Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Marie-Hélène Bourcier
La Découverte | Mouvements
2002/2 - No 20
pages 37-43
ISSN 1291-6412
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marie-Hélène Bourcier, « Queer Move/ments »,
Reproducing this article (including by photocopying) is only authorized in accordance with the general terms and conditions of
use for the website, or with the general terms and conditions of the license held by your institution, where applicable. Any other
reproduction, in full or in part, or storage in a database, in any form and by any means whatsoever is strictly prohibited without
the prior written consent of the publisher, except where permitted under French law.
Queer Move/ments
Queer thought has experienced significant turmoil for several M ARIE -H ÉLÈNE
years, bringing theoretical contradictions to materialist feminism B OURCIER *
as well as a replacement of practical positions. Conceived as a
toolbox intended to open new spaces beyond the frontal impact
Document downloaded from www.cairn-int.info - - Bourcier Marie-Hélène - 89.87.124.104 - 09/12/2014 12h34. © La Découverte
“J
udith Butler is completely crazy, don’t you think?” a “great” * Auteure de Queer
Zone, Balland, 2001.
French editor was saying to me the other day. After having
dreamed very briefly of translating the author of Gender Trouble, 1. De Lauretis. T.
Technologies of
he had decreed her intellectually and editorially incorrect. We live in a Gender, Essays on
decidedly reluctant country in matters of sexual politics: having just gone Theory, Film and
through feminism that, at best, pleads for its survival and which has com- Fiction. Bloomington
& Indianapolis, IN:
pletely avoided its reflective and critical phase, at least at the moment. . . Indiana University Press,
Our borders are locked up. We do not translate the reference texts that 1987.
deal with feminism, post-feminism, queer theory or postcolonial theories, 2. Segdwick, E.K.
whereas they are read in Spain, in Germany, in Italy or in Mexico. Epistemology of the
This lack of circulation of knowledge deprives us of many other Closet. Berkeley, CA:
University of California
women theorists and practitioners of queer theory: Teresa de Lauretis 1, Press, 1990.
Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick 2, Gayle Rubin 3, Judith Halberstam 4. It partially 3. Rubin, G. “Thinking
explains the definitional pressure that continues to trigger “the queer” in Sex: Notes for a Radical
France. Ze queer. The substantialist wording could pass as an ontologi- Theory of the Politics of
Sexuality.” In Pleasure
cal joke with the followers of queer theory since they have tried so hard and Danger: Exploring
to wage war with essences and naturalized identities. For after all, this is Female Sexuality edited
the heart of the queer theory-politics-movement: a hypercritical relation- by C.S. Vance, New
York: Routledge, 1982.
ship to identity and identity politics, be they homo/heterosexual, national,
related to gender, class, race, and including the intersection of identity 4. Halberstam, J. Female
Masculinity. Durham,
traits. With a pointed awareness of identity possibilities (considering that NC: Duke University
they are exploited on a daily basis in businesses, in the army, in show Press,1998.
•I
Queer Move/ments
ual) identities often worth being political subjects and that have become
•Beyond
Queer Queens
the differences of approach and problematics that separate
them, the American women queer theorists of the nineties all have in com-
mon problematizing identity by feasting on French poststructural theories,
and most particularly on Foucault. It would perhaps be more appropri-
ate to say that these feminists and postfeminists, of whom a great major-
ity are lesbian or who claim to have hetero-staggered identities – as is the
case with Sedgwick – have succeeded in diverting the Foucauldian prob-
lematization of identity. This was indeed necessary given the resolutely
mono-gendered options of the author of The Will to Knowledge. Foucault
was hardly interested in femininity, in lesbians or in heterosexuality as a
bio-political system. But he came just at the right time to boost a radical
constructivism that emphasized the constructed and discursive character
of homosexuality and heterosexuality, sexual identities as we know them,
as they are produced by the modern era. A little doxography in a rush.
5. De Lauretis, T. De Lauretis 5, for example, used Foucault to redefine “the construction
Technologies of of gender as being at the same time the product and the process of rep-
Gender. . ., Chapter 1. resentation and self-representation” 6 and took advantage of it to regroup
6. De Lauretis, T. under the semi-Foucauldian inspired denomination “gender technology”
Technologies of all languages and all social and cultural representations that produce gen-
Gender. . ., 9.
ders. For de Lauretis, and too bad for heteronormative orthodox psy-
choanalysis, gender is not derived from sexual difference either. It is a
7. Butler, J. Gender varied ensemble of effects that produce behaviors and social relation-
Trouble, Feminism
and the Subversion of
ships in bodies and that feed institutionalized discourses, critical, episte-
Identity. London, New mological and daily practices as well as cinema. According to Butler, the
York: Routledge, 1990. reconceptualization of our sex/gender system 7 begins with the criticism
II •
Queer Move/ments
of the category of sex utilized by Foucault. In the same way that, as Fou-
cault tells us 8, sex and sexuality are not the expression of an inner self, 8. Foucault, M. The Will
to Knowledge. Paris:
gender, Butler tells us, is not the expression of sex. The discourses that Gallimard, 1972.
feed the truth of sex position sex as the cause of urges or desire even
though it is an effect of these discourses. The discourses on gender posi-
tion them as being caused by sex (read: biological), as if sex and gender
maintained an expressive or descriptive relationship (the masculine gen-
der would naturally express the masculine biological sex), even though
gender identity is the result of an effect of regulated repetition of gender
performance codes.
For Sedgwick 9 and Rubin 10, the detour through Foucault leads rather to 9. Sedgwick,
relativizing the theoretical usage of the category of gender that they both Epistemology of the
deem insufficient to take sexualities into account, in particular alternative Closet.
Document downloaded from www.cairn-int.info - - Bourcier Marie-Hélène - 89.87.124.104 - 09/12/2014 12h34. © La Découverte
sexual practices, S&M for Rubin. It would take too long to go back into 10. Rubin, G. “Thinking
•The
Queer move/ments
first major uncoupling: the one that consists of deconstructing het-
erosexual identity, the way in which heterosexual identity produces its
deviant other, homosexuality, and the normative sex/gender system that
is connected to it. This translates, in particular, into a serious challenge of
sexual difference and its guardian discourse, psychoanalysis, as well as
straight (heterocentric) thought in general. The second uncoupling is the
one that no longer does away with sexuality, sexual practices and sexual
subcultures deemed different or perverse in analysis and politics. These
two queer move/ments suggest another movement that is no less funda-
mental and that is found in our queer queens: the moment when femi-
nism is toppled towards post-feminism or queer feminism. A good part
of Technologies of Gender as well as Gender Trouble consists of a criti-
cal analysis of the feminism of the eighties and the identity of “woman”
that it promoted at the same time as ideal and as a subject of politics. The
questioning is far from concerning only the essentialist feminists of the
second American wave and often proves to be pertinent for French femi-
nism in its various components: the psychoanalytico-essentialist feminine
feminism of Psych et Po as well as the materialist lesbianism of Marxist
inspiration, or even radical French lesbianism that, curiously, remained
adhered to the paradigm of woman (except for Monique Wittig 11). What 11. Wittig, M. The
about a feminism that posed as a point of departure for the emancipation Straight Mind and Other
Essays. Boston, MA:
of the sexualized body according to sexual difference? Did it not favor
Beacon Press,1992 (La
the renaturalization of the feminine body and femininity instead of mak- Pensée Straight. Balland,
ing it into an object of criticism, deconstruction, de-identification with 2001).
• III
Queer Move/ments
IV •
Queer Move/ments
the quote queer theory beside the title lesbian and gay sexualities was a
way to remove the branding from the slogan “lesbian and gay,” that had 14. The reaction
become a generator of silence for lesbians from the time that it meant gay towards heterocentric
feminism and the
only on. This fourth uncoupling was thus done in relation to gay identity reappropriation of the
politics, which had itself become hegemonic, normative and exclusive. texts of Monique Wittig
The initiatives of queer groups that have risen in France since 1996 are in relation to criticism
of heterosexuality
located in this ambivalence in relation to identity 14, by demanding that as a political regime
identity politics also be politics of differences and resistance to norms 15. and lesbian politics
Post-identitarian identitarians, often convinced of the productive con- versus feminine politics
occupied a good
structability/deconstructability of identities (sexual identities and gender number of the seminars
identities), these “gays” and these “lesbians” are no longer straight and of the Le Zoo queer
do not want to become straight after more than forty years of post-Stone- association in 1999.
It also materialized
wall culture. But they criticize the limitations and the infradiscrimina-
Document downloaded from www.cairn-int.info - - Bourcier Marie-Hélène - 89.87.124.104 - 09/12/2014 12h34. © La Découverte
because of the
tions that post-Stonewall culture produced as well as the identitarian and translation into French
of Wittig’s political texts
•V
Queer Move/ments
•The
Queer Kings
determination for denaturalization and use of identity that we just
Document downloaded from www.cairn-int.info - - Bourcier Marie-Hélène - 89.87.124.104 - 09/12/2014 12h34. © La Découverte
VI •
Queer Move/ments
that they are to be confused with sex change techniques, even though a 22. Halberstam, J.
Female Masculinity,
number of these techniques are gender stabilization techniques currently op. cit. and J.
practiced on heterosexual bodies (from silicone breasts to lengthened Halberstam, “F2M:
penises) and on which the intersex movement, the work of Halberstam 22 The Making of Female
Masculinity.” In L.
on the butch-drag king-Female to Male continuum or Preciado’s work on Doan (ed.), The Lesbian
dildos and contra-sexuality effectively turns away our attention. Maybe Postmodern. New York:
it was time for gender fucking not to forget. . .the body, and that it was Columbia University
Press, 1994.
Foucault, the sadomasochistic disciple of fist fucking, who was likely to
encounter Gayle Rubin in the same sex clubs of San Francisco for high- 23. On the way in
tech sexuality 23, who is once again inspiring the queer/move/ment. • which Foucault made
the contemporary
language of the S&M
community talk to
Greeks and to fool
Document downloaded from www.cairn-int.info - - Bourcier Marie-Hélène - 89.87.124.104 - 09/12/2014 12h34. © La Découverte
• VII