Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Separation of Flavonoids by CC and TLC
Separation of Flavonoids by CC and TLC
(A) Adsorption of Flavonoids onto Chareoal from a Crude Plant Extraet. About 200 g of dried ground
Baptisia lecontei Ieaf and stern material was extracted with excess cold 20 % aqueous methanol for 3 days; on
evaporation of the solvent the extract yielded about 36 g of a sticky syrup, which was subsequently dissolved in
125 ml of hot methanol. This solution was mixed with 5 g of celite and filtered through a Buchner funnel. The
celite-residue material was suspended in 50 ml of hot methanol and filtered again. The two filtrates (about
300 ml inc1uding all washings) were combined, left standing overnight, and then refiltered.
About 250 ml of the c1ear filtrate was mixed with activated charcoal (common commercial type) using a
mechanical stirrer. Charcoal was added in portions until the supernatant liquid showed no flavonoids as
determined by polyamide TLC. A total of 80 g of charcoal was added, two 20 g and four 10 g portions.
The charcoal-flavonoid material was filtered onto a small Buchner funnel, and the residue was washed
with 21 of boiling methanol. The methanol filtrate yielded, on concentration, 16.3 g of a flavonoid-free residue.
The charcoal-flavonoid material was next washed with 11 of boiling water; the water yielded another 2.7 gof
flavonoid-free residue.
(B) Recovery of Flavonoids from the Chareoal. The charcoal-flavonoid material from procedure (A),
which had been collected on a Buchner funnel, was now washed (in a fume hood) with 11 of a boiling solution
ofphenol:water (7:93). After the phenol-water solution had been concentrated to a small volume on a rotary
evaporator (at about 80° and 12 mm pressure), the remaining traces of phenol were removed by ether extraction.
Concentration of the phenol-free solution gave a flavonoid-rich residue (4.4 g).
Fractions produced from a large polyamide column (Table II-l) often yield pure
flavonoids or simple mixtures which may be further separated by additional column
1 We have also successfully used other commercial polyamide powders, for example Polypenco 66D from
the Polymer Corp., Reading, Pa. With this material excellent separation of flavonoid mixtures was obtained
using as eluent Egger's solvent: chloroform: methanol: methyl ethyl ketone; 12: 2: 1.
18 The Separation of Flavonoids by Column and Thin Layer Chromatography
H 20 1 +
20% MeOH 2 + +
20% MeOH 3 + + + + +
20% MeOH 4 + + +
20% MeOH 5 + + + +
20% MeOH 6 + + + + + + +
30% MeOH 7 + + + + + + +
30% MeOH 8 + + + +
40% MeOH 9 + + +
50% MeOH 10 + +
50% MeOH 11 +
75% MeOH 12
100% MeOH 13
0.3N HCI 14
l.1NHCI 15
4.5NHCI 16
a For the structures ofthese flavonoids (I - XIII) and coumarins (XIV and XIVa) see Chapter I, Fig. I-2b.
b The volume of each fraction was approximately 150 ml; however, this amount was varied to permit
+
+ + + +
+ + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + +
+ + + + + +
+ + +
+ +
+ +
+ +
The polyamide material prepared by the above method has a number of desirable
properties:
(1) It contains almost no water/methanol soluble monomers and oligomers.
(2) It has a unif.orm grain size (unlike commercial material prepared by grinding).
(3) It forms a column with a satisfactory flow rate.
(4) It has a high adsorption capacity.
OH 0
Silica gel column chromatography is not suitable for the separation of polar
flavonoids such as polyhydroxyflavonols or glycosides but does provide a convenient
method for the purification of many flavonoid aglycones obtained by the hydro lysis of
glycosides. An increase in the methanol content of the eluting solvent will allow the
rem oval of most flavonoid aglycones from silica gel. Isoflavone aglycones can be se pa-
rated on si li ca gel by using as eluent chloroform which is gradually increased in polarity
by the addition of ether or ethyl acetate. This system separated the isoflavones for-
mononetin (IV), afrormosin (V) and texasin (VI), which were isolated from Baptisia
australis [6].
HO OH
The authors [7J suggested that the degree of adsorption of flavonoid aglycones onto
Sephadex depends gene rally on the number of hydroxyl groups but not on their acidity
while with flavonoid glycosides, with much larger molecular weights, both gel sieving
and adsorption are important. Sephadex appears to be an efficient, high capacity medium
for both analytical and preparative flavonoid work.
microcrystalline cellulose and tale) mayaiso be used. The detection of flavonoid spots
on thin layer plates may be achieved, as in paper chromatography, by viewing the plate
under UV light, with and without the aid of ammonia fumes. A number of adsorbents
are now available which contain UV -fluorescent phosphors and these provide a highly
sensitive method for the detection of flavonoids. These phosphors are available com-
mercially (Kensington Scientific Corp., California) and may be added to any thin layer
adsorbent.
IHl~D" ~ HD~D" ~
~DH ~DH
o DH 0
VIII. Daidzein IX. Genistein
fine white precipitate of polyamide had settled overnight, the supernatant liquid was removed by siphoning.
The polyamide was washed to neutrality by repeatedly refilling the jar with tap water. The suspension was
filtered onto a Buchner funnel, and the polyamide, which was finally washed with 41 of distilled water 4 , was
then ready for use. The material, covered with water, was stored in a stoppered jar.
(B) Preparation ofPolyamide TLC Plates. The polyamide (prepared as described above) was slowly filtered
onto a Buchner funne1 and washed successively with distilled water, methanol and finally thoroughly with ethyl
acetate 4 (all traces of water and methanol must be removed). The washed polyamide was shaken vigorously
with ethyl acetate to produce a dilute slurry which was poured onto a glass TLC plate (5 x 20 or 10 x 20 cm). The
plate, which was about half covered with the slurry, was gently tilted until the material was evenly distributed
over the surface. After air drying, the plate was ready for use.
The polyamide prepared by the above procedure gave TLC plates which provided
good resolution ofmost flavonoids (both glycosides and aglycones). One solvent system
that is used extensively in oUf laboratory for polyamide TLC of flavonoids is methanol:
acetic acid:water (90:5:5). This solvent has been used successfully with glycosides and
aglycones of aurones, chalcones, flavanones, flavones, flavonols and isoflavones. Also,
we have found that Egger's solvent [12] (chloroform:methanol:butan-2-one; 12:2:1)
gives excellent separation of most flavonoids on polyamide TLC plates. Other solvent
systems such as methanol, methanol:water (4:1), acetone:water (1:1) and isopro-
panol: water (3: 2), have also been used for the polyamide TLC analysis of certain
flavonoids [8].
Wender and co-workers [13] separated a number of flavanone glycosides by both
column chromatography on Polyc1ar AT (General Aniline and Film Corp., Grasselli,
N.1.) and polyamide TLC (Woelm polyamide, Alupharm Chemicals, New Orleans, La.).
For the latter, they used a solvent system consisting of nitromethane-methanol (5: 2, v/v).
For the same flavanones they also employed TLC plates prepared from Avicel SF
Technical Grade microcrystalline cellulose (FMC Corporation, American Viscose
Division, Marcus Hook, Pa.) with the following deve10ping solvents: benzene-ethyl
acetate-formic acid-water (9:21:6:5, v/v/v/v) and n-butanol-acetic acid-water (6:1:2,
v/v/v).
References
1. Rösler, H., T.J. Mabry, and 1 Kagan: Chem. Ber. 98, 2193 (1965).
2. Seike1, M.K., in: The chemistry of flavonoid compounds (edited by T.A Geissman), p. 34-69. Oxford:
Pergamon Press 1962.
3. Markharn, K.R., and T.l Mabry: Phytochemistry 7,791 (1968).
4. Rösler, H.: Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Munich, Germany (1960). See also Rösler's procedure in
H. Wyler, H. Rösler, M. Mercier, and A S. Dreiding: Helv. chim. Acta SO, 545 (1967).
5. a) Thomas, M.B., and T.J. Mabry: J. Org. Chem. 32, 3254 (1967). b) Thomas, M.B., and T.J. Mabry:
Tetrahedron 24, 3675 (1968).
6. a) Lebreton, P., K.R. Markharn, W. T. Swift III, Oung-Boran, and T.l Mabry: Phytochemistry 6, 1675
(1967). b) Markharn, K.R., W. T. Swift III, and T.J. Mabry: J. Org. Chem. 33, 462 (1968).
7. Johnston, K.M., D.J. Stern, and AC. Waiss Jr.: 1 Chromatog. 33, 539 (1968).
8. Kirchner, 1 G.: Thin Layer Chromatography in: Techniques of organic chemistry series, vol. XII (edited by
A Weissberger), p. 558. New York: Interscience Publishers 1967.
9. Guggolz, l, AL. Uvingston, and E.M. Bickoff: 1 Agr. Food Chem. 9, 135 (1961).
10. Stahl, E., and P. 1 Schorn: Hoppe-Seylers Z. Physiol. Chem. 325, 263 (1961).
11. Hörhammer, L., H. Wagner, and K. Heini: 1 Chromatog. 13,235 (1964).
12. Egger, K., and M. Keil: Z. Anal. Chem. 210, 201 (1965).
13. a) Mizelle, lW., W.l Dunlap, R.E. Hagen, S.H. Wender, B.l Urne, R.F. Albach, and F.P. Griffiths:
Anal. Biochem. 12, 316 (1965). b) Hagen, R.E., W.J. Dunlap, lW. Mizelle, S.H. Wender, B.l Urne,
R.F. Albach, and F.P. Griffiths: Anal. Biochem. 12, 472 (1965).