Professional Documents
Culture Documents
cm_sp=SearchF-_-topnav-_-
Results&ds=20&kn=jean%20terrel&sts=t
- “The Tropics of Empire Why Columbus Sailed South to the Indies”
Nicolás Wey Gómez (2008)
1. “Los Hijos de La Gran Diosa : Psicologia Analitica, Mito y Violencia” (1999) Marta
Cecilia Velez Saldarriaga.
2. “El Errar del Padre” (2007) Marta Cecilia Velez Saldarriaga
Sloan has assembled a collection of interesting essays that will help readers appreciate
White’s artwork. Sloan herself brings us up to date on what we know about White’s
background and his career in the “curious and gentle art of limning.” Joyce Chaplin
explores White’s motivations and the importance of his work in the promotional effort
designed to support English overseas enterprise. Christian Feest looks at White’s work
in the context of early European ethnographic representation, and Ute Kuhlemann
examines the partnership between White and the Flemish engraver Theodor De Bry,
who both publicized White’s work and altered it as he presented it to European readers.
Readers, no doubt, will find things to object to and disagree with in each of these
essays, but they will also find themselves thoroughly versed in the scholarly debates
surrounding the meaning of White’s work. For that, and for the beautiful reproductions,
this book should be considered essential reading for anyone interested in the history of
Native Americans, early European expansion into the Atlantic World, and Elizabethan
art.
COMPRAS ACADÉMICAS:
A la Sombra de lo Político, Por María del Rosario Acosta, Carlos Manrique
Antropología de la inhumanidad, Por María Victoria Uribe Alarcón
Archivo, poética y violencia política Por Jaime Iregui
Arte como presencia indéxica Por María Margarita Malagón
Boulê. Ensayos en filosofía política y del discurso en la antigüedad Por Sergio
Ariza, Catalina González.
INVESTIGACIÓN: SOLICITUD PARA ACCESO A LOS ANDES:
-
- Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty (2012) An aesthetic education in the era of
globalization Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press, 2012. xvi, 607 p.
INVESTIGACIÓN
- Principe de la philosophie chez Hobbes L’expérience de soi et du monde
Milanese, A. (2011)
- Liberté et nécessité chez Hobbes et ses contemporaines: Descartes, Cudworth,
Spinoza, Leibniz
-
- Hobbes's Political Theory Hardcover – August 26, 1988 by Deborah Baumgold
- Terrel, Jean (1994) Hobbes. Matérialisme et politique Jean Terrel. Vrin
- Jauffrey, Berthier; Arnaud, Milanese (2016) Hobbes et le matérialisme. Editions
Matériologiques
- (2015) De l’homme Thomas Hobbes - Vrin - Bibliothèque des Textes
Philosophiques
- (2008) Jean Terrel. Hobbes: Vies D Un Philosophe (Philosophica)
vocabulaire de Hobbes (Le) (LE VOCABULAIRE DE) (Francés) Tapa blanda – 15
Octubre 2003 de Jean Terrel
- https://www.amazon.com/Lectures-de-Hobbes/dp/2729877045
- Sur le rapport entre Hobbes et le matérialisme des Lumières, voir Y. Glaziou,
Hobbes en France au xvii siècle, Paris, PUF, 1993, et O. Bloch, Matière à
histoires, Paris, Vrin, 1997, p. 287-310 (en particulier p. 295-299 pour le rapport
avec Helvétius)
SOLICITAR A DIEGO:
- Sur la «présence, pas seulement indiscutable, mais ‘centrale’ des ‘sauvages’» dans
la pensée de Hobbes, v. Sergio Landucci, /filosofi e i selvaggi. 1580-1780, Laterza,
Bari 1972, p. 114-142.
- Droit, pouvoir et liberté: Spinoza critique de Hobbes por Christian Lazzeri (1998)
- Hobbes (Philo-philosophes) (Francés) Tapa blanda – 15 Noviembre 1997
- Les passions à l'âge classique. Tome II: Théories et critiques des passions
(Léviathan) (French Edition) (Francés) Tapa blanda – 7 Agosto 2006
de Pierre-François Moreau
- Les theories du pacte social : droit naturel, souveraineté et contrat de Bodin a
Rousseau by Jean Terrel Format:Print BookPublication year:1988
5. Thomas Hobbes, Court Traite des Premiers Principes, tr.Jean Bemhardt (Paris,
1988)
6. "Strong Wits and Spider Webs: A Study in Hobbes's Philosophy of Language"
(1996) Deborah Hansen Soles.
7. le conatus, voir Geoffrey Barnouw, "Le vocabulaire du conatus", in Hobbes et son
vocabulaire. Etudes de lexicographie philosophique, dir. Yves Charles Zarka, Paris,
Vrin, 1992, p. 103-124. "Le vocabulaire de la passion", in Hobbes et son
vocabulaire. Etudes de lexicographie philosophique, op. cit., p. 139-154.
3. "The Selected Works of Pierre Gassendi" (1972) Editorial: (Texts in Early Modern
Philosophy). Traductor: Craig B. Brush de Pierre Gassendi.
4. M. Blay, « Genèse des couleurs et modèles mécaniques dans l’œuvre de Hobbes »,
Thomas Hobbes. Philosophie première, théorie de la science et politique, Paris, PUF, 1990.
5. Lexicon Spinozanum. vol. 1. A-K. Boscherini, Emilia Giancotti
6. Hobbes oggi: Atti del convegno internazionale di studi promosso da Arrigo Pacchi,
Milano-Locarno 18-21 maggio 1988 (Filosofia e scienza nel Cinquecento e nel Seicento.
Studi) (Italian Edition) (Italian) Paperback –
7. “Hobbes and the ‘Continental’ Tradition of Scepticism,” in Skepticism in Renaissance
and Post-Renaissance Thought. New Interpretations, ed. by J. R. Maia Neto and Richard H.
Popkin (Amherst, Mass.: Humanity Books 2004), 65-105.
(1962) _“Disquisitio metaphysica : seu dubitationes et instantiae adversus Renati Cartesii
metapysicam et responsa”_ *de Pierre Gassendi*; Texto editado por: Bernard Rochot.
N° de clasificación: 194. G177 Z96
3. https://nawa.gov.pl/en/nawa-programmes/nawa-programmes-
alias/ongoing?start=5
https://centrodememoriahistorica.gov.co/libros/
Diego Arias El conflicto armado DOI: https://doi.org/10.14409/cya.v0i30.8916
colombiano visto por
los escolares
Nylza Offir Educación, memoria DOI: https://doi.org/10.17227/rce.num79-8918
García-Vera histórica y escuela.
Contribuciones para un
estado del arte
Bibliography on Skepticism
The present bibliography is divided into five parts. The first lists collections
that contain papers dealing with different periods of the skeptical tradition.
The other four parts list books, papers, discussions, critical notices, and
reviews bearing upon ancient, medieval, modern, and contemporary
skepticism. Note that the bibliography is an ongoing project and that I add
new items when I have some free time. Inclusion of a work in this bibliography
does not mean that I consider the work in question worth reading.
Blackson, T. 2005. “In
Defense of an Unpopular Interpretation
of Ancient Skepticism,” Logical Analysis and the History
of Philosophy: History of Epistemology 8: 68–81.
Blomqvist, J. 1974. “Die Skeptika des Sextus Empiricus,” Grazer Beiträge 2: 7–
14.
Bonazzi, M. 2003a. Academici e Platonici. Il dibattito antico sullo scetticismo
di Platone. Milano: Led.
––––. 2003b. “I pirroniani, l’Academia e l’interpretazione scettica di Platone”,
181–217 in M. Bonazzi & F. Trabattoni
(eds.), Platone e la tradizione platonica. Studi di filosofia antica. Milano:
Cisalpino La Goliardica.
––––. 2003c. “Un dibattito tra academici e platonici sull’eredità di Platone. La
testimonianza del commentario anonimo al
Teeteto”, 41–74 in Papiri filosofici. Miscellanea di studi IV. Firenze Olschki.
––––. 2004. “Contro la rappresentazione sensibile: Plutarco tra l’Academia e
il platonismo”, Elenchos 25: 41–71.
––––. 2007. “Enesidemo ed Eraclito”, Rhizai 4: 329–38. (Critical notice of
Polito 2004 & Pérez-Jean 2005.)
–––––––. 2012. “Plutarch on the Differences between the
Pyrrhonists and the Academics”, Oxford Studies in
Ancient
Philosophy 43: 271-298.
Bonazzi, M. & Celluprica, V. (eds.). 2005. L’eredità platonica. Studi sul
platonismo da Arcesilao a Proclo. Napoli:
Bibliopolis.
Boys-Stones, G. 2005. “Alcinous, Didaskalikos 4: in Defence of Platonism”,
201–34 in Bonazzi & Celluprica 2005.
Brancacci, A. (ed.). 2001. Antichi e moderni nella filosofia di età imperiale.
Napoli: Bibliopolis.
Brennan, T. 1998. “Pyrrho on the Criterion”, Ancient Philosophy 18: 417–34.
––––. 1999. Ethics and Epistemology in Sextus Empiricus. New
York/London: Garland Publishing.
––––. 2000. Review of Algra et alii 1999, Bryn Mawr Classical
Review 2000.09.11.
Brittain, C. 2001. Philo of Larissa: The Last of the Academic Sceptics.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
––––. 2005. “Arcesilaus”, Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/arcesilaus.
––––. 2006. “Philo of Larissa”, Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/philo-larissa.
––––. 2007. “Middle Platonists on Academic Scepticism”, 297–315 in R.
Sharples & R. Sorabji (eds.), Greek & Roman
Philosophy 100 BC–200 AD, vol. II. London: Institute of Classical Studies.
Brittain, C. & Palmer, J. 2001. “The New Academy’s Appeals to the
Presocratics”, Phronesis 46: 38–72.
Brochard, V. 1887/2002. Les Sceptiques grecs. 4th edition. Paris: Le livre de
poche.
Brunschwig, J. 1994. “Once again on Eusebius on Aristocles on Timon on
Pyrrho”, 190–211 in his Papers in Hellenistic
Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
––––. 1995. Études sur les philosophies hellénistiques. Paris: Presses
Universitaires de France.
––––. 1988/95. “Le problème de l’héritage conceptuel dans le scepticisme:
Sextus Empiricus et la notion de kritērion”,
289–319 in Brunschwig 1995.
––––. 1990/95a. “Le titre des Indalmoi de Timon: d’Ulysse à Pyrrhon”, 271–
87 in Brunschwig 1995.
––––. 1990/95b. “La formule hoson epi tō logō chez Sextus Empiricus”,
321–41 in Brunschwig 1995.
––––. 1999. “The Beginnings of Hellenistic Epistemology”, 229–59 in Algra et
alii 1999.
Burkhard, U. 1973. Die angebliche Heraklit-Nachfolge des Skeptikers
Aenesidem. Bonn: R. Habelt.
Burnyeat, M. 1980/97. “Can the Sceptic Live his Scepticism?”, 25–57 in
Burnyeat & Frede 1997.
––––. 1982. “Idealism and Greek Philosophy: What Descartes Saw and
Berkeley Missed?”, The Philosophical Review 91:
3–40.
––––. 1987/97. “The Sceptic in his Place and Time”, 92–126 in Burnyeat &
Frede 1997.
Burnyeat, M. & Frede, M. (eds.). 1997. The Original Sceptics: A Controversy.
Indianapolis: Hackett.
Calogero, G. 1981. “Socratismo e scetticismo nel pensiero antico”, 35–46 in
Giannantoni 1981, vol. I.
Castagnoli, L. 2000. “Self-bracketing Pyrrhonism”, Oxford Studies in Ancient
Philosophy 18: 263–328.
––––. 2010. Ancient Self-Refutation: The Logic and History of the Self-
Refutation Argument from Democritus to
Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chiesara, M. L. 1988. “Luigi Credaro e Lo scetticismo degli Accademici”, Rivista
di Storia della Filosofia 3: 479–500.
––––. 2001a. Aristocles of Messene: Testimonia and Fragments. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
––––. 2001b. Review of Bett 2000, Elenchos 22: 422–8.
––––. 2002. “Enesidemo e i tropi in Aristocle in Eus. PE XIV 18”, ACME 55: 33–
56.
––––. 2003. Storia dello scetticismo greco. Torino: Einaudi.
––––. 2008. Review of Spinelli 2005a, Rivista di Storia della Filosofia 23: 197–
200.
Clayman, D. 2009. Timon of Phlius: Pyrrhonism into Poetry. Berlin & NY:
Walter de Gruyter.
Conche, M. 1973/94. Pyrrhon ou l’apparence. 2nd edition. Paris: Presses
Universitaires de France.
Cooper, J. 2004. “Arcesilaus: Socratic and Sceptic,” 81–103 in his Knowledge,
Nature, and the Good: Essays on
Ancient Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cortassa, G. 1981. “Sesto Empirico e gli ‘egkuklia mathēmata’:
un’introduzione a Sext. Emp. Adv. Math. I–VI”, 713–24
in Giannantoni 1981, vol. II.
Corti, L. 2002. “Scale pirroniane: ouden mallon in Sesto Empirico,” Dianoia 7
(2002).
––––. 2009. Scepticisme et langage. Paris: Vrin.
Cossutta, F. 1994. Le Scepticisme. Collection Que sais-je?. Paris: Presses
universitaires de France.
Couissin, P. 1929. “L’origine et l’évolution de l’epochē,” Revue des études
grecques 42: 373–97.
––––. 1929/83. “The Stoicism of the New Academy,” 31–63 in Burnyeat 1983.
(Originally published as “Le Stoïcisme de
la Nouvelle Académie”, Revue d’histoire de la philosophie 3: 241–76.)
Dal Pra, M. 1950/75. Lo scetticismo greco. 2nd edition. Roma/Bari: Laterza.
De Lacy, P. 1953. “Plutarch and the Academic Sceptics”, The Classical
Journal 49: 79–85.
––––. 1958. “Ou mallon and the Antecedents of Ancient
Scepticism”, Phronesis 3: 59–71.
––––. 1991. “Galen’s Response to Skepticism”, Illinois Classical Studies 16:
283–306.
de Olaso, E. 1983. “La investigación y la verdad”, Manuscrito 6/2: 45–62.
––––. 1988. “Zétesis”, Manuscrito 11/2: 7–32.
––––. 1991. Review of Annas & Barnes 1985, Noûs 25: 145–52.
––––. 1996. “Scepticism and the Limits of Charity”, 253–66 in Popkin 1996.
Decleva Caizzi, F. 1981. Pirrone: Testimonianze. Collection of texts referring to
Pyrrho, with Italian translation and
commentary. Napoli: Bibliopolis.
––––. 1986. “Pirroniani ed Accademici nel III secolo a.C.”, 147–83 in H. Flashar
& O. Gigon (eds.), Aspects de la
philosophie hellénistique. Vandœuvres/Genève: Fondation Hardt.
––––. 1992a. “Sesto e gli scettici”, Elenchos 13: 279–327.
––––. 1992b. “Aenesidemus and the Academy,” The Classical Quarterly 42:
176–89.
––––. 1993. “L’elogio del cane. Sesto Empirico, Schizzi pirroniani I 62–
78,” Elenchos 14: 305–330.
––––. 1998. “Pirrone, pirroniani, pirronismo,” 336–353 in W. Burkert, L.
Gemelli Marciano, E. Matelli, L. Orelli (eds.),
Fragmentsammlungen philosophischer Texte der Antike – Le raccolte dei
frammenti di filosofi antichi. Göttingen:
Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Delattre, J. (ed.). 2006. Sur le Contre les professeurs de Sextus Empiricus. Lille:
Presses de l’Université de Charles-de-
Gaulle–Lille 3.
Desbordes, F. 1990. “Le scepticisme et les ‘arts libéraux’: une étude de Sextus
Empiricus, Adversus Mathematicos I–
VI,” 167–79 in Voelke 1990a.
Dumont, J.-P. 1972/85. Le scepticisme et le phénomène. 2nd edition. Paris:
Vrin.
Dye, G. & Vitrac, B. 2009. “Le Contre les géomètres de Sextus
Empiricus: sources, cible, structure,” Phronesis 54: 155–
203.
Edelstein, L. 1967. “Empiricism and Scepticism in the Teaching of the Greek
Empiricist School,” 195–203 in his Ancient
Medicine (ed. O & C. Temkin). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Everson, S. 1991. “The Objective Appearance of Pyrrhonism”, 121–47 in id.
(ed.), Companion to Ancient Thought II:
Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fine, G. 1996. “Scepticism, Existence, and Belief,” Oxford Studies in Ancient
Philosophy 14: 273–90. (Critical iscussion
of Hankinson 1995.)
––––. 2000. “Sceptical Dogmata: Outlines of Pyrrhonism I 13,” Méthexis 13:
81–105.
––––. 2003a. “Sextus and External World Scepticism,” Oxford Studies in
Ancient Philosophy 24: 341–85.
––––. 2003b. “Subjectivity, Ancient and Modern: The Cyrenaics, Sextus, and
Descartes,” 192–231 in J. Miller & B.
Inwood (eds.), Hellenistic and Early Modern Philosophy. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
––––. 2010. “Sceptical Enquiry,” 493–525 in D. Chares, Definition Greek
Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Floridi, L. 2002. Sextus Empiricus: The Transmission and Recovery of
Pyrrhonism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Frede, M. 1973. Review of Stough 1969, The Journal of Philosophy 70: 805–10.
––––. 1979/97. “The Sceptic’s Beliefs”, 1–24 in Burnyeat & Frede 1997.
––––. 1982. “The Method of the So-called Methodical School of Medicine”, 1–
23 in J. Barnes, J. Brunschwig, M.
Burnyeat, and M. Schofield (eds.), Science and Speculation: Studies in
Hellenistic Theory and Practice. Cambridge
and Paris: Cambridge University Press and Éditions de la Maison des
Sciences de l’Homme.
––––. 1984/97. “The Sceptic’s Two Kinds of Assent and the Question of the
Possibility of Knowledge”, 127–51 in
Burnyeat & Frede 1997.
––––. 1987a. Essays in Ancient Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
––––. 1987b. “Stoics and Skeptics on Clear and Distinct Impressions”, 151–
76 in Frede 1987a.
––––. 1987c. “The Ancient Empiricists”, 234–60 in Frede 1987a.
––––. 1988. “The Empiricist Attitude towards Reason and Theory”, 79–97 in
Hankinson 1988.
––––. 1990. “An Empiricist View of Knowledge: Memorism”, 225–50 in S.
Everson (ed.), Companions to Ancient Thought
I: Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gaukroger, S. 1995. “The Ten Modes of Aenesidemus and the Myth of Ancient
Scepticism,” British Journal for the
History of Philosophy 3: 371–87.
Giannantoni, G. (ed.). 1981. Lo scetticismo antico. 2 vols. Napoli: Bibliopolis.
Gifford, E. H. 1903. Eusebius: Preparation for the Gospel. 4 vols. English
translation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Giovacchini, J. 2008. “Le ‘dogmatisme négatif’ des médecins empiriques:
Sextus et Galien à la recherche d’une médecine
sceptique,” Cahiers Philosophiques 115: 63–80.
Glidden, D. 1983. “Skeptic Semiotics,” Phronesis 28: 213–55.
Glucker, J. 1978. Antiochus and the Late Academy. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck &
Ruprecht.
––––. 1997. “Socrates in the Academic books and other Ciceronian works”,
58–88 in Inwood & Mansfeld 1997.
––––. 2004. “The Philonian/Metrodorians: Problems of Method in Ancient
Philosophy”, Elenchos 25: 99–152. (Critical
notice of Brittain 2001.)
Grgić, F. 2006. “Sextus Empiricus on the Goal of Skepticism”, Ancient
Philosophy 26: 141–60.
––––. 2008. “Sextus Empiricus on the Possibility of Inquiry”, Pacific
Philosophical Quarterly 89: 436–459.
Hankinson, R. J. 1987. “Causes and Empiricism: A Problem in the
Interpretation of Later Greek Medical Method”,
Phronesis 32: 329–48.
––––. 1988. “Galien: la médecine et la philosophie antisceptique”, Revue de
philosophie ancienne 6: 229–69.
––––. 1994. “Values, Objectivity and Dialectic; The Sceptical Attack on Ethics:
its Methods, Aims, and Success”,
Phronesis 39: 45–68.
––––. (ed.). 1988. Method, Metaphysics and Medicine: Studies in the
Philosophy of Ancient Medicine, special volume of
Apeiron 21. Edmonton: Academic Printing and Publishing.
––––. 1995/8. The Sceptics. 2nd edition. London/New York: Routledge.
Hiley, D. R. 1987. “The Deep Challenge of Pyrrhonian Scepticism,” Journal of
the History of Philosophy 25: 185–213.
Holford-Strevens, L. 1997. “Favorinus: The Man of Paradoxes,” 188–217 in J.
Barnes & M. Griffin (eds.), Philosophia
Togata II: Plato and Aristotle at Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
House, D. 1980. “The Life of Sextus Empiricus,” Classical Quarterly 30: 227–38.
Inwood, B & Mansfeld, J. (eds.). 1997. Assent and Argument: Studies in
Cicero’s Academic Books. Leiden/New
York/Köln: Brill.
Ioppolo, A. M. 1981. “Il concetto di ‘eulogon’ nella filosofia di Arcesilao”, 143–
61 in Giannantoni 1981.
––––. 1986. Opinione e scienza. Il dibattito tra Stoici e Accademici nel terzo
e secondo secolo a. C. Napoli: Bibliopolis.
––––. 1992. “Sesto Empirico e l’Accademia scettica”, Elenchos 13: 169–99.
––––. 1993. “The Academic Position of Favorinus of
Arelate”, Phronesis 38: 183–213.
––––. 1994. “Accademici e pirroniani nel II secolo D.C.”, 85–103 in A. Alberti
(ed.), Realtà e ragione: Studi di filosofia
antica. Firenze: Olschki.
––––. 1995. “Socrate nelle tradizioni accademico-scettica e pirroniana”, 89–
123 in G. Giannantoni (ed.), La tradizione
socratica. Napoli: Bibliopolis.
––––. 2000. “Su alcune recenti interpretazioni dello scetticismo dell’Academia.
Plutarch. Adv. Col. 26, 1121F–1122F: una
testimonianza su Arcesilao”, Elenchos 21: 333–60.
––––. 2002. “Gli accademici ‘veōteroi’ nel secondo secolo
d.C.”, Méthexis 15: 45–70.
––––. 2004. “Il dibattito antico sullo scetticismo di Platone”, Elenchos 25:
413–46. (Critical notice of Bonazzi 2003a.)
––––. 2007a. “Cicerone e lo scetticismo”, 75–84 in P. Ciaravolo (ed.), La
personalità filosofica di Marco Tullio Cicerone.
Roma: Aracne.
––––. 2007b. “L’assenso nella filosofia di Clitomaco: un problema di
linguaggio?”, 227–67 in Ioppolo & Sedley 2007.
––––. 2008. “La critica di Sesto Empirico all’interpretazione di Platone
‘aporetico’”, 457–80 in F. Alesse, F. Aronadio, M.
C. Dalfino, L. Simeoni, & E. Spinelli (eds.), Anthropine sophia. Studi di
filologia e storiografia filosofica in
memoria di Gabriele Giannantoni. Napoli: Bibliopolis.
––––. 2009. La testimonianza di Sesto Empirico sull’Accademia scettica.
Napoli: Bibliopolis.
Ioppolo, A. M. & Sedley, D. (eds.). 2007. Pyrrhonists, Patricians, Platonizers:
Hellenistic Philosophy in the Period
155–86 BC. Napoli: Bibliopolis.
Janáček, K. 1948. Prolegomena to Sextus Empiricus. Acta Universitatis
Palackianae Olomucensis 4. Olmütz.
––––. 1972. Sextus Empiricus’ Sceptical Methods. Praha: Universita
Karlova.
––––. 1979/2008. “Das Wort skeptikos in Philons Schriften”, 239–243
in Janáček 2008.
––––. 2008. Studien zu Sextus Empiricus, Diogenes Laertius und zur
pyrrhonischen Skepsis. Berlin/New York: de
Gruyter.
Johnsen, B. 2001. “On the Coherence of Pyrrhonian Skepticism”, The
Philosophical Review 110: 521–61.
Krentz, E. 1962. “Philosophic Concerns in Sextus Empiricus, Adversus
Mathematicos I”, Phronesis 7: 152–60.
La Sala, R. 2005. Die Züge des Skeptikers: Der dialektische Charakter von
Sextus Empiricus’ Werk. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck &
Ruprecht.
Laursen, J.-C. 2004. “Yes, Skeptics Can Live Their Skepticism and Cope with
Tyranny as Well as Anyone”, 201–34 in J.
R. Maia Neto & R. Popkin (eds.), Skepticism in Renaissance and Post-
Renaissance Thought: New Interpretations.
Amherst, New-York: Humanity Books.
Lesses, G. 2002. “Pyrrho the Dogmatist”, Apeiron 35: 255–71. (Critical notice
of Bett 2000.)
Lévy, C. 2001. “Pyrrhon, Enésidème et Sextus Empiricus: la question de la
légitimation historique dans le scepticisme”,
299–326 in Brancacci 2001.
––––. 2003. Compte rendu de Brittain 2001, Revue des Études Latines 81:
374–8.
––––. 2005. “Les petits académiciens: Lacyde, Charmadas, Métrodore de
Stratonice”, 53–77 in Bonazzi & Celluprica 2005.
––––. 2008. Les scepticismes. Collection “Que sais-je?” 2829. Paris: PUF.
Long, A. A. 1988. “Socrates in Hellenistic philosophy”, Classical Quarterly 38:
150–71.
––––. 2005a. From Epicurus to Epictetus: Studies in Hellenistic and Roman
Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
––––. 2005b. “Timon of Phlius: Pyrrhonist and Satirist”, 70–95 in Long 2005a.
(Revised and updated version of a paper
published in Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society NS 24
[1978]).
––––. 2005c. “Arcesilaus in his Time and Place”, 96–113 in Long 2005a.
(Revised and updated version of a paper
published in Elenchos 7 [1986]).
Machuca, D. E. 2004. Review of Sextus Empiricus 2002, Ancient
Philosophy 24: 503–10.
––––. 2006a. “The Pyrrhonist’s ἀταραξία and φιλανθρωπία,” Ancient
Philosophy 26: 111–39.
––––. 2006b. Review of Brittain 2006b, Bryn Mawr Classical
Review 2006.11.07.
––––. 2008a. “Sextus Empiricus: His Outlook, Works, and Legacy,” Freiburger
Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie
55: 28–63.
––––. 2008b. Review of Bett 2005, Bryn Mawr Classical
Review 2008.01.11.
––––. 2009a. “Argumentative Persuasiveness in Ancient
Pyrrhonism,” Méthexis 22: 101–26.
––––. 2009b. Compte rendu de Delattre 2006, Bryn Mawr Classical
Review 2009.07.06.
––––. 2011a. “Ancient Skepticism: Overview,” Philosophy Compass 6: 234–45.
––––. 2011b. “Ancient Skepticism: Pyrrhonism,” Philosophy Compass 6: 246–
58.
––––. 2011c. “Ancient Skepticism: The Skeptical Academy,” Philosophy
Compass 6: 259–66.
––––. 2011d. “The Pyrrhonian Argument from Possible Disagreement,” Archiv
für Geschichte der Philosophie 93: 148–
61.
––––. 2011e. “Moderate Ethical Skepticism in Sextus Sextus’ Against the
Ethicists?” pp. 143–78 in Machuca (ed.), New
Essays on Ancient Pyrrhonism. Leiden: Brill.
––––. 2011f. (ed.). New Essays on Ancient Pyrrhonism. Leiden: Brill.
––––. 2011g. “Pyrrhonism and the Law of Non-Contradiction,” pp. 51–77 in
Machuca (ed.), Pyrrhonism in Ancient,
Modern, and Contemporary Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer.
––––. 2013. “Pyrrhonism, Inquiry, and
Rationality,” Elenchos 34: 201–228.
––––. 2015a. “Pyrrhonian Relativism,” Elenchos 36: 89–
114.
––––. 2015b. “Suspension, Equipollence, and Inquiry: A
Reply to Wieland,” Analytic Philosophy 56: 177–187.
––––. 2017. “Again on Sextus on Persuasiveness and
Equipollence,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 99:
212–224.
Magrin, S. 2003. Scetticismo e fenomeno in Sesto Empirico: la critica ai
grammatici e ai retori. Napoli: Bibliopolis.
Merrill.
Laursen, J. C. 1992. The Politics of Skepticism: in the Ancients, Montaigne,
Hume, and Kant. Leiden: Brill.
––––. 2009. “Pedro de Valencia and Academic Scepticism in Late
Renaissance Spain”, 111–23 in Maia Neto &
Paganini 2009.
Lennon, T. 2008. The Plain Truth: Descartes, Huet, and Skepticism.
Leiden: Brill.
Macarthur, D. 2003. “The Seriousness of Doubt and our Natural Trust in
the Senses in the First Meditation”, Canadian
Journal of Philosophy 33: 159–82.
Maia Neto, J. R. & Popkin, R. (eds.). 2004. Skepticism in Renaissance and
Post-Renaissance Thought: New
Interpretations. Amherst, New York: Humanity Books.
Maia Neto, J. R. & Paganini, G. (eds.). 2009. Renaissance Scepticisms.
Dordrecht: Springer.
Maia Neto, J. R., Laursen, J. C. & Paganini, G. (eds.). 2009. Skepticism in the
Modern Age: Building on the Work of
Richard Popkin. Leiden: Brill.
Paganini, G. (ed.). 2003. The Return of Scepticism from Hobbes and
Descartes to Bayle. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
––––. 2004. “Hobbes and the Continental Tradition of Skepticism”, 65–105
in Maia Neto & Popkin 2004.
––––. 2008. Skepsis. Le débat des modernes sur le scepticisme. Paris: Vrin.
Perin, C. 2008. “Descartes and the Legacy of Ancient Scepticism”, 52–65 in
J. Broughton & J. Carriero (eds.), A
Companion to Descartes. Oxford: Blackwell.
Perler, D. 2004. “Was There a ‘Pyrrhonian Crisis’ in Early Modern
Philosophy? A Critical Notice of Richard H.
Popkin”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 86: 209–20.
Popkin, R. H. 1960. The History of Scepticism from Erasmus to Descartes.
Assen: van Gorcum.
––––. 1979. The History of Scepticism from Erasmus to Spinoza:
Berkeley University of California Press.
––––. 2003. The History of Scepticism from Savonarola to Bayle. New York:
Oxford University Press.
––––. (ed.). 1996. Scepticism in the History of Philosophy: A Panamerican
Dialogue. Archives internationales d’histoire
des idées 145. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Popkin, R., Watson, R., Force, J. (eds.). 1993. The High Road to
Pyrrhonism. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Popkin, R. H., Vanderjagt, A. (eds.). 1993. Scepticism and Irreligion in the
Seventeeth and Eighteenth Centuries.
Leiden: Brill.
Russell, P. 2008. The Riddle of Hume’s Treatise: Skepticism, Naturalism, and
Irreligion. Oxford: OUP.
Schmitt, C. 1972. Cicero Scepticus: A Study of the Influence of the
“Academica” in the Renaissance. The Hague:
Martinus Nijhoff.
––––. 1983. “The Rediscovery of Ancient Skepticism in Modern Times”, 225–
51 in Burnyeat 1983.
Williams, M. 1986. “Descartes and the Metaphysics of Doubt”, 117–39 in R.
Rorty (ed.), Essays on Descartes’
Meditations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
V – Contemporary Skepticism
Bett, R. 1988. “Is Modern Moral Scepticism Essentially Local?”, Analysis 68:
102–7.
Brueckner, A. 1990. “Skepticism about Knowledge of Content”, Mind 99: 447–
51.
––––. 1992. “Semantic Answers to Skepticism”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 73:
200–19.
––––. 2003. “Trees, Computer Program Features and Skeptical Hypotheses”,
in Luper 2003.
––––. 2010. Essays on Skepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (A collection of
Brueckner’s thirty-six most
important essays on skepticism.)
David, M. & Warfield, T. 2008. “Knowledge-Closure and Skepticism”, 137–87
in Q. Smith (ed.), Epistemology: New
Essays. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dretske, F. 1997. “So Do We Know or Don’t We?”, Philosophy and
Phenomenological Research 57: 407–9. (Discussion
of Fogelin 1994.)
Fogelin, R. 1994. Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and Justification. New
York: Oxford University Press.
––––. 1997a. “Précis of Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and
Justification”, Philosophy and
Phenomenological Research 57: 395–400.
––––. 1997b. “What does a Pyrrhonist Know?”, Philosophy and
Phenomenological Research 57: 417–25.
––––. 1999. “The Sceptic’s Burden”, International Journal of Philosophical
Studies 7: 159–72.
––––. 2004. “The Skeptics Are Coming! The Skeptics Are Coming!”, 161–73 in
Sinnott-Armstrong 2004a.
Frances, B. 2005. Scepticism Comes Alive. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fumerton, R. 1995. Metaepistemology and Skepticism. Rowman and
Littlefield.
––––. 2004. “Inferential Internalism and the Presuppositions of Skeptical
Argument”, in R. Schantz (ed.), The Externalist
Challenge. De Gruyter.
––––. 2005. “The Challenge of Refuting Skepticism”, in M. Steup and E. Sosa
(eds.), Contemporary Debates in
Epistemology. London: Blackwell.
––––. 2006. “Epistemic Internalism, Philosophical Assurance, and the Skeptical
Predicament”, in T. Crisp, M. Davidson,
& D. Vander Laan (eds.), Knowledge and Reality: Essays in Honor of Alvin
Plantinga. Kluwer.
––––. 2008. “The Problem of the Criterion”, in Greco 2008 (see Section
I supra).
Garner, R. 1990. “On the Genuine Queerness of Moral Properties and
Facts”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 68:
137–46.
Joyce, R. 2001. The Myth of Morality. Cambridge: CUP.
––––. 2016. Essays in Moral Skepticism. New York: Oxford
University Press.
Joyce, R. & Kirchin, S. (eds.). 2010. A World Without Values: Essays on
Mackie’s Moral Error Theory. Dordrecht:
Springer.
Klein, P. D. 1999. “Human Knowledge and the Infinite Regress of Reasons”, in
J. Tomberlin (ed.),
Philosophical Perspectives 13: 297–325.
––––. 2000. “Why Not Infinitism?”, 199–208 in R. Cobb-Stevens
(ed.), Epistemology: Proceedings of the Twentieth
World Congress in Philosophy. Bowling Green: Philosophy
Documentation Center 5.
––––. 2004a. “Closure Matters: Skepticism and Easy
Knowledge”, Philosophical Issues 14: 165–84.
––––. 2004b. “Skepticism”. Oxford Handbook of Epistemology. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
––––. 2005a. “Infinitism Is the Solution to the Epistemic Regress Problem”,
131–40 in Steup & Sosa.
––––. 2005b. “Reply to Ginet”, 149–152 Steup & Sosa 2005
––––. 2005c. “Skepticism”, Stanford Encyclopaedia of
Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/skepticism.
––––. 2007a. “Human Knowledge and the Infinite Progress of
Reasoning,” Philosophical Studies 134.1: 1–17.
––––. 2007b. “How to be an Infinitist about Doxastic
Justification”, Philosophical Studies, 134/1: 25–29.
––––. 2008. “Contemporary Responses to Agrippa’s Trilemma”, 484–503 in
Greco 2008.
Lammenranta, M. 2008. “The Pyrrhonian Problematic,” 9–33 in Greco 2008.
––––. 2011. “Skepticism, Disagreement, and the Dialectical Conception of
Justification,” International Journal for the
Study of Skepticism 1: 3–17.
Luper, S. (ed.). 2003. The Skeptics: Contemporary Essays. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Macarthur, D. 2003. “McDowell, Skepticism and the ‘Veil of
Perception,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81: 175–
90.
Machuca, D. E. 2006. “The Local Nature of Modern Moral Skepticism”, Pacific
Philosophical Quarterly 87: 315–24.
––––. 2015a. “Agrippan Pyrrhonism and the Challenge of
Disagreement,” Journal of Philosophical Research 40: 23–39.
––––. 2015b. “Conciliationism and the Menace of
Scepticism,” Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical
Review 54: 469–488.
––––. 2017. “A Neo-Pyrrhonian Response to the Disagreeing about
Disagreement Argument,” Synthese 194: 1663–1680.
––––. (ed.), 2018. Moral Skepticism: New Essays. New
York: Routledge.
Mackie, J.-L. 1977. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Harmondsworth:
Penguin.
Moser, P. 1997. “The Relativity of Skepticism”, Philosophy and
Phenomenological Research 57: 401–6. (Discussion of
Fogelin 1994.)
Pritchard, D. 2005. Epistemic
Luck. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
––––. 2008a. “Radical Scepticism, Epistemic Luck and
Epistemic Value”, Proceedings and Addresses of the
Aristotelian Society 82: 19–41.
––––. 2008b. “Contrastivism, Evidence, and
Scepticism,” Social Epistemology 22: 305–23.
––––. 2008c. “Certainty and Scepticism,” Philosophical
Issues 18: 58–67.
Reed, B. 2006. “Epistemic Circularity Squared? Skepticism about Common
Sense”, Philosophy and Phenomenological
Research 73: 186–97.
––––. 2007. “The Long Road to Skepticism”, The Journal of Philosophy 104:
236–62.
––––. 2009. “A New Argument for Skepticism”, Philosophical Studies 142: 91–
104.
Schellenberg, J. L. 2007. The Wisdom to Doubt: A Justification of Religious
Skepticism. Ithaca: Cornell UP.
––––. 2009. The Will to Imagine: A Justification of Skeptical Religion. Ithaca:
Cornell UP.
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2004b). “Classy Pyrrhonism”, 188–207 in Sinnott-
Armstrong 2004a.
––––. 2006. Moral Skepticisms. New York: Oxford University Press.
Snare, F. 1984. “The Empirical Basis of Moral Scepticism”, American
Philosophical Quarterly 21: 215–25.
Sorensen, R. 2004. “Commercial Applications of Skepticism”, 208–32 in
Sinnott-Armstrong 2004a.
Sosa, E. 2004. “Two False Dichotomies: Foundationalism/Coherentism and
Internalism/Externalism”, 146–60 in Sinnott-
Armstrong 2004a.
––––. 2008. “Skepticism and Perceptual Knowledge,” 121–35 in Q. Smith
(ed.), Epistemology: New Essays. New York:
Oxford University Press.
Streumer, B. 2017. Unbelievable Errors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.