Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
Situation Analysis
control over events that affect their life is considered to be the most influential aspect of
self-knowledge, and a key element in the exercise of control and personal agency.
The beliefs of self- efficacy upon the preference and choice, level of attempt, the
anxiety experienced, persistency the difficulties and the belief that the losing should bear
an informative role for the recovery feedback or may act as a destructive factor (Bandra,
1986), the people with weaker level of self- efficacy take the assignments harder then
what they truly are which results in sickness, depression and a limited view on problem
solving (Pajares,2002).
Self-efficacy refers to student’s beliefs in their ability to master new skills and
tasks, often in a specific academic domain (Pajares, and Miller, 1994, cited by Nasiriyan,
Azar, Noruzy, Dalvand, 2011). In other words, perceived self-efficacy is concerned with
people beliefs in their capabilities to produce given attainments (Bandura, 1997, cited by
1997, cited by Mahyuddin, Elias, Loh, Muhamad, Noordin & Abdullah, 2006) which
stated that human achievement depends on interactions between one's behaviors, personal
appraise their self-efficacy from their actual performances, their vicarious experiences,
the persuasions they receive from others, and their physiological reactions. Self-efficacy
beliefs influence task choice, effort, persistence, resilience, and achievement. Compared
with students who doubt their learning capabilities, those who feel efficacious for
readily, work harder, persist longer when they encounter difficulties, and achieve at a
thoughts, feelings and actions. In other words, the beliefs that individuals hold about their
abilities and outcome of their efforts influence in great ways how they will behave.
Therefore, it is not surprising that many researches shows that self-efficacy influences.
& Philippou, 2005) reported that there was a positive relationship between self-efficacy
and academic achievement and that if students are trained to have higher self-efficacy
beliefs their academic performance also improves. Most researchers investigating the
correspondence (Pajares and Miller, 1994). Students with strong senses of self-efficacy
tendency involve in challenging tasks, invest more effort and persistence, and show
excellent academic performance in comparison with students who lack such confidence
activity (Bandra & Locke (2003). A strong relation between self- efficacy and general
performance of the individuals was observed. Staikovic & Luthans (1988) through a
research on 114 experimental studies which had considered the relationship between the
self – efficacy and the performance found out that there is a strong and positive
Multon Brown & Leni (1991) through a research on 38 studies within the years 1977 to
1988 found the positive relationship between the self-efficacy and the academic
achievements. Due to the fact that the self-efficacy cannot be presumed as the direct
reason for the academic achievement, however, it will be the self- regulation that causes
the academic achievements. The self-efficacy will cause the use of self- regulation and
therefore the relation between self-efficacy and the self- regulation may be defined as
According to Bandura, 2006 the self-efficacy for self- regulated learning refers to
the individual's beliefs on application of the self- regulation processes such as the goal
setting, self-monitoring, strategy use, self- evaluation and self- reaction. Several
researches have shown the positive relation between the self-efficacy and self- regulated
learning and the academic achievements. (Wigfield, Eccles, Schiefele, Roeser & Kean
2006; Zimmerman, Banudra, & Martinez, Pons, 1992; Denissen Zarrete & Eccles, 2007).
According to Bandura, 1986 the self-efficacy beliefs are important as through
them the learning processes, motivations, passion and selectiveness regulates the
individual's use in different areas. Accordingly, pour Jafar Doust (2007) according to the
definition of the self-efficacy for the self- regulation (Bandura 2006) considers the self-
efficacy as a born capability that should be organized in behavior, sensational, social and
learning sub- skills including the self-believe (Self- confidence, problem- solving,
positive thinks), self- control, regulating the thinks and behavior to reach the goal, self-
evaluation, self- monitoring, positive thinking, controlling the behavior to reach the goal
step by step, and self-simulation to overcome the losing. The aim of this research is the
prediction in the individual's academic achievements through the sub- skills in the self-
academic performance of the selected students in Aringay Senior High School (ASHS)
School Year. 2018-2019 as perceive by the student’s respondents. As specific, this sought
a. Age
b. Sex
Hypothesis
There is a significant relationship between the profile of the respondents and to the
Students. The researcher’s hope’s that the result of this study would benefit the
selves if they are effective. The study will help them to figure out their weaknesses in
School. It would benefit from this study because they will be aware on what the
relationship of Self efficacy to their Academic Performance of the students. This study
will serve as a guide for students to gain knowledge and information about this topic and
Future researchers. Hope’s that the result of this study would benefit the
about the Relationship between self-efficacy and academic performance and its possible
Aim of the current study was to evaluate the relation between self-efficacy and the
academic performance of the selected students of Aringay Senior High School. The study
considers the student’s personal information such as their name, gender, and age. The
researcher limited the study to 50 respondents in Aringay Senior High School. Each of
Definition of Terms
The variables below are clearly defined to have an easy understanding of the study.
concept, a personal judgment of how well or poorly a person is able to cope with a given
situation based on the skills they have and the circumstance they face. Self-efficacy
mean or average of all final grades. The most common form of General Point Average is
Student / Learners. The benefits of this study are to know the relationship between self-
efficacy and the academic performance of the selected student of Aringay Senior High
School.
CHAPTER 2
METHODOLOGY
This chapter present the methodology of the study involving the research method
Research Design
a fast-finding study with adequate and accurate interpretation of the findings. It describes
with emphasis what actually excerpts such as conditions, practices, situations, or any
other phenomena. This method of research was used to evaluate the Relationship between
High School.
researchers with the participating students who took part of the study.
Sources of Data
Technology Students of Aringay Senior High School, there is 50 students who answer the
given questionnaire.
The research instrument utilized an adopted questionnaire from the study entitled
Relationship between Self-efficacy and the Academic Performance of the Selected grade
The questionnaire was divided into two, Part 1 of the questionnaire is design to
determine the respondent’s profile of Selected students from Aringay Senior High
School. Part 2 of the questionnaire is design to determine the relationship between self-
Before the conduct of the study the researcher sought permission to the principal and
teachers of the Aringay Senior High School. Likewise, a letter of permission sent to the
The responses in the Likert scale will be expressed in the following categories:
CHAPTER 3
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Age
14 and below 0 0
15-16 0 0
17-18 44 90
19-20 6 10
TOTAL 50 100
Gender
Male 19 20
Female 31 80
TOTAL 50 100
Table shows that most of the respondents age ranges from 17-18 with a
frequency count of 44 or 90% of the total of the respondents. This reflects that greater
percentage of the respondents were in the middle adolescent stage. Table shows that
respectively. This means that female respondents dominated the present study.
Table 2: General Pointed Average
75 – 79 8 16
80 – 84 15 30
85 – 89 22 44
90 5 10
Total 50 100
respondents by their general point average, most of the respondents had a grade of 85 -
89 with the frequency of 22 or 44%, it means that the students’ self – efficacy has a
Table 3 results shows that student’s perception on our study entitled the Relationship
of Self-efficacy and the Academic Achievement of the selected students is AGREE.
The shows that self-efficacy can affect to the academic achievement of the
respondents.
Chapter 4
Summary
Specifically, the study sought information on 1. Profile of the Respondents (age and the
The majority of the respondents age ranging from 17-18 with a frequency count of
44 or 90% of the total of the respondents. This reflects that greater percentage of the
respondents were in the middle adolescent stage. It shows that female is dominant over
male respondents with frequency count of 31 and 19 respectively. This means that female
respondents dominated the present study. The frequency and percentage distribution of
the student’s respondents by their general point average, most of the respondents had a
grade of 85 - 89 with the frequency of 22 or 44%, it means that the students’ self –
and actions. In other words, the beliefs that individuals hold about their abilities and
outcome of their efforts influence in great ways how they will behave. Therefore, it is not
attainments.
Conclusions
1. Most of the respondents profile 90% belongs to the age of 17-18 years old.
Recommendations
1. We recommend that the student must be concentrate on school subjects
during class.
Bandura,A. & Locke,E. 2003. Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited.
Retrievedfrom https://scholar.google.com.ph/scholar?
hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_vis=1&q=Bandura%2CA.+%26+Locke%2CE.
+2003.+Negative+self-efficacy+and+goal+effects+revisited.++&btnG=
Bates, R. & Khasawneh, S. 2007. Self-efficacy and college students’ perceptions and
use of online learning systems. Retrieved from
https://scholar.google.com.ph/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_vis=1&q=Bates
%2C+R.+%26+Khasawneh%2C+S.+2007.+Self-efficacy+and+college+students
%E2%80%99+perceptions+and++use+of+online+learning+systems&btnG=
Cascio M., Botta V., Anzaldi V. 2013. The role of self-efficacy and internal locus of
control in online learning.
Retrieved from
https://scholar.google.com.ph/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&as_vis=1&q=Cascio+M.
%2C+Botta+V.%2C+Anzaldi+V.+2013.+The+role+of+self-
efficacy+and+internal+locus+of++control+in+online+learning.+&btnG=
Ensinar e Aprender Online com Tecnologias Educativas (pp.15-30). Porto: Porto Editora
Knowles, M. Holton,E. & Swanson, R. 2012. The adult learner. New York: Routledge
Merriam,S. & Brockett,R. 2007. The profession and practice of adult education. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. K. (1991). A manual for the
use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ).University of
Michigan.
Taipjutorus, W., Hansen, S., & Brown, M. 2012. Investigating a Relationship between
Learner Control and Self-efficacy in an Online Learning Environment. Journal of Open,
Flexible, and Distance Learning, 16(1), 56 - 69
Appendix A
LETTER TO SCHOOL PRINCIPAL
DATE
Ma’am,
May I ask permission from your good office to float our questionnaire to the
Grade 11 students of our school. This is in relation to our research study entitled
“Relationship between Self-efficacy and the Academic Performance of the Selected
Students of Aringay Senior High School”.
Respectfully yours,
MARJORIE D. NISPEROS
ANDREA NICOLE G. DELINA
DANDY U. MAPANAO
JEMARK Q. RULLAN
Researchers
APPENDIX B
LETTER TO THE RESPONDENTS
DATE
Dear Respondents,
The undersigned is currently gathering data for the descriptive research study entitled
“Relationship between Self-efficacy and the Academic Performance of the Selected
Students Aringay Senior High School”.
Respectfully yours,
MARJORIE D. NISPEROS
ANDREA NICOLE G. DELINA
DANDY U. MAPANAO
JEMARK Q. RULLAN
Researchers
APPENDIX C
QUESTIONNAIRE
Dear Respondents,
Greetings!
You were chosen as the respondents because of your related knowledge and
experience. In accordance to this, kindly accomplish the questionnaire as truthfully and
accurately as possible. Rest assured that your response would be treated with outmost
confidentiality.
Thank you very much for your cooperation and support!
Respectfully yours,
MARJORIE D. NISPEROS
ANDREA NICOLE G.
DELINA
DANDY MAPANAO
JEMARK Q. RULLAN
Researcher
PART I: Profile of Respondents
Name: ____________________________
PART II, Relationship between Self-efficacy and the Academic Performance of the
Direction: Please put a check ( ) on the box that corresponds to your choice. Use the Verbal
Description below.
Verbal Description
3 - Agree (A)
2 - Disagree (DA)
Age
14 and below 0 0
15-16 0 0
17-18 44 90
19-20 6 10
TOTAL 50 100
Gender
Male 19 20
Female 31 80
TOTAL 50 100
APPENDIX E
GENERAL POINT AVERAGE
75 – 79 13 43
80 – 84 9 35
85 – 89 5 12
90 3 10
Total 30 100
APPENDIX F
Interpretation
MARJORIE D. NISPEROS
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
AWARDS/HONORS RECIEVED
EXAMINATION PASSED
NISPEROS, MARJORIE D.
Signature over Printed Name
DANDY MAPANAO
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
EXAMINATION PASSED
December 28,2016
National Certificate Assessment II
AMA College
San Fernando City
NC2 Passer
TRAINING AND SEMINARS ATTENTED
MAPANAO, DANDY U.
Signature over Printed Name
ANDREA NICOLE G. DELINA
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND