IPTeC TEACHING PORTFOLIO MIDPOINT REVIEW

Please note that this evaluation pertains to the participant's progress thus far
with developing their teaching portfolio and that the participant will need to
update their portfolio with any additional teaching experiences in the
remainder of the IPTeC year prior to submitting their final portfolio.

Please enter the your name (teaching mentor):

Deanna Kania

Please enter the participant's first and last name:

Taylor Lager

Please enter the participant's email (this will send a copy to them to confirm
submission):

taylor.lager1@ascension.org

Teaching Log Progress:

Is the teaching log updated by the participant as lectures or presentations are
given? Does the participant appear to be on target to complete the minimum
requirements for IPTeC?

IPTeC Requirements:
Didactic (2 hours): instruction to health professionals and/or health
professional students
Experiential (6 hours): APPE or IPPE rotation teaching through facilitation of or
assessment of learners delivering topic discussions, journal clubs,
presentations, etc. **presenting to a preceptor alone without learners does NOT
count**
Precepting/co-precepting (6 hours): patient care discussions, patient care
activities, project management, etc.
 All IPTeC requirements met
On track to meet all IPTeC requirements
Major changes needed to meet IPTeC requirements

Mentor comments for the participant's teaching log:

Provided comments on how to word some activities on the teaching log (i.e. Facilitation
of ....lab); also suggested removing the vaccine clinic under precepting.

Teaching Philosophy:
The participant has developed a teaching philosophy that is clear, concise, and
reflective. The participant has considered his or her own personal approach to
teaching and precepting.

Yes
Some improvement needed (detailed below)
Not included

Mentor comments for the participant's teaching philosophy:

Really liked Taylor's teaching philosophy -- her passion showed through!

Examples of Teaching:
The participant has included teaching materials (handouts, cases,
presentations) that reflect his or her teaching philosophy.

Yes
Some improvement needed (detailed below)
Not included

Mentor comments for the participant's teaching materials:

Include student topic discussion handouts, journal club handouts, etc. Don't forget to
include your self reflections on each of your activities.
Feedback Regarding Teaching:
The participant includes feedback from lectures and presentations given from
students, peers, and/or preceptors.

Yes
Some improvement needed (detailed below)
Not included

Mentor comments for the participant's feedback:

Just move all evals to be under the same file as the document so it is easy to see your
slides or handout, evaluations, and self-reflection.

Reflection of Teaching:
Provided self-reflection following each lecture highlighting areas that he or she
did exceptionally well during the lecture, as well as opportunities for
improvement. If a lecture or presentation was repeated, did the participant
adequately reflect what was done differently to make the lecture successful?

Yes
Some improvement needed (detailed below)
Not included

Mentor comments for participant's reflection of teaching:

She has them -- just needs to add them in

Portfolio Organization:
Is the portfolio organized in a clear and concise manner at this time?

Yes
Some improvement needed (detailed below)
 Portfolio not yet compiled but discussed required components to complete
certificate

Mentor comments for participant's portfolio organization:

Provided some additional organization feedback. The timing of this mid-point review in
early March was PERFECT! In previous years, I felt it was too early, but this time, I
actually got to see some of Taylor's work (she still has more to go) and provide much
more meaningful feedback to help her on her last four months of teaching/precepting.
Keep up the great work, Taylor! I'm excited to see the final product.

Powered by Qualtrics