You are on page 1of 98

7/16/2021

IDEALIZED CYCLE ANALYSIS


OF JET PROPULSION ENGINES

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
1

GENERAL JET ENGINE CYCLE

nozzle, segment 5-6-7.

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
2

1
7/16/2021

From previous lectures,


it was found Gross thrust

in terms of exit Mach number

This format normalize the gross thrust by the


nozzle exit area so that the result is independent of
engine size and completlty dependent on nozzle
performance.
Ram drag

The net thrust normalized to the nozzle exit area


This format shows that the net thrust depends
upon both the nozzle and the inlet

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
3

Schematic diagram of typical turbojet engine showing major


components and the standard numbering
scheme for engine stations

The segment 1-2 : Inlet


Compressor, segment 2-3
Combustor, segment 3-4
Turbine, segment 4-5
Nozzle, segment 5-6-7
Exits at station 7: Pressure near or
equal to the ambient pressure p0
Station 6: is the minimum section, or
throat

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
4

2
7/16/2021

H-S diagram

for a turbojet in subsonic flight, M0 < 1

Schematic plot of the Brayton-like cycle of an ideal jet engine

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
5

Generic turbojet cycle diagram


for subsonic flight, M0 < 1.

• In subsonic flight the pressure at station 1 is always lower


than the free stream pressure P0 because the stream tube area
usually decreases as it enters the inlet at station 1. p1 < p0 ; M0<1
• In supersonic flight the pressure at station 1 is always greater
than the free stream pressure because of shock wave in and around
the inlet lip, that is, p1 > p0 when M0 > 1 entropy increases

• Entropy increases, signifying losses in those components


• End at station 7 with p7 = p0

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
6

3
7/16/2021

IDEAL JET ENGINE CYCLE ANALYSIS


• In order to appreciate the contribution of the
engine components to overall performance
let us consider an idealized jet engine cycle
• all the compression and expansion processes
are considered to be isentropic
• consider the thermodynamic properties cp
and  to be constant
• fuel weight flow negligible
• The gas processed by the engine is thus
considered to be pure air
with c Idealized turbojet cycle in which all the
Cp=1.00kJ/kgK, =1.40, and molecular weight compression and expansion processes are
W=28.96kg/kgmol. considered to be isentropic
HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
7

IDEAL TURBOJET IN MAXIMUM POWER


TAKEOFF
• strongly influenced by takeoff considerations because this represents
the maximum weight condition.
• thermal limitations on turbine materials.
• Current engines operate in the range 1200K < Tt,4 < 1700K.
• Take-off: at standard day sea level conditions, that is, altitude z=0,
pressure p0=101.3kPa, temperature T0=288K, and speed of sound
a0=340.3m/s.
• The typical takeoff flight condition is taken here as M0 = 0 ( V0 = 0 ),
also called the static thrust condition

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
8

4
7/16/2021

IDEAL TURBOJET IN MAXIMUM POWER TAKEOFF:


3.4.1 INLET FLOW, STATIONS 0-2
• Stagnation values of pressure and temperature delivered to the
compressor face are equal to those in the free stream

The isentropic flow relations are as follows

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
9

IDEAL TURBOJET IN MAXIMUM POWER TAKEOFF:


3.4.2 COMPRESSOR FLOW, STATIONS 2-3

• The compressor provides an increase in stagnation


pressure from the inlet value determined by the
compressor pressure ratio Pt3/Pt2
• Current engines operate in the range 5<Pt3/Pt2 <40
• isentropic compression

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
10

5
7/16/2021

IDEAL TURBOJET IN MAXIMUM POWER TAKEOFF:


3.4.3 COMBUSTOR FLOW, STATIONS 3-4
• Heat addition, energy equation in terms of
stagnation temperature to obtain

• The quantity Qf is the heating value of the fuel;


• for Jet A fuel , Qf = 43.4MJ=kg

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
11

IDEAL TURBOJET IN MAXIMUM POWER TAKEOFF:


3.4.3 COMBUSTOR FLOW, STATIONS 3-4
• For etab = 1; and Cp=1,0 Kj/kgk
• f/a in the following table

• Higher compressor ration the lower the fuel-air ratio


required.

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
12

6
7/16/2021

IDEAL TURBOJET IN MAXIMUM POWER TAKEOFF:


3.4.4 TURBINE FLOW, STATIONS 4-5

• The turbine power must equal the compressor power

• The turbine exit stagnation temperature may be found from the


isentropic relation

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
13

IDEAL TURBOJET IN MAXIMUM POWER TAKEOFF:


3.4.5 NOZZLE FLOW, STATIONS 5-7
• The nozzle considered for takeoff will be of the simple converging duct
type so that stations 6 and 7 are coincident.
• The minimum section, or throat, is the exit of the nozzle M7 = M6 <= 1
• The maximum thrust for such a nozzle will be developed when the exit
station is choked, that is, M7 = 1
• stagnation pressure is constant throughout the nozzle, pt,5 = pt,6 =pt,7
• The pressure at the exit station p7 may be found using the isentropic flow
relation with the condition M7=1

The ratio of the exit pressure to free stream pressure P7/P0>1


indicating that the jet

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
14

7
7/16/2021

IDEAL TURBOJET IN MAXIMUM POWER TAKEOFF:


3.4.5 NOZZLE FLOW, STATIONS 5-7

• The ratio of the exit pressure to free stream pressure P7/P0>1 indicating
that the jet exhaust is always under-expanded under the take-off
conditions.
• A variable area diverging section between station 6 and 7 would permit the
exhaust nozzle to get closer to matched conditions,
• Therefore greater thrust, but weight and complexity of the nozzle would
increase, the exit flow would be supersonic, and jet noise would be greater.
• Such converging diverging nozzels are used on supersonic aircraft.

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
15

IDEAL TURBOJET IN MAXIMUM POWER TAKEOFF:


3.4.6 TURBOJET THRUST AND FUEL EFFICIENCY IN TAKEOFF

• The net thrust

• The mass conservation equation requires that

• Then the specific thrust may be written as

• Units of velocity

• Gives a useful view of the net thrust produced per unit mass flow of air passing through the engine without specifying the size of the engine

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
16

8
7/16/2021

IDEAL TURBOJET IN MAXIMUM POWER TAKEOFF: 3.4.6


TURBOJET THRUST AND FUEL EFFICIENCY IN TAKEOFF

For a fixed value of Tt,4 the specific thrust


shows a maximum in the pressure ratio range
of between 10 and 15, and this is related to
the magnitude of the nozzle exit pressure P7
which increases more rapidly than V7
decreased in this range.

Specific thrust as a function of compressor pressure ratio


and turbine inlet stagnation temperature for
an ideal turbojet (TJ) in takeoff

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
17

a mass flow: 80.7 kg/s


Pratt & Whitney J57 Turbojet (from Pratt & Whitney Classic a turbine inlet temperature of 1140 K
Engines) Thurst= 45–80 kN Fn/m = 730 m/s ➔ 60 KN

Installed for:
American F-100 Super Sabre , the first of the USAF fighter
aircraft to M>1
Boeing 707 and Douglas DC-8 commercial airliners

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
18

9
7/16/2021

• The specific fuel consumption

Specific fuel consumption as a


function of compressor pressure ratio
and turbine inlet stagnation
temperature for an ideal turbojet (TJ)
in takeoff

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
19

IDEAL TURBOJET IN HIGH SUBSONIC CRUISE IN THE STRATOSPHERE:

• The basic cruise state considered here is standard day stratospheric


conditions,
• Altitude z = 10km,
• Pressure P0 = 26.5kPa,
• Temperature T0 = 223K, and speed of sound a0 = 300m/s.
• The typical cruise flight condition is taken here as M0 = 0.80 (V0
=240m/s)
• Though current aircraft cruise in the range 0.75 < M0 < 0.85.

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
20

10
7/16/2021

IDEAL TURBOJET IN HIGH SUBSONIC CRUISE IN THE STRATOSPHERE:


3.5.1 INLET FLOW, STATIONS 0-2
• Since it is subsonic, isentropic,

[mach, T, P, rho, area] = flowisentropic(1.4, 0.8, 'mach')

mach = 0.8000
T = 0.8865
P = 0.6560
rho = 0.7400

Pt,2= 26.5kPa/0.6560=40.39
Tt,2=223/0.8865=252

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
21

IDEAL TURBOJET IN HIGH SUBSONIC CRUISE IN THE STRATOSPHERE:


3.5.2 COMPRESSOR FLOW, STATIONS 2-3
• The compressor provides an increase in stagnation
pressure from the inlet value that is determined by
the compressor pressure ratio

3.5.3 COMBUSTOR FLOW, STATIONS 3-4

• Added Q =Q from Fuel

3.5.4 TURBINE FLOW, STATIONS 4-5

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
22

11
7/16/2021

IDEAL TURBOJET IN HIGH SUBSONIC CRUISE IN THE STRATOSPHERE:

3.5.5 NOZZLE FLOW, STATIONS 5-7

The nozzle considered for takeoff is of the simple converging duct type
so that stations 6 and 7 are coincident. The maximum thrust for such a
nozzle will be developed when the exit station is choked, that is, M7
=1. The nozzle is considered to operate ideally so that the stagnation
pressure is constant

Thus the pressure at the exit station P7 may be found using the
isentropic flow relation for M7=1

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
23

IDEAL TURBOJET IN HIGH SUBSONIC CRUISE IN THE STRATOSPHERE:


• Note that because p0 = 40.4kPa at the cruise altitude,
• the ratio of exit pressure to free stream pressure p7/p0 > 1 indicating that the jet exhaust is always under
expanded under the cruise conditions.
• A variable area diverging section between stations 6 and 7 would permit the exhaust nozzle to expand the
flow further to supersonic exit Mach numbers and thereby get closer to matched conditions, and therefore
greater thrust.
• This approach is used by military aircraft to reach higher flight speeds, but such variable geometry devices add
greatly to the engine cost, weight, and serviceability and therefore are not used on subsonic airliners.
• If the nozzle were of variable area so that A7 could be increased over A6 and thereby accelerate the nozzle
flow to lower pressures such that a matched condition, p7 = p0, could be achieved, the nozzle exit Mach
number, temperature, and velocity would change.

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
24

12
7/16/2021

IDEAL TURBOJET IN HIGH SUBSONIC CRUISE IN THE STRATOSPHERE:


3.5.1 INLET FLOW, STATIONS 0-2
• Since it is subsonic, isentropic,

3.5.2 COMPRESSOR FLOW, STATIONS 2-3


• The compressor provides an increase in stagnation
pressure from the inlet value that is determined by
the compressor pressure ratio

3.5.3 COMBUSTOR FLOW, STATIONS 3-4

3.5.4 TURBINE FLOW, STATIONS 4-5

3.5.5 NOZZLE FLOW, STATIONS 5-7


The nozzle is considered to operate ideally so that the stagnation
pressure is constant

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
25

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
26

13
7/16/2021

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
27

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
28

14
7/16/2021

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
29

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
30

15
7/16/2021

3.6 IDEAL TURBOJET IN SUPERSONIC CRUISE IN


THE STRATOSPHERE
• Concorde supersonic airplane which entered service in 1976.
• Military aircraft had been able to fly supersonically since the 1950s, but
the Concorde was to cruise supersonically over long ranges.
• The Concorde would cruise at Mach 2 at higher altitudes than subsonic
airliners, around z=15km.
• The ability of the Concorde to fly across the Atlantic in about 3 h
ushered in a wave of interest in supersonic commercial airplanes.

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
31

3.6 IDEAL TURBOJET IN SUPERSONIC CRUISE IN


THE STRATOSPHERE
• Though substantial effort was placed on keeping aerodynamic drag down at these
supersonic speeds, there was also a requirement for reliable high thrust engines
and turbojets outfitted with afterburners
filled that need.
• As mentioned in the previous sections, current engines operate in the range of
turbine inlet temperatures 1200K <Tt4 < 1700K although materials and cooling
techniques permitting higher temperatures are constantly being sought.
• The basic cruise state is standard day stratospheric conditions, that is, altitude
z=15km, pressure p0 = 12.1kPa, temperature T0 = 217K, and speed of sound
a0=295m/s.
• The typical cruise flight condition is taken here as M0=2 (V0=590m=s).
HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
32

16
7/16/2021

3.6 IDEAL TURBOJET IN SUPERSONIC CRUISE IN


THE STRATOSPHERE (Inlet Flow, Station 0-2)
• Although the flight Mach number is supersonic, the inlet of the ideal turbojet is still considered to
operate isentropically so that the stagnation values of pressure and temperature delivered to the
compressor face are equal to those in the free stream, that is,
• Pt,2 = Pt,0 and Tt,2 =Tt,0.

• for the given supersonic cruise conditions, the stagnation conditions at station 2
are readily calculated to be
• Pt,2 =Pt,0 =94:7kPa and
• Tt,2 =Tt,0 = 391K.
• We will see later that a well-designed inlet can deliver a pressure recovery of more
than 90% at M0=2.
HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
33

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
34

17
7/16/2021

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
35

HAVACILIK VE UZAY
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ
Aerospace Engineering AE308 Propulsion
36

18
AE308 Aerospace Propulsion
1. Introduction to propulsion systems.

2. Reciprocating engines.

3. Propeller Theory.

4. Aerothermodynamics of ideal airbreathing propulsion systems


(turbojet, turbofan, turboprop, turboshaft, ramjet, scramjet).

5. Mixtures, Combustion, Equilibrium and Dissociation.

6. Rocket Engines.

7. Aerothermodynamic performance of aircraft engines.

AE308 Aerospace Propulsion


8- Non-ideal cycle analysis of turbojet, turbofan and turboprop engines.

9- Performance characteristics of axial and radial compressors and turbines.

10-Performance of non-rotating components: inlets, nozzles and combustion chambers.

11- Matching of compressors and turbines.

1
AE308 Aerospace Propulsion 4

an idealized flow machine


Ae
A0

V0 Ve
p0
T0 pe=p0
Te
• Steady, quasi-one-dimensional flow
• Entrance and exit stations are pressure matched
• No heat transfer across control volume
• Friction outside the flow machine is negligible
• Mass injected into the stream is negligible
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 5

2
quasi-1-d conservation equations
Mass − 0 A0V0 + e AeVe = 0
m = 0 A0V0 = e AeVe = const

Momentum
( − 0 A0V0 )V0 + ( e AeVe )Ve = F
F = m (Ve − V0 ) = net force on fluid

 
m ( he − h0 ) + (Ve2 − V02 )  = mQ + P
1
Energy
 2 

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 6

zero heat addition, DQ=0


 
m ( he − h0 ) + (Ve2 − V02 )  = P
1
 2 
he  h0 because no heat is added to the flow
1
m (Ve + V0 )(Ve − V0 ) = FVavg = P
2
Force on P Power added P>0: thrust on machine
fluid
F= Power removed P<0: drag on machine
Vavg
FV0
p = Propulsive= Useful power
Actual power
FVavg efficiency
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 7

3
propeller

Motor=
propeller blade (a) Reciprocating
piston engine

motor (b) Electric motor


housing (c) Gas turbine
V0
motor engine

0 1 e
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 8

DQ=0 and P>0: piston-engine props

The North American Aviation P-51 Mustang is an


American long-range, single-seat fighter and fighter-bomber used during World
War II and the Korean War, among other conflicts. The Mustang was designed in
1940 by North American Aviation (NAA) in response to a requirement of the British
Purchasing Commission.

9
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion

4
DQ=0 and P>0: turboprops

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 10

A modern large turboprop engine

The Europrop International


TP400-D6 is a collaborative
engine between Rolls-Royce,
MTU, Snecma and ITP.
Power range in excess of
11,000shp TP400-D6 is the most
powerful Western turboprop
ever
Application: Airbus Military
A400M

http://defence.rolls-royce.com/most-powerful-turboprop-engines/
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 11

5
fans and turbines
Example of DQ=0 with Example of DQ=0 with
P>0: Fans P<0: Turbines

Cincinnati Fan GE 1.5 MW wind turbine farm in Gatun,


tube axial fan Spain
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 12

turbopumps
Example of DQ=0 with P>0:
Turbopumps
Even though Pratt & Whitney
Rocketdyne's SSME weighs
one-seventh as much as a
locomotive engine, its high-
pressure fuel pump alone
delivers as much horsepower
as 28 locomotives, while its
high-pressure oxidizer pump
delivers the equivalent
horsepower for 11 more.

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 13

6
propeller operation
The propeller is speed-limited: F/P =1/Vavg < 1/Vo

0.05
V0/Ve

0.04 0.9

0.03 0.6
F/P
(kN/kW) 0.3
0.02

0.01

0
0 50 100 150 200 250
V0 (m/s)

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 14

propulsive efficiency
Propeller propulsive efficiency is high for Ve/Vo~1
1

0.8

0.6
p
0.4

0.2

0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

V0/Ve

Propulsive efficiency p=V0/Vavg = 2/(1+Ve/V0)


Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 15

7
constant DQ but no net power: P=0

Energy eq.

Thrust

Overall
efficiency

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 16

turbojet
fuel lines
inlet

combustor
compressor
nozzle
combustor

turbine

1 2 3 4 5 6,7

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 17

8
turbojet with afterburner
fuel lines

inlet

afterburner
combustor
nozzle

combustor

1 2 3 4 5 5AB 6 7

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 18

DQ>0 but P=0: the turbojet engine


Pratt & Whitney J57 turbojet. World's first jet engine to develop 10,000
lbs. thrust. Powers F-100 to supersonic flight.

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 19

9
ramjet
fuel lines
inlet

combustor
nozzle
combustor

1 2, 3 4, 5 6,7

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 20

DQ>0 with P=0: the ramjet


Marquardt RJ43-MA-20-B4 Ramjet powered the unmanned 42 ft long D-
21 (M=3, 90kft) after launching from an SR-71aircraft

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 21

10
early problems with jet aircraft
Performance characteristics of early jet fighters were
different than those of propeller-driven aircraft with
reciprocating engines

Differences were due to the manner in which the thrust


and power of turbojet engines vary with speed.

Reciprocating engines generate the same amount of


power at takeoff as at high speeds, whereas the turbojet
at the same altitude has nearly the same thrust at both
high and low speeds.

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 22

turbojets are weakly speed-limited


0.03
prop takeoff
0.025
jet takeoff
0.02
1/Vavg
0.015
(s/m) jet max
0.01
0.005 prop max

0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
V0 m/s)

F ~ 1/Vavg = 2/(Ve+V0); Propeller has Ve~V0 so F~1/V0


Turbojet has Ve~2.5V0,max so thrust decay is much slower
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 23

11
jet vs. propeller comparison
Acceleration of the jet on takeoff will be low and takeoff
distance long (subscript denotes 25mph)

Characteristic Propeller Jet


P25 1600 167
P410 1600 2740
F25 7200 2500
F410 1168 2500
(F/W)25 0.75 0.25
(F/W)410 0.12 0.25

For the same drag area, the jet would be much faster than
the propeller-driven aircraft. (subscript denotes 410mph)
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 24

specific fuel consumption

Specific fuel consumption is the amount of fuel consumed by a


vehicle for each unit of power output.

A vehicle's specific fuel consumption is more or less


independent from its nitrogen oxide emissions per kilometer.

The specific fuel consumption of an engine is the rate of fuel


burnt to produce a unit of thrust.

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 25

12
specific fuel consumption
Specific fuel consumption: “mass of fuel burned per hour for
each unit of thrust produced” Specific energy
content of the fuel

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 26

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 27

13
specific fuel consumption (SI units)

0.18
M=1
0.15

0.12
cj
0.09
(kg/hr/N)
0.06
subsonic turbojets supersonic turbojets
0.03

0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
V0 (m/s)

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 28

specific fuel consumption (English units)

2
M=1

1.5

cj
1
(lbm/hr/lb)

0.5 subsonic turbojets supersonic turbojets

0
0 500 1000 1500 2000
V0 (ft/s)

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 29

14
early jet-propeller combination
Ryan Fireball FR-1 jet-propeller fighter

Leading edge
inlets

F=1600 lbs

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 30

modern jet-propeller: the turbofan


The special case of combined heat and power addition: the turbofan

hot flow
Energy cold flow
 
m ( he − h0 ) + (Ve2 − V02 )  = mQ + P
1
 2 
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 31

15
the turbofan engine
fan
cowling
fan flow
fan flow cold flow

combustor

core flow nozzle hot flow


combustor

cold
fan flow fuel line flow
fan

1 2 2.5 3 3F 4 5 6,7

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 32

the turbofan advantage

Bypass ratio

Cold stream

Hot stream

Fuel to air Ratio


33
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion

16
turbofan specific fuel consumption

bsfc = power-based specific


fuel consumption of the fan,
typically 0.5lbm/hp/hr

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 34

the turbofan advantage

Using practical numbers we see that (sfc)c /(sfc)h <1 for


the turbofan, where b>1. Therefore the specific fuel
consumption is always less than that of the turbojet

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 35

17
low bypass turbofan engine
Pratt & Whitney's first F100 military engine flew on July 27, 1972, on a
twin-engine F-15 Eagle. It also powered the F-16 Fighting Falcon.

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 36

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 37

18
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 38

high bypass turbofan engine


GE's commercial engines of the 1970s built on the technology of the
TF39 military engine of the 1960s. By the 1980s, the CF6 family of
engines was powering wide-body aircraft, including the Boeing 747 and
767

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 39

19
Genx Engine TurboFan
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 40

TF39 up close with GE Tuarbofan Engine

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 41

20
Rolls Royce Trent 700 TurboFan Engine - Explainer

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 42

Airbus Beluga A300-600ST - Takeoff at Hamburg Finkenwerder!


Turbofan installed on it

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 43

21
Rockets
The special case of Ao=0; the rocket

Ae
A0=0 nozzle

fuel at h=hi
V0 Ve
oxidizer at hi

0 e
combustion chamber

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 44

rocket engine equations


Vo

If A0=0 then m0=0 and the Ve


force on the fluid is

The energy equation may be rearranged to provide an equation for


the force as a function of the heat addition

FV0 V0 waste
propulsive efficiency p = = heat
FVe Ve
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 45

22
specific impulse
t

 Fdt F 𝑁𝑠
𝑚
𝑘𝑔. 2 𝑠 𝑚
𝑠
I sp = 0
 = =
t
m 𝑘𝑔 𝑘𝑔 𝑠
 mdt
𝑠 𝑠
𝑠 𝑠
o

Airbreathing engines Rocket engines


( f a )bQ f th I sp = Ve
I sp =
Vavg

Isp is measured in units of velocity but is often given in units of time


by dividing through by g, the acceleration of gravity
𝑚
𝐼𝑠𝑝 𝑠 =𝑠
𝐼𝑠𝑝 = =𝑚
𝑔
𝑠2
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 46

specific impulse comparison


Airbreathing engines vs. rocket engines
20000
M=5 M=10
16000

12000 LH2/Air
Isp
(m/s) HC/Air
8000
LH2/LOX
4000
RP-1/LOX
0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000
V0(m/s)

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 47

23
liquid-fueled rocket engine
Designed for the Boeing Delta
IV family launch vehicles, the
Rocketdyne bell-nozzle RS-68
is a LH2-LO2 booster engine

Thrust Level: 745,000 lbf


Weight: 14,560 lb
Mixture Ratio:6.06
Isp:410 sec
Chamber Pressure pc =1410 psia
Expansion Ratio e=21.5
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 48

RS-25: Space Shuttle Main Engine test firing

Propellant Liquid oxygen / Liquid hydrogen


Cycle Staged combustion
Configuration
[1]
Nozzle ratio 69:1
Performance
[1]
Thrust (vac.) 512,300 lbf (2,279 kN)
[1]
Thrust (SL) 418,000 lbf (1,860 kN)
[2]
Thrust-to-weight ratio 73.1
[1]
Chamber pressure 2,994 psi (20.64 MPa)
[1]
Isp (vac.) 452.3 seconds (4.436 km/s)
[1]
Isp (SL) 366 seconds (3.59 km/s)
Dimensions
Length 168 inches (4.3 m)
Diameter 96 inches (2.4 m)
Dry weight 7,775 pounds (3,527 kg)

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 49

24
solid propellant rocket

Space Shuttle
solid rocket
booster motor
(SRBM)
produces 2.65
million pounds
of thrust

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 50

space propulsion systems with DQ>0


nuclear 50% greater Isp

thermal (a)
use a low molecular
nuclear weight gas like
rocket propellant nozzle
reactor hydrogen which will
tank produce the highest
(NTP) specific impulse Isp

produce thrust in the


(b)
range of 5 mN to about
electric propellant nozzle 0.5 N (10-3 to 10-1 lb).
resistojet tank resistance heater

(c) Capable of thrust


propellant nozzle levels of 50 mN to 5
electric tank N(10-2 to 1 lb)
electric arc
arcjet

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 51

25
space propulsion with electric acceleration
magnetoplasmadynamic (MPD) ion electron
accelerator emitter

Electrostatic ion propellant ion generator


rocket tank

cesium (a)
Isp=20000-60000 m/s
Isp=Ve/g=2000-6000 s ions accelerated by an electrostatic field
the mass flow of ions is quite small so that thrust is only in the range of

electric arc nozzle

jxB force
Magneto-
plasmadynamic propellant plasma
(MPD) rocket tank

The specific impulse


Isp=V can be around 20,000 m/s or Isp=Ve/g=2000 s
e
(b)
magnetic field coil
However, the mass flow of plasma can be substantial and the thrust might be in the range of 25–200 N (5–40 lb) 52
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion

Comparative fuel efficiencies of different


propulsion systems

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 53

26
force field for airbreathing engines

Ae
A0
Ve
V0 mf me=mf + m0

p0 pe=p0
T0 Te

0 1 7 e

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 54

force field on the control volume


Momentum principle to a control volume from 0 to 7

F is the force exerted on the


1

fluid by the external flow

F2 is the force exerted on the


fluid by the walls of the
nacelle

Momentum Flux = resultant force

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 55

27
force field on the structure

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 56

force field on the structure

F: force exerted
on the nacelle Drag
by the aircraft F4 is the force
through the exerted on the
pylon. outside of the
nacelle by the
external stream.
F2 is the force exerted
by the fluid on the
inside of the nacelle,

Equilibrium σ 𝐹𝑥 = 0 →+ Positive direction

𝐹 − 𝐹2 + 𝐹4 = 0

𝐹 = 𝐹2 − 𝐹4

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 57

28
Grouping the forces
F is the force exerted on
1
Momentum Flux = resultant force
the fluid by the external
flow
F2 is the force exerted on the
𝐹 = 𝐹2 − 𝐹4 fluid by the walls of the
nacelle

pdAs
pdA

A A+dA

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 58

thrust and drag components


Net thrust = gross thrust – ram drag
 w + wf  w
Fn =  0 V7 + ( p7 − p0 ) A7  − 0 V0
 g  g
Nacelle drag A1

D = p0 ( A0 − A7 ) + F1 + F4
F1 =  pdA
A0
A7

Additive, or inlet, drag


F4 =  pdA + D
A1
f
Friction force
Pressure force
A1 A7

D=  ( p − p )dA +  ( p − p ) dA + D
A0
0
A1
0 f

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 59

29
Thrust components
For preliminary studies it is generally assumed that wf/w0<<1
For airbreathing engines wf/w0~2%

Fn = m (Veff − V0 )  m0 (Veff − V0 )
A7
Veff = V7 + ( p7 − p0 )
m0
Consider the gross thrust and ram drag:

Fg = ( m0 + mf )V7 + ( p7 − p0 ) A  A7  p7 (1+  7 M72 ) − p0 


Fr = m0V0 =  0 p0 A0 M02
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 60

the nozzle as an energy transformer


A nozzle can transform internal energy to kinetic energy. Consider a
point on the exit plane, that is, station 7

 h   T 
V7 = 2ht ,7 1 − 7   2cp,7Tt ,7 1 − 7 
 h   T 
 t ,7   t ,7 
 7 −1
T7  p7  7
= 
Tt ,7  pt ,7 
V7

 7 −1
 
  7
V7 = 2c p ,7Tt ,7 1 −  7  
p
p  7
  t ,7  
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 61

30
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 62

total pressure ratio in the engine


For a matched nozzle, i.e., one where p7=p0, we have
 7 −1
 
  7
V7 = 2c p ,7Tt ,7 1 −  0 t ,0  
p p
p p 
  t ,0 t ,7  
pt ,0 pt ,0 pt ,2 pt ,3 pt ,4 pt ,5
=
pt ,7 pt ,2 pt ,3 pt ,4 pt ,5 pt ,7
Nozzle pressure recovery
Turbine work removal
Combustor pressure recovery
Compressor work input
Inlet pressure recovery
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 63

31
Mach angle and the zone of silence
m
(M2-1)1/2
Sound source 1 sound waves
moving M>1
supersonically

Sound source moving


sonically sound waves
M=1

Mach angle
m=arcsin(1/M)
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 64

nozzle types & related exit flow


Mach lines No real
m<90o m=90o Mach lines

M7>1 M7=1 M7<1

Supersonic exhaust Subsonic exhaust

Exit flow can support pressure mismatch Exit must be


because external pressure information can’t pressure matched
get inside nozzle because pressure is
felt everywhere

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 65

32
net thrust as a function of V7
7 7
maximum thrust
Fn

saddle point

p7=p0
M7>1

0
V0 V7=a7 V7

Exit flow Exit flow


subsonic supersonic
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 66

interpretation of maximum thrust


Thrust loss – pressure too low

Nozzle
wall Thrust loss - high pressure
contribution lost

Dlong
p0

correct length – pressure Dshort p0


pressure
matched
pressure along nozzle wall
67
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion

33
Example: Pratt & Whitney J58 jet engine for the SR-71
8,000gal/hr of JP-7 (F/O=0.034) with Fg,=34,000lbs @200kts, M7=1
and TET=1,580F=Tt,7
(a)Veff=Fg/mf(1+O/F)= 2,400fps
(b)Fn=Fg-m0V0=29,400lbs
(c) cj =mf/Fn=8,000(6.76lbm/gal)/29,400=1.84lbm/hr/lb
(d)A0=m0/r0V0=17.4 ft2 (d1=4.7ft)
(e)Puseful=FnV0=14,750 hp (11MW)
(f) T7=Tt,7[1-(7 -1)M72/2]-1 =2,040R(0.86) =1,750R (use 7=1.33)
(g)V7=a7=(7RT7)1/2=2,000fps
(h)A7=[m(1+7)(RT/7)1/2]7/p0 – Fg/p0 and A7=7.36ft2 (d7=3.1ft)
(i) p7=(Fg/A7+p0)/(1+7M72)=1.37p0
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 68

Example: The German A-4 Rocket (V-2)

The V-2 burned about 8000kg of propellant (LOX


and Alcohol, O/F=1.3) in 65s with Ve =2000m/s with
a matched nozzle. Find:
(a) F=mVe =(8000kg/65s)(2000m/s)=246kN (or
55.3klbs),
(b) P=V0F= 0 on the pad and 492e6KNm/s (492MW
or 660,000hp) at 2km/s,
(c) Isp=F/mg=246kN/(8000kg/65s)(9.81m/s2) =203s,
b=1
(d)o=FV0/wfhbQf=FV0/{(m/[1+O/F])bQf}=
(492MNm/s)/{123kg/s(1)(27.2MJ/kg)/(2.3)}= 33.8%

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 69

34
Analysis of propulsion system components

• Equations for flow through a combustor under the


steady quasi-one-dimensional approximation
• Applications extend to other propulsion subsystems,
such as, nozzles, inlets, and turbomachinery
cascades.
• The equations are simple to deal with, yet they are
commonly acknowledged to be reasonably accurate
• The equation set is particularly useful for preliminary
design purposes.

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 1

Q-1D flow theory accounts for:

• Changes in combustor cross-sectional area


• Chemical reactions
• Variations in gas molecular weight and specific heat
• Exchange of heat with the surroundings
• Drag caused by internal bodies or solid particles in
the flow
• Losses due to friction on the combustor walls

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 2

1
equation of state

Perfect gas equation

 RuT dp d  dT dW
p= = + −
W p  T W
Ru: Universal gas constant is 8.314 J / mol. K

W: molecular weight for air: 28.97 g/mol


for O : 16 g/mol
H: 1 g/mol

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 3

2
3
4
5
Isentropic Relation:

speed of sound

 p     RT
a2 =   =  ( C   ) = u
  s    W
Ru: universal gas constant is 8.314 J / mol. K

W: molecular weight for air: 28.97 g/mol


for O : 16 g/mol
H: 1 g/mol

da 1  d  dT dW 
=  + − 
a 2  T W 

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 12

6
Mach number

V
M=
a

dM 2 dV 2 dW d dT
= 2 + − −
M 2
V W  T

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 13

r
Mass conservation
z

 V  ndA
A
ˆ =  V dA =0
A
n Vn
A(z)

In differential form for axisymmetric flow this becomes


 
(  rVr ) + (  rVz ) = 0
r z
Integrating over the area A(z)=p[rw(z)] 2 leads to:
rw ( z )
    drw Vr ,w 
2
z  0
Vz rdr  − Vz ,wrw 
  dz
− =0
Vz ,w 
mass flow Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 14

7
Mass conservation (continued)

Wall boundary condition


V Vr drw
drw Vr , w
= Vz
dz Vz , w dz

The mass conservation equation then reduces to

rw ( z )
   dm
2
z  0
Vz rdr  =
 dz
=0

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 15

mass conservation (concluded)

rw ( z )

m = 2 
0
Vz rdr = V  rw2 = const

dm d  dV dA
= + + =0
m  V A

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 16

8
Conservation of energy
Rate of heat transfer in across the boundary

 V2  Total energy
m ( dQ − dWk ) = m  dh + d 
change within
 2  boundary
Power taken out across the boundary
Heat input rate - Power output = Total energy change

m = mo + mf
N
h = Yi hi
Mass fraction of i =1
T
species i  hi = h +  c p ,i dT
0

Y = i f ,i
i
 Tr

defined as the energy per unit mass necessary to form the


species from the constituent atoms in its standard state at a
17
pressure of 1 atm and a reference temperature Tr = 298.16

conservation of energy (continued)


N N
Enthalpy change dh =  Yi dhi +  hi dYi
i =1 i =1
Mixture (fuel + oxidizer)

differential of species enthalpy dhi = c p ,i dT


N
Specific heat of mixture c p =  Yi c p ,i
i =1
temperature change composition change
N
Change in enthalpy of dh = c p dT +  hi dYi
mixture
i =1
18
Substituting dh into the energy yields

9
Conservation of energy (continued)

dQ − dWk − dH dT dV 2
= +
cpT T 2c pT
across the control within the control
Ru
surface volume
c p − cv =
W
N
dH =  hi dYi cp
i =1
=
cv
change in composition due to chemical reaction
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 19

conservation of energy (continued)


dQ − dWk − dH dT   −1  2 dV
2
= + M
cpT T  2  V2
General chemical reaction N N Book: n → C
among N species  Ci Ai →  Ci Ai
i =1 i =1
Ai : general chemical species
Example C’i : number of moles of species i in the reactants
C’’i : number of moles of products

Heat addition term

dH on a molar basis

C: number of moles of mixture

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 20

10
conservation of energy (concluded)
The heat of reaction of a chemical reaction is given by
at a given temperature and pressure
N  0 T  N  0 T 
H (T ) = Ci H f ,i +  C p,i dT  − Ci H f ,i +  C p,i dT 
 
i =1  Tr  i =1  Tr 

 ( C  − C  ) H
in terms of a finite chemical 1 N
composition change as follows H (T ) = i i i
CW i =1
C’i : number of moles of species i in the reactants
C’’i : number of moles of products

To determine the heat of W: molecular weight for air: 28.97 g/mol


for O : 16 g/mol H: 1 g/mol

reaction we must determine the


chemical composition of the
flow.
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 21

EXAMPLE: HEATING VALUES FOR DIFFERENT


FUEL-OXIDIZER COMBINATIONS

Pdf: 816 / 833

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 22

11
EXAMPLE: HEATING VALUES FOR DIFFERENT
FUEL-OXIDIZER COMBINATIONS

Paraffin hydrocarbons

Molecular Weight of Octan.


C8H18 : 8x12.011+1.008x18= 114.232 g/mol

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 23

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 24

12
Species conservation equation

i i+di

V di/dt V+dV

A A+dA

dz
The conservation of species equation is
i
− iVA + ( i + d i )(V + dV )( A + dA) = Adz
t
-(rate of species i into CV)+(rate of species i out of CV)=
rate of production of species i in CV
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 25

Species conservation (cont.)


i
Expanding and ignoring second-order infinitesimals yields

d ( i AV ) = AVd i + i d ( AV ) = Adz
t
Global mass conservation equation :

d (  AV ) = 0 = AVd  +  d ( AV )

i
d
AVd i − AV i Adz =
 t Change Mass fraction of
species i


VdYi = i dz
t
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 26

13
normalizing the species equation
introduce L and tc:
Characteristic time for
reaction to be completed

L
z
z  = = O (1)
L reaction
t t=0 t= completed
=
tc
1  i  1  i   f  f 
Characteristic residence time of a

= =
fluid particle, L/V
 
V  t       c
dz dz ' O
 c  Characteristic time for
reaction to be completed

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 27

species conservation (concluded)

Characteristic residence time of a


fluid particle, L/V

f  1 i 
dYi =   dz
c    
Characteristic time for reaction
to be completed
The quantity f /c is essentially the first Damkohler similarity
parameter for reacting flows the ratio of the characteristic residence time of a
fluid particle in the combustor to the characteristic
chemical reaction time

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 28

14
characteristic times
slow flow but fast reaction fast flow but slow reaction

f/c>>1 f/c<<1
fluid particles move slowly through reaction zone Fluid particles pass quickly through reaction zone

In the limit dYi is infinite because the Here dYi ~0 because the
reaction time goes to zero and the residence time is very brief
reaction proceeds instantaneously to the compared to the reaction
equilibrium composition pertinent to the time, no appreciable reaction
local temperature and pressure, and thus
occurs, and dH=0.
dH is determined by using the chemical
equilibrium conditions.
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 29

Damkohler number limits

For tf / tc>>1 the heat of reaction is

 ( C  − C  )
N
1
H (T ) = i i Hi
CW i =1 equil

For f/c~O(1) and neither of the limits is applicable the reaction in


the combustor is rate-controlled and the actual chemical kinetics
must be accounted for. This complicates the equation set and the
solution techniques required.

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 30

15
Conservation of momentum

 ( V  ˆ
n )
VdA =   F +
dF
 dA dA b
s

A  A

p p+dp
V dFz V+dV
(drag force on fluid)

wdAw (wall shear force on fluid)


isentropic shear stress
flow mdV =−Adp −wdAw − dFz
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 31

Conservation of momentum
Skin friction coefficient Hydraulic diameter
Relates wetted area to /cross-
w shear stress sectional area
Cf =
1
V 2 dAw dz
2
=4
A D
one-dimensional momentum equations
 
dp 1 dV 1  2
dz dFz 
+  M 2 2 +  M 2  4C f + =0
p 2 V 2 D 1
  pAM 
2

 2 
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 32

16
Equations in standard form
dA
A
dQ − dWk − dH
c pT
4C f dz dFz
Independent variables +
D 1
 pAM 2
2
dW
W
d

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 33

Equations in standard form (cont.)

dM 2 dV da dp dT d 
dependent variables: , , , , ,
M2 V a p T 
Typical equation from influence coefficient chart

dp   M 2  dA   M 2  dQ − dWk − dH
= − −
p 1 − M 2  A 1 − M 2  c pT
 
  M 2 1 + (  − 1) M 2    4C f dz dFz    M 2  dW
   + + 2
 2 (1 − M 2 )   D 1
 pAM  1 − M  W
2

 2 
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 34

17
influence coefficients: constant W and 
dA dQ − dWk − dH 4C f dz dFz
+
A cpT D 1
 pM 2 A
2
dM 2   −1 2  1+  M 2   −1 2 
1 + 2 M   M 2 1 + M 
M2 −2   1−  M 2  2 
 1− M 1− M 2
2

 
dT (  − 1) M 2
1−  M 2 − ( − 1)  M 4
T 1− M 2 1− M 2 2 (1 − M 2 )
d M2 −1 − M 2
 1− M 2 1− M 2 2 (1 − M 2 )
dp M2 − M 2 − M 2 1 + ( −1) M 2 
1− M 1− M 2 2 (1 − M 2 )
p 2

area change heat addition friction


Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 35

Gas flow with simple area change

A(z)
z

  −1 2 
dp  M 2 dA dM 2 1 + 2 M  dA
= = −2  
p 1− M 2 A  1− M
2
M  A
 
dT (  − 1) M dA d
2
M 2 dA
= =
T 1− M 2 A  1− M 2 A

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 36

18
Nozzle

nptel.ac.in/content/
storage2/courses/1
12104118/lecture-
40/40_7_isentropic
_flow_converge_di
verge_nozzle.htm

http://aerorocket.com/Nozzle/Nozzle.html

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 37

Youtube Topic
Compressible Flow - Part 4 of 4 - Choked Flow:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h308rjI-vIc&ab_channel=PeterKay

converging diverging nozzle


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8e8A3sdVOg&ab_channel=JoshTheEngineer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXpcariAlVU&ab_channel=TheConHathyChannel

converging diverging rocket nozzle

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ycxMTUnruw&ab_channel=mekanizmalar

Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 38

19
Theory of Aerospace Propulsion 39

20
Afterburning Turbojet

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 1

Chapter 3
(3.6.5 AFTERBURNER FLOW, STATIONS 5-5B )

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 2

1
Chapter 3
(3.6.5 AFTERBURNER FLOW, STATIONS 5-5B )

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 3

Chapter 3
(3.6.5 AFTERBURNER FLOW, STATIONS 5-5B )

• Assume that the combustion in the afterburner brings the final temperature
Tt,5b back up to the limiting turbine inlet temperature so that the afterburner
exit temperature Tt,5b=Tt,4.
• This is the best that can be achieved since we have assumed the turbine
inlet temperature is set by thermal capability of engine materials.
• Some of the oxygen present in the air entering the engine has been
consumed in the combustor and is no longer available for combustion in the
afterburner.
HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 4

2
Chapter 3
(3.6.5 AFTERBURNER FLOW, STATIONS 5-5B )
• Stoichiometric reaction:
• denoting complete consumption of the oxygen in the air in
combustor, it has formed the minimum number of species
• we need to determine the fuel–oxidizer ratio of ethane and
oxygen mixture. For this we need to consider the stoichiometric
reaction of ethane and oxygen,
• C2H6 (ethane )+ 7⁄2 O2 → 2 CO2 + 3 H2O
• Fuel-to-oxidizer stoichiometric ratio:
𝑓 𝑚𝐶2 𝐻6 1 × 2 × 12 + 6 × 1 30
= = = 0.268
𝑜 𝑠
𝑚𝑂2 3.5 × 2 × 16 112
𝑓
= 0.268 × 20.9% = 0.056
𝑎𝑖𝑟 𝑠

• The equivalence ratio, ϕ

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 5

Chapter 3
(3.6.5 AFTERBURNER FLOW, STATIONS 5-5B )
• Effective heating value of the fuel that depends upon the combustor fuel-
𝑓 𝑀𝐽
to-air ratio, , and is decreased from the usual value of 𝑄𝑓 = 43.4 by an
𝑎 𝑘𝑔
𝑓
amount proportional to the ratio in the combustor.
𝑎
• A simple approach is to assume that the actual stagnation temperature rise
achievable is linearly proportional to some function of the fuel-to-air ratio
𝑓
used in the core engine ϕ ( ) as given by
𝑎

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 6

3
Chapter 3
(3.6.5 AFTERBURNER FLOW, STATIONS 5-5B )

• The actual stagnation temperature rise


𝑇𝑡,5𝑏 − 𝑇𝑡5 is assumed to be directly
proportional to the ideal stagnation
temperature rise
𝑇𝑡,5𝑏𝑖 − 𝑇𝑡5

(that for nondepleted oxygen in the air flow)


with the constant of proportionality depending on the fuel-to-air ratio in the core
engine combustor.

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 7

Chapter 3
(3.6.5 AFTERBURNER FLOW, STATIONS 5-5B )

• K=0: when the fuel-to-air ratio in the core engine is stoichiometric, denoting
complete consumption of the oxygen in the flow, the absence of any excess
oxygen will permit no combustion and therefore no stagnation temperature
rise so that

𝒇
• K=1: if the fuel-to-air ratio, in the core engine combustor were zero,
𝒂
• then there would be the full complement of oxygen available and the ideal
stagnation temperature rise could be achieved

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 8

4
Chapter 3
(3.6.5 AFTERBURNER FLOW, STATIONS 5-5B )

𝒇
• If
𝒇
= ( )s is stoichiometric,  = 1,  K=0
𝒂 𝒂
𝒇
• If = 𝟎   = 0  K=1.
𝒂

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 9

Chapter 3
(3.6.5 AFTERBURNER FLOW, STATIONS 5-5B )

For Jet A, a typical hydrocarbon fuel for jet engines, the stoichiometric
𝒇
fuel-to-air ratio may be taken as = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟔𝟖, as described in detail in
𝒂 𝒔
Chapter 4, which leads to the result that

1
≈ 14.7
0.068

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 10

5
Chapter 3
(3.6.5 AFTERBURNER FLOW, STATIONS 5-5B )
The energy balance in the afterburner
follows that for the combustor as given by
Eq. (3.11) and leads to the following equation
for the fuel-to-air ratio required to achieve the
desired afterburner stagnation temperature

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 11

Chapter 3
(3.6.5 AFTERBURNER FLOW, STATIONS 5-5B )

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 12

6
Chapter 3 (Problems)
• E3.1 A turbojet engine with a convergent nozzle is operating at 100% power at
M0=0.9 and an altitude of 11km. The engine characteristics are such that the
compressor, burner, and turbine efficiencies may be taken as 0.85, 0.96, and 0.90,
respectively. The inlet pressure recovery may be taken as the MIL-E-5008B standard.
The mass flow captured by the inlet is 29.17kg/s and the heating value of the fuel is
44MJ/kg.The compressor pressure ratio is pt,3/pt,2=18, the combustor pressure loss is
(pt,3-pt,4)=0.02pt,3, and the turbine inlet temperature Tt,4=1330K. Calculate the
properties of the flow at each station in the engine, the gross thrust, and the net
thrust.

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 1

Chapter 3 (Problems E3.1)


𝑘𝑔 𝑀𝑗
𝑚. 0 = 29.17 𝜂𝑐 = 0.85 𝜂𝑏 = 0.96 𝜂𝑇 = 0.9 𝑄𝑓 = 44 𝐾𝑔
𝑠

𝑀𝑜 = 0.9

𝑃𝑡,3 − 𝑃𝑡,4 = 0.02𝑃𝑡,3

𝑍 = 11000 𝑚

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 2

1
Chapter 3 (Problems E3.1)
Calculate air property at flight altitude

• The altitude at a given air pressure can be calculated using Equation 1 for
an altitude up to 11 km (36,090 feet). This equation can be arranged to also
calculate the air pressure at a given altitude as shown in Equation 2.

−𝑅.𝐿𝑏
𝑇𝑏 𝑃 𝑔𝑜 .𝑀 .
ℎ = ℎ𝑏 + −1 (1)
𝐿𝑏 𝑃𝑏

−𝑔𝑜 .𝑀
.
𝑅.𝐿𝑏
𝐿𝑏
𝑃 = 𝑃𝑏 . 1 + . ℎ − ℎ𝑏 (2)
𝑇𝑏

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 3

Chapter 3 (Problems E3.1)


• The altitude at a given air pressure can be calculated using Equation 1 for an altitude
−𝑅.𝐿𝑏
up to 11 km (36,090 feet ). 𝑇𝑏 𝑃 𝑔𝑜 .𝑀 .
ℎ = ℎ𝑏 + −1 (1)
𝐿𝑏 𝑃𝑏
This equation can be arranged to also calculate the air pressure at a given altitude as shown in Equation 2.
−𝑔𝑜 .𝑀
. Lb=-0.0065;
𝑅.𝐿𝑏
𝐿𝑏
𝑃 = 𝑃𝑏 . 1 + . ℎ − ℎ𝑏 (2) Tb=288.15;
𝑇𝑏
Pb=101325;
𝑃 = 22.632 𝐾𝑃𝑎 hb=0;
Rhob=1.225
𝑇 = 𝑇𝑏 + 𝐿𝑏 . ℎ − ℎ𝑏 (3) h=11000;
gb=9.80665;
M=0.0289644;% [kg/mol]
T= 216.65 𝐾 R=8.31432; %universal gas constant
𝜌 𝑃 𝑇𝑏
= . (4) P=Pb*(1+Lb/Tb*(h-hb))^(-gb*M/R/Lb)
𝜌𝑏 𝑃𝑏 𝑇
kg
𝜌 = 0.3639 3 8.314 𝑚
m 1.4 216.65 = 295.0696
0.0289644 𝑠𝑒𝑐
𝑎= 𝛾𝑅𝑇 = [T, A, P, RHO] = atmosisa(H)
HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion

2
HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 5

Chapter 3 (Problems E3.1)


𝑘𝑔 𝑀𝑗
𝑚. = 29.17 𝜂𝑐 = 0.85 𝜂𝑏 = 0.96 𝜂 𝑇 = 0.9 𝑄𝑓 = 44 𝐾𝑔
𝑠

𝑀𝑜 = 0.9

𝑃𝑡,3 − 𝑃𝑡,4 = 0.02𝑃𝑡,3


𝑍 = 11000 𝑚

𝑃 = 22.6 𝐾𝑃𝑎 𝑃𝑜 = 𝑃1 = 22.6 𝐾𝑃𝑎


T= 216.65 𝐾
𝑚
𝑎 = 295.1
𝑠𝑒𝑐 𝑚
𝑀 = 0.9, ⇒ 𝑉0 = 265.6
𝑠𝑒𝑐
HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 6

3
HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 7

Chapter 3 (Problems E3.1)


𝑘𝑔 𝑀𝑗
𝑚. = 29.17 𝜂𝑐 = 0.85 𝜂𝑏 = 0.96 𝜂 𝑇 = 0.9 𝑄𝑓 = 44 𝐾𝑔
𝑠

𝑀𝑜 = 0.9

𝑃𝑡,3 − 𝑃𝑡,4 = 0.02𝑃𝑡,3


𝑍 = 11000 𝑚
𝑃 = 22.6 𝐾𝑃𝑎
T= 216.65 𝐾
𝑚
𝑎 = 295.1
𝑠𝑒𝑐 𝑚
𝑀 = 0.9, ⇒ 𝑉 = 265.5627
𝑠𝑒𝑐
HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 8

4
Chapter 3 (Problems E3.1)
Pressure and Temperature at inlet

𝑇𝑡 𝛾−1 2
= 1+ .𝑀
𝑇 1
𝑀 = 0.9 𝛾−1 2 𝑇𝑡
1+ . 𝑀 = 1.1620 = 1.1620
𝛾 = 1.4 1 𝑇
𝛾
= 3.5
𝛾−1
T= 216.65 𝐾 Tt = 216.65𝑥1.1620

Tt = 251.7473 K
𝛾
𝑃𝑡 𝛾−1 2 𝛾−1
= 1+ .𝑀
𝑃 1
𝑃𝑡
= 1.691 ⇒ Pt = 38.278 KPa
𝑃

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 9

Chapter 3 (Problems E3.1)


𝑘𝑔 𝑀𝑗
𝑚. = 29.17 𝜂𝑐 = 0.85 𝜂𝑏 = 0.96 𝜂𝑇 = 0.9 𝑄𝑓 = 44
𝐾𝑔
𝑠

(ii) Inlet, Stations 1-2


𝑀𝑜 = 0.9

The MIL-E-5008B standard pressure recovery or (ram recovery factor


RR) for M0=0.9 is pt,2/pt,0 =1.0

https://www.gspteam.com/GSPsupport/OnlineHelp/index.html?gp_inlet.htm

0 The inlet flow is assumed to be adiabatic so that


Tt,2/Tt,0=1.
𝑍 = 11000 𝑚
𝑃 = 22.632 𝐾𝑃𝑎 Pt0 = 38.278 KPa Pt2 = 38.278 KPa
T= 216.65 𝐾 Tt0 = 251.7473 K Tt2 = 251.7473 K
𝑚
𝑎 = 295.1
𝑠𝑒𝑐 𝑚
𝑀 = 0.9, ⇒ 𝑉 = 265.56
𝑠𝑒𝑐
HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 10

5
Chapter 3 (Problems E3.1)
(iii) Compressor, Stations 2-3: 𝑃𝑡3
= 18 Pt3= 18Pt2 = 690.8kPa
𝑃𝑡2
𝛾−1
at 𝛾 = 1.4 = 0.286
𝛾
𝛾−1
𝑇𝑡𝑠3 𝑃𝑡3 𝛾
= = 180.286 = 2.2838 
𝑇𝑡2 𝑃𝑡2
𝜼𝒄 = 𝟎. 𝟖𝟓
𝑇𝑡3𝑠 = 574.9 k
𝑇𝑡3𝑠 +𝑇𝑡2
𝑇𝑎𝑣 = = 413.34 K
2

𝑇𝑎𝑣 𝐶𝑝 = 1.0289
𝐶𝑝 = 0.94 + 0.215. =
Pt2 = 38.278 KPa 1000
𝑇𝑎𝑣
Tt2 = 251.7473 K
𝛾 = 1.4 − 0.0667. = 𝛾 = 1.3724
1000

𝑇𝑡3𝑠 = 551.5k 𝛾 = 1.3732


𝑇𝑡3𝑠 = 552.23k 𝛾 = 1.3732

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 11

Chapter 3 (Problems E3.1) 3


3𝑠
(iii) Compressor, Stations 2-3:
Pt,3= 690.8kPa
𝑃𝑡3 𝑇𝑡3𝑠 = 552.23k
= 18
𝑃𝑡2 𝛾 = 1.3732 𝐶𝑝 = 1.026
0,1,2
𝐶𝑝 𝑇𝑡3𝑠 − 𝑇𝑡2
𝜂𝑐 = = 0.85
𝜼𝒄 = 𝟎. 𝟖𝟓 𝐶𝑝 𝑇𝑡3 − 𝑇𝑡2

𝑇𝑡3 = 605.23 k

The work done by the compressor

Pt2 = 38.278 KPa Wc=CP.(Tt3-Tt2) =362.83 KJ/Kg


Tt2 = 251.7473 K
The power absorbed by the compressor is
Pc =m’.Wc = 10.584 MW

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 12

6
Chapter 3 (Problems E3.1)
(iv) Combustor, Stations 3-4 𝜼𝒃 = 𝟎. 𝟗𝟔 𝑴𝒋
𝑸𝒇 = 𝟒𝟒
𝑲𝒈
Tt4=1330
𝑘𝑔
𝑚. 0 = 29.17 𝑇𝑡3 = 605.23 k 𝑇𝑡3 +𝑇𝑡4
𝑠 𝑇𝑎𝑣 = = 697.6 K
2
Pt,3= 690.8kPa 𝑎𝑣
𝐶𝑝 = 0.94 + 0.215. 1000
𝑇
= 𝐶𝑝 = 1.148

𝑇
𝑎𝑣
𝛾 = 1.4 − 0.0667. 1000 =
𝛾 = 1.335

=0.02022
𝑚. 𝑓 = 0.02022 ∗ 29.17
𝑘𝑔
Pt2 = 38.278 KPa 𝑷𝒕,𝟑 − 𝑷𝒕,𝟒 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟐𝑷𝒕,𝟑 𝑚. 𝑓 = 0.5898
𝑠
Tt2 = 251.7473 K
𝑷𝒕,𝟒 =675.22 KPa 𝑚. 𝑔 = 𝑚𝑓 + 𝑚𝑜 = 29.17 + 0.5898
𝑘𝑔
𝑚𝑔 = 29.7598
𝑠
HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 13

4
Chapter 3 (Problems E3.1) 3
3𝑠
(v) Turbine, Stations 4-5: Generated
Absorbed word work by
by compressor = turbine 5
𝑇𝑡3 = 605.23 k 5𝑠
Pt,3= 690.8kPa WC = [1+(f/a)]WT 0,1,2
WT = 355.64 KJ/Kg
Tt5 = Tt4-WT/CP = 1020.2 K
𝑇𝑡4 +𝑇𝑡5
𝜼𝑻 = 𝟎. 𝟗 𝑇𝑎𝑣 = = 1175 K
2

𝑎𝑣 𝑇
𝐶𝑝 = 0.94 + 0.215. 1000 = 𝐶𝑝 = 1.1926

𝑇
𝑎𝑣
𝛾 = 1.4 − 0.0667. 1000 =
𝛾 = 1.3216

𝑃𝑡,3 − 𝑃𝑡,4 = 0.02𝑃𝑡,3 Tt5 = Tt4-WT/CP = 1032.2 K


Pt2 = 38.278 KPa
𝑃𝑡,4=675.22 KPa 𝐶𝑝 𝑇𝑡4 − 𝑇𝑡5
Tt2 = 251.7473 K 𝑇𝑡5𝑠 = 998.67 𝑘
Tt4=1330 𝜂𝑇 = = 0.9
𝐶𝑝 𝑇𝑡4 − 𝑇𝑡5𝑠
𝐶𝑝 = 1.148
𝛾 = 1.335
HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 14

7
4
Chapter 3 (Problems) 3
3𝑠
(v) Turbine, Stations 4-5: Generated
Absorbed work work by
by compressor = turbine 5
𝑇𝑡3 = 605.23 k 5𝑠
Pt,3= 690.8kPa WC = [1+(f/a)]WT 0,1,2
WT = 355.64 KJ/Kg
Tt5 = Tt4-WT/CP = 1020.2 K

𝜼𝑻 = 𝟎. 𝟗 𝐶𝑝 = 1.1926 𝛾 = 1.3216 𝑇𝑡5𝑠 = 998.67 𝑘

𝛾
Pt5 𝑇𝑡5𝑠 𝛾−1
= Pt5 =208.04 KPa
Pt4 𝑇𝑡4

𝑃𝑡,3 − 𝑃𝑡,4 = 0.02𝑃𝑡,3


Pt2 = 38.278 KPa
𝑃𝑡,4=675.22 KPa
Tt2 = 251.7473 K
Tt4=1330 k
𝐶𝑝 = 1.148 𝛾 = 1.335

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 15

Chapter 3 (Problems E3.1)


(vi) Nozzle, Stations 5-6:
Is it choked?
Well, it chocked if pressure ratio is high enough to reach M
=1 at the throat
Lets calculate the minimum pressure ratio to obtain
chocking (M=1)
throat
𝛾 𝑇𝑡5 = 1032 𝑘
𝑃𝑡 ∗ 𝛾−1 2 𝛾−1
g =1.3312
= 1+ .𝑀
𝑃 1 𝐶𝑝 = 1.1618


𝑃𝑡 Pt5 208.04
= 1.8513 = =9.2
𝑃 𝑃𝑡𝑜 22.6

Pt5 =208.04 KPa Pt5 𝑃𝑡 ∗


> So the nozzle is clearly operating in a
𝑇𝑡5𝑠 = 998.67 𝑘 𝑃𝑡𝑜 𝑃 supercritical state and therefore will be
choked with M6=1.0.
𝑇𝑡5 = 1032 𝑘
The exit pressure will be the critical pressure p*
𝑃𝑜 = 22.632 𝐾𝑃𝑎

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 16

8
Chapter 3 (Problems E3.1)
(vi) Nozzle, Stations 5-6:
𝑃𝑡 ∗
= 1.8513 Pt5 =208.04 KPa
𝑃

p6 = p* = pt,5/ 1.8513 =112.0kPa

𝑇𝑡 ∗ 𝛾−1 2
=1+ . 𝑀 = 1.1656
𝑇 1

T6 = T* = Tt,5/1.165 = 885.5K

Pt5 =208.04 KPa

𝑇𝑡5𝑠 = 998.67 𝑘 The exit velocity


V6 = a* = (gRT*)1/2 = [(1.33)(287m2/s2-K)(880.7K)]1/2 = 581.6 m/s.
𝑇𝑡5 = 1020 𝑘
𝑃𝑜 = 22.632 𝐾𝑃𝑎 V6 = a6 = a*= 581.6 m/s
HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 17

Chapter 3 (Problems E3.1)


(vi) Nozzle, Stations 5-6:
𝑃6 112 𝑘𝑔
p6 = p* = pt,5/ 1.8513 =112.0kPa 𝜌6 = = 𝜌6 = 0.4423
𝑅.𝑇6 287.8856 𝑚3
T6 = T* = Tt,5/1.165 = 885.5K The required nozzle exit area is found from the
V6 = a* =a6 = 581.6 m/s conservation of mass equation

m6  6 A6V6  p* A6 g RT *
𝑘𝑔
𝑚𝑔 = 𝜌6 . 𝐴6 . 𝑉6 𝑚𝑔 = 29.7598
𝑠
𝐴6 = 0.117 𝑚2 𝑑6 = 0.3838 𝑚

Pt5 =208.04 KPa

𝑇𝑡5𝑠 = 998.67 𝑘 V6 = 581.6 m/s


𝑇𝑡5 = 1020 𝑘
𝑃𝑜 = 22.632 𝐾𝑃𝑎

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 18

9
Chapter 3 (Problems E3.1)
Fg  m6V6  A6  p6  p0 
(vii) Performance:
The gross thrust
𝑘𝑔
𝑚𝑓 = 0. . 5892 Fg= (29.76kg/s)(581m/s) + (0.117m2 ) (112–22,6) N/m2
𝑠
𝑘𝑔 Fg=27.69 KN
𝑚𝑔 = 29.7598
𝑠 The ram drag Fr  m0V0 (29.17kg/s)(265.7m/s) = 7.750kN
𝑚
𝑉0 = 265.7
𝑠𝑒𝑐
𝑃𝑜 = 22.632 𝐾𝑃𝑎 The net thrust 𝐹𝑛 = 𝐹𝑔 − 𝐹𝑟 Fn = 27.54kN-7.75kN = 19.79kN.

𝑚𝑓ሶ
The specific fuel consumption is 𝐶𝑗 =
p6 = 112.0kPa 𝐹𝑛
V6 = 581.6 m/s cj 
mf

 0.5892 kg s  3600 s hr   0.1072 kg hr N  1.051lbm hr lb
𝐴6 = 0.117 𝑚 2 Fn 19, 790 N 
Fn Vo
The overall efficiency of the engine is 𝜂𝑜 =
𝑚𝑓ሶ 𝑄𝑓

o 
FnV0

19, 790 N  265.7 m s   20.28%
m f Q f  0.5892 kg s   44 106 J kg 

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace 19


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion

10
Chapter 3 (Problems)
• E3.4 Consider adding an afterburner to the turbojet engine of
problem 3.1 with the additional information that the afterburner
combustion efficiency is 0.85 and frictional losses in the afterburner
yield (pt,5-pt,5b)=0.05pt,5. In the afterburner the fuel flow is =1.17
kg/s. Calculate the properties of the flow at each station in the
engine, the gross thrust, and the net thrust.

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 1

Chapter 3 (Problems E3.4)


𝑘𝑔
𝑚. 0 = 29.17 𝜂𝑐 = 0.85 𝜂𝑏 = 0.96 𝜂𝑇 = 0.9 𝑀𝑗
𝑠 𝑄𝑓 = 44 𝐾𝑔
1.17 kg/s
𝑀𝑜 = 0.9

𝑃𝑡,3 − 𝑃𝑡,4 = 0.02𝑃𝑡,3


(pt,5-pt,5b)=0.05pt,5

𝑍 = 11000 𝑚

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 2

1
Chapter 3 (Problems E3.4)
Calculate air property at flight altitude

• The altitude at a given air pressure can be calculated using Equation 1 for
an altitude up to 11 km (36,090 feet). This equation can be arranged to also
calculate the air pressure at a given altitude as shown in Equation 2.

−𝑅.𝐿𝑏
𝑇𝑏 𝑃 𝑔𝑜 .𝑀 .
ℎ = ℎ𝑏 + −1 (1)
𝐿𝑏 𝑃𝑏

−𝑔𝑜 .𝑀
.
𝑅.𝐿𝑏
𝐿𝑏
𝑃 = 𝑃𝑏 . 1 + . ℎ − ℎ𝑏 (2)
𝑇𝑏

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 3

Chapter 3 (Problems E3.4)


• The altitude at a given air pressure can be calculated using Equation 1 for an altitude
−𝑅.𝐿𝑏
up to 11 km (36,090 feet ). 𝑇𝑏 𝑃 𝑔𝑜 .𝑀 .
ℎ = ℎ𝑏 + −1 (1)
𝐿𝑏 𝑃𝑏
This equation can be arranged to also calculate the air pressure at a given altitude as shown in Equation 2.
−𝑔𝑜 .𝑀
. Lb=-0.0065;
𝑅.𝐿𝑏
𝐿𝑏
𝑃 = 𝑃𝑏 . 1 + . ℎ − ℎ𝑏 (2) Tb=288.15;
𝑇𝑏
Pb=101325;
𝑃 = 22.632 𝐾𝑃𝑎 hb=0;
Rhob=1.225
𝑇 = 𝑇𝑏 + 𝐿𝑏 . ℎ − ℎ𝑏 (3) h=11000;
gb=9.80665;
M=0.0289644;% [kg/mol]
T= 216.65 𝐾 R=8.31432; %universal gas constant
𝜌 𝑃 𝑇𝑏
= . (4) P=Pb*(1+Lb/Tb*(h-hb))^(-gb*M/R/Lb)
𝜌𝑏 𝑃𝑏 𝑇
kg
𝜌 = 0.3639 8.314 𝑚
m3 1.4 216.65 = 295.0696
𝑎= 𝛾𝑅𝑇 = 0.0289644 𝑠𝑒𝑐
HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion

2
Chapter 3 (Problems E3.4)
𝑀𝑗
𝑄𝑓 = 44
𝐾𝑔
𝑘𝑔
𝑚. 0 = 29.17 𝜂𝑐 = 0.85 𝜂𝑏 = 0.96 𝜂𝑇 = 0.9
𝑠
1.17 kg/s
𝑀𝑜 = 0.9

(pt,5-pt,5b)=0.05pt,5
0

𝑃𝑡,3 − 𝑃𝑡,4 = 0.02𝑃𝑡,3

𝑍 = 11000 𝑚
𝑃 = 22.6 𝐾𝑃𝑎 𝑃𝑜 = 𝑃1 = 22.6 𝐾𝑃𝑎
T= 216.65 𝐾
𝑚
𝑎 = 295.1
𝑠𝑒𝑐 𝑚
𝑀 = 0.9, ⇒ 𝑉0 = 265.6
𝑠𝑒𝑐
HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 5

Chapter 3 (Problems E3.4)


Pressure and Temperature at inlet

𝑇𝑡 𝛾−1 2 𝑀 = 0.9 𝛾 = 1.4


= 1+ .𝑀
𝑇 1
𝛾−1 2 𝛾
1+ . 𝑀 = 1.1620 = 3.5
1 𝛾−1

T= 216.65 𝐾 Tt = 216.65𝑥1.1620

Tt = 251.7473 K
𝛾
𝑃𝑡 𝛾−1 2 𝛾−1
𝑃𝑡
= 1+ .𝑀 = 1.691 ⇒
𝑃 1 𝑃

Pt = 38.278 KPa

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 6

3
Chapter 3 (Problems E3.1)
𝑘𝑔
𝑚. = 29.17
𝑠

(ii) Inlet, Stations 1-2


𝑀𝑜 = 0.9

The MIL-E-5008B standard pressure recovery for M0=0.9 is


pt,2/pt,0 =1.0

The inlet flow is assumed to be adiabatic so


0 that
Tt,2/Tt,0=1.
𝑍 = 11000 𝑚
𝑃 = 22.632 𝐾𝑃𝑎 Pt0 = 38.278 KPa Pt2 = 38.278 KPa
T= 216.65 𝐾 Tt0 = 251.7473 K Tt2 = 251.7473 K
𝑚
𝑎 = 295.1
𝑠𝑒𝑐 𝑚
𝑀 = 0.9, ⇒ 𝑉 = 265.56
𝑠𝑒𝑐
HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 7

Chapter 3 (Problems E3.4)


(iii) Compressor, Stations 2-3: 𝑃𝑡3
= 18 Pt3= 18Pt2 = 690.8kPa
𝑃𝑡2
𝛾−1
at 𝛾 = 1.4 = 0.286
𝛾
𝛾−1
𝑇𝑡𝑠3 𝑃𝑡3 𝛾
= = 180.286 = 2.2838 
𝑇𝑡2 𝑃𝑡2
𝜼𝒄 = 𝟎. 𝟖𝟓
𝑇𝑡3𝑠 = 574.9 k
𝑇𝑡3𝑠 +𝑇𝑡2
𝑇𝑎𝑣 = = 413.34 K
2

𝑇𝑎𝑣 𝐶𝑝 = 1.0289
𝐶𝑝 = 0.94 + 0.215. =
Pt2 = 38.278 KPa 1000
𝑇𝑎𝑣
Tt2 = 251.7473 K
𝛾 = 1.4 − 0.0667. = 𝛾 = 1.3724
1000

𝑇𝑡3𝑠 = 551.5k 𝛾 = 1.3732


𝑇𝑡3𝑠 = 552.23k 𝛾 = 1.3732

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 8

4
Chapter 3 (Problems E3.4) 3
3𝑠
(iii) Compressor, Stations 2-3:
Pt,3= 690.8kPa
𝑃𝑡3 𝑇𝑡3𝑠 = 552.23k
= 18
𝑃𝑡2 𝛾 = 1.3732 𝐶𝑝 = 1.026
0,1,2
𝐶𝑝 𝑇𝑡3𝑠 − 𝑇𝑡2
𝜂𝑐 = = 0.85
𝜼𝒄 = 𝟎. 𝟖𝟓 𝐶𝑝 𝑇𝑡3 − 𝑇𝑡2

𝑇𝑡3 = 605.23 k

The work done by the compressor

Pt2 = 38.278 KPa Wc=CP.(Tt3-Tt2) =362.83 KJ/Kg


Tt2 = 251.7473 K
The power absorbed by the compressor is
Pc =m’.Wc = 10.584 MW

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 9

Chapter 3 (Problems E3.4)


(iv) Combustor, Stations 3-4 𝜼𝒃 = 𝟎. 𝟗𝟔 𝑴𝒋
𝑸𝒇 = 𝟒𝟒 𝑲𝒈 Tt4=1330
𝑘𝑔
𝑚. 0 = 29.17 𝑇𝑡3 = 605.23 k 𝑇𝑡3 +𝑇𝑡4
𝑠 𝑇𝑎𝑣 = = 697.6 K
2
Pt,3= 690.8kPa 𝑎𝑣
𝐶𝑝 = 0.94 + 0.215. 1000
𝑇
= 𝐶𝑝 = 1.148

𝑇𝑎𝑣
𝛾 = 1.4 − 0.0667. 1000 =
𝛾 = 1.335

=0.02022 kg/s
𝑚. 𝑓 = 0.02022 ∗ 29.17
𝑘𝑔
Pt2 = 38.278 KPa 𝑷𝒕,𝟑 − 𝑷𝒕,𝟒 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟐𝑷𝒕,𝟑 𝑚. 𝑓 = 0.5898
𝑠
Tt2 = 251.7473 K
𝑷𝒕,𝟒 =675.22 KPa 𝑚. 𝑔 = 𝑚𝑓 + 𝑚𝑜 = 29.17 + 0.5898
𝑘𝑔
𝑚𝑔 = 29.7598
𝑠
HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 10

5
4
Chapter 3 (Problems E3.1) 3
3𝑠
(v) Turbine, Stations 4-5: Generated
Absorbed work work by the
by compressor = Turbine 5
𝑇𝑡3 = 605.23 k 5𝑠
Pt,3= 690.8kPa WC = [1+(f/a)]WT 0,1,2
WT = 355.64 KJ/Kg
Tt5 = Tt4-WT/CP = 1020.2 K
𝑇𝑡4 +𝑇𝑡5
𝜼𝑻 = 𝟎. 𝟗 𝑇𝑎𝑣 = = 1175 K
2

𝑎𝑣 𝑇
𝐶𝑝 = 0.94 + 0.215. 1000 = 𝐶𝑝 = 1.1926

𝑇
𝑎𝑣
𝛾 = 1.4 − 0.0667. 1000 =
𝛾 = 1.3216

𝑃𝑡,3 − 𝑃𝑡,4 = 0.02𝑃𝑡,3 Tt5 = Tt4-WT/CP = 1032.2 K


Pt2 = 38.278 KPa
𝑃𝑡,4=675.22 KPa 𝐶𝑝 𝑇𝑡4 − 𝑇𝑡5
Tt2 = 251.7473 K 𝑇𝑡5𝑠 = 998.67 𝑘
Tt4=1330 𝜂𝑇 = = 0.9
𝐶𝑝 𝑇𝑡4 − 𝑇𝑡5𝑠
𝐶𝑝 = 1.148
𝛾 = 1.335
HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 11

4
Chapter 3 (Problems E3.4) 3
3𝑠
(v) Turbine, Stations 4-5: Generated
Absorbed word work by
by compressor = turbine 5
𝑇𝑡3 = 605.23 k 5𝑠
Pt,3= 690.8kPa WC = [1+(f/a)]WT 0,1,2
WT = 355.64 KJ/Kg
Tt5 = Tt4-WT/CP = 1020.2 K

𝜼𝑻 = 𝟎. 𝟗 𝐶𝑝 = 1.1926 𝛾 = 1.3216 𝑇𝑡5𝑠 = 998.67 𝑘

𝛾
Pt5 𝑇𝑡5𝑠 𝛾−1
= Pt5 =208.04 KPa
Pt4 𝑇𝑡4

𝑃𝑡,3 − 𝑃𝑡,4 = 0.02𝑃𝑡,3


Pt2 = 38.278 KPa
𝑃𝑡,4=675.22 KPa
Tt2 = 251.7473 K
Tt4=1330 k
𝐶𝑝 = 1.148 𝛾 = 1.335

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 12

6
Chapter 3 (Problems E3.1)
(vi) Afterburner, Stations 5-5b:

The total pressure at the exit of the afterburner,


station 5b, may be found from the specified
loss equation (pt,5 - pt,5b)=0.05pt,5 so that pt,5b=
0.95pt,5 =0.95(203.5kPa) and

pt,5b=193.3kPa.

How to calculate the temperature at station 5b?

We need to use energy balance

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 13

Chapter 3 (Problems E3.1)


(vi) Afterburner, Stations 5-5b: pt,5b=193.3kPa.

The total temperature at the afterburner exit Tt,5b is given by the energy balance

m 0  m f  c p ,eTt ,5  m f , AB AB Qeff   m0  m f  m f , AB  c p ,eTt ,5b

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 14

7
Chapter 3 (Problems E3.1)
(vi) Afterburner, Stations 5-5b: pt,5b=193.3kPa.

The total temperature at the afterburner exit Tt,5b is given by the energy balance

m 0  m f  c p ,eTt ,5  m f , AB AB Qeff   m0  m f  m f , AB  c p ,eTt ,5b

The heating value in the afterburner Qeff is lower than Qf


because the flow into the afterburner has had some oxygen
depletion due to fuel burn in the main combustor. This is
given approximately by Equation (3.26) in the text:

Qeff  1  14.7  f a   Q f

The afterburner fuel flow is given as 1.17kg/s so that (f/a)AB=1.17/29.17=0.4. Then, using
the value for cp,e=1.192 determined previously for the turbine as a first approximation here,
the energy balance becomes
Substituting in the appropriate values yields
HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 15

Chapter 3 (Problems E3.1)


(vi) Afterburner, Stations 5-5b: pt,5b=193.3kPa.

m 0  m f  c p ,eTt ,5  m f , AB AB Qeff   m0  m f  m f , AB  c p ,eTt ,5b

(1.02022)(1.192kJ/kg-K)(1026K)+(0.04)(0.85)[1-14.7(0.02022)](44,000kJ/kg)
= [1.02022+0.04](1.192kJ/kg)Tt,5b
[1.06022](1.192)Tt,5b= 1248kJ/kg+1051kJ/kg= 2299kJ/kg

Then as a first approximation Tt,5b = 1819K and we use this in calculating a new
average stagnation temperature: Tt,avg=(1026+1819)/2=1423K.
Then cp,e= 0.94+(0.215Tt,avg)/1000 =1.246 and g=1.4-0.0667(Tt,avg)=1.305.
The second approximation to the stagnation temperature in the afterburner is then

Tt,5b = (2299kJ/kg)/ [(1.06022)(1.246kJ/kg-K)] = 1740K.

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 16

8
Chapter 3 (Problems E3.1)
(vi) Nozzle, Stations 5-6:
Is it choked?
Well, it chocked if pressure ratio is high enough to reach M
=1 at the throat
Lets calculate the minimum pressure ratio to obtain
chocking (M=1)
throat
𝛾 𝑇𝑡5 = 1032 𝑘
𝑃𝑡 ∗ 𝛾−1 2 𝛾−1
g =1.29
= 1+ .𝑀
𝑃 1 𝐶𝑝 = 1.1618

𝑃𝑡 ∗ Pt5 193.3
= 1.8513 = =8.5
𝑃 𝑃𝑡𝑜 22.6

Pt5 =193.3 KPa Pt5 𝑃𝑡 ∗


> So the nozzle is clearly operating in a
𝑃𝑡𝑜 𝑃 supercritical state and therefore will be
choked with M6=1.0.
The exit pressure will be the critical pressure p*
𝑃𝑜 = 22.632 𝐾𝑃𝑎

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 17

Chapter 3 (Problems E3.1)


(vi) Nozzle, Stations 5-6:
𝑃𝑡 ∗
= 1.8513 Pt5 =193.3kPa
𝑃

p6 = p* = pt,5/ 1.8513 =105.8kPa

𝑇𝑡 ∗ 𝛾−1 2
=1+ . 𝑀 = 1.1656
𝑇 1

T6 = T* = Tt,5/1.165 = 1494K.

Pt5 =193.3 KPa


The exit velocity
V6 = a* = (gRT*)1/2 = [(1.29)(287m2/s2-K)(1494K)]1/2 = 743.7m/s.

𝑃𝑜 = 22.632 𝐾𝑃𝑎 V6 = a6 = a*= 743.7m/s


HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace
1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 18

9
Chapter 3 (Problems E3.1)
(vi) Nozzle, Stations 5-6:
𝑘𝑔
p6 = p* = pt,5/ 1.8513 =112.0kPa 𝑃6 105.8kPa 𝜌6 = 0.2467kg/m3
𝜌6 = = 𝑚 3
𝑅.𝑇6 287.1494K
T6 = T* = Tt,5/1.165 = 885.5K The required nozzle exit area is found from the
V6 = a* =a6 = 581.6 m/s conservation of mass equation

m6  6 A6V6  p* A6 g RT *
𝑘𝑔
𝑚𝑔 = 𝜌6 . 𝐴6 . 𝑉6 𝑚𝑔 = 30.93
𝑠
𝐴6 = 0.1686m2

Pt5 =208.04 KPa

𝑇𝑡5𝑠 = 998.67 𝑘 V6 = 581.6 m/s


𝑇𝑡5 = 1020 𝑘
𝑃𝑜 = 22.632 𝐾𝑃𝑎

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion 19

Chapter 3 (Problems E3.1)


Fg  m6V6  A6  p6  p0 
(vii) Performance:
The gross thrust
𝑘𝑔
𝑚𝑓𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑒 = 0.5892
𝑠 Fg= (30.93kg/s)(743.7m/s) + (0.1686m2 ) (105,800 N/m2 – 22,690N/m2)
𝑘𝑔
𝑚𝑓𝐴𝐵 = 1.17
𝑠 Fg=37.01kN
𝑚𝑓 = 1.7592
𝑘𝑔
The ram drag Fr  m0V0 (29.17kg/s)(265.7m/s)=7.750kN
𝑚𝑔 = 30.93
𝑠
𝑚
𝑉0 = 265.7 The net thrust 𝐹𝑛 = 𝐹𝑔 − 𝐹𝑟 Fn = 37.01kN-7.75kN = 29.26kN.
𝑠𝑒𝑐
𝑃𝑜 = 22.632 𝐾𝑃𝑎
𝑚𝑓ሶ
The specific fuel consumption is 𝐶𝑗 =
𝐹𝑛
𝑘𝑔 𝑠 𝑘𝑔 𝑙𝑏𝑚
𝑚ሶ 𝑓 1.757 𝑠 3600 ℎ𝑟
𝑐𝑗 = = = 0.2162 ℎ𝑟 = 2.12 ℎ𝑟
p6 = 105.8kPa 𝐹𝑛 29,26𝑁 𝑁 𝑙𝑏
Fn Vo
V6 = 743.7 m/s The overall efficiency of the engine is 𝜂𝑜 =
𝑚𝑓ሶ 𝑄𝑓
𝐴6 = 0.1686 𝑚2

o 
FnV0

 29, 260 N  265.7 m s   10.06%
m f Q f 1.757 kg s   44 106 J kg 

HAVACILIK VE UZAY BSC in Aerospace 20


1973 BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ Engineering AE308 Propulsion

10

You might also like