Professional Documents
Culture Documents
They are important however as they are good for finding treatment and aligning views
and learning more about the same phenomenon. Also helpful in making people feel they
aren’t the only people suffering from similar symptoms. Easing mind if they thought
symptoms were separating themselves or making them bad because of the symptoms.
Therapy and treatment to get more control of live in face of said symptoms and labels
What is abnormal behavior?
No complete definition, each captures a part of what abnormal behavior is.
Four D’s of abnormality
o Deviance: outside cultural norms
Abnormal vs. eccentric:
Going against set up laws?
Distress: emotional or physical pain
Personal suffering or pain may be indicative, most disorders associated
with a form of pain, not all being pain on self (mania/anti social)
Distress that is not normal due to short term situation placed upon an
individual
Dysfunction: interfere with the ability to function in day to day life
Breakdown in either behavioral, cognitive or emotional (easily upset or
anxious/ blunted) functioning
Interfering with relationships and normal tasks during the day like school
or work
Dangerousness: can harm or scare yourself or others
Threatening or harming self or others ie. through literal self injury,
reckless behavior, aggression. (not as clear cut)
Jobs/Careers in Abnormal Psychology
Clinical psychologists: Ph.D. varied career path, research heavy. Focus on disorders and
neuropsychology
Psychiatrist: M.D., prescribe Medicine for mental illness, some therapy elements not as
heavy
Marriage/family therapist: MA,
Clinical Social Workers: MSW, therapist or government work. Treatment and resource
connection for people
Psychiatric Nurses: Nursing Degree: treatment of severe Psychopathology. Work in
inpatient settings.
Doctor of Psychology: PsyD, 4 year professional Therapy Degree.
PhD Areas
Clinical: Abnormal processes/disorders
Cognitive: Normal and abnormal Information Processing
Developmental: Normal and abnormal development/learning processes
Neuroscience: brain and biological processes
Social: group dynamics/processes, situational influence on behavior
Scientist-Practitioner Framework
Approach taken by many mental health professionals
Interaction of clinical and science work
o Consumer of science to inform practices
o Evaluator of practice to determine what therapy would be effective
o Creator of science to synthesize both, ie testing therapies and seeing what works
8/30/2021
9/1/2021
9/13/2021
Assessment: the process of gathering information about symptoms and causes of symptoms
Diagnosis: a label attached to
- Kinds of information
o What we need to know to make a diagnosis:
Symptoms and history, current and past, recent events, history of
psychological problems, family history of mental disorders, how patient is
coping with symptoms
o Physiological and neurological factors:
Physical examination, drugs, cognitive or intellectual ability
o Sociocultural factors:
Social resources (money, employment, transportation), societal/cultrual
background, therapy they have been through
o Differential diagnosis: a determination of several possible disorders an individual
may be suffering from
o Reliability: the consistency of a test in measuring what is supposed to measure
Test-retest reliability: test produces similar results when done multiple
times
Internal reliability: different parts of same test produce similar results
Alternate form reliability: two versions of same test produce same results
Interrater reliability: to or more judges who administer and score a test
come to similar conclusions
o Validity: the accuracy of a test in assessing what it is supposed to measure
Content validity: test assesses all aspects of a phenomenon
Face validity: test appears to measure what it is supposed to
Concurrent validity: test yields same results as other measures of the same
behavior thoughts or feelings
Construct validity: test measures if it is supposed to measure not
something else
Predictive validity: test predicts the behavior it is supposed to measure
o Psychological tests: standardized procedures to measure performance symptoms
or personality traits
Standardization: administered to many people to establish norms (ie. IQ
test). Tests need to be standardized to yield the most fair and accurate
results
o Clinical interviews
Unstructured: only ask a few open-ended questions, like an intake
interview (how are you, current relationship or work status). These
interviews can’t offer an accurate diagnosis and requires the subject to be
intrinsically aware of the issues they have
Structured interview: series of questions, concrete criteria being asked
about. Diagnostic interviews (standardized questions centered around
trying to find a diagnosis)
o Neuripsychological evaluations
Used to detect neurological impairment as indicated by specific cognitive
and fine motor deficits (Bender-Gestalt test)
o Brain imaging
Used to assess structural damage
Computerized Tomography CT
Positron-Emission tomography PET
Magnetic resonance imaging MRI
o Can be used to supplement other forms of testing, and show
correspondence between other tests
o Intelligence testing
Craniometry: bigger head = bigger brains = smarter people
Modern intelligence tests can help to diagnose intellectual disability and
brain damage, as well as identify intellectual differences and classroom
placement
IQ: intelligence quotient, number that is part of a method of comparing an
individuals score on a test with others
IQ tests do not necessarily equal intelligence, standardized tests
don’t sample all forms of intelligence
o Symptom Questionnaires
A quick assessment of a wide variett of symptoms or symptoms of a
specific disorder
DO NOT MAKE DIAGNOSES ALONE
Quick to administer and provide normative information that aids in
diagnosis, allow for efficient symptom monitoring that can be shared with
clients
o Personality inventories
Questionares that are meant to assess peoples ways of thinking feeling and
behaving
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory MMPI
Validity scales to see if the subject is evasive, confused, answering
randomly, and if subject is defensive
o Projective Tests
Assume people presented with ambiguous information and they will
interpret them in a way that matches their thoughts
Rorschach Inkblot test, ten cards with ink blots, they researcher examines
content and structure the descriptions. Doesn’t give you more information
then asking a subject directly
Thematic Apperception Test TAT: pictures to simulate stories to see how
the person relates things and views images. Could reflect problems and
insecurities a person has
o Self-Monitoring
Subject collects data themselves
Useful in charting behavior and behavior change/what causes the changes
in behavior
Could be overwhelming to have people track information themselves
o DSM-5
The dictionary of psychopathology
DSM 1-2 had vague descriptions, heavily influenced by psychoanalytic
theory, reliability issues
DSM 3-5 had vague descriptions replaced with scientific, observable and
reportable criteria, specified the duration of symptoms, requires
interference
The American Psychiatric Associations committee conducts reviews of
published literature and field trials to reflect and process a consensus on
disorders and differentiating them
With changes of the DSM, legal cases, insurance policy, disability plans
can change to reflect more modern diagnosis
Where does normaility end and psychopathy begin
The disease model: assumes you can define where normality ends
and psychopathy begin
Personality disorders in the DSM represent long lasting symptoms
different from normal human behavior BUT, researhers have
argued personality disorders are variants of normal personality
traits
Symptoms vs syndromes
DSM disorders have variable reliability and validity with some
symptoms overlapping between disorders
Dangers with being diagnosed (especially with children) leading to stigma,
over medication
Issues of comorbid disorders: what to do if people have multiple disorders,
how to best do treatment
DSM is atheoretical
PTSD: what counts as a Criterion A event?
9/15/2021