Multiple cracks can interact with each other, either magnifying or diminishing the stress intensity factor at crack tips. Coplanar cracks magnify the stress intensity as the distance between them decreases due to the decreasing area transmitting force. Parallel cracks decrease the stress intensity due to mutual shielding. In general, coplanar cracks increase the stress intensity while parallel cracks decrease it due to their relative orientations.
Multiple cracks can interact with each other, either magnifying or diminishing the stress intensity factor at crack tips. Coplanar cracks magnify the stress intensity as the distance between them decreases due to the decreasing area transmitting force. Parallel cracks decrease the stress intensity due to mutual shielding. In general, coplanar cracks increase the stress intensity while parallel cracks decrease it due to their relative orientations.
Multiple cracks can interact with each other, either magnifying or diminishing the stress intensity factor at crack tips. Coplanar cracks magnify the stress intensity as the distance between them decreases due to the decreasing area transmitting force. Parallel cracks decrease the stress intensity due to mutual shielding. In general, coplanar cracks increase the stress intensity while parallel cracks decrease it due to their relative orientations.
86 Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications
2.12 INTERACTION OF MULTIPLE CRACKS
The local stress field and crack driving force for a given flaw can be significantly affected by the presence of one or more neighboring cracks. Depending on the relative orientation of the neighboring cracks, the interaction can either magnify or diminish the stress intensity factor. An example of the former is an infinite array of coplanar cracks (Figure 2.21). The KI solution for this configuration is given by Equation (2.45) and is plotted in Figure 2.22. When cracks are parallel to one another, KI tends to decrease due to the interaction. The interaction of both coplanar and parallel cracks is discussed further in the following section.
2.12.1 COPLANAR CRACKS
Figure 2.57 illustrates two identical coplanar cracks in an infinite plate. The lines of force represent the relative stress-concentrating effect of the cracks. As the ligament between the cracks shrinks in size, the area through which the force must be transmitted decreases. Consequently, KI is magnified for each crack as the two cracks approach one another. Figure 2.58 is a plot of the KI solution for the configuration in Figure 2.57. As one might expect, the crack tip closest to the neighboring crack experiences the greater magnification in KI. The KI solution at tip B increases asymptotically as s → 0. At tip A, the solution approaches 2 as s → 0 because the two cracks become a single crack with twice the original length of each crack. Figure 2.57 and Figure 2.58 illustrate the general principle that multiple cracks in the same plane have the effect of magnifying KI in one another.
2.12.2 PARALLEL CRACKS
Figure 2.59 illustrates two parallel cracks. In this case, the cracks tend to shield one another, which results in a decrease in KI relative to the single crack case. Figure 2.60 shows the KI solution for this geometry. This is indicative of the general case where two or more parallel cracks have a mutual shielding interaction when subject to Mode I loading. Consequently, multiple cracks that are parallel to one another are of less concern than multiple cracks in the same plane.
Bahram Farahmand, George Bockrath, James Glassco (Auth.) - Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics of High Risk Parts - Application of LEFM & FMDM Theory-Springer US (1997)