Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prof. Reynolds
ENG 1201
19 February 2022
The Eurythmics and Marilyn Manson have a very different things come to mind when
you think of the two. You could say that these artist do however know what sweet dreams are
made of. The Eurythmics and Marilyn Manson each put out a video for the song “Sweet
Dreams”. The original by The Eurythmics came out in 1983. Marilyn Manson followed with his
own version in 1995. Although the two videos follow the same main idea of the song, the minds
The original song and video by Eurythmics shows the way that they envisioned the song.
It starts out with Annie Lennox in a suit in a very dark looking office. She is very serious looking
in the video. The video seems like a dream state like setting. In this setting there are normal
things going on but out of place. For example Dave Stewart is playing an instrument in a pasture
with a cow next to him. Dave Stewart and Annie Lennox are very obviously the main characters
for the music video. A prop that was used over and over again that you can't help but notice are
the cows. By the end of the video it shows Annie in bed almost as all of the video was in fact a
dream. Overall the video has a very good beat that is very moderate. It isn't upbeat but also is not
too slow. The audience rally could be anyone at this time period interested in this type of music.
It does not seem to have be trying to reach a vast audience to get a point across. I believe that the
main claim they are making in the song is that everyone has there own dreams and what they are
In this alternate version to the original, Marilyn Manson does his own version. This
version has a very different vibe throughout the entire video. It has a more darker and angrier
tone. The video is set in a run down, dirty looking, building. This video also looks like it is meant
look like it is in a dream like state. Nothing is really in focus throughout the video. It has Marilyn
which is the main character in a wedding dress and a variety of creepy outfits. The recurring
wedding dress is the most used prop in the video. The audience for this video would most likely
also be for people into music like this. Once again like the previous, I believe that the main claim
they are making in the song is that everyone has there own dreams and what they are made of,
Both versions have the same lyrics and meaning behind them. These artist just took the
videos in different directions. I believe they most likely did this to express themselves and their
unique personalities. The Eurythmics took a different approach than Marilyn Mansons
alternative metal version. I think the biggest rhetorical appeal the videos aiming for are pathos. I
believe it is pathos because songs are really meant to make you feel a certain way and the video
really gives an insight to how you may feel listening to the song. As a listener, you usually enjoy
music much more when you can relate to the lyrics or overall vibe of the song. Both of these
versions of the song can really appeal to anyone, any age, and any sex. The audience attracted to
these songs will most likely be people who are into similar music styles.
Once again, although the two videos follow the same main idea of the song, the minds of
the artist took the song in two different directions. By just watching the video by both artists, you
would never believe they are preforming the same song. This alone shows just how drastically
different these artist are and how they took these songs and created their own personal version.
Whether is was props used or the way the artist used different tones while singing. At the end of
the day both artist for sure showed what their sweet dreams are really made of.
Works Cited
Stewart, Dave. Sweet Dreams. YouTube.com, Sony Music UK, 2009, https://www.youtube.com/