Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kone 1 4.55
Thyssen - -
Otis 4 18.18
Schinder - -
Hyundai 8 36.36
Mitsubishi 4 18.18
Johnson - -
Others 5 22.73
TOTAL 22 100.00
Interpretation of Data and Market Study Results Presentation
This table shows that out of twenty two (22) respondents, One (1) used Kone; Four (4)
used Otis; Seven (7) used Hyundai; Four (4) used Mitsubishi; while Five (5) answered that they
used other brands. With the result, introducing JDR Elevator and Equipment Services would be
Consumers Response on how often they ask for elevator service maintenance
Frequency Percentage
Weekly - -
Twice a month - -
Monthly 22 100%
Total 22 100%
This survey showed that shows that all the twenty two (22) respondents, ask for elevator
service on monthly basis. The study revealed that JDR Elevator and Equipment Service has the
chance of being viable in the market due to the respondents’ response,
Consumers’ Response on how long they have been dependent to their present elevator
service provider
Frequency Percentage
1 year 4 18.18
3 years 16 72.72
5 years 1 4.55
5 years and up - -
Others 1 4.55
TOTAL 22 100.00
Out of twenty two (22) respondents, survey showed that four (4) respondents have been
dependent to their current elevator service provider for 1 year; Seventeen (17) for 4 years; One
(1) for 5 years; and One (1) answered others.
Frequency Percentage
Yes 22 100%
No - -
Total 22 100%
The table shows that all the twenty two (22) respondents were offered local parts and
branded parts for their elevator.
Frequency Percentage
Local Parts 8 36.36
Branded Parts 14 63.64
Total 22 100.00
Out of twenty two (22) respondents, eight (8) of them prefer local parts while fourteen
(14) choose branded parts.
Frequency Percentage
Yes 22 100%
No - -
Total 22 100%
Table shows that all the twenty two (22) respondents were satisfied with their current
elevator service provider.
Frequency Percentage
Experience and reputation - -
Customer Assistance Support - -
Insurance - -
Services Offered - -
Pricing -
All of the above 22 100.00
TOTAL 22 100.00
This table presents that all the twenty two (22) respondents choose all the factors
mentioned in choosing their elevator service provider. The study revealed that these are the
factors that JDR Elevator and Equipment Services need to focus and work with to gain
competitive advantage.
Frequency Percentage
P5,000.00-P5,300.00 11 50.00
P5,400.00-P5,800.00 4 18.18
P5,900.00-P6,300.00 6 27.27
P6,400.00-above 1 4.55
TOTAL 22 100.00
Out of twenty two (22) respondents, it showed that eleven (11) respondents allocate
P5,000.00-P5,300.00 in their current service provider; four (4) respondents allocate P5,400.00-
P5,800.00 in their current service provider; six (6) allocate P5,900.00-P6,300.00 in their current
service provider; And one (1) allocate P6,400.00 and above in their current service provider.
The result gave the owners an idea on what will be the pricing of the service.
Frequency Percentage
Yes 22 100%
No - -
Total 22 100%
Table shows that all the twenty two (22) respondents are all willing to choose and
consider JDR Elevator and Equipment Service. The result gave the owners a big opportunity to
introduce a new Elevator Service Provider in the market.
Demand Analysis
Assumptions:
2. The results of the survey shows that, out of 140 buildings that used elevators in Calamba City,
100% of them are willing try JDR Elevator and Equipment Services. (140 x 100% = 140)
3. Assume that out of 140 buildings who are willing to try, 80% of them have the capacity to try
JDR Elevator and Equipment Services. (140 x 80% = 112)
4. To get the demand each year for the service, multiply the total population 112 to 1, multiply
again by number of months which is 12, the assumption is 1,344.
a. It is 1 because according to the survey consumers have their elevator repair and maintenance
on a monthly basis. (See table __).
5. Assume that every year the population increases by 15%.
Supply Analysis
YEAR SUPPLY/CAPACITY
2019 936
2020 983
2021 1,032
2022 1,084
2023 1,138
Assumptions:
1. The capacity of the firm to service a company is 3 a day multiplied by the number of working
days in a month (26 days) then multiplies by the number of month in a year (12 months).
2. The capacity of the firm increases 5% annually.
PERCENTAG
YEAR DEMAND SUPPLY/CAPACITY GAP
E
Sales Plan