Professional Documents
Culture Documents
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-5241-z
Abstract
The present investigation attempts to highlight clay minerals existing in fluvial shaley sandstones belonging to the upper Triassic
(Rhaetian) reservoir using the French abbreviation “TAGS” for Trias argilo-gréseux supérieur. This reservoir is localized in the
Toual field-SE of Algeria. In the absence of core samples, three main types of clay minerals are detected by wireline log analysis
and core laboratory data (porosity and permeability measurements). To differentiate allogenic clay (laminated and structural
clays) from authigenic clay (dispersed clay), Thomas and Stieber petrophysical model (shale volume versus total porosity) was
applied. This model clearly shows that dispersed clay type has a leading presence in the reservoir’s sandstone. The Neasham
petrophysical model (porosity versus permeability) allowed us to find that authigenic illite (a dispersed type of clay) is dominant
in TAGS sandstones. This model also shows that permeability is highly influenced by authigenic illite whereas porosity is less
affected.
Introduction (Sonatrach EXPL 2010a). More than 25 wells have been iden-
tified across the reservoir from 1962 until present time
The French abbreviation TAGS for “Trias Argilo-Gréseux (Sonatrach DPGTL 2011; Mazouz 2018) (Fig. 3).
Supérieur” is the upper Triassic (Rhaetian) shaley sandstone Except the presence of illite and halite in TAGS sandstone
reservoir well known in the Saharan platform. The present as authigenic minerals indicated by Mazouz et al. (2017), rare
paper is studying TAGS in the Toual field located in Gassi papers have investigated the diagenesis features of TAGS.
Touil area in the south-east of Algeria (Figs. 1, 2, and 3). Only information about the depositional environment
TAGS reservoir is covering about 5 × 10 km2 in surface (lithofacies, sedimentary structures, and paleocurents) and
general reservoir information (geometry and main
petrophysical properties) are found (Askri et al. 1995;
This paper was selected from the 1st Conference of the Arabian Journal of Echikh 1998; Zeroug et al. 2007; Galeazzi et al. 2010;
Geosciences (CAJG), Tunisia 2018
Sonatrach DPGTL 2011). In order to clear up some diagenetic
aspects, this paper contributes, using some petrophysical
* El Hadi Mazouz
emazouz@yahoo.fr
methods, to clarify the existence of authigenic clays in
TAGS sandstone.
1
University of Larbi Ben M’Hidi, 04000 Oum-El-Bouaghi, Algeria
2
Larbi Tebessi University, 12000 Tebessa, Algeria
3
Mostapha Benboulaid (Batna-2) University, 05000 Batna, Algeria Geological setting
4
Sonatrach Research Department, 16000 Hydra, Algiers, Algeria
5 TAGS structure is represented by a NNE-SSW oriented
LHyGes Strasbourg University, Strasbourg, France
anticline (Figs. 4 and 5) resulting from the Alpine
330 Page 2 of 17 Arab J Geosci (2020) 13:330
orogeny (Askri et al. 1995). With an average of a hundred shallow marine deposits—sabkha (Askri et al. 1995;
of meters in thickness, TAGS formation is divided into Zeroug et al. 2007; Galeazzi et al. 2010 and Mazouz
two members (Fig. 6): lower TAGS (sandy member) et al. 2017). Silurian black shale with graptolites is con-
interpreted as fluvial channels deposits with few clay sidered the source rock of all Triassic reservoirs.
sheets, and upper TAGS (shaley member) which consist Reservoir trap system is a mixed type (structural and strat-
of sand lenses incorporated in thick muddy interval attrib- igraphic) (Askri et al. 1995).
uted to shallow marine sabkha. This model is shown in an
electrofacies cross section with TAGS bottom as reference
(Fig. 7) (Mazouz 2018). Methods
Echikh (1998) has created a paleogeographic model of
the Triassic period around the Berkine basin (Berkine ba- Usually, rock minerals are described through microscopic
sin, Algerian part of Ghademes basin). The region of our techniques. In the absence of physical samples, wireline
study is located (in this model) in the continental margin, logs and core data are used for this purpose. This tech-
between the El Biod arch and the Berkine Basin (Fig. 8), nique has given good results in many surveys (e.g., Allen
with a fluvial network of braided networks. The heteroge- 1979; Wendt et al. 1986; Bloch 1991; Yan 2002; Chow
neity of the Triassic sedimentary deposits is not due solely et al. 2005; Lai et al. 2016).
to the nature of the deposition medium (fluvial), it is also
related to the topography developed on the Hercynian Clay types—state of the art
unconformity (Benrabah et al. 1991 in Echikh 1998).
Triassic sediments originate from the erosion of El Biod The distribution of clays in sandstones is an important
paleomountains outcrops with a high sand/clay ratio, factor for the petrophysical analysis of clayey sandstones.
which has led to the development of sandstone bodies Knowing the modes of occurrence of clays in sandstone,
with considerable lateral extension and good reservoir petrophysical parameters are easily evaluated. However,
quality (Echikh 1998). we distinguish three types of clays: (1) laminated clay,
The TAGS reservoir lower seal (Trias Carbonaté) and (2) structural clay, and (3) dispersed clay (Figs. 9, 10,
upper seal (Lias argileux) (Fig. 7) are both considered as and 11) (Heslop 1975; Serra 1979; Bateman 1985;
Arab J Geosci (2020) 13:330 Page 3 of 17 330
Bassiouni 1994; Tiab and Donaldson 2004; Barber et al. the same constraints. In this type of clay, the per-
2007; Jahn et al. 2008; Darwin and Julian 2008; Hugh- centage of clay minerals can vary significantly (be-
Skelt 2014). tween 60 and 100%). When the laminated clay in-
1) Laminated clay: It corresponds to clays deposited cludes silts, the shale fraction is defined as (Vsh) is
in fine beds between two reservoir layers. This cat- actually the sum of the percent silt and clay (Serra
egory of clay does not affect the useful porosity 1979; Serra and Serra 2003).
(Fig. 10), the saturation and the permeability of 2) Structural clay: It corresponds to the clays which ap-
the reservoir (at least if they do not create lateral pear in grains or nodules playing the same role as the
barriers of permeability). Moreover, this clay has other grains of the matrix. As a result, we admit that
the same petrophysical characteristics as the host they are subject to the same constraints and have the
clays; they are in thicker banks, since they undergo same characteristics as laminated clays (Serra 1979).
330 Page 4 of 17 Arab J Geosci (2020) 13:330
Fig. 3 Toual field structural location in a regional geological cross section (Modified from Askri et al. 1995)
3) Dispersed clay: It is a category of clay, which ad- Clay mineral in sandstone: identification from well
heres to the matrix grains (for example quartz grains) logs
or which coats them or which partially occupies the
pores. As a result, they do not resist the same con- To recognize clay types in sandstone, we used the cross
straints as grains and do not have the same charac- plot Thorium/Potassium-CP19 (Schlumberger 2000)
teristics as laminated clays. In terms of permeability, (Fig. 13). This cross plot represents an efficient tool for
this type of clay decreases it considerably because, mineral identification in rocks especially clay minerals.
on the one hand, the pores and canaliculis are Thorium and potassium rates are given using spectral
narrowed by the clay and, on the other hand, the gamma ray tool.
clay generally has wettability with more water great-
er than quartz. All of this helps to increase water Dispersed clay minerals in sandstone
saturation and slow down the flow of hydrocarbons
(Serra 1979). Neasham model (Neasham 1977) (Fig. 14) is used to distin-
guish between three sub-types of dispersed clays and their
These different types of clay can be met simultaneously in relation with the quality of the reservoir. The used data were
the same formation. However, laminated and structural clays porosity and permeability core laboratory measurements (Ø &
are essentially detrital clay, whereas dispersed clay consists K). Neasham model equivalent is presented using North’s
mainly of authigenic clay (Serra 1979). model (1985) (Fig. 15).
Illitization process
Clay types in sandstone: identification from well logs Alteration processes and early diagenesis release cations from
silicate minerals in the solutions. In their roles, the alteration
To recognize clay types in sandstone, we have used Thomas products attract (H+) to form kaolinite, smectite, and interstrat-
and Stieber model (Thomas and Stieber 1975) (Fig. 12). This ified clays.
model consists of a cross-plot of shale volume (Vsh) versus When the sediment depth increases with high temperatures,
total porosity (ØT). these minerals become unstable and the reverse reaction oc-
Parameters indicated on the cross-plot (Fig. 12) are calcu- curs (Bjorlykke 1988).
lated (Table 1) or read from logs (Figs. 16 and 17): Kaolinite (a product of alteration of feldspars and detritital
smectite clays) in the presence of potassium between 120 and
– Øs: Clean sandstone porosity is the maximal porosity in 150 °C becomes unstable and becomes illite (Hower et al.
the studied interval; it is read directly from porosity log 1976 in Bjorlykke 1988).
ØT.
– 3AL2 Si2 O5 ðOHÞ4 þ 2Kþ → 2KAl3 Si3 O10 ðOHÞ2 þ 2Hþ þ 3H2 O
Øsh: Shale porosity is read from ØT log (in front of the ð1Þ
Kaolinite Illite
highest value of Vsh).
Arab J Geosci (2020) 13:330 Page 5 of 17 330
Fig. 4 Isobaths TAGS in Toual field enlarged from the map of isobaths TAGS in Gassi Touil area. (Modified from Sonatrach EXPL 2010b)
The decrease of potassium with depth militates in favor of Based on the available data, we have drawn only a cross
this transformation (Hower 1976 in Bjorlykke 1988). plot constraining potassium (in %) to depth (in meter) to con-
firm illitization of kaolinite.
By combining the reactions (1) and (2), we find: Dominance of dispersed clay type in TAGS sandstone
Illitization of kaolinite
Conclusions
Fig. 5 Wells position map in SE of Toual field (Mazouz 2018). The investigation of authigenic clay minerals without
(Intentionally presented without geographic coordinates) physical samples (direct data) is possible but it is not an
easy issue. The present work attempts to extract maxi-
in TAGS sandstone. The laminated clay is abundant in mum information from indirect data (well logs and core
shaley zones but it is rare in sandstone levels. Structural measurements).
clay is very rare. Shale volume/total porosity cross-plot (Thomas and
To confirm the above log lecture, we apply Thomas and Stieber model 1975) applied for TAGS sandstone indi-
Stieber model. cates that dispersed clays are the main type of clay pres-
Sandstone and shale porosities (Øs and Øsh) for wells (14 ent in this reservoir. Structural clay type is very rare
and 15) are taken from logs (Figs. 16 and 17) before proceed- whereas laminated clay is rare in sandstone but it is
ing to the model application. The rest of the parameters are presented in shaley zones by detrital clays sheets which
calculated (Table 1). The cutoff used for the shale volume act as secondary seals in TAGS reservoir.
(Vsh) is 50%. Potassium/thorium cross-plot (CP19–Schlumberger 2000)
conducted in four wells allow us to identify several clay min-
The Thomas and Stieber model for TAGS sandstones erals with the preponderance of illite.
(Figs. 18 and 19) allows us to conclude that dispersed Porosity/permeability cross plot (Neasham model 1977)
clays (authigenic ones) are dominant in this siliciclastic indicates that dispersed clays are represented mainly by illite
reservoir. in a weak permeability zone.
The TAGS reservoir quality deterioration by illite
Clay minerals in TAGS sandstone was confirmed. Illite influences greatly reservoir perme-
ability (0.01 < K < 1 md). Porosity (0% < Ø < 21%) is
Clay minerals distribution in TAGS sandstone based on relatively less influenced by this clay type when it
thorium/potassium cross-plot was conducted in four wells comes to permeability. Laminated detrital clay sheets
(7, 8, 9, and 15) (Fig. 20). It shows the presence of chlorite, acting as secondary seals inside TAGS reservoir can
illite, micas, glauconite, and stratified clays with the abun- reduce vertical permeability.
dance of illite and stratified clays. According to available data, the origin of illite could be the
The presence of glauconite in TAGS sandstone in unstable kaolinite at high temperature transformed in the pres-
such conditions (fluvial deposits) let us ask many ques- ence of potassium. This is confirmed through potassium/depth
tions. If knowing that the precipitation depth of cross-plot.
Arab J Geosci (2020) 13:330 Page 7 of 17 330
Fig. 7 NNE-SSW Electro-cross section in Toual field (Modified from Mazouz 2018)
Fig. 8 Triassic paleogeography around the Berkine basin (Modified from Echikh 1998)
Fig. 9 Model of shaley sandstone with three types of shale (Modified Heslop 1975)
Arab J Geosci (2020) 13:330 Page 9 of 17 330
Fig. 12 Thomas and Stieber original model (1975). (Modified from Juhasz, 1981). a Structural grain replacing. b Structural pore-filling. c Dispersed
pore-filling. d Dispersed grain replacing. e Laminated
Øs 0.360 0.280
Øsh 0.084 0.098
1 − Øs 0.640 0.720
Øs + (1 − Øs) × Øsh 0.414 0.350
Øs × Øsh 0.030 0.027
Fig. 16 a Composite log of clay types of TAGS reservoir—Well14 (black arrow indicates Øsh = 8.44 %). b Total porosity histogram (green arrow
indicates Øs = 36%)
Arab J Geosci (2020) 13:330 Page 13 of 17 330
Fig. 17 a Composite log of clay types of TAGS reservoir—Well15 (black arrow indicates Øsh = 9.8%). b Total porosity histogram (green arrow
indicates Øs = 28%)
330 Page 14 of 17 Arab J Geosci (2020) 13:330
Fig. 20 Mineralogical
distribution in TAGS sandstone
based on Th/K cross-plot (Wells
7, 8, 15, and 9)
330 Page 16 of 17 Arab J Geosci (2020) 13:330
2904. 2861.
Y=f(x): DEPTH = 2971.2442 - -10.4813 * POTA R2= 0.2256 Y=f(x): DEPTH = 2928.5974 - -10.3370 * POTA R2= 0.1967
2925. 2880.8
2946. 2900.6
DEPTH
DEPTH
2967. 2920.4
2988. 2940.2
3009. 2960.
0. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 0. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
POTA POTA
Fig. 22 Inverse correlation of potassium with the depth in well 14 (left) and 15 (right)
Arab J Geosci (2020) 13:330 Page 17 of 17 330