Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Foundations of
European Studies
EUST 1010
Course instructors:
• Dr Roland Vogt (Course convenor)
• Dr Stefan Auer
For further information and announcements, please check the European Studies
Programme website at www.europe.hku.hk
Introduction
Welcome to the European Studies Programme and its first year core course. This course
familiarises you with the most important features of contemporary Europe and the European
tradition. This will lead you assess and reflect on the geography, history, religions, ideas,
cultures, politics, and economic developments of Europe. This interdisciplinary area studies
course provides you with the basics about one of the world’s most dynamic and diverse regions.
Understanding Europe is of great importance in numerous academic disciplines, as Europeans
have shaped and influenced societies elsewhere and over long periods of human history.
Throughout the course, you will examine several aspects of European life. You might find some
of this information to be complex, challenging, or even confusing. We have carefully selected
which aspects to include in the course. The point is to provide you with a comprehensive
thematic overview of the key essentials about Europe. By the end of the course, you will have
understood that Europe is not only a geographical region and a civilisation, but also an idea and
a polity in the making. The point of the course is to define, illustrate, and explore an abstract
concept – ‘Europe’ – that means different things to different Europeans. All aspects treated
throughout the module will be accompanied by examples and supplementary readings in order
for you to better grasp the basic forces which move the continent.
The lectures are structured thematically in order to explore Europe’s characteristic diversity
and the degree to which this is a result of ideational factors – beliefs, customs, traditions, and
values. We will elucidate the main religions and ideologies which have shaped the continent’s
modern history, the emergence and continuing importance of nationalism in Europe, as well as
the evolution of the modern state. Religions, ideologies, nationalism, and the modern state
system are the pillars on which contemporary European societies have emerged. The course
allows us to understand recent political and economic developments in Europe, the emergence
and importance of the European Union (EU), the Euro currency, and to make sense of pressing
issues and challenges in Europe today.
Learning outcomes
All European Studies majors are required to take this course, preferably in their first year of
study. For inter-Faculty broadening purposes, the course is also offered to undergraduate
students who do not major in European Studies. Having taken this course, you will be able to:
2
• Summarise, appraise, and critique - on a basic level - the conflicts, fault lines, and
areas of contestation which have characterised Europe's past and which continue to
characterise its present.
Doing the readings is essential. The readings help you to understand why and how Europe
developed the way it did. The reading assignments are designed to get you thinking about the
different subject matters which we discuss throughout the course. They are also designed to
develop your academic writing skills and familiarise yourself with different forms of academic
texts.
You will be assessed on the merit of your coursework as well as a final examination. The
coursework grade is composed of an essay and your contributions and proactive participation in
the tutorials. You will not be assessed or judged on the basis of your opinions or beliefs, but on
the basis of the quality and conceptual sophistication and persuasiveness of your arguments.
• Proactive contribution and participation (not just attendance) (20%): interaction and
engagement is an important part of the course. You must not miss more than three
sessions, otherwise your case will be referred to the Faculty of Arts for further action.
• Essay (40%): The essay will be 1,500 words in length (+/- 10%). They essay is due for
submission on 22 March 2021 at 11.00 PM. Please upload your essay as a pdf file to
Moodle.
In the essay you will have to answer only one out of three questions.
Late submissions will be penalised by deducting 5 marks per late day from the overall
mark. Exceptions apply for urgent medical circumstances.
Please ensure that the essay directly answers the question posed. A clear essay
structure is essential (introduction → main argument → conclusion). Be concise and to
the point and avoid unsubstantiated claims. Remember that all sources used need to be
properly referenced so as to prevent plagiarism. See > plagiarism policy below.
• Final examination (40%): The final exam is scheduled for the assessment period in May
2021. The exact date, time, and venue will be announced in April.
The following general grade descriptors indicate the assessment expectations for grades
(especially the essay):
3
exceptional degree of insight as well as independent thinking and critical reflection on
the question posed. Appropriate examples are used to support the line of analysis. In
addition, the work displays originality and an exceptionally high level of linguistic
competence. Sources are plentiful and are used accurately and concisely to inform the
answer without dominating it. There should be a sense of a critical and committed
argument, mindful of other interpretations but not afraid to question them.
• B (Good): Clearly structured work displaying an ability to deal with the concepts,
sources and arguments relevant to the topic under discussion and critical judgement in
selecting, evaluating and organising material. The work will display some of the
qualities of independent and critical reflection, although some aspects will be less fully
realised and not appropriately nuanced. The work is well-structured, but the line of
argumentation is more descriptive and less analytical than outlined above. There are
some shortcomings as far as the delivery of the text in terms of language and grammar
is concerned.
• C (Competent): Sound and largely competent work which covers the basic subject
matter and is organised and presented in a manner that is still indicative of some
analytical sophistication. The answer tends to narration and description rather than
analysis but it does attempt to answer the question. There will be some evidence of
inclusion of irrelevant material, a certain lack of focus in the discussion or deficiencies
in the evidence used to support the argument, and a general lack of engagement with
the scholarly literature. The work may be factually sound but it shows only a general
grasp of the issues which the question is raising. Also, there are deficiencies as far as
critical awareness, analytical thought, and linguistic ability are concerned.
• D (Pass): The work is barely adequate and very limited in its scope, breadth, and
depth. The answer addresses the questions only partially and touches on aspects that
are ultimate unnecessary for the development of an effective answer. It may include
irrelevant material and be too descriptive and narrative. Some aspects of the question
may be answered competently, but others will be ignored because of omissions in the
reading, factual inaccuracy, lack of structure, difficulty in identifying the key issues
and arguments, or poor style, language and grammar as well as presentation. The
engagement with the relevant scholarly literature is by and large absent. Sources are
rare and poorly used, as are examples.
• F (Fail): The answer is poorly structured, of very limited relevance, and poorly
delivered to the question. It lacks supporting evidence, contains ample conceptual
misunderstandings, fails to address the question asked, and omits the development of a
real argument. There is a pervasive lack of basic factual knowledge. In some cases, the
work shows little or no real understanding of the question and displays little or no
evidence of learning. Linguistic ability is inadequate. There are little or no sources,
totally inadequate referencing, or – in some cases – evidence of plagiarism.
4
Plagiarism policy
Plagiarism is a serious matter and will be followed up by disciplinary action by the University.
All members of the University are required to familiarise themselves with and abide by the
University of Hong Kong’s rules and guidelines on appropriate referencing and quotation
techniques. In order to find more information about plagiarism and the University’s code of
conduct, please consult http://www.hku.hk/plagiarism/
Important dates
Course outline
5
Week Date Topic Readings
Caramani, chp.
4 9 Feb The European economy Dr Vogt
21
12 Feb Lunar new year - no class
6
Readings, bibliography, and learning resources
• Required readings:
Bowker, J. ed. 2003. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of World Religions. Oxford: Oxford
University Press. Available at: http://library.hku.hk/record=b2589222
Caramani, D. ed. 2014. Comparative Politics, 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Maidenhead: McGraw Hill. Available at: http://library.hku.hk/record=b4640809
Cohen, M. and N. Fermon eds. 1996. Princeton Readings in Political Thought: Essential Texts
Since Plato. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Furet, F. 1990. ‘From 1789 to 1917 & 1989: Looking Back at Revolutionary Traditions’,
Encounter (September 1990): 3-7.
Gellner, E. 1981. ‘Nationalism’, Theory and Society 10:6 (November 1981): 753-776.
Leiken, R.S. 2012. Europe’s Angry Muslims. The Revolt of the Second Generation. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Smith, A.D. 1993. ‘A Europe of Nations - or the Nation of Europe?, Journal of Peace Research
30:2 (May 1993): 129-135.
• Further readings:
Bache, I., S. Bulmer, S. George, and O. Parker. 2014. Politics in the European Union, 4th
edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bulmer, S. and C. Lequesne. The Member States of the European Union, 2nd edition. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Dinan, D. 2010. Ever Closer Union: An Introduction to European Integration, 4th edition.
Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dinan, D. 2004. Europe Recast. A History of the European Union. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
7
Gillingham, J. 2003. European Integration 1950-2003: Superstate or New Market Economy?
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hill, S. 2010. Europe’s Promise. Why the European Way is the Best Hope in an Insecure Age.
Berkeley: University of California Press.
McCormick, J. 2002. Understanding the European Union. A Concise Introduction, 2nd edition.
Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Milward, A. S. 2000. The European Rescue of the Nation-State, 2nd edition. London: Routledge.
Moravcsik, A. 1998. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to
Maastricht. London: Routledge.
Nelsen, B. F. and A. Stubb eds. 2003. The European Union. Readings on the Theory and Practice
of European Integration. third edition. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Nugent, N. 2003. The Government and Politics of the European Union, 5th edition.
Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Reid, T.R. 2004. The United States of Europe. The Superpower nobody talks about – from the
Euro to Eurovision. London: Penguin.
Smith, K.E. 2003. European Union Foreign Policy in a Changing World. Cambridge: Polity.
Vogt, R. 2017. Personal Diplomacy in the EU. Political Leadership and Critical Junctures in
European Integration. London: Routledge.
Vogt, R. ed. 2012. Europe and China. Strategic Partners or Rivals? Hong Kong: Hong Kong
University Press.
Woods, N. 2016. ‘The European Disunion. How the Continent Lost Its Way’, Foreign Affairs
(Jan/Feb 2016): 160-165.
History:
Hitchcock, W. 2003. The Struggle for Europe. The History of the Continent Since 1945. London:
Profile Books.
Sakwa, R. and A. Stevens eds. Contemporary Europe, 3rd edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave
Macmillan.
Wakeman, R. ed. 2003. Themes in Modern European History Since 1945. London: Routledge.
Wegs, J.R. and R. Ladrech. 2006. Europe Since 1945: A Concise History, 5th edition.
Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
8
Ideologies:
Ebenstein, W. and A.O. Ebenstein eds. 1990. Great Political Thinkers, 5th edition. Fort Worth:
Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Ingersoll, D., R.K. Matthews, and A. Davison. 2001. The Philosophic Roots of Modern Ideology.
Liberalism, Communism, Fascism, Islamism, 3rd edition. Upper Saddle River: Pearson.
Love, N.S. ed. 2010. Dogmas and Dreams. A Reader in Modern Political Ideologies, 4th edition.
Washington DC: CQ Press.
Scruton, R. 2003. ‘Why I Became a Conservative: A British liberal discovers England’s greatest’,
The New Criterion (February 5).
Hobsbawm, E.J. 1992. Nations and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, myth, reality.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hutchinson, J. and A.D. Smith eds. 1994. Nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vogt, R., W. Cristaudo, and A. Leutzsch eds. 2014. European National Identities. Elements,
Transitions, Conflicts. London: Routledge.
Politics:
Diamond, L. and M.F. Plattner eds. 2009. Democracy: A Reader. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins
University Press.
Gallagher, M, M. Laver, and P. Mair. 2011. Representative Government in Modern Europe, 5th
edition. McGraw-Hill.
Judge, D. 2005. Political Institutions in the United Kingdom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kriesi, H., E. Grande, R. Lachat, M. Dolezal, S. Bornschier, and T. Frey. 2008. West European
Politics in the Age of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Snyder, T. 2014. ‘The Battle in Ukraine Means Everything: Fascism returns to the continent it
once destroyed’, New Republic.
9
• Journals (selection):
o British Journal of Politics and International Relations (BJPIR)
o Contemporary European History (CEH)
o European History Quarterly
o European Journal of International Relations (EJIR)
o French Politics
o German Politics and Society
o International Affairs
o Journal of Common Market Studies (JCMS)
o Journal of Contemporary European Studies
o West European Politics
• Institutional websites:
• Newspapers:
(English language)
10
• Newspapers:
(Non-English language)
o ABC http://www.abc.es
o Corriere della Sera http://www.corriere.it
o Der Spiegel http://www.spiegel.de
o Der Standard http://www.derstandard.at
o El Mundo http://www.elmundo.es
o El País http://www.elpais.com
o Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung http://www.faz.net
o La Repubblica http://www.repubblica.it
o L’Express http://www.lexpress.fr
o Le Figaro http://www.lefigaro.fr
o Le Monde http://www.lemonde.fr
o Le Monde Diplomatique http://www.monde-diplomatique.fr
o Le Soir http://www.lesoir.be
o Neue Zürcher Zeitung http://www.nzz.ch
o Süddeutsche Zeitung http://www.sueddeutsche.de
11