RESPONSE.

Calvin: Irma: Ayu

Response: People in the world: use social Negative news have to exists.
1. Case of pandemic is still media for many things.
growing, that govt must Negative matters because
think for more efficient 3.7% increase, and even sharper 1. People will realize that
policy  motion will be during the pandemic stage …….. (????)
communication error - professional development.
and form of not - platform to share knowledge
transparency that public and skill
will not know true - craving for news quickly
information  create - educational media…
mistrust and will worsen
their image

WHY BEING TRANSPARENT IS A

GOOD POLICY?

Many people are still

unemployment, and other sucks
condition.
- Communication needs to be
valid.

Tax and so on to raise state

budget (?)…..

WHY NEGATIVE INFO CAN HELP

SOLVING THE ISSUE.
.
Govt spending is overspent
when it comes to pandemic.
.
Donations. From super rich
people.
Negative info: suffer of people,
struggle from people to face
pandemic.
They find the importance of
donation.

People anxiety are raising 

medical performance are raising
to handle the issue.
Govt need to deliver the danger
of COVID-19. (why?)

WHY?

Aprison: Vilda:

1. Negative -> people can alert that they will 1. People can be more alert in daily activity
apply more health protocol….  in SQ medical personnel have done
many things, but people are being
disobedient.

2. Socialization as alternative can be used by

government to deliver the harm of the
coronavirus

1. HOW IS THE PROCESS

2.

1. Validity.
A tidak Menyebabkan B
More people watch negative news, the more they will be judgmental.
2. Significance.
Even if A menyebabkan B, tidak ada masalah.
3. Exclusivity
Benefit yang mereka jelaskan, juga bisa dicapai di sisi kita, bahkan lebih baik

In our side, se stick status quo, in which we employ the media to deliver not only the positive case of
covid but also negative case to counterbalance the information.

What we want is a balance information. Where people know the harm of covid, but still informed how
far we have gone to deal with covid. So their proposal is not exclusive only happen in their side of the
house but also achievable in our side of the house.

A. RESPONSE.
Clear, Poin mana yang mau direspon dan responnya apa.
1. They said that positive news can bring the security.
Response: 1. Security is fake. Because media portrays as if there were no more problems,
but in fact we still have the severe pandemic issue.
Even if they say they want avoid bully, they want to avoid mental health from the infected.
- People has been more progressive. They have understood the misery of infected people, people
have understood that some people really have to leave their home due to generating income. Case
of bullying is no longer happen.
- Even if some are bullied,  mental health activist. Govt’s advocacy.

2. They said that their proposal will increase people’s participation for the vaccination
program.
Response: 1.
- It can also happen in our side because we also portray the positive news about covid, they can still
see the progress.
- It is going to be better. Because alongside with the positivity, you can still see that pandemic isn’t
over yet. Thus, if you are not getting any of your vaccine, you have more interest because you know
the harm…..

B. Argumen.
Argumen 1: why neglecting negative news, can cause disobedient
Absence of negative news:
1. People don’t realize the harm
2. People don’t see the real issue.
3. Media can display more health protocol procedure

Argumen 2: why information in media needs to be balance

1. Media needs to be neutral, media is the ultimate source to find info
2. Credibility of media.