoodsbased on their anatomical features.
Hardwood is more complexand heterogeneous in structure than softwood. Generally,
softwood fibers are 3–4 times longer thanhardwood. However, it is known that hard-woods
have more rigid structure than softwoods due to their highRunkel ratio (cell wall thickness
divided by lumen radius. Therefore, it was reported that softwood requires less mechanical
treatment than hardwood to produce equivalent fibrillation level. At the same time, non-wood
plants are receiving increasing interest as a source of cellulose since they, generally,
compriseless lignin. Consequently, fiber delignification and purification pro-cesses are easier
and less harmful for cellulose. Moreover, further fibrillation of such cellulose is less energy-
consuming. It should be also noted, that the use of never-dried cellulose comparing to once-
dried makes the fibrillation more favorable, since drying promotes irreversible hydrogen-
bonding between nanofibrils, known as hornification. However, the dry cellulose is much
easier to transport.Therefore, research focuses on both never-dried and dry celluloseas raw
material for CNF production.
2.3. Nanocellulose
Cellulose particles with at least one dimension in nanoscale (1–100 nm) are referred to as
nanocellulose. Depending on the pro-duction conditions, which influence the dimensions,
composition and properties, nanocellulose can be divided into two main cate-gories: (i)
cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) or cellulose whiskers and(ii) cellulose nanofibrils (CNF), also
known as nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC), microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) or cellulose
nanofibers.Due to various terminology used to describe cellulose nanomateri-als, several
technical committees and organizations (ISO TC 6 andTC 229; TAPPI and CSA Z5100-14)
initiated a standardization of different types of nanocellulose. Even though this work has not
beenfinalized yet, the majority of experts are inclined to the term “cel-lulose nanofibrils” for
the second type of nanocellulose describedabove, which is a subject of this review.Bacterial
cellulose (BC) and electrospun cellulose nanofibers (ECNF) are also considered as
nanocellulose. However, CNC and CNFare much more common, since they are produced by
disintegration of cellulose fibers into nanoscale particles (top–down process),whereas BC and
ECNF are generated by a buildup of nanofibers(bottom–up process) from low molecular
weight sugars by bacte-ria or from dissolved cellulose using electrospinning,
respectively.Thus, large-scale production of BC and ECNF remains questionable.Regardless
of the nanocellulose type, it exhibits hydrophilicity,relatively large specific surface area,
broad potential of surfacechemical modification etc.
CNCs have high crystallinity with diameter less than 100nm and length less than 500 nm,
which are formed though intra and intermolecular interaction of cellulose macromolecules.
Mechanical Treatments
Mechanical Treatments Dry cellulose pulps can be fibrillated to small fragments using
mechanical methods, like milling, but it usually leads to fiber shredding, rather than
elementary fibril delamination. Consequently, the nanofibrils present low DP, crystallinity,
and aspect ratio, and this results in relatively poor mechanical properties. Thus, CNF are
preferentially produced in aqueous suspension at low concentrations (,5 wt.%) using
mechanical treatments coupled with a pretreatment. It results in highly viscous suspensions
that are hard to handle and especially pump. High-pressure homogenization,
microfluidization, refining, and grinding are the most common techniques used for
mechanical production of CNF. These techniques are the most efficient for CNF isolation, as
well as being suitable for upscaling. Meanwhile, other methods are being studied in order to
economize the CNF production. The main mechanical treatments reported in the literature are
summarized in Different authors have published comparative studies among mechanical
treatments and their energy demand. The processing cycles are affected by the pulp used as
raw material, its fiber morphology and fiber swelling. Spence et al. concluded that nine
passes through a microgrinder was one of the most costefficient production processes of CNF
from recycled fibers. In addition, they reported that the microgrinding of wood fibers was
more efficient in terms of energy consumption than the homogenization of refined fibers. In
addition, films formed by CNF produced through microgrinding presented better mechanical
properties. Moreover, CNF produced by homogenization presented the highest specific
surface area and the lowest porosity of the films. On the other hand, Wang et al. observed that
microgrinding fibrillation time and energy expense trigger a decrement in the size, the DP,
and the crystallinity index (CrI) of CNF.
Properties of cnc and cnf compared to other materials
The mineral acid hydrolysis is the most common method for the
preparation of CNCs.
The typically used mineral acids are sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid,
phosphoric acid, hydrobromic acid, and their mixed acids. Sulfuric acid is
the most typically used as it produces a negative surface charge on the
particles which leads to more stable suspension.
Hydrochloric acid also was commonly used for the preparation of CNCs.
Due to the lack of charge on the surface of CNCs, the CNCs prepared by
hydrochloric acid are easily flocculation in water. But the thermal
stability of CNCs by HCl is higher than that by H2SO4.
Phosphoric acid, which belongs to middle strong acid, could be used for
the manufacture of CNCs with high thermal stability and stable
suspension.
Preparation of Cellulose nanocrystals by Acid Hydrolysis
How acid hydrolysis works
Acid hydrolysis is executed to remove the amorphous regions from the crystalline
regions
Crystalline region possess the desired properties of cellulose nanocrystals, hence it is
preferred to make cellulose nanocrystals.
This review summarizes the preparation methods of CNCs and CNFs. For the preparation of
CNCs, promising techniques were discussed besides the conventional mineral acid
hydrolysis, such as organic acid hydrolysis, subcritical hydrolysis, AVAP method, and ionic
liquid hydrolysis. Most of them have great possibility for further industrialization. However,
there are still some problems that need to be solved. For example, the corrosion of equipment
is serious and the post processing of waste acid is difficult for mineral acid hydrolysis, the
preparation time is long and the technological requirements is rigorous for enzymatic
hydrolysis, Therefore, in order to achieve the industrialization of various CNCs, a lot of
research works need to be done. The appropriate catalysts should be developed to reduce the
amount of acid or increase the efficiency of organic acid hydrolysis.
For the preparation of CNFs, various mechanical treatments are discussed, including high
pressure homogenization, grinding method, ball milling, twin-screw extrusion, cryocrushing,
blending, and aqueous counter collision. Among them, the twin-screw extrusion is the
method with the most potential for the preparation of CNFs due to a high solid content of
obtained CNFs. In order to reduce energy consumption of mechanical disintegration, the
pretreatment of cellulose materials is necessary. Various pretreatment methods are
summarized in this review.
REFERENCE’S
1Tianjin Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper, Tianjin University of Science and Technology,
Tianjin 300457, China
2State Key Laboratory of Pulp & Paper Engineering, South China University of Technology,
Guangzhou 510640, China
3Key Laboratory of Industrial Fermentation Microbiology of Ministry of Education and
Tianjin Key Lab of Industrial Microbiology,
Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin 300457, China
4Department of Chemical Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA5.
HITOSHI TAKAGI, ANTONIO N. NAKAGAITO & YUYA SAKAGUCHI
Graduate School of Science and Technology, Tokushima University, Japan
5. Oleksandr Nechyporchuk∗, Mohamed Naceur Belgacem, Julien BrasUniversité Grenoble
Alpes, Laboratory of Pulp and Paper Science and Graphic Arts (LGP2), CNRS, Agefpi, F-
38000 Grenoble, France
6. Advanced Structures and Composites Center, University of Maine, 35 Flagstaff Road,
Orono,
ME 04469-5793, USA
7. School of Forest Resources, University of Maine, 5755 Nutting Hall, Orono, ME 04469-
5755, USA
8. Forest Products Laboratory, U.S. Forest Service, 1 Gifford Pinchot Drive, Madison,
Wisconsin 53726, USA
Department of Natural Resources, Behbahan Khatam Alanbia University of Technology,
Behbahan, Iran Corresponding author: P. Rezayati Charani, rezayati@bkatu.ac.ir
9. M. M. de Souza Lima and R. Borsali, “Rodlike cellulose microcrystals: structure,
properties, and applications,” MacromolecularRapid Communications, vol. 25, no. 7, pp.
771–787, 2004.
10.Y. Habibi, L. A. Lucia, and O. J. Rojas, “Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly,
and applications,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 110, no. 6, pp. 3479–3500, 2010.
Refrences: