Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Other Considerations
Drainage: alignment to be fixed such that the
number of cross drainage structures are less.
Political Pressure: Pressure from the government to run
the highway alignment in the way they have decided also
affects the selection of highway alignment.
Monotony: Setting the straight alignment leads to
monotonous driving. So a small bend is provided to make
the driver aware and alert. The roads are designed as
forgiving roads.
Special Consideration in Hill Roads
Stability: road should be aligned with the hill side that is
stable. Excessive cutting and filling may effect on their
stability.
Drainage: Adequate drainage facility need to be provided
across the road and the number of cross drainage structures
need to be less during construction.
Geometric Standards: Geometric design parameters also
influence on the construction of roads.
Resisting Length: Ineffective rise and excessive fall
should be minimum.
Engineering Survey and its stages
Desk study [Map Study]
Reconnaissance
Preliminary Survey
Final Location and detailed Survey
After the baseline has been pegged and levels run over
it, the topography elevations may be taken by one of
the several methods, i.e. cross sectional leveling at the
same time as the profile levels.
Economic Evaluation, EE
• carried out to determine the future effect of investing the
resources necessary to construct the highway.
• Evaluation methods such as capital cost (construction cost,
right-of-way cost, and vehicle cost), maintenance cost,
facility operating costs, travel time (total hours and cost
of system travel.
• Average door to door speeds, vehicles operating costs,
safety, social and environmental costs are used for this
decision process.
Results obtained from the EE of the feasible routes
provide valuable information to the decision maker.
Factors to be taken into consideration include:
- Road user costs,
-Construction costs,
- Maintenance costs,
- Road user benefits,
Information from these results will provide information
on the economic resources that will be gained or lost.
Information is used to help the policy maker in
determining whether the highway should be built, and
what type of highway it should be.
Results obtained from the economic evaluation of the
feasible routes provide valuable information to the
decision maker.
Preliminary survey: art of finding the details of alternative
alignments found suitable during the reconnaissance survey.
During this survey, instruments to be used are chain type,
prismatic compass, leveling instrument, plane table
theodolite.
Objective
To survey various alignments found later the reconnaissance
and to collect all physical information and details of
topography, drainage, and soil.
To compare the different proposals in outlook of the
requirements of good road alignment.
To estimate the cost of constructing the road including
bridges and other construction aspects along each
alternative alignment of the road.
To finalize the best alignment from construction,
maintenance, and traffic operation point of view.
Comparison of Alternative routes
1) Cost Benefit Analysis [CBA]:
Technique for comparing the costs and benefits
of a project in monetary terms.
Compares costs (capital and recurrent) of road
investment with the resultant benefits to road users.
Benefits includes: vehicle operating cost savings,
travel time savings, reductions in accident costs and
future maintenance expenditure.
Principal Out put of CBA:
NPV [Net present Value]
BCR [Benefit to cost ratio]
IRR (%) [Internal Rate of return]
Principal Out put of CBA:
NPV [Net present Value] of proposed project:
• Total discounted benefits minus total discounted costs
BCR (Benefit to cost ratio of project):
• Ratio of discounted benefits to discounted costs
IRR (%) (Internal Rate of return):
• Discount rate at which NPV = 0 Benefit equal costs
2) Multi-Criteria and cost effectiveness Analysis:
MCA: developed to combine both quantified and non-
quantifiable benefits
MCA: involves the ranking of route alternatives on
the basis of their performance against a set of
criteria. It is subjective.
Final location Survey
This survey often carried out as part of the preliminary survey.
It serves the dual purpose:
i) to fix the centre line of the selected alignment and
ii) collect additional data for the design and preparation of working
drawings.
• Steps in Final Location Survey
i. Pegging the centre line: usually done at stations established at 30m
intervals with reference to preliminary traverse/ base line (if used
earlier) or a control survey (if aerial survey was used).
ii. Centre-line Levelling: at the stations and at intermediate points
between stations where there is a significant change in the slope to
obtain the representative profile of the ground
iii.Cross-section Levelling: at each station and at points with
significant change in ground slope
iv) Intersecting Roads: the directions of the centre line of all
intersecting roads, profiles, and cross-sections for some
distance on both sides.
v) Ditches and Streams: horizontal alignment, profile, and
cross section levelling of the banks of the stream.