Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/354381213
CITATIONS READS
0 9
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Ulugbek Ismatullaev on 06 September 2021.
대한인간공학회
발행처
Ergonomics Society of Korea
(Publisher)
URL http://www.dbpia.co.kr/journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE10589822
APA Style Ismatullaev Ulugbek Vahobjon Ugli, Sangho Kim (2021). An Extended Technology Acceptance Model for
Investigating Factors Affecting the Adoption of Self-Driving Cars. 대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집, 41-44.
이용정보 울산과학기술원
114.70.8.***
(Accessed) 2021/09/06 18:53 (KST)
저작권 안내
DBpia에서 제공되는 모든 저작물의 저작권은 원저작자에게 있으며, 누리미디어는 각 저작물의 내용을 보증하거나 책임을 지지 않습니다. 그리고 DBpia에서 제공되는 저작물은 DBpia와 구독
계약을 체결한 기관소속 이용자 혹은 해당 저작물의 개별 구매자가 비영리적으로만 이용할 수 있습니다. 그러므로 이에 위반하여 DBpia에서 제공되는 저작물을 복제, 전송 등의 방법으로 무단
이용하는 경우 관련 법령에 따라 민, 형사상의 책임을 질 수 있습니다.
Copyright Information
Copyright of all literary works provided by DBpia belongs to the copyright holder(s)and Nurimedia does not guarantee contents of the literary work or assume responsibility for the
same. In addition, the literary works provided by DBpia may only be used by the users affiliated to the institutions which executed a subscription agreement with DBpia or the
individual purchasers of the literary work(s)for non-commercial purposes. Therefore, any person who illegally uses the literary works provided by DBpia by means of reproduction or
transmission shall assume civil and criminal responsibility according to applicable laws and regulations.
대한인간공학회 2021 춘계학술대회 논문집 Proceedings of 2021 Spring Conference of ESK
기술수용모델 개발
금오공과대학교 산업공학과
ABSTRACT
Objective: To investigate the effects of factors on the adoption of autonomous vehicles (AVs) using a new
extended technology acceptance model. Background: Since self-driving cars are being implemented and
developed to use for driving purposes, it is important to find the factors that can hinder the acceptance of these
technologies. Factors in traditional technology acceptance theories were used to determine the actual use of AVs.
However, factors in behavior theories are not directly observable (latent variables), therefore the effect of
technological factors (manifest variables) on these factors were also studied. In addition, the differences in the
acceptance of AVs regarding various human factors (e.g., education, income, driving experience) were evaluated.
Method: Research hypotheses of the model were proposed to predict acceptance of AVs. Data were collected by
an online survey among 81 residents of South Korea to confirm the hypotheses proposed. Structure Equation
Modeling (SEM) was used to validate the relationship between factors and effects on the adoption of AVs.
Results: The measurement model showed good reliability and validity after model and hypotheses testing results.
A total of 18 of the 25 hypotheses were supported. Moreover, the differences between users who have different
driving experience were observed, while no significant effect of e ducation and income were found.
Conclusion: It is confirmed that behavioral intention is the main determinant of the actual use of AVs, while it is
mostly affected by attitude, subjective norms, and perceived enjoyment. Technological factors, in particular,
compatibility, relative advantage, reliability, and complexity have significant effects on factors in behavior
theories. Users with less experience with driving are highly dependent on other’s opinions and suggestions to use
AVs. It can be helpful for developers to focus on safety risks than privacy, since young adults are not likely to
concern about sharing their data with AVs. Application: Key findings of this study will be used as a basis for
developing a new extended technology acceptance model for self-driving cars.
Keywords: Technology Acceptance, Self-Driving Cars, Behavior Theories, Behavioral Intention, Structural
Equation Modeling
Figure 2. Results of the structural model. The black lines indicate significant paths; Dotted lines indicate non-significant
paths; Oval-shaped constructs indicate factors with Behavior theories; Rectangular-shaped constructs represents technological
factors and human factors; R2 shows the validity of the research model, i.e., AU (R2=0.52) means 52% of AU can be explained
by BI.
Table 2. Results of research hypotheses H11 RA → PU =0.241* Supported
H1 BI → AU =0.637*** Supported H11a RA → TRU ** Supported
H2 ATT → BI *** Supported H11b RA → PE =0.210* Supported
H3 SNs → BI =0.424** Supported H12 REL → PU Rejected
H3a SNs → PU *** Supported H12a REL → TRU =0.282** Supported
H4 PU → BI =0.15 Rejected H13 CPL → PEOU *** Supported
H4a PU → ATT ** Supported H13a CPL → TRU =-0.096 Rejected
H5 PEOU → ATT =0.04 Rejected Note: ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05
H5a PEOU → PU ** Supported
H5b PEOU → TRU =0.326** Supported 4. Discussion & Conclusion
H6 TRU → BI Rejected
H6a TRU → ATT =0.316* Supported In this study, the effects of factors impacting the
H7 PE → BI * Supported
acceptance of AVs were evaluated through an
H7a PE → ATT =0.512*** Supported
H8 PPR → TRU Rejected extended technology acceptance model. It was found
H9 PSR → TRU =-0.152* Supported that the ATT, SNs, and PE have a positive direct
H10 COM → PU Rejected impact on BI to use AVs, implying users are likely to
H10a COM → PEOU =0.508*** Supported use an AV when they have a positive attitude, and they
H10b COM → PE *** Supported