Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3. Schlieper G, Brandenburg V, Djuric Z et al. Risk 5. Cheung C, Bernardo AS, Trotter MW et al. clinical significance of basic structural
factors for cardiovascular calcifications in non- Generation of human vascular smooth muscle changes.
diabetic Caucasian haemodialysis patients. subtypes provides insight into embryological
Kidney Blood Press Res 2009; 32: 161–168. origin-dependent disease susceptibility. Nat The simplest structural parameter is
4. Leroux-Berger M, Queguiner I, Maciel TT et al. Biotechnol 2012; 30: 165–173. kidney size, a decrease in which is frequent
Pathologic calcification of adult vascular 6. Bostrom KI, Rajamannan NM, Towler DA.
smooth muscle cells differs on their crest or The regulation of valvular and vascular
in advanced CKD and is often used to
mesodermal embryonic origin. J Bone Miner sclerosis by osteogenic morphogens. Circ Res confirm this diagnosis. It is reasonable to
Res 2011; 26: 1543–1553. 2011; 109: 564–577. assume that this loss begins at earlier
stages of CKD, but, amazingly, there has
been little attention to this as a clinical or
see clinical investigation on page 677 research tool. Even though it is well
known that kidney size varies with body
Structure, not just function size, there are no published nomograms
based on data from subjects without renal
W. Charles O’Neill1 disease that can be used to analyze kidney
size in adults. Therefore, most renal
Although kidney size can be important in the evaluation of renal sonograms are interpreted without correc-
disease, it has not been carefully studied and true volume is rarely tion for or even consideration of body
measured, and good normative data are lacking. Wang et al. measured size, clearly limiting the ability to recog-
nize CKD at earlier stages. Other potential
both cortical and medullary volumes in potential transplant donors and
determinants of kidney size, such as sex
correlate these with physiologic, morphometric, and metabolic and age, are also not considered. Although
parameters. The results reveal interesting and potentially important these corrections would enhance the
correlations and differential responses between the two compartments, ability of ultrasound to recognize kidney
providing a framework for future investigation. disease at an earlier stage, this is limited by
Kidney International (2014) 85, 503–505. doi:10.1038/ki.2013.426 the imprecision of ultrasound.
Sonographic measurement of kidney
volume entails measuring three orthogo-
Nephrologists usually take a dysfunc- the poor correlation between estimated nal dimensions and modeling the kidney
tional approach to kidney disease. Not GFR and true GFR when serum creatinine as an ellipsoid. However, there are errors
that there is anything wrong with us, is in the normal range.1 Therefore, if we are in these measurements, particularly in the
but our detection of kidney disease and to improve our diagnostic and prog- two transverse dimensions, that become
stratification of its severity are based nostic approach to kidney disease, we very large when multiplied in the for-
almost entirely on altered function must move beyond measurements of mula. Furthermore, the kidney rarely
rather than structure. On top of that, function and focus on structural changes approximates an ellipsoid and varies
we take a glomerulocentric view of as well. The study by Wang et al.2 (this considerably in shape. Thus renal length
kidney dysfunction, focusing only on issue) is an important step in this direction. is the only useful sonographic indication
albuminuria and reduced glomerular Recent studies have demonstrated of kidney size, but its correlation with
filtration rate (GFR) as if the kidney the potential utility of simple structural actual volume is poor.10 Accurate
consists exclusively of cortex composed changes, recognizable by standard non- measurements of kidney volume require
entirely of glomeruli. Kidney disease is invasive imaging, in identifying and either computed tomography or magnetic
presumed absent when glomerular managing CKD. A good example is resonance imaging with summation of
function is normal, and thus many autosomal dominant polycystic kidney cross-sectional areas from multiple
cases of early disease are missed, while disease, in which decreased GFR occurs sequential images. Their relative utility is
chronic kidney disease (CKD) or acute too late in the disease to be a useful dictated by availability, cost, and radiation
kidney injury is diagnosed when GFR is parameter for prognosis or evaluating exposure.
decreased, even though the dysfunction therapies. However, renal enlargement The kidney is also composed of non-
may be entirely hemodynamic and the occurs much earlier and can accurately parenchymal tissues (sinus fat, calyces,
kidneys structurally normal. Additional predict disease progression.3 Sporadic blood vessels, nerves, and lymphatics),
problems with this approach are the cysts, long thought to be of little clini- and recent studies have used computed
impracticality of measuring GFR and cal significance, are associated with tomography to exclude them in order to
reduced kidney size and altered func- measure true parenchymal volume. A
1
Renal Division, Emory University School of tion4–6 and are probably an early indi- prior study of 224 potential kidney
Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA cator of underlying damage.7 Renal transplant donors11 found a strong
Correspondence: W. Charles O’Neill, Emory
University, Renal Division, WMB 338, 1639 Pierce
enlargement occurs early in diabetes correlation between renal parenchymal
Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA. and is a risk factor for nephropathy.8,9 volume and body surface area (r ¼ 0.68),
E-mail: woneill@emory.edu These examples demonstrate the a larger volume in males independent of
Medulla
parenchymal volume as a risk factor.
Future longitudinal studies will be needed
Cortex to explore these tantalizing findings.
Even the best of studies have limita-
tions that always need to be considered.
Although the study population was ap-
Age 20 40 60
parently normal and healthy, there is a
potential selection bias that could have
influenced this. Specifically, it is reasonable
to assume that a large proportion of the
subjects were family members of patients
with advanced CKD and could have
Figure 1 | Effect of age on kidney size. Cortical volume appears to decrease throughout shared genetic or familial traits that
adulthood, but whether this is due to nephron loss or decreased nephron size is unclear. predispose to CKD. Also, the differentia-
Because of an increase in medullary volume, which could be compensatory, total parenchymal tion between cortex and medulla is a
volume remains unchanged. When the increase in medullary volume ceases after age 60, total functional rather than an anatomic dis-
volume decreases.
tinction based on the delivery of the
body size, and no decrease with age nces in nephron size? The latter could be contrast agent. The timing of the cortical
(though there were few subjects older the result of diet or of other metabolic phase (and thus calculation of cortical and
than 60 years). Wang et al. used the same parameters, as explored by Wang et al.2 medullary volumes) can vary between
approach in 1344 subjects and, remark- Although glycemia correlated with paren- individuals and is influenced by hemody-
ably, found the identical correlation chymal volume or cortical volume, this is namics, contrast dose, and rate of injec-
between parenchymal volume and body probably explained by overweight, as the tion. Repeat studies by Wang et al. on
surface area, again with greater volume in correlation was lost when volume was some of the subjects suggest that this
males and little effect of age up to 60.2 corrected for body size. A direct effect of variability is not large.
However, they went a step further and obesity on parenchymal volume was shown While the study of Wang et al.2 does
also examined the cortical and medullary in patients before and after weight loss in not yield specific insights into CKD, it
compartments, which can be distin- the previously cited study.11 GFR correlates raises important questions, demon-
guished on different phases of a contrast- strongly with parenchymal volume11— as strates the methodology to answer
enhanced scan. Importantly, they found Wang et al. confirm2—and parenchymal them, and provides important referen-
that cortical volume decreases throughout volume accounts entirely for the effects of ce data. It is clear that there is a
adulthood and is masked by an increase in body surface area, age, sex, and ethnicity on potentially very informative yet largely
medullary volume (Figure 1). This rela- GFR.11 Although Wang et al. showed that unexplored role of simple structural
tionship differed slightly in females, and, cortical volume also correlates strongly parameters in the evaluation of kidney
interestingly, certain metabolic parameters with GFR, this could not fully account disease and that our approach to kidney
also correlated differently with cortical for the age-related decline in GFR. The fact disease needs to become less
and medullary volume, the meaning of that GFR varies almost twofold in subjects dysfunctional and more dysmorphic.
which remains to be determined. with similar volumes indicates additional Unfortunately, few nephrologists have
Of the many questions about kidney variability in single-nephron GFR or much knowledge or understanding of
size that remain to be answered, two tubular mass per nephron. renal imaging, even fewer actually image
important ones are the identity of other Whether kidney size drives GFR or vice kidneys, and just a handful have an
determinants of size and the relationship versa and whether size is a risk factor for academic focus in this area. Whereas the
with function. Body size, age, and sex CKD are additional important questions anatomy of the nephron is well under-
account for only about half the variability that cannot be answered by cross-sectional stood by nephrologists, most are lost
in renal parenchymal volume,11 and even studies. The positive correlation between when zooming out to the whole kidney.
after correction for these variables, kidney cortical volume and albuminuria found by Nephrologists will need to take a greater
volume varies as much as twofold bet- Wang et al.2 is intriguing and suggests that interest in renal imaging and pay more
ween subjects. Is this due to differences in volume measurements may have pro- attention to structure, not just function.
nephron number, which is fixed in the gnostic value. Interestingly, this was not
neonatal period and can vary as much as explained by GFR in a multivariate model, DISCLOSURE
eightfold,12,13 or is it due to differe- suggesting that it may not be simply due to The author declared no competing interests.