Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Spectra
\
Energy
F i v e 1shows that the energy separation between the *TZ transfer
and Az levels is very sensitive to the magnitude ofDq. Popu-
lation of the 4 ~level
z involves electron occupation of both the
e, and tzr orbitals (see below). Thus. the enerev senaration
t&eeikis level and the 4 ~ ground
2 state is &&t indica- Laser
m
3 output
tion of the demee of electrostatic repulsion between the occu-
pied orbitalsand the neighboring &ions. This separation is g
assimed a value eauivalent to 10Du and can be assessed em- 2 W
piri&ly from abso&on spectra b4 measuring the cnergy of
the 'T~-"A?transnion. Convrrselv, thc Tunahc~5ueanndia-
gram also allows one to predict theiptical spectrum i f a tran- Cr3+Sensitizer ~ d Activator
~ +
sition metal ion in a particular environment given some
knowledge of the crystal-fieldstrength. Figure 2. Energy diagram illustrating the absorption of pump energy
The absorption and fluorescence spectra of transition by sensitizer ions, the transfer of energy to the activator ions, and the
metal ions are typically broad (50-100 n m full width at re-emission of energy as laser radiation.
half maximum) though the associated transitions occur be-
tween discrete electronic levels. This is especially true in
crystal hosts where vibration of the crystal lattice ions
about their equilibrium positions modulates the crystal
field exerted on the transition metal ions and dynamically
varies the separation between energy levels. This gives
rise to what is commonly called vibronic or phonon-broad-
ened spectra. Rare earth ions on the other hand. exhibit
relatively narrow band spectra (around 1nm full k d t h a t
half maximum) due to the absence of phonon broadening.
The f orbitals associated with rare earth ion spectra are
well-shielded and are therefore less subject to electrostatic
repulsion than are d orbitals. Accordingly, rare earth ions
-
also experience a more limited crystal-field sulittine than
do transition metal ions.
i h the efficienwof the laser. One solution to this dilemma is Interpreting the Emission Spectrum
the~corporationbfa second species of fluorescentions into the We can interpret this emission spectrum in terms of the
laser crvstal to serve as a fluorescencesensitizer forthe activator YAG cmstal field and its effect on the relative ~ositionsof
ions. The ideal sensitizing ion is one that absorbs pump energy the crJi. energy levels, a relationship clearly illustrated by
over a bmad spectrum and then transfers the concentrated en- the Tanabe-Sueano diamam shown in Figure 1.The value
ergy to the activator ions by reemitting it at wavelengthswhere of Dq for C ~ : Y ~has
G been estimated to i e 1640 cm-I (4).
the activator ions absorb mast stmngly The energy diagram in As shown in Figure 1, at this value of Dq the 'E level is
Figure 2 illustratesthe absorption of pump energy by sensitizer positioned somewhat lower in energy than the 4 ~ level. z
ions, the transfer of energy to the activatorions, and the reemis- Even at room temperature, the two levels are not in ther-
sion of energy as laser radiation. mal equilibrium and all of the energy absorbed by the
-
e x c e. ~ eadolinium
t ions r e ~ l a c evttrium ions, and scandium
and gallium ions rcplacr ulummum ions. The chemical cum-
level has lower energy (longer wavelength) than fluorescence from
' E due to the increased interionic distance associate with the 4 ~ 2
state. Multiple arrows represent phonon-broadened emission. Also
onsition of GSGG is C ~ ? S ~ K ~ P~Kr ' ~ . ions
I ~ . substitute fnr shown are electron-orbitalconfigurations associated with the 4 ~ 2' E, ,
Lome of the scandium ions in GSG.As can be seen in Figure and 4 ~ energy
z levels.
3, the intense cr3+emission band effectively overlaps the
Nd3+absorption bands between 750 and 900 nm. l h what can bottom of the 4 ~ ezn e r w well to the upper vibronic levels
we attribute this dramatic shiR in the cr3+emission spec- of the 4 ~ ground z state are longer &-wavelength than
trum? Spectral differences between Cr:YAG and Cr:GSGG those associated with emission from the bottom of the E '
can best be explained in terms of the crystal field with the to the lowest vibronic levels of the 4 ~ ground z state. In ad-
help of the Tanabe4ugano diagram. Figure 1indicates that dition, the 4 ~ +24 ~ 2transitions are honon-broadened to
the magnitude of Dq determines the mutual proximity of the a much greater extent than are the 9E + 4 ~ ztransitions,
4 ~ and z ' E levels, which can be of considerable influence on thereby supporting fluorescence a t longer wavelengths. As
the emission characteristics of cr3+. aresult, optimum overlap with the pumping bands of Nd3+
Field Strength and Energy Differences is achieved thus enabling eff~cientenergy transfer be-
tween cr3+ ions and Nd3+ions. Not surprisin ly, cr3+ions
I n the garnets, the crystal field decreases a s the radii of are extremely effective as sensitizers for Nd & ions . in the
the cations and the associated lattice narameter increases. GSGG host, and efficient operation of a Cr,Nd:GSGG laser
Due to the incorporation of large caiions (sc3+ and ~ a ~ has ' been successfully demonstrated (8). However, despite
-
instead of A13+).GSGG bas a lareer lattice Darameter than
YAG and, thus, H wwkrr crystal field From the ahsorpt~on
the efficiencv advantape obtained bv incornoratine cr3+
ions a s senskizers in &,N~:GSGG, ksensiiized N ~ Y A G
sowtrum of'Cr:GSGG one can estlmatr the value of Do to continues to Dredominate over Cr.Nd:GSGG for most ao-
de 1479 cm-I (6).Figure 1shows that a t this fieJd strength, plications due to the superior optical and thermal proper-
the energy difference between the 4 ~ azn d E levels in ties of YAG relative to GSGG.
GSGG is considerably less than that in YAG. In fact, this
energy difference is sufficiently small in GSGG for these Summaw
levels to be in thermal equilibrium a t room temperature; The preceding discussions of thc cmission spectr:1 nf t n -
this favors the predominance of spin-allowed fluorescence valcnt chromium ions in YAG and in GSGG emohasize thr
fmm the 4 ~ level.z Most importantly, the intense emission value of Tanabe-Sugano diagrams for makingLqualitative
originating from the 4~ level extends much further into
2
the near-IR than the E emission observed in Cr:YAG
comparisons of the crystal-field environments in different
hosts. The slight difference in crystal field between the
though these levels are approximately equal in energy YAG and GSGG hosts, due to differences in the radii of the
Fluorescence a t Longer Wauelengths constituent cations, has a profound effect on the channel-
in of absorbed energy, the emission characteristics of
The energy diagram in Figure 4 shows the vibronically mu- Cr5 +Ions,
. and their utility a s sensitizers for a Nd3+laser.
nlrd enerw levels invol\.cd in Cr" ion emission and indicutes The Tanabe-Sugano diagram clearly illustrates that it is
ihat the g t t o m of the potential well for 4 ~ isz located a t a the crystal-field-dependent energy separation between
greater interionic distance than the bottom of the potential various s t a t e s t h a t determines the emission charac-
wells for4Az and'^. Population of the excited 4 ~level z occurs teristics of transition metal ions in a particular host.
-
when one of the three electrons in the t r i.~-l vdegenerate tzc
orbitals 1s pnlmoted into thc doubly degenerate e,. orbitals Acknowledgment
twr Fia. 4). The stronr t~ltxtrostaticrepulsion of the i r c u ~ i r d The author would like to thank Daniel C. Harris for the
eg o r h a causes an I>crease in the interionic distanci be- valuable discussions, interest, and enthusiasm that facili-
tween the cr3+ ion and the neighboring anions. he'^ level tated the preparation of this manuscript.
and t h c ' ~ 2grnund state are associated w t h vlrctron occupa-
tion ol'thc less repulsivr 1x1 orbitals only w e Fig. 4,. lircause Literature Cited
emission originates from the bottom ofthe ex&d-state en- 1. Tanabe.Y.; Sugano. S. J Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1964,9,766719.
ergy well, and the interionic distance does not change during 2. Huheey, J. E.; Inorganic Cltrmafry, SI units edition: Harper and Raw: New York.
1975;p 368.
this process, emission from the lowest vibronic levels of the 3. Milonni, P. W.; Eberly, J. H. Losrs: Wiley: Nelr York, 1988; p 310.
4 ~ canz only proceed via transitions to the upper vibronic lev- 4. Morrison, C.A.;Gmber. J.B.; Hills, M. E. Chem. Phys. 1981,154,437447.
5. Struve. B.: Huber, G. Appl. Phys B 1985,36,19%201.
els of the 4~~ ground state as shown in Figure 4. 8. Gmber,J.B.;Hills,M.E.;Moniaon. C.A.:Tumer.G.A.;Kokta,M. R P h y s R e v B
The notion that the interionic distance does not vary in 1988.37.8564-8574,
the time frame associated with emission of light is called 7 . Herzberg. G.Sprcfm ofDlolomle Moleules; Van Noatrand: New York, 1950;p 194.
8. Beirnowski,A.; Huber, G.; Pruss, D.;Lapte~V.v.: Sheherbakov.1. A.: 7.harikov.Y V.
the Franck-Condon Principle (7).The transitions from the &plied Phys~csB 1982.28.234-235,