IPTeC TEACHING PORTFOLIO MIDPOINT REVIEW

Please note that this evaluation pertains to the participant's progress thus far
with developing their teaching portfolio and that the participant will need to
update their portfolio with any additional teaching experiences in the
remainder of the IPTeC year prior to submitting their final portfolio.

Please enter the your name (teaching mentor):

Alissa Jara

Please enter the participant's first and last name:

Amy Bao

Please enter the participant's email (this will send a copy to them to confirm
submission):

ajbao@purdue.edu

Teaching Log Progress:

Is the teaching log updated by the participant as lectures or presentations are
given? Does the participant appear to be on target to complete the minimum
requirements for IPTeC?

IPTeC Requirements:
Didactic (2 hours): instruction to health professionals and/or health
professional students
Experiential (6 hours): APPE or IPPE rotation teaching through facilitation of or
assessment of learners delivering topic discussions, journal clubs,
presentations, etc. **presenting to a preceptor alone without learners does NOT
count**
Precepting/co-precepting (6 hours): patient care discussions, patient care
activities, project management, etc.
 All IPTeC requirements met
On track to meet all IPTeC requirements
Major changes needed to meet IPTeC requirements

Mentor comments for the participant's teaching log:

Only 1 more didactic lecture needed, and we discussed some options to fulfill this, most
likely in Fall 2022. Amy also has some other, more advanced teaching experience from
Fall 2021 that could be considered to meet this lecture requirement as an alternative
teaching activity.

Teaching Philosophy:
The participant has developed a teaching philosophy that is clear, concise, and
reflective. The participant has considered his or her own personal approach to
teaching and precepting.

Yes
Some improvement needed (detailed below)
Not included

Mentor comments for the participant's teaching philosophy:

We discussed my review of the philosophy, which is on track and thoughtfully written.

Amy will be adding sub-headings and refining writing to increase its clarity and focus.

Examples of Teaching:
The participant has included teaching materials (handouts, cases,
presentations) that reflect his or her teaching philosophy.

Yes
Some improvement needed (detailed below)
Not included

Mentor comments for the participant's teaching materials:

Amy has a wide array of teaching experience to date, which she accomplished in a
short time. It's evident she has a vested interest in supporting education and student
learning.
Feedback Regarding Teaching:
The participant includes feedback from lectures and presentations given from
students, peers, and/or preceptors.

Yes
Some improvement needed (detailed below)
Not included

Mentor comments for the participant's feedback:

We discussed instructor and student feedback in the fall. Amy welcomes feedback and
demonstrates a commitment to improvement.

Reflection of Teaching:
Provided self-reflection following each lecture highlighting areas that he or she
did exceptionally well during the lecture, as well as opportunities for
improvement. If a lecture or presentation was repeated, did the participant
adequately reflect what was done differently to make the lecture successful?

Yes
Some improvement needed (detailed below)
Not included

Mentor comments for participant's reflection of teaching:

Very thoughtful self-reflections!

Portfolio Organization:
Is the portfolio organized in a clear and concise manner at this time?

Yes
Some improvement needed (detailed below)
 Portfolio not yet compiled but discussed required components to complete
certificate

Mentor comments for participant's portfolio organization:

Amy has completed a full draft of all the content, which I reviewed, and she will be
revising to finalize her portfolio and also transform it into a web-based type format. In
short, the portfolio content has been compiled and she's working on the final touches.

Powered by Qualtrics