Professional Documents
Culture Documents
S1
Table of contents
Synthetic procedures............................................................................................................................. S3
Ir(III) photosensitizers ............................................................................................................ S3
S2
Synthetic procedures
Ir(III) photosensitizers
Irppy-bpy. [Ir(ppy)2Cl]2 (0.0571 mg, 0.0532 mmol) and 2,2’-bipyridine (20.0 mg, 0.128 mmol) were
suspended in ethyleneglycol (7.0 mL). The mixture was refluxed overnight under Argon. The solution
was cooled to room temperature and a saturated aqueous solution of NH4PF6 (6.0 mL) was added for
precipitation. The solid was centrifuged, washed with water (3X) and dried under reduced pressure.
HRMS (ESI): m/z calculated for [C32H24193IrN4 – PF6]+, 657.16247 ; found: 657.16221, m/z calculated for
[C22H16193IrN2 – PF6 – bpy]+, 501.09372 ; found: 501.09222. 1H NMR (CD3CN), δ/ppm: 8.53 (dd, 2H, H-3,
J3-4 = 8.1 Hz, J3-5 = 1.3 Hz), 8.12 (ddd, 2H, H-4, J4-3 = 8.1 Hz, J4-5 = 7.9 Hz, J4-6 = 1.7 Hz), 8.06 (dd, 2H, H-d,
Jd-c = 8.5 Hz, Jd-b = 1.6 Hz), 7.98 (dd, 2H, H-6, J6-5 = 5.5 Hz, J6-4 = 1.7 Hz), 7.85 (ddd, 2H, H-c, Jc-d = 8.5 Hz,
Jc-b = 7.6 Hz, Jc-a = 1.6 Hz), 7.80 (dd, 2H, H-e, Je-f = 7.8 Hz, Je-g = 1.4 Hz), 7.60 (dd, 2H, H-a, Ja-b = 5.8 Hz, Ja-
c = 1.6 Hz), 7.50 (ddd, 2H, H-5, J5-4 = 7.9 Hz, J5-6 = 5.5 Hz, J5-3 = 1.3 Hz), 7.04 (ddd, 2H, H-f, Jf-e = 7.8 Hz, Jf-
g = 7.5 Hz, Jf-h = 1.3 Hz), 7.02 (ddd, 2H, H-b, Jb-c = 7.6 Hz, Jb-a = 5.8 Hz, Jb-d = 1.6 Hz), 6.92 (ddd, 2H, H-g,
Jg-f = Jg-h = 7.5 Hz, Jg-e = 1.4 Hz), 6.28 (dd, 2H, H-h, Jh-g = 7.5 Hz, Jh-f = 1.3 Hz).
S3
Figure S1. 1H NMR spectrum of Irppy-bpy (CD3CN, 500 MHz)
S4
Irpiq-bpy. [Ir(piq)2Cl]2 (0.0322 mg, 0.0253 mmol) and 2,2’-bipyridine (9.4 mg, 0.0602 mmol) were
suspended in ethyleneglycol (3.0 mL). The mixture was refluxed overnight under Argon. The solution
was cooled to room temperature and a saturated aqueous solution of NH4PF6 (3.0 mL) was added for
precipitation. The solid was centrifuged, washed with water (3X), dried under reduced pressure and
washed again with diethylether (3X). HRMS (ESI): m/z calculated for [C40H28193IrN4 – PF6]+, 755.19144 ;
found: 755.19342, m/z calculated for [C30H20193IrN2 – PF6 – bpy]+, 601.12502 ; found: 601.12306. 1H
NMR (CD3CN), δ/ppm: 9.02 (m, 2H, H-c/H-f), 8.54 (dd, 2H, H-3, J3-4 = 8.1 Hz, J3-5 = 1.0 Hz), 8.38 (dd, 2H,
H-g, Jg-h = 8.2 Hz, Jg-i = 1.0 Hz), 8.11 (ddd, 2H, H-4, J4-3 = 8.1 Hz, J4-5 = 7.8 Hz, J4-6 = 1.1 Hz), 7.99 (m, 2H,
H-f/H-c), 7.87 (dd, 2H, H-6, J6-5 = 5.4 Hz, J6-4 = 1.1 Hz), 7.84 (m, 4H, H-d + H-e), 7.51 (d, 2H, H-b, Jb-a = 6.4
Hz), 7.46 (ddd, 2H, H-5, J5-4 = 7.8 Hz, J5-6 = 5.4 Hz, J5-3 = 1.0 Hz), 7.42 (d, 2H, H-a, Ja-b = 6.4 Hz), 7.14 (ddd,
2H, H-h, Jh-g = 8.2 Hz, Jh-i = 7.8 Hz, Jh-j = 1.1 Hz), 6.88 (ddd, 2H, H-i, Ji-h = 7.8 Hz, Ji-j = 7.6 Hz, Ji-g = 1.0 Hz),
6.31 (dd, 2H, H-j, Jj-i = 7.6 Hz, Jj-h = 1.1 Hz).
S5
Figure S3. 1H NMR spectrum of Irpiq-bpy (CD3CN, 500 MHz)
S6
Irpiq-L
S7
Figure S6. 1H-1H dqfCOSY spectrum of Irpiq-L (CD3CN)
S8
Co(III) catalyst
CoCl2,6H2O (150 mg, 0.65 mmol), dimethylglyoxime (167 mg, 1.4 mmol) and NaOH (26.0 mg, 0.65
mmol) were dissolved in 95% ethanol (5.0 mL) and heated to 70 °C. Pyridine (51 mg, 0.65 mmol) were
then added and the resulting solution cooled to room temperature. A stream of air was then passed
through the solution for 30 min, which caused precipitation of a brown solid. The suspension was
stirred for 1 h and filtered. The precipitate was successively washed with water (10 mL), ethanol (10
mL), and diethyl ether (10 mL). The product was then extracted with acetone (15 mL) and the solution
is let to a slow evaporation (m = 130 mg, 49%). Elemental Analysis: calc. for C13H19ClCoN5O4 C= 38.68
S9
Ir(III)-Co(III) dyad
Irpiq-L-Co
S10
Figure S8. 1H-1H dqfCOSY spectrum of Irpiq-L-Co (acetone-d6)
S11
Cyclic voltammetry
Ir(III) photosensitizers
1,5
0,5
Current (normalized)
0
-2 -1,5 -1 -0,5 0 0,5
-0,5
-1
-1,5
-2
Potential (V vs. Ag/AgCl)
Figure S9. Reduction voltammogram of Irppy-bpy (10-5 M) in acetonitrile with Bu4NClO4 0.1 M as
supporting electrolyte.
1,2
0,8
Current (normalized)
0,6
0,4
0,2
0
0,5 0,7 0,9 1,1 1,3 1,5 1,7
-0,2
-0,4
Potential (V vs. Ag/AgCl)
Figure S10. Oxidation voltammogram of Irppy-bpy (10-5 M) in acetonitrile with Bu4NClO4 0.1 M as
supporting electrolyte.
S12
2
0
-2 -1,5 -1 -0,5 0 0,5
-1
Current (normalized)
-2
-3
-4
-5
Potential (V vs. Ag/AgCl)
Irpiq-bpy
Figure S11. Reduction voltammogram of Irppy-bpy (10-5 M) in acetonitrile with Bu4NClO4 0.1 M as
supporting electrolyte.
1,2
1
Current (normalized)
0,8
0,6
0,4
0,2
0
0,5 0,7 0,9 1,1 1,3 1,5 1,7
-0,2
Potential (V vs. Ag/AgCl)
Irpiq-bpy
Figure S12. Oxidation voltammogram of Irpiq-bpy (10-5 M) in acetonitrile with Bu4NClO4 0.1 M as
supporting electrolyte.
S13
1,5
0,5
0
-2,2 -1,7 -1,2 -0,7 -0,2 0,3 0,8
Current (normalized)
-0,5
-1
-1,5
-2
-2,5
-3
Potential (V vs. Ag/AgCl)
Figure S13. Reduction voltammogram of Irpiq-L (10-5 M) in acetonitrile with Bu4NClO4 0.1 M as
supporting electrolyte.
1,2
0,8
Current (normalized)
0,6
0,4
0,2
0
0,5 0,7 0,9 1,1 1,3 1,5 1,7 1,9
-0,2
Potential (V vs. Ag/AgCl)
Figure S14. Oxidation voltammogram of Irpiq-L (10-5 M) in acetonitrile with Bu4NClO4 0.1 M as
supporting electrolyte.
S14
Ir(III)-Co(III) dyad
0
-2,5 -2 -1,5 -1 -0,5 0 0,5 1
Current (normalized)
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
Potential (V vs. Ag/AgCl)
Figure S15. Reduction voltammogram of Irpiq-L-Co (10-5 M) in acetonitrile with Bu4NClO4 0.1 M as
supporting electrolyte.
1,2
0,8
Current (normiazed)
0,6
0,4
0,2
0
0,5 0,7 0,9 1,1 1,3 1,5 1,7
-0,2
-0,4
Potential (V vs. Ag/AgCl)
Figure S16. Oxidation voltammogram of Irpiq-L-Co (10-5 M) in acetonitrile with Bu4NClO4 0.1 M as
supporting electrolyte.
S15
Photophysical measurements
Table S1. Spectroscopic data of Irppy-bpy, Irpiq-bpy, Irpiq-L and Irpiq-L-Co in acetonitrile
Irppy-bpy Irpiq-bpy Irpiq-L Irpiq-L-Co
S16
Photocatalyzed hydrogen production
60000
50000
40000
30000
20000
10000
0
0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2 1,4 1,6 1,8 2 2,2 2,4 2,6 2,8 3 3,2 3,4 3,6 3,8 4 4,2 4,4 4,6 4,8 5
µL of H2/min
Figure S17. Calibration curve of hydrogen flux in 10mL/min of carrier gas Argon (0 to 5 µLH2/min).
The two grey lines show the uncertainly in x of the calibration curve.
The uncertainly in x is ± 0.045 µLH2/min. The interval of confidence at 95% of the slope is 147.2
Conditions of photo-reactions
0,5 M of electron sacrificial donor TEOA, 0,5 M HBF4 as acid source, solvent is acetonitrile.
[Irpiq-L-Co] = 0.1 mM
S17
Various wavelengths of irradiation sources
In the case of blue, green and red light, the interchangeable light source is composed of a 90 x
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750
-20
Table S2. Maxima, width band of emission spectra and photon flux of used L.E.D’s.
[a]
An analog power-meter PM100A (THORLABS) associated with a compact photodiode power head
with silicon detector S120C is used to evaluate the photon flux for each LEDs. Photo-diode detector is
placed at the same distance from the LED surface than the bottom of illuminated vial (0.7 cm for blue,
green and red LED panels and 1.2 cm for yellow LED).
S18
Performance of photocatalytic systems
Table S3. Performances of Ir/Co systems for hydrogen photo-catalytic production under various
wavelengths of irradiation.
Irpiq-L-Co 180 (2.3 h ) 16000 251 (3.8 h) 3500 180 (18 h) 270 78 (110 h)[a] 15[b]
Absolute errors of TON and TOF are estimated ± 10 % from reference systems Irppy-bpy /
Co(dmgH)2PyrCl. This system was analyzed in triplicata.
[a]
Induction time of 37 min.
[b]
A smoothing LOWESS with software Origin was applied for TOF data.
S19
Figure S19. Hydrogen evolution of Irpiq-L-Co (green) and dissociated system Irpiq-
bpy/[Co(dmgH)2PyCl] (blue) and Irppy-bpy with Co(dmgH)2Pyr (Red). Solid line: TON, dashed line:
Figure S20. Hydrogen evolution of Irpiq-L-Co. Solid line: TON, dashed line: TOF. Irradiation centered
S20
Figure S21. Overlap of the absorption spectrum of the Ir-Co dyad (green) and the emission spectrum
S21
Crystallographic information for Irpiq-L-Co structure
Identification 1 2
CCDC Number 1515333 1515335
Empirical formula C53H45ClCoF6IrN9O4P C53H45ClCoF6IrN9O4P
Formula weight 1303.53 1303.53
Temperature/K 100 100
Crystal system monoclinic monoclinic
Space group C2/c P21/n
a/Å 43.3450(7) 17.1260(10)
b/Å 11.1091(2) 10.4445(6)
c/Å 30.4979(5) 30.4628(19)
α/° 90 90
β/° 128.3740(10) 91.457(3)
γ/° 90 90
Volume/Å3 11513.0(4) 5447.2(6)
Z 8 4
ρcalcg/cm3 1.504 1.589
μ/mm-1 7.954 8.406
F(000) 5184.0 2592.0
Crystal size/mm3 0.14 × 0.12 × 0.05 0.24 × 0.04 × 0.03
Radiation CuKα (λ = 1.54178) CuKα (λ = 1.54178)
2Θ range for data collection/° 5.2 to 144.426 5.804 to 144.292
Index ranges -53 ≤ h ≤ 53, -13 ≤ k ≤ 12, -37 ≤ l ≤ 37 -21 ≤ h ≤ 21, -12 ≤ k ≤ 12, -37 ≤ l ≤ 37
Reflections collected 167315 117808
Independent reflections 11342 [Rint = 0.0405, Rsigma = 0.0144] 10688 [Rint = 0.1045, Rsigma = 0.0491]
Data/restraints/parameters 11342/0/712 10688/323/764
Goodness-of-fit on F2 1.044 1.043
Final R indexes [I>=2σ (I)] R1 = 0.0263, wR2 = 0.0670 R1 = 0.0554, wR2 = 0.1256
Final R indexes [all data] R1 = 0.0277, wR2 = 0.0684 R1 = 0.0790, wR2 = 0.1396
Largest diff. peak/hole / e Å-3 1.84/-0.54 1.72/-1.04
S22
Figure S22. X-ray crystal structure 1 of [Irpiq-L-Co]+, atoms are represented at the 50 % probability
level. Hydrogen atoms and PF6 counteranion are omitted for clarity.
Figure S23. X-ray crystal structure 2 of [Irpiq-L-Co]+, atoms are represented at the 50 % probability
S23
Table S5. Selected angles and bond lengths of crystal structure 1
1
Bond lengths (Å) Ir(1)–C(315) 2.004 (3)
S24
Theoretical studies
Table S6. Representation of the orbitals LUMO+4 through to HOMO-4 with the contributions of the
different fragments of Irppy-bpy
Contour (iso 0.03 e/A3) Contribution Contour (iso 0.03 e/A3) Contribution
HOMO-4 LUMO
Ir = 30% Ir = 1%
HOMO-3 LUMO+1
Ir = 48% Ir = 4%
Bpy = 7% Bpy = 1%
HOMO-2 LUMO+2
Ir = 48% Ir = 4%
Bpy = 3% Bpy = 2%
HOMO-1 LUMO+3
Ir = 8% Ir = 1%
HOMO LUMO+4
Ir = 40% Ir = 1%
S25
Table S7. Representation of the orbitals LUMO+4 through to HOMO-4 with the contributions of the
different fragments of Irpiq-bpy
Contour (iso 0.03 e/A3) Contribution Contour (iso 0.03 e/A3) Contribution
HOMO-4 LUMO
Ir = 50% Ir = 2%
HOMO-3 LUMO+1
Ir = 36% Ir = 4%
Bpy = 5% Bpy = 5%
HOMO-2 LUMO+2
Ir = 27% Ir = 3%
Bpy = 1% Bpy = 1%
HOMO-1 LUMO+3
Ir = 10% Ir = 2%
HOMO LUMO+4
Ir = 37% Ir = 1%
S26
Table S8. Representation of the orbitals LUMO+4 through to HOMO-4 with the contributions of the
different fragments of Irpiq-L
Contour (iso 0.03 e/A3) Contribution Contour (iso 0.03 e/A3) Contribution
HOMO-4 LUMO
Ir = 50% Ir = 1%
L = 6% L = 97%
HOMO-3 LUMO+1
Ir = 36% Ir = 4%
L = 4% L = 2%
HOMO-2 LUMO+2
Ir = 26% Ir = 3%
L = 2% L = 2%
HOMO-1 LUMO+3
Ir = 10% Ir = 2%
L = 1% L = 93%
HOMO LUMO+4
Ir = 36% Ir = 1%
L = 2% L = 96%
S27
Table S9. The 100 lowest singlet–singlet and 10 lowest singlet–triplet transitions obtained from the
TD-DFT/singlets and the TD-DFT/triplets output files for Irppy-bpy at the S0-optimized geometry.
Energy (cm-1) Wavelength (nm) Oscillation strength Major contributions
35151,26 284,48 0,1424 H-6->LUMO (38%), H-3->L+4 (15%), H-2->L+3 (14%), H-1->L+4 (19%)
37721,74 265,10 0,0024 H-5->L+3 (18%), H-2->L+6 (10%), HOMO->L+9 (14%), HOMO->L+10 (27%)
S28
38004,84 263,12 0,1003 H-2->L+6 (30%), H-1->L+5 (28%)
40155,12 249,03 0,02 H-4->L+6 (20%), H-4->L+10 (11%), H-2->L+9 (10%), H-2->L+10 (29%)
42561,88 234,95 0,0051 H-12->LUMO (14%), H-11->LUMO (36%), H-6->L+4 (24%), HOMO->L+9 (11%)
S29
45964,73 217,56 0,0071 H-14->LUMO (22%), H-4->L+7 (10%), H-2->L+7 (53%)
46388,17 215,57 0,0338 H-10->L+1 (17%), H-3->L+7 (10%), H-1->L+9 (17%), H-1->L+10 (22%)
48603,78 205,75 0,0759 H-5->L+9 (11%), H-3->L+9 (14%), H-3->L+10 (16%), H-2->L+8 (11%), H-1->L+10 (12%)
Triplets
Energy (cm-1) Wavelength (nm) Oscillation strength Major contributions
S30
Table S10. The 100 lowest singlet–singlet and 10 lowest singlet–triplet transitions obtained from the
TD-DFT/singlets and the TD-DFT/triplets output files for Irpiq-bpy at the S0-optimized geometry.
Energy (cm-1) Wavelength (nm) Oscillation strength Major contributions
34914,93 286,41 0,0032 H-7->LUMO (34%), H-7->L+1 (16%), H-6->L+2 (13%), H-2->L+4 (21%)
S31
36421,58 274,56 0,0089 H-11->LUMO (13%), H-9->LUMO (62%)
39463,10 253,40 0,0109 H-12->LUMO (26%), H-11->LUMO (19%), H-10->LUMO (25%), H-5->L+4 (14%)
40797,14 245,12 0,0205 H-12->L+2 (15%), H-5->L+5 (10%), H-5->L+6 (19%), H-1->L+7 (26%)
S32
41851,30 238,94 0,0954 H-13->L+1 (12%), H-10->L+2 (10%), H-8->L+3 (36%)
41961,80 238,31 0,0198 H-13->L+1 (24%), H-11->L+1 (13%), H-10->L+2 (13%), H-2->L+7 (10%)
42986,93 232,63 0,0247 H-2->L+7 (12%), H-2->L+8 (16%), H-2->L+9 (18%), HOMO->L+13 (13%)
45230,77 221,09 0,0378 H-15->LUMO (10%), H-14->LUMO (16%), H-6->L+5 (23%), H-2->L+10 (12%)
45325,13 220,63 0,0037 H-14->LUMO (12%), H-12->L+3 (14%), H-10->L+3 (11%), H-9->L+4 (29%)
45348,52 220,51 0,0195 H-15->LUMO (19%), H-14->LUMO (11%), H-8->L+5 (10%), H-6->L+5 (15%)
Triplets
Energy (cm-1) Wavelength (nm) Oscillation strength Major contributions
26091,23 383,27 0 H-4->L+1 (12%), H-2->L+1 (17%), H-2->L+2 (10%), H-1->L+1 (11%), H-1->L+2 (14%)
26295,29 380,30 0 H-4->L+1 (14%), H-2->L+1 (13%), H-2->L+2 (12%), H-1->L+1 (11%)
S33
Table S11. The 100 lowest singlet–singlet and 10 lowest singlet–triplet transitions obtained from the
TD-DFT/singlets and the TD-DFT/triplets output files for Irpiq-L at the S0-optimized geometry.
Energy (cm-1) Wavelength (nm) Oscillation strength Major contributions
34685,07 288,31 0,0358 H-10->LUMO (24%), H-8->L+1 (18%), H-7->L+2 (17%), H-4->L+3 (10%)
S34
34985,10 285,84 0,053 H-6->L+1 (46%), H-4->L+3 (16%), H-1->L+6 (10%)
35360,96 282,80 0,2805 H-7->L+1 (11%), H-6->L+1 (19%), H-1->L+5 (15%), H-1->L+6 (24%)
37443,48 267,07 0,0083 HOMO->L+8 (10%), HOMO->L+10 (43%), HOMO->L+12 (10%), HOMO->L+14 (15%)
37688,68 265,33 0,0072 HOMO->L+8 (23%), HOMO->L+10 (17%), HOMO->L+12 (20%), HOMO->L+14 (19%)
38247,62 261,45 0,011 H-14->LUMO (10%), H-13->LUMO (37%), H-11->LUMO (11%), H-9->L+1 (10%)
38846,08 257,43 0,0071 H-14->L+1 (12%), H-13->L+2 (10%), H-11->L+2 (32%), H-9->L+2 (18%)
S35
40245,45 248,48 0,0401 H-15->LUMO (12%), H-14->L+1 (21%), H-11->L+2 (10%), H-7->L+3 (12%)
41645,63 240,12 0,015 H-16->L+1 (12%), H-13->L+2 (12%), H-12->L+1 (17%), H-1->L+10 (10%)
41944,06 238,41 0,0138 H-14->L+2 (11%), H-13->L+1 (11%), H-12->L+2 (23%), H-2->L+9 (11%)
42287,65 236,48 0,0058 H-2->L+10 (16%), H-1->L+11 (33%), HOMO->L+12 (11%), HOMO->L+14 (10%)
Triplets
Energy (cm-1) Wavelength (nm) Oscillation strength Major contributions
26146,88 382,45 0 H-4->L+1 (10%), H-3->L+1 (10%), H-2->L+1 (16%), H-1->L+1 (13%), H-1->L+2 (17%)
S36
Figure S24. Experimental spectra and calculated transitions for in Irppy-bpy (upper), Irpiq-bpy
S37
References
S38