Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Logistics, also often referred to as Physical Distribution (PD), has many definitions, but most
share the same underlying theme expressed in Kotler’s classic definition, which defines
logistics as “Planning, implementing, and controlling the physical flows of materials and final
goods from points of origin to points of use to meet customer’s needs at a profit. The term
supply chain management has come into common usage to describe logistical systems that
emphasize close cooperation and comprehensive interorganizational management to
integrate the logistical operations of the different firms into the channel. Even the most
carefully designated and managed marketing channel must rely on logistics to actually make
products available to customers. The movement of the right amount of the right products to
the right place at the right time – a commonly heard description of what logistics is
supposed to do – is more than a catchy phrase. It is in fact, the essence of the role of
logistics in the marketing channel.
2. Materials Handling – encompasses the range of activities and equipment involved in the
placement and movement of products in storage areas. Issues that must be addressed when
designing materials handling systems include how to minimize the distance products are
moved within the warehouse during the course of receiving, storage, and shipping; what
kinds of mechanical equipment (such as conveyor belts, cranes, and forklifts) should be used
and how to make the best use of labor when receiving, handling and shipping products.
3. Order Processing – the task of filling customer orders may at first appear to be a minor
part of logistics and rather routine activity that does not require a great deal of thought to
do well. The importance of order processing in logistics lies in its relationships with order
cycle time, which the time between when an order is placed and when it is received by the
customer.
4. Inventory Control – it refers to the firm’s attempt to hold the lowest level of inventory
that will still enable it to meet customer demand.
6. Packaging – packaging and the cost associated with packing of products are relevant as a
component of the logistics system because packaging can affect the other components
system, and vice versa. For example, the type of transport used can affect packaging and
packing costs.
Johnson, et.al capture succinctly the meaning and importance of customer service in the
context of logistics: Customer service is the collection of activities performed in filling orders
and keeping customershappy or creating in customer’s mind the perception of an
organization that is easy to do business with. A number of attempts have been made to
define and enumerate these services and to measure performance in terms of what logistics
experts refer to as service standards. Heskett, Galskowsky and Ivie, for example, stress the
following nine categories of logistics service standards:
5. Percentage of orders filled within a given number of days from receipt of the order
1. Product availability
In general, the higher the service standards offered by the manufacturer, the higher the cost
will be. While well-designed logistics systems and modern technology can keep these cost
under control, it is usually not possible to completely escape the trade-off of higher costs for
higher service standards .A manufacturer or other channel member must cover the costs
either indirectly in the price it charges for products or by passing them along to channel
members in the form of service charges.
Regardless of how good a manufacturer perceives its logistics program to be, it still must
convince channel members of its value. Steward made this point succinctly in the seminal
discussion of this topic:
Stewart went on to suggest several types of appeals that, if emphasized by the manufacturer
in attempting to sell the logistics program, may help the manufacturer to be more
convincing. They are as relevant today as ever. Manufacturers should emphasize that a new
logistics program can foster:
CHAPTER 14
Evaluating Channel Member Performance
1. Degree of Control
The degree of control a producer, manufacturer or franchisor has over its channel members
plays a major role in determining the scope and frequency of its evaluation. If control is
based on strong contractual agreements with channel members, the channel manager is in a
position to demand a great deal of information on channel member performance on
virtually every aspect of the channel members’ operations.
For the manufacturer who sells all of its output through intermediaries, the evaluation of
channel members is likely to be much more comprehensive than for manufacturers who rely
less on intermediaries. This is because the firm’s success in the market is so directly
dependent on the channel members’ performance.
Generally, the more complex the product is, the broader the scope of the evaluation and
vice versa. For example, a manufacturer of high-volume products of low unit value requiring
little after-sale servicing may settle for routine sales data as the basis for an evaluation of
channel members.
For the manufacturer using distribution, channel member evaluation may be little more than
a cursory“once over lightly” look at current sales figures. Some manufacturers find it
necessary to use an“evaluation by exception” process whereby a more thorough evaluation
is reserved only for those channel members who show sales figures that are unusually out of
line.
The channel member performance audit is a periodic and comprehensive review of channel
member performance. The audit may be done for one, several or all of the channel
members at the wholesale and/or retail levels. The frequency of the audit varies, bbut
seldom is it done more frequently than once per year per channel member. The channel
member performance audit consists of three phases: (1) developing criteria for measuring
channel member performance; (2) periodically evaluating the channel member’s
performance against the criteria and (3) recommending corrective actions to reduce the
number of inadequate performances.