Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/230822516
CITATIONS READS
5 730
5 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Mohd Natashah Norizan on 30 December 2014.
1 1 2
N. Mohd Natashah , M. I. Muammar , P. J. Soh , A.A.H Azremi2 and A. Norhawati 1
2 1School ofMicroelectronic Engineering,
School ofComputer and Communication Engineering,
Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP),
Kompleks Pusat Pengajian UniMAP,
02600 Jejawi, Perlis, Malaysia
mnatashah@student.uninlap.edu.my
I. INTRODUCTION
セi
It is well known that planar antennas such as Figure 1.1: Microstrip feed line.
microstrip patch have a significant number of
advantages over conventional antennas, such as low A rectangular microstrip patch antenna is chosen
profile, lightweight and low production cost. For good because it simplifies the analysis and the performance
antenna performance, a thick dielectric substrate prediction. The antenna is designed to operate at 2.4
having a low dielectric constant is more desirable since GHz frequency, using Ferro A6M dielectric material,
Cr, 5.9 with dielectric loss tangent, tan £5, 0.0012 and
this provides better efficiency, larger bandwidth, and
better radiation [1. height of substrate, h, 635 Jlm and FR4 dielectric
VII. REFERENCES
[1]. Kumar, M., Sinha, M. K., Bandyopadhyay, L. K., &
Kumar, S. (n.d.). Design ofa Wideband Reduced
Size Microstrip Antenna In. Retrieved from Union
Radio-Scientifique Intemationale:
http://www.ursi.org/Proceedings/ProcGA05/pdf/B04
P.12(0770).pdf
[2]. Stetson, H., "Multilayer Ceramic Technology,"
Ceramics and Civilization, No.3, Oct. (1987), pp.
Figure 1.4: Maximum radiation at 0 dB, gain = 5.44 307-322.
dB for rectangular microstrip patch antenna using [3]. Gyuvk, W. 1., "Methods of Manufacturing
LTCC technology. Multilayered Monolithic Ceramic Bodies," U.S.
Patent No. 3,192,086, June 1965.
[4]. Stetson, H., "Methods of Making Multilayer
VI. CONCLUSION
Circuits," U.S. Patent No.3, 189, 978, June 1965.
[5]. Schwartz, B., "Microelectronics Packaging: II," Am.
The aim of this project was to design two Ceram. Soc. Bull., Vol. 63, No.4, (1984) pp. 577-
microstrip patch antenna for incorporation in the 81.
frequency of 2.4GHz. The results obtained proved that [6]. Blodgett, A. 1., and Barbour, D. R., "Thermal
two microstrip patch antenna using LTCC technologies conduction module: A high performance multilayer
have been successfully designed having a centre ceramic package," IBM 1. Res. Develop., Vol. 26,
frequency of2.4GHz to 2.41GHz. No.3, May (1982), pp. 30.
For rectangular microstrip antenna design using [7]. Ho, C. W., Chance, D.A., Bajorek, C. H., and
Acosta, R. E., "The Thin-Film Module and High
LTCC technology, the length of the patch is 25.5 mm
Performance Semiconductor Package", IBM 1. Res.
and the width of the patch is 34 mm. For rectangular Develop., Vol. 26, No.3 ,May (1982), pp 286-296.
microstrip antenna design using PCB technology, the [8]. Horowitz, S., (1999). "High Performance Ceramic
length of the patch is 28 mm and the width of the patch Interconnect Technology for Wireless Applications,"
is 37 mm. By introducing this technology, it is proven MTT Workshop.
that the length and width of the patch are shortened and [9]. Rector, J. (1998). "Economic and Technical
smaller than the antenna that used PCB technology by Viability of Integral Passives," in Proceedings
8 to 9%. Electronic Components and Technology
The S JJ plots for all antennas have a magnitude of Conference, Seattle, pp. 218-224.
[10]. Wersing, W., Gohlke, S., Matz, R., Eurskens, W.,
much less that -10 dB at the operating frequency 2.4
and Wannenmacher, V., "Integrated Passive
GHz, which means that those antennas had not many Components using Low Temperature Co-Fired
losses while transmitting the signal. The patch using Ceramic," in Proceedings IMAPS, San Diego, CA.
Ferro A6M substrate simulation result gives the RL of USA, 1998.
-24.92 dB while for the patch using FR4 substrate
simulation result gives the RL of -25.49 dB. This gives
difference by 5.9631 %.
The antenna bandwidth determine from the 10 dB
return loss is found to be 1.2448% for the LTCC
technology design, and 2.8216% for PCB technology
design. It can be seen that the antenna bandwidth of the
rectangular microstrip patch antenna design using
LTCC substrate is reduced. This is to be expected
owing to the antenna size reduction.
This value of bandwidth needs to be slightly
increased for RF applications. Probe reactance and
probe radiation may cause problems, and surface
waves can reduce efficiency and distort the radiation
pattern. Several other methods are possible. Many
different techniques have been developed, including