Oe On eT ee OE DO er er Dee Mixtures for Laboratory Testing, does not include Rice testing in its Significance and Use section. Note paragraph 3.1 from the standard reads: 3.1 Samples obtained in accordance with the procedure given in this practice may be used to measure pavement thickness, density, resilient or dynamic modulus, tensile strength, Marshall or Hveem stability, or for extraction testing, to determine asphalt content, asphalt properties and mix gradation. There are a couple of reasons for this. First, coring is naturally a destructive process which alters the gradation. The level to which the gradation shifts varies with the nature of the parent gradation and material. i.e., a half-inch SMA is likely to see a greater gradation shift then say a fine, dense-graded three-eighths mix. Secondly, and more importantly, by coring you are creating aggregate that is not coated with asphalt. This lack of coating can then allow for water absorption into these non-protected surfaces. Naturally, the more absorptive the aggregate the greater the potential issue with this situation. The AASHTO standard for Rice is 7-209. It addresses absorption in part 15 of the standard entitled, “Supplemental Procedure for Mixtures Containing Porous Aggregate.” This is also known as the “dry-back procedure.” It is used on mixes produced with aggregate who's water absorption is greater than 1.5%.However, while collection of Rice material via cores is not the preferred method, it is an acceptable method when more preferred alternatives (plant or lab produced samples) are not available. | am unaware of any state that does not allow for cores to be used for Gmm when no good alternative is an option. With the previous discussion in mind, one should do what they can to minimize any potential problems that may arise from field-cut specimens. What this leads to is a bigger is better mindset. A 6-inch core will have a smaller percentage of its aggregate affected by the coring than would a 4-inch core from the same road. Therefore, it is