Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Death in The Hills
Death in The Hills
Mexican Characters
Author(s): Eric Skipper
Source: The Steinbeck Review , Fall 2004, Vol. 1, No. 2 (Fall 2004), pp. 78-88
Published by: Penn State University Press
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Penn State University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access
to The Steinbeck Review
Eric Skipper
Augusta State University
Two other works follow the theme on a lighter scale. In The Wayward
Bus (1947) Juan Chicoy drives his passengers into the hills in order to
avoid a flood, giving them a chance at both physical and spiritual salva-
tion. In Tortilla Flat (1935) Steinbeck situates Danny and his paisano
friends in an elevated district overlooking Monterey, although, as Jackson
J. Benson notes in The True Adventures of John Steinbeck, Writer , "their
real-life counterparts . . . did not live in Tortilla Flat."1 Both works lack suf-
ficient elements of refuge or death in a mountain setting to be included in
this study.
In John Steinbeck's Re-vision of America, Louis Owens has established the
Santa Lucia Mountains as the setting for portions of "Flight," "The Great
Mountains," and To a God Unknown and notes that the mountains in The
Pearl bear a strong resemblance to those in "Flight."2 He makes the case that
"Death in these mountains ... is a transcendent experience in which one
may achieve a new-world vision and become recognizably and even con-
sciously a part of the 'whole.'"3 He notes that Steinbeck's concept of tran-
scendence to a realm of "wholeness" has a bevy of potential influences -
among them the sacrificial deaths of Jesus Christ and Sir James Frazer's
fisher-king; the beliefs of the natives of northern Mexico, whom Steinbeck
wrote about in The Log from the Sea of Cortez (1951); and the theories of
the mythologist Joseph Campbell, a personal friend of Steinbeck's. In any
case, the intent here is not to expand on Owens's assertions but to establish
some rationale behind the penchant Steinbeck's Mexicans have for ending
up in the mountains, more often that not with the simple goal of self-
preservation.
Chronologically, the pattern is initiated in The Pastures of Heaven. In the
opening scene a Spanish corporal and his posse pursue an escaped band of
recently converted Indians "up the Carmen valley and into the mountains
beyond."4 These escapees might technically be among the first Mexican-
Indians, since at the time (1776) the boundaries of Mexico extended far
into what is now California. In any case, the purpose of the corporal is "to
restore these erring children to the bosom of Mother Church" and "to give
the poor neophytes a chance at repentance in the clay pits."5 Whether they
like it or not, these recaptured Indians are well on the way to becoming
Hispanicized, at least in religion and speech. Another antecedent is estab-
lished here: some type of criminal activity, incidental or not, precedes the
flight of every Mexican concerned in this study. In this case, the Indians are
heretics; they have abandoned the Catholic religion. They are discovered
"practicing abominations in the bottom of a ferny canyon . . . that is, the
twenty heretics were fast asleep in attitudes of abandon."6
In To a God Unknown the mountain-bound hero is Joseph Wayne, a
non-Hispanic. The plight of the Mexican cattlehand Juanito closely paral-
lels Wayne's, however. After killing Benjy, Juanito advises Wayne that he is
headed for the mountains. He, like Gitano in "The Great Mountains,"
seeks death there, but his objective is thwarted when Wayne refuses to stab
him. After a period of exile in which he watches over the dream-tormented
Willie until his companion hangs himself, Juanito reunites with Wayne at
the same spot in the mountains, beside the mysterious rock on which
Joseph Wayne will later commit suicide. Juanito insists on remaining with
Wayne through the drought season but is rejected again. Two days later
Wayne takes his own life in a symbolic gesture that ends the drought.
Several important antecedents are established in To a God Unknown
that carry through to the next three works (coinciden tally, the most im-
portant ones) examined in this study: "Flight," "The Great Mountains,"
and The Pearl The Santa Lucia Mountains provide the setting; an individ-
ual takes flight, as opposed to a group of people; knives are established as
the Mexican's weapon of choice (Juanito kills Benjy with a knife and asks
Joseph Wayne to stab him). Lastly, the transcendent experience, or "whole-
ness," as described by Owens, is established with Joseph Wayne and con-
tinues in the characters of Pepé ("Flight"), Kino ( The Pearl), Gitano ("The
Great Mountains"), and General Zapata ( Viva Zapata!). Whereas Joseph
Wayne's suicide elevates him to a godlike status, Pepé's death brings about
the less-spectacular transition of boyhood to manhood. Similar to Pepé in
his organic relation to the mountains, Kino, through the death of his son,
transcends tragedy to achieve superhuman status. Gitano achieves a final
symbolic union with the mountains, which are as mysterious as he. Gen-
eral Zapata, whose ultimate betrayer meets him in the mountains, be-
comes a folk hero after his death, believed by many still to be hiding out in
the mountains.
The flight episodes in "Flight" and The Pearl bear striking similarities
from beginning to end. In each the hero has killed someone and flees into
the mountains to escape the consequences of his actions. In "Flight" Pepé
has killed a man in town after being insulted. In The Pearl Kino kills a man
who attacks him and tries to steal the pearl. Each uses a knife and each kills
quickly and almost as if by accident: the knife darts from Pepé's hand be-
fore he knows it; Kino is attacked in the dark and reacts in self-defense.
Pepé goes into the mountains alone; although Kino has the added respon-
sibility of protecting his wife and son, he ultimately works alone in at-
tempting to conceal his family's tracks and in physically confronting his
pursuers. Owens notes the striking resemblance between the two moun-
tain ranges: "In The Pearl . . . Steinbeck takes us into a range of dark, des-
olate, and devouring mountains strikingly similar to those we encountered
in 'Flight.'"7 Both heroes ultimately encounter death: Pepé encounters his
own; Kino, his son Coyotito's. Owens observes that each comes of age in
the end: "the experience makes Pepé a man and Kino ... a man transcen-
dent and set apart."8
In "The Great Mountains" the old paisano Gitano goes off into the Santa
Lucia Mountains as Pepé does in "Flight." Whereas Pepé tries to escape
death in the mountains, Gitano seeks it there. His only crime is stealing the
old horse Easter, which Jody's father has no use for anyway. After Jody's fa-
ther likens the old paisano to the horse in his old age and uselessness, Gi-
tano rides the broken animal into the mountains with his rapier, presum-
ably to end his own life. These mountains, which the boy Jody considers
savage and terrible, hardly seem a suitable setting for a peaceful, voluntary
death. But the union becomes more plausible when Jody identifies Gitano
with the mountains: "Gitano was mysterious like the mountains . . . behind
the last range piled up against the sky there was a great unknown country.
. . . And in behind [Gitano's eyes] was some unknown thing."9
In the film Viva Zapata! the mountains serve as a sanctuary for General
Zapata, a place to hide out and plan strategies. Steinbeck was a passionate
scholar of the Mexican Revolution and wanted to make Viva Zapata! as ac-
curate a film as possible. Zapata's frequent use of the mountains as a hide-
out was historically accurate, as Steinbeck saw it. Therefore, it offers little
insight into Steinbeck's fiction other than to suggest that an early familiar-
ity with Zapata's story might have had some influence on his tendency to
link Mexican characters with the mountains. In the final version of the
screenplay, however, Steinbeck did resort to fiction in creating the charac-
ter Fernando, who, as Robert E. Morsberger explains, "is a composite of all
those who have betrayed democratic revolutions and replaced them with
oppression."10 True to the pattern Steinbeck has established, Zapata meets
Fernando in the mountains - not in town, nor in the countryside or near a
battle site, but in the "precipitous and savage mountains."11 Dressed in city
clothes and drenched in sweat, the betrayer Fernando, who will ultimately
plot Zapata's death, climbs up a steep mountain path carrying his coat, a
briefcase, and a typewriter, which he refers to, perhaps in a moment of fore-
shadowing, as "the sword of the mind."12 It seems that Steinbeck has gone
to some trouble having Fernando meet Zapata in the mountains. A more
realistic union could have been effected at a lower altitude; the film offers
ample opportunity for this. Nevertheless, Fernando climbs, briefcase and
typewriter in tow, until he pinpoints Zapata's hideout in the mountains.
Another item of note: in the previous scene, Zapata has just escaped
from a band of rurales. It is during the period of refuge that follows that
Zapata meets his betrayer Fernando in the mountains. The fact that the
pattern of mountain flight leading to death (in this case, an agent of death)
persists even in a historical context all but confirms that the pattern is
more than coincidental. Likewise, it is hard to argue that Steinbeck did not
perceive some finite connection between Mexicans and the mountains.
Across the canon of Steinbeck's work, his «on-Mexican characters die in or
flee to a variety of topographies and settings. Excepting the case of Joseph
Wayne, the mountains are conspicuously absent as a place of death for
Steinbeck's non-Mexican characters. A closer look at Steinbeck's percep-
tions of mountains and Mexicans (Mexican-Indians, in particular) pro-
vides some insight.
Throughout the canon of Steinbeck's work, people share a strong bond
with the earth, from valley farmers, to migrant workers, to the specimen-
collecting Doc Burton of Cannery Row (1945) and Sweet Thursday
(1954). Steinbeck was very open to the Greek view of nature, in which
man and nature exist in harmony. His readings of Carl Jung and Jessie L.
Weston, among others, bolstered this viewpoint. According to Steinbeck,
Mexican-Indians demonstrated more than a mere bond. He describes
their relationship with nature in The Log from the Sea of Cortez "They
[the Indians] seem to live on remembered things, to be so related to the
seashore and rocky hills and the loneliness that they are these things. To
ask about the country is like asking about themselves."13 Steinbeck attrib-
The Santa Lucias stood up against the sky to the west and kept the valley
from the open sea, and they were dark and brooding - unfriendly and dan-
gerous. I always found in myself a dread of west and a love of east. Where I
ever got such an idea I cannot say, unless it could be that the morning came
over the peaks of the Gabilans and the night drifted back from the ridges of
the Santa Lucias. It maybe that the birth and death of the day had some part
in my feeling about the two ranges of mountains.21
mension of remoteness in fiction. They sit "against the sky to the west . . .
dark and brooding"; they are "so impersonal and aloof that their very im-
perturbability was a threat."26
In pitting Man against Nature, Steinbeck, like a boxing promoter, had
the opportunity to exhibit his two best opponents - the heroic Mexican-
Indian and the terrible Santa Lucia Mountains. Man confronts the moun-
tains alone and void of the possessions that might aid in his survival. In a
naturalistic vein, the distinction between nature and man blurs as the
mountains take on characteristics of a living being. They have a "sharp
backbone" and "jagged rotten teeth."27 They are "naked"; they have "bare
stone teeth" and a "frowning peak."28 In "The Great Mountains," the
mountains take on personality traits: they are "savage . . . wonderful ... se-
cret and mysterious," "dear . . . and terrible."29 In To a God Unknown , the
comparison is reversed. A dead cow assumes the characteristics of the
mountains: "Its hip was a mountain peak, and its ribs were like the long
water-scars on the hillsides."30
Once the flight into the mountains is begun, events and details are re-
lated in increasingly naturalistic terms. In the cases of Pepé, Kino, and
Juanito, flight is prompted by bloodshed. Kino flees instinctively "for the
high place, as nearly all animals do when they are pursued."31 Both he and
Pepé are closely identified with animals. As Pepé approaches inevitable
death, he becomes more animal-like. He moves "with the effort of a hurt
beast."32 He tries to speak, but only a "thick hissing" escapes him; in pain,
he "whined like a dog."33 As Kino flees toward the mountains, an "animal
thing"moves in him and an "animal light" comes into his eyes.34 In the
mountains he moves "like a slow lizard"; the music in his head sounds like
"snake rattles"and later like "the snarl of a female puma."35 The mountains
reduce not only Kino to an animal state, but his family and his pursuers,
too. Juanita peers "like an owl"; Coyotito, true to his name, whines like a
coyote.36 The trackers "scuttled over the ground like animals [and] whined
a little, like excited dogs on a warming trail."37 From a distance, they look
like scurrying ants, and they sleep "curled up like dogs."38 Similarly, Gitano
rides off into the mountains on horseback and at last glimpse resembles an
insect: "a black speck crawling up the farthest ridge."39 Pepé, Kino, Gitano,
and Juanito lose many of the possessions that link them to civilization as
they undergo the process of dehumanization. Pepé loses his coat, hat,
knife, horse, and rifle; Kino loses his house and boat; Gitano leaves his bag
of belongings in the bunkhouse and rides the horse with "no saddle, only
a piece of rope for a bridle."40 Juanito leaves his bloodstained knife at the
scene of Benjy's murder.
It is possible that Steinbeck incorporated certain aspects of Aztec sacri-
fice rituals in his "mountain death" episodes. As related in Frazer's The
Golden Bough, the man to be sacrificed would dispense with his material
possessions, bidding farewell to his wives at the "Mountain of Parting" and
then breaking his own flutes as he ascended the temple where he would be
sacrificed.41 Moreover, the designated man was regarded as a god - "he
passed for our Lord God; the people acknowledged him as the Lord" - a
detail that recalls the perceived correlation between heroes and gods that
Steinbeck and Campbell shared.42 Eliade's definition of temples should
also be considered: "Temples are replicas of the cosmic mountain and
hence constitute the pre-eminent 'link' between heaven and earth."43 Each
of Steinbeck's mountain-bound Mexicans ascends his own symbolic tem-
ple, toward godliness, enlightenment, death, or a combination of all three.
Indeed, the end physical result of the "mountain experience" is death. Pepé
and Gitano perish in the mountains. Kino loses his son. Zapata meets the
man who will plot his death. Juanito is spared an encounter with death. He
seeks it at the hands of Joseph, but when his wish is unfulfilled, he goes off in
exile. At first glance, it may seem that the rugged mountains triumph in the
Man versus Nature struggle. It is man who truly prevails, however, through a
transcendence of his former state. Besides representing a "fitting" destination
for the remote, heroic Mexican-Indian, the mountains serve as a platform for
transcendence into a new realm of existence.
It is through death that Pepé finally achieves manhood. After Coyotito
is killed, Kino is "removed from human experience, [has] gone through
the pain and come out on the other side," and gains an "almost magical
protection."44 Gitano confronts the mystery of the mountains, and
achieves the peaceful death he has sought from the beginning of the story.
Zapata's legacy will continue to live, and his countrymen will reap the ben-
efits of his heroic deeds long after his death. Steinbeck explains, "The peo-
ple of Morelos do not believe that Zapata is dead."45 Perhaps it is no sur-
prise that they should believe that he is living " back in the hills and will one
day come to them again" [my italics].46
NOTES