You are on page 1of 2

Assessment 1

Roan Joy E. Dellomas                                                               August 26, 2021


BAT 3-B
Direction: Please fill-out the box provided with you sound critiquing of your preferred
review article (only one) attached herewith. 
Title of the review:
ITEM YES NO COMMENTS
It was not difficult for me to figure
out what the review article was
Title / about.
Does the title properly reflect
the subject of the paper?
10-15 words
In my opinion, the study is clearly
stated based on what I read in the
Rationale/Abstract last part of the abstract and it's
The study is not clearly stated, / relevant to a topic.
and if hypothesis is only implied
and not expressed, how could
one express it?
300-350 words
I think the introduction is clear and
simple. Clear because all the
Introduction information and study are clearly
Is it clear, short and simple? / stated in the introduction.
Literature cited For me all the literature cited is
Adequate adequate. It’s toomuch but it’s good
to have a lot of  information that can
/ help the readers to understand this
review article.
But if inadequate, I think they need
to cite another review article to have
If inadequate, what points need additional support and information
(more) citation support? about this.
I think there’s no method used in
this review article.
Methodology /
Are the methods used
appropriate?
For me, it is okay if the research
study is repeatable, because it
The study research is depends on researchers if they
repeatable need more information about their
study and also indicate the
references.
I think the missing part is
methodology, because they don't
If incomplete, which part(s) are gather data.
missing? If too many details are
given, which ones can be safely
deleted?
For me it’s clearly presented, they
discuss the useful techniques for
Result and Discussion / livestock improvement.
Are the results clearly formatted
and presented?
It absolutely meets the objectives,
even if it is too short but it's clearly
Conclusions / presented.
Are they based on the findings
and meet the objectives of the
study?

If not, provide suggestions on


how to restate the objectives
and revise the conclusion(s).
I think the recommendation is
contained in the conclusion.
Recommendations /
Are they based on the
conclusions?

APA 7 edition citation: 


th

 Okpeku, M., Ogah, D. M., & Adeleke, M. A. (2019). A review of challenges to


genetic improvement of indigenous livestock for improved food production in Nigeria.
African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 19(1), 13959-
13978. https://doi.org/10.18697/ajfand.84.BLFB1021

You might also like