Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Data Analysis Results of 51 Nurses

    Uploaded by

    wayan sugita
    7 views4 pages
    1) The document analyzes data from a survey of 51 nurses on their age, education, work experience, motivation, infection control education, and universal precaution implementation. 2) Bivariate analysis found a significant association between higher motivation and better universal precaution implementation, as well as between better infection control education and better universal precaution implementation. 3) Risk estimates indicate nurses with higher motivation had over 50 times the odds of better precaution implementation compared to less motivated nurses, and those with better education had over 200 times the odds of better implementation compared to those with poorer education.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    HASIL OLAHAN DATA

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) The document analyzes data from a survey of 51 nurses on their age, education, work experience, motivation, infection control education, and universal precaution implementation. 2) Bivariate analysis found a significant association between higher motivation and better universal precaution implementation, as well as between better infection control education and better universal precaution implementation. 3) Risk estimates indicate nurses with higher motivation had over 50 times the odds of better precaution implementation compared to less motivated nurses, and those with better education had over 200 times the odds of better implementation compared to those with poorer education.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views4 pages

    Data Analysis Results of 51 Nurses

    Uploaded by

    wayan sugita
    1) The document analyzes data from a survey of 51 nurses on their age, education, work experience, motivation, infection control education, and universal precaution implementation. 2) Bivariate analysis found a significant association between higher motivation and better universal precaution implementation, as well as between better infection control education and better universal precaution implementation. 3) Risk estimates indicate nurses with higher motivation had over 50 times the odds of better precaution implementation compared to less motivated nurses, and those with better education had over 200 times the odds of better implementation compared to those with poorer education.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 4

    HASIL OLAHAN DATA

    A. Karakteristik Responden

    Usia

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative


    Percent

    17-25 Tahun 21 41,2 41,2 41,2

    26-35 Tahun 23 45,1 45,1 86,3


    Valid
    36-45 Tahun 7 13,7 13,7 100,0

    Total 51 100,0 100,0

    Pendidikan

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative


    Percent

    D III 35 68,6 68,6 68,6

    Valid Ners 16 31,4 31,4 100,0

    Total 51 100,0 100,0

    Lama Kerja

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative


    Percent

    < 5 Tahun 15 29,4 29,4 29,4

    Valid ≥ 5 Tahun 36 70,6 70,6 100,0

    Total 51 100,0 100,0

    B. Analisis Univariat

    Motivasi

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative


    Percent

    Tinggi 33 64,7 64,7 64,7

    Valid Rendah 18 35,3 35,3 100,0

    Total 51 100,0 100,0


    Edukasi IPCN

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative


    Percent

    Baik 36 70,6 70,6 70,6

    Valid Kurang Baik 15 29,4 29,4 100,0

    Total 51 100,0 100,0

    Penerapan universal precaution

    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative


    Percent

    Baik 35 68,6 68,6 68,6

    Valid Kurang Baik 16 31,4 31,4 100,0

    Total 51 100,0 100,0

    C. Analisis Bivariat

    Motivasi * Penerapan universal precaution Crosstabulation

    Penerapan universal precaution Total

    Baik Kurang Baik

    Count 31 2 33

    Tinggi Expected Count 22,6 10,4 33,0

    % within Motivasi 93,9% 6,1% 100,0%


    Motivasi
    Count 4 14 18

    Rendah Expected Count 12,4 5,6 18,0

    % within Motivasi 22,2% 77,8% 100,0%


    Count 35 16 51

    Total Expected Count 35,0 16,0 51,0

    % within Motivasi 68,6% 31,4% 100,0%


    Chi-Square Tests

    Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
    sided) sided) sided)

    Pearson Chi-Square 27,824 a


    1 ,000
    Continuity Correction b
    24,592 1 ,000
    Likelihood Ratio 29,290 1 ,000
    Fisher's Exact Test ,000 ,000
    Linear-by-Linear Association 27,278 1 ,000
    N of Valid Cases 51

    a. 0 cells (0,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5,65.
    b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

    Risk Estimate

    Value 95% Confidence Interval

    Lower Upper

    Odds Ratio for Motivasi (Tinggi / Rendah) 54,250 8,870 331,794


    For cohort Penerapan universal precaution = Baik 4,227 1,774 10,076
    For cohort Penerapan universal precaution = Kurang Baik ,078 ,020 ,305
    N of Valid Cases 51

    Edukasi IPCN * Penerapan universal precaution Crosstabulation

    Penerapan universal precaution Total

    Baik Kurang Baik

    Count 34 2 36

    Baik Expected Count 24,7 11,3 36,0

    % within Edukasi IPCN 94,4% 5,6% 100,0%


    Edukasi IPCN
    Count 1 14 15

    Kurang Baik Expected Count 10,3 4,7 15,0

    % within Edukasi IPCN 6,7% 93,3% 100,0%


    Count 35 16 51

    Total Expected Count 35,0 16,0 51,0

    % within Edukasi IPCN 68,6% 31,4% 100,0%

    Chi-Square Tests
    Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
    sided) sided) sided)

    Pearson Chi-Square 37,892 a


    1 ,000
    Continuity Correction b
    33,924 1 ,000
    Likelihood Ratio 40,653 1 ,000
    Fisher's Exact Test ,000 ,000
    Linear-by-Linear Association 37,149 1 ,000
    N of Valid Cases 51

    a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,71.
    b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

    Risk Estimate

    Value 95% Confidence Interval

    Lower Upper

    Odds Ratio for Edukasi IPCN (Baik / Kurang Baik) 238,000 19,934 2841,541
    For cohort Penerapan universal precaution = Baik 14,167 2,129 94,260
    For cohort Penerapan universal precaution = Kurang Baik ,060 ,015 ,230
    N of Valid Cases 51

    You might also like