Deities and Shrines of Neolithic Anatolia
Excavations at Catal Huyuk, 1962
“THE EXCAVATIONS conducted in 1961 at the Neolithic site of Catal Hibyik in
the plain of Konya (southern Turkey) produced sch spectacular fiads—the aston:
ishing frescoes were shown in our Spring 1962 issue—that it seemed impossible to
expect anything to equal them, But in 1962 James Mellaart found chat the site was
scll full of susprises—and of an even earlier date, Excavating again in the eastern
half of the mound, which has been found 0 comprise ten Early Neolithic building
levels (Levels O-1X, from top to bottom), the expedition uncovered &
series of shrines quite unlike any previously known, We fel
highly privileged to present these amazing discoveries,
By James Mellaart
‘GueAT 1s Duwwa_ OF THE EPHESIANS!" Althoogh
thee words from The Acts of the Apostles ate ta
mous Few people pause to think who this great pagan,
sodas eily was. Artemis of Ephesus, asthe Grecks
Called het, was quite diferent gure fom hee Hel
lenized namesske, the chaste twin sister of Apollo
In the hal-Lydian cty of Ephesus her colossal clt
siatue showed her with many breasts, and Clsical
inscriptions from Lydia invoke hee’ as "Mother.
Koown to the Greeks since the Late Bronze Age, tis
‘zoids, whose cult was especially popular in western
‘Anatolia, favored the Trojans in their war against
the Grecks. Homer calls her "Mistress of Animals.”
‘AS 4 goddess of the hunt, “rejoicing én boars and
swift deer,” she is portrayed accompanied by hinds
dnd he clothes are decorated with the figures of lions,
stags, hinds and bulls. She is said to protect the
Young, both human and animal; women invoke hee
fn childbirth and she dispenses death with her gentle
shafts At Ephesus 2 college of prcstesse called
Meise ("bees") adminiscee her cal.
(On the Anatolian plateau similar and a0 less pow
ciful goddenes were worshiped: Cybele the "Magna
Mater” of Phaygia, Ma of Cappadocis, Ansits in
Pontus and farther cast, where Persian influence was
strongest, and. Kupaps or Hepat in the old Lavisn
tnd Hurtian territories. Cybele's holy ciy was Pes
finws, ear the fantastic cocks of Sivrhise, and she
tlso was 4 Great Mother, Mistess of Animals, Lions
drow hee chariot: her cat lice that of Dion, was
steongly.orgistic, pethaps a heritage of the’ bat
burous Thracian homeland of the Phrygians, Among
these Anatolian peoples male gods, like Apollo and
Dionysus in the west, ply a subordinate sole as aso
slats ofthe godess
Literary s0ures of the seond millennium ac. a:
low one to trace this clk of a Great Nature Goddess
back to the third millennium, but only im some parts
of Anatolia, The chief deity of the Hitite pantheon
is Wunserna of Hat, transformed into the "Sun
Goddess of Arinna” and her husband, the Weather-
God of Hat, isan oll fertility god of streams and
rivers. Theis saceed animals are lioas, leopards and
ball, Elsewhere in Anatolia we find the kame pattern
»Anatolia coxinsed
Hepat and Tesup and their son Sarrama among the
Harrians in the east: Although syncretism was at
‘work to reconcile the tsligious beliefs of an Indo
Evropean ruling clss, with predominantly male gods,
to the deities ofthe old population, it ean be sid that
the old clement—the supremacy of a Grext Goddess
—was litle curtailed and triumphed in. the end
‘Working back feom the texts, we may assume that
before the arrival of Mitts, Lavians, ec. Cie. due
ing the thied willennium) the cult of « Great Mothee
Goss with a subordinate tale god a¢ son and or
husband was the rule thoughout Anatolia. Archaeo.
logical evidence would tend to support this, since the
figurines which have been found are neatly all female,
with exceedingly rare exceptions.
‘Apart from a few schematic figures dating feom
the ith and foot millenia (Che sore Late
CChalcolthic period), our evidence for the study of
Anatolian religion hitherto began only in the third
millennium with a fine sequence of shrines at Bey-
‘cesultan, the Royal Tombs of Alaca Hyik and Ho-
toxtepe, the Cappadocian igutines and thoxe from
scattered sites allover the country. Compared to what
was known from other countries in the ates of the
4, Suitett of baked clay representing
ons throne
Bieth'She i set
sn shulls From shrine in Level Uh
[Near East or even from southeastern Europe, this was
separ even nded
Thea came the discovery of catiee cultures at
Haalar;* and with it numerous realistic figucines in
the pint pty calle of the Farly Gli
period, naked of elothed but lacking in variety. Ie was
‘only when we reached the Neolithie period, with
Haalar VI (ca. 3600-5400 8.¢., according to adio-
carbon dates), that «richly varied and most natural
istic seties was found, allowing one to form an idea
of Neolithic man’s conception of the Supreme God-
dess, the Mistress of Nature and its creatures, human,
animal and vegetable. In an incompirable series we
see her as maiden, matron and crone; we see hee
with the young Boy-God, in fabor, with her child or
a young pet animal, and enthroned onions or loop:
ards as Mistress of Animals. The figure of the God-
dess with the Boy-God was costed with grain im
prim, and it ad evidently Been plein «rain
in, perhaps to promote better harvests, a form of
sympathetic magic widespread throughout the world,
‘These accomplished Hacilar figures of the Late
‘Excavations were condosted by Me, Melliart at this
site ia southwcitern Avatola (oexe madern Bards) from
1957.to.196L- The finds have heen teported ia Hered
Londo New, Febrary 11, 1961 and pal 8, 1961,
ee Gonos giv
fl by lions, her fect cestng
lenght 16 caAnatolia cosines
Hepat and Tesup and their son Sarruma among the
Horrians in the east. Although syncretism was at
‘work to reconcile the religious beliefs of am Indo
European ruling class, with predominantly male gods,
to the deities of the old population, it can be said that
the old element—the supremacy of a Great Goddess
—was litte curtailed. and triumphed in the end.
‘Working back from the teats, we may assume that
before the arrival of Hittites, Luvians et. (ic, du
ing the thitd millennium) the cult of a Great Mother
Goxldess with a subordinate male god as son and/or
hrusband was the mule throughout Anatolia. Archaco:
logical evidence would tend to suppor th
figurines which have been found are neaely all female,
with exceedingly are exceptions.
‘Apart from a few schematic Rigutes dating from
the fifth and fourth millennia (the socalled Late
‘Chalcolithic period), our evidence for the study of
‘Anatolian ccligion hitherto began oaly in the thied
millennium with a fine sequence of shrines at Bey: